ライフサイエンスコーパス: resorbable

1 s graft materials and barrier membranes (non-resorbable and bioabsorbable) have been used in GBR.

2 of implants placed in bone regenerated with resorbable and non-resorbable membranes.

3 g materials, guided tissue regeneration with resorbable and nonresorbable membranes, coronally positi

4 the native tissue of interest and should be resorbable as well as biocompatible.

5 pective multi-center study was to evaluate a resorbable barrier membrane designed for periodontal reg

6 expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) non-resorbable barriers and polylactic acid bioabsorbable ba

7 10% porcine collagen fibers combined with a resorbable bilayer membrane composed of non-cross-linked

8 t electronics, has potential applications in resorbable biomedical devices, eco-friendly electronics,

9 iologic blasting, 3) plasma, 4) microblasted resorbable blasting media (microblasted RBM), and 5) alu

10 CAM, when applied to a 3-dimentional printed resorbable calcium-triphosphate/hydroxyapatite scaffold

11 devices compares favourably with that of non-resorbable clinical standards.

12 d, third, and fourth mandibular premolars; a resorbable collagen membrane was secured over the implan

13 h as connective tissue, buccal fat pads, and resorbable collagen membranes have been reported in the

14 nerves, are used to seed a synthetic, often resorbable conduit, which is then used to bridge and rep

15 a sensor to an implanted (but only partially resorbable) data-communication system, proving the princ

16 freeze-dried bone allograft covered by a non-resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane.

17 in a single implantable, biocompatible, and resorbable device.

18 n injury; the measurement performance of our resorbable devices compares favourably with that of non-

19 Such externally controllable, resorbable devices not only obviate the need for seconda

20 e represents an important alternative to non-resorbable ePTFE barriers in combination with DFDBA for

21 zed laminar bone allograft membrane or a non-resorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) memb

22 half of the implants were covered with a non-resorbable (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene [ePTFE]) me

23 le, polylactic acid (PLA) barrier or the non-resorbable, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) bar

24 icates their major advantage as a radiopaque resorbable filter material, as the radiopacity allows mo

25 The scaffolds were shown to be highly resorbable following implantation in a porcine femoral a

26 olytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane (non-resorbable) for GBR using a bovine bone xenograft/autogr

27 a fresh extraction socket filled with slowly resorbable graft biomaterial and with a delayed prosthet

28 f bone healing compared to PRP-free collagen resorbable graft.

29 eration (GTR) with resorbable (GTRr) and non-resorbable (GTRnr) membrane and GTRr with anorganic xeno

30 Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with resorbable (GTRr) and non-resorbable (GTRnr) membrane an

31 en shown to be a good candidate material for resorbable IVC filters.

32 Regeneration involves the implantation of a resorbable matrix that is expected to remodel in vivo an

33 ided tissue regenerative surgery using a non-resorbable membrane and allograft.

34 atite mineral on its surface combined with a resorbable membrane composed of type I porcine collagen

35 The bone grafts were immobilized by a resorbable membrane glued to the recipient bed with cyan

36 The non-resorbable membrane was retrieved 6 weeks following plac

37 ent in horizontal defect depth compared with resorbable membranes (1.9 +/- 1.4 mm) as shown in one st

38 but no significant difference compared with resorbable membranes was shown.

39 , porous hydroxyapatite-collagen grafts with resorbable membranes with or without 10-mg SIM were plac

40 nation with barrier membranes, evaluation of resorbable membranes, and use of bone substitutes or gro

41 issue engineering have introduced the use of resorbable membranes, xenografts, and osteoinductive pro

42 in bone regenerated with resorbable and non-resorbable membranes.

43 izontal furcation defect depth compared with resorbable membranes.

44 or to control treatments but as effective as resorbable membranes.

45 ene, and cell based) and biomaterials (e.g., resorbable, nonresorbable, and 3-dimensionally printed)

46 tion biomaterials were designed to be either resorbable or bioactive, the next generation of biomater

47 This class of device provides fully resorbable packaging and electronics that can be turned

48 r fixation was achieved with polylactic acid resorbable pins.

49 mentum, using an in situ-generated adherent, resorbable plasma-thrombin biologic scaffold, was evalua

50 selected patients randomly received collagen resorbable plug dressing material (control group).

51 with PRP compared to 38.3% +/- 9.3% collagen resorbable plug.

52 All 28 grafted sites were covered with a resorbable polylactide membrane.

53 The most common approach is biodegradable or resorbable scaffolds configured to the shape of the new

54 the current BVS and point the way to thinner resorbable scaffolds in the future.

55 we prepare and characterize a new family of resorbable screws prepared from silk fibroin for craniof

56 When studied on resorbable substrates, osteoclastic resorption was suppr

57 ymer that is used in children every day as a resorbable suture material, and therefore, highly biocom

58 arlier use as biodegradable products such as resorbable sutures, orthopaedic implants, macroscale and

59 Recently, resorbable systems have gained interest because they avo