ライフサイエンスコーパス: resource utilization

1 em ("unnecessary, excessive, and inefficient resource utilization").

2 No change in care plan concordance or resource utilization.

3 ion in HF may optimize clinical outcomes and resource utilization.

4 vent rates, recidivism rates, and downstream resource utilization.

5 rea of health costs, cost-effectiveness, and resource utilization.

6 gnificant mortality and increased healthcare resource utilization.

7 uch as safety, waste management, and uranium resource utilization.

8 oviders and contribute to inefficient health resource utilization.

9 th improved decision-making quality and less resource utilization.

10 ch may improve pediatric intensive care unit resource utilization.

11 groups for differences in downstream medical resource utilization.

12 lacement, pneumothorax, death, and radiology resource utilization.

13 ts on postoperative complications and health resource utilization.

14 cute care facilities or about the associated resource utilization.

15 are-management strategy on medical costs and resource utilization.

16 possible aspect of complete Martian in-situ resource utilization.

17 ance to this subset of patients may optimize resource utilization.

18 are needed to limit their impact on overall resource utilization.

19 alleviated by the inclusion of tradeoffs in resource utilization.

20 ner satisfaction, care plan concordance, and resource utilization.

21 consequence and does not result in increased resource utilization.

22 ghted Hospital Days scale (WHD-94) to assess resource utilization.

23 intervention studies to reduce their greater resource utilization.

24 (MPM0-III) but not the model for predicting resource utilization.

25 t rGNR infections are associated with higher resource utilization.

26 -CPB renal injury on operational outcome and resource utilization.

27 of monitoring strategies, and critical care resource utilization.

28 e impact of obesity on surgical practice and resource utilization.

29 implications for health policy and surgical resource utilization.

30 ndividual cases and the efficiency of health resource utilization.

31 associated with significant improvements in resource utilization.

32 le in balancing photosynthetic activity with resource utilization.

33 l of enhancing patient care while optimizing resource utilization.

34 tality and functional capacity, and relative resource utilization.

35 ction of the subsequent cycle, survival, and resource utilization.

36 ventions, thereby improving patient care and resource utilization.

37 se of HRV for the prediction of postsurgical resource utilization.

38 ure outcomes, track performance, and monitor resource utilization.

39 ciated with poor clinical outcomes or excess resource utilization.

40 ty, tolerability, quality of life (QOL), and resource utilization.

41 terms of in-hospital deaths and health care resource utilization.

42 associated with mortality or greater global resource utilization.

43 hain of events that can significantly affect resource utilization.

44 on that leads to excess mortality and health resource utilization.

45 ily stratifies pediatric trauma patients for resource utilization.

46 cells/kg was associated with a reduction in resource utilization.

47 characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and resource utilization.

48 s, PRISM was the more sensitive indicator of resource utilization.

49 plantation on patient and graft survival and resource utilization.

50 pain and a nondiagnostic ECG result in poor resource utilization.

51 ficant morbidity, mortality, and health care resource utilization.

52 Hospital charges were used as a proxy for resource utilization.

53 derable mortality, morbidity and health care resource utilization.

54 assessments of medical illnesses as well as resource utilization.

55 e strategy for global warming mitigation and resource utilization.

56 sts were calculated for all-cause healthcare resource utilization.

57 variation with implications for outcomes and resource utilization.

58 med to evaluate differences in mortality and resource utilization.

59 C and sepsis are predictors of mortality and resource utilization.

60 f cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and greater resource utilization.

61 Thirty-day mortality and costs reflecting resource utilization.

62 ling a first-principles approach to optimize resource utilization.

63 ainty, diagnostic ability, and treatment and resource utilization.

64 ten requires the evolution of differences in resource utilization.

65 he impact of standardization on outcomes and resource utilization.

66 ely to suffer cardiac arrest and inefficient resource utilization.

67 ic bypass (LRYGB) should be 1 day to improve resource utilization.

68 mon driver of both in hospital mortality and resource utilization.

69 egies to provide quality care while reducing resource utilization.

70 evaluation of chest pain reduces healthcare resource utilization.

71 h pretransplantation and posttransplantation resource utilization.

72 1 (during the Tc-99m shortage) on downstream resource utilization.

73 iagnostic accuracy, clinical management, and resource utilization.

74 ral and immunosuppressive complications, and resources utilization.

75 tially modifiable factors affect measures of resource utilization after hepatectomy.

76 The effect of cell dose on resource utilization after transplantation has not been

77 Adjusted length of stay and resource utilization also differed significantly among t

78 ssociated with a change in mortality rate or resource utilization, although small nonsignificant tren

79 d products, infection, rejection, and global resource utilization (an index of cost) greater than the

80 Resource utilization analysis revealed that both minimal

81 tients that can improve outcomes, and reduce resource utilization and adverse events.

82 Clinically significant decreases in resource utilization and an increase in same-admission p

83 In an effort to maximize resource utilization and contain costs, immediate postop

84 We collected detailed resource utilization and cost data for each patient's in

85 Detailed resource utilization and cost data were collected for ea

86 We prospectively measured medical resource utilization and cost for 801 patients undergoin

87 od group incompatible despite the additional resource utilization and cost of therapy.

88 These protocols lead to an increase in resource utilization and cost of transplantation and may

89 Limited data exist on the medical resource utilization and costs during the final stages o

90 Resource utilization and costs during the index hospital

91 This study aims to describe the healthcare resource utilization and costs of managing renal posttra

92 All-cause medical and pharmacy resource utilization and costs were computed over the 12

93 Using Premier data (2008-2012), ICU resource utilization and costs were tracked over a 1-yea

94 historically been associated with increased resource utilization and diminished survival, should be

95 has been proposed as a mechanism to decrease resource utilization and expenditures.

96 tor-led team debriefing, which could improve resource utilization and feasibility of team-based simul

97 Readmitted patients have a greater resource utilization and have lower survival rates.

98 Our analysis aids in defining apheresis resource utilization and helps in risk stratification of

99 ortic reconstructions dramatically decreased resource utilization and hospital costs without affectin

100 lights the molecular underpinnings of diatom resource utilization and how cooccurring diatoms adjust

101 source of variability in intensive care unit resource utilization and if accurately predicted and com

102 ment and patients who receive it could guide resource utilization and improve treatment initiation an

103 ertainable, and powerful predictor of excess resource utilization and inferior outcome.

104 ether there are racial/ethnic differences in resource utilization and inpatient mortality in patients

105 ent is not achieved at the cost of increased resource utilization and is associated with an increased

106 ealth care resources and minimal feedback on resource utilization and its effect on the cost of care.

107 Despite apparently similar health resource utilization and joint involvement, Medicaid sta

108 h effects similar to those of usual care for resource utilization and may improve physiologic goal at

109 s were determined using empirically measured resource utilization and microcosting techniques.

110 ssociated with increased intensive care unit resource utilization and mortality.

111 erative nutritional assessment could predict resource utilization and outcome after liver transplanta

112 and ISS (using TRISS methodology) to predict resource utilization and outcome in pediatric trauma.

113 Demographic data including PICU resource utilization and outcome were recorded.

114 as prolonged mechanical ventilation patient resource utilization and overall in-hospital mortality.

115 enient for scheduling, it increases hospital resource utilization and patient complications.

116 f this tool may decrease rapid response team resource utilization and provide a better opportunity to

117 forts at cost containment focus on decreased resource utilization and reduced length of stay.

118 while simultaneously sustaining appropriate resource utilization and reducing unnecessary healthcare

119 e prolonged mechanical ventilation have high resource utilization and relatively poor outcomes, espec

120 a medication treatment; and (2) estimate the resource utilization and short-term costs associated wit

121 olders conduct risk evaluation and to inform resource utilization and strategic decision-making.

122 n development as well as optimized microbial resource utilization and survival in a fluctuating, freq

123 Because of this disproportionate resource utilization and the shifting U.S. demographics,

124 eived burden and quality of life, healthcare resources utilization and costs, surgical referral rate,

125 superior outcomes and greater efficiency in resource utilization, and aiding in the conduct of clini

126 , health-related quality of life, healthcare resource utilization, and associated costs.

127 It is important to compare outcomes, study resource utilization, and attempt to risk stratify patie

128 main outcome measures were duration of stay, resource utilization, and complication rate.

129 ined by retrospective comparison of outcome, resource utilization, and cost (total and direct variabl

130 al allografts with respect to complications, resource utilization, and cost from day -14 to 90 days a

131 alth status, depression, medications, health resource utilization, and current employment status.

132 tion of evidence-based therapies, healthcare resource utilization, and expenditures among those with

133 gher incidence of cardiac arrest, had higher resource utilization, and had higher proportion of patie

134 ng, site of death, health care satisfaction, resource utilization, and health care expenditures.

135 erial pH, serum electrolytes, fluid balance, resource utilization, and in-hospital mortality.

136 potential to improve conditioning, decrease resource utilization, and lead to better outcomes in pat

137 have been reported to control costs, reduce resource utilization, and maintain or improve the qualit

138 inistered, 24-hour urine output, measures of resource utilization, and mortality did not significantl

139 verity score, head abbreviated injury scale, resource utilization, and mortality than unhelmeted pati

140 ed demographics, markers of injury severity, resource utilization, and outcome.

141 sociations among location of onset of STEMI, resource utilization, and outcomes.

142 Secondary outcomes included length of stay, resource utilization, and patient experience.

143 visualization and impacts cardiac diagnosis, resource utilization, and patient management.

144 s were reviewed for patient characteristics, resource utilization, and survival.

145 ly to be reasonable by current standards for resource utilization, and that either colonoscopy every

146 Significant variation exists in practice, resource utilization, and treatment-related cost associa

147 Costs were based on resource utilization, and utilities were based on visual

148 c Core Scale scores (P < 0.05), while health resource utilization appeared similar between groups.

149 ation, as determined by patient survival and resource utilization, appears to be at a risk score arou

150 insights allow for more effective healthcare resource utilization, as defined from patient, healthcar

151 e population undergoing surgical evaluation, resource utilization, as reflected by operative interven

152 depression, cognitive function, health care resource utilization, as well as blood and urine specime

153 nfarction identified justifies the increased resource utilization associated with coronary CTA.

154 d operative efficiencies may further improve resource utilization associated with laparoscopic colect

155 is an independent risk factor for increased resource utilization associated with liver transplantati

156 x (BMI) (in kilograms per square meter), and resource utilization band (RUB) (a measure of expected h

157 rocedures imposes a significant clinical and resource utilization burden in the United States.

158 Furthermore, the patterns of resource utilization by patient risk differed significan

159 illness analysis examines national cost and resource utilization by persons with asthma using a sing

160 Resource utilization can vary without adverse effect on

161 diatoms, indicating apparent differences in resource utilization capacity that may prevent direct co

162 e of stroke, anatomic durability of CEA, and resource utilization changes during the study.

163 Use of peer management through a resource utilization committee (RUC) to favorably modify

164 ous disease specialists decreases healthcare resource utilization compared with delayed referrals.

165 ive laparotomy, subsequent surgical details, resource utilization, complications, and mortality.

166 ision analysis was used to estimate expected resource utilization costs of three alternative implanta

167 Post hoc analysis of efficacy, safety, and resource utilization data at 1-year follow-up from the D

168 nomic model, we applied cost data figures to resource utilization data derived from the two arms of t

169 These preliminary resource utilization data seem promising, but further an

170 condary analysis using efficacy, safety, and resource utilization data through 2 years of follow-up a

171 Detailed resource utilization data were collected for all hospita

172 Resource utilization data were collected prospectively t

173 Resource utilization data were gathered by telephone que

174 Clinical, laboratory, and hospital resource utilization data were obtained from patient rec

175 Resource utilization declined, resulting in more availab

176 Standardized resource utilization derived from a database created by

177 Economic analyses based on measures of resource utilization derived from randomized clinical tr

178 Economic models based on measures of resource utilization derived from RCTs have provided FN

179 ce = 0.0253 days, 95% CI: 0.0225-0.0282) and resource utilization determined by costs per day were gr

180 Resource utilization diminished (first versus last 2-yea

181 tion risk as well as severity of illness and resource utilization during admission in patients with c

182 We show that differential resource utilization during competition for mixtures of

183 tion must be improved by high yield and high resource utilization efficiency (HYHE).

184 Improving resource utilization efficiency and reshaping the embodi

185 che complementarity), but a lack of study on resource utilization efficiency, a link between resource

186 measures: statin and ASA use, (3) healthcare resource utilization: emergency room visits and hospital

187 -dependent tradeoff between reproduction and resource utilization entails an inherent resonance that

188 ease translational efficiency and streamline resource utilization, especially in an academic setting.

189 cost-neutral or even cost-saving by reducing resource utilization, especially in the setting of aggre

190 ity, guild structure, resource partitioning, resource utilization, facultative niche exploitation, ex

191 We assessed CD34(+) cell dose and resource utilization for 1,317 patients undergoing trans

192 gether with increasing emphasis on renewable resource utilization for chemical production, has advanc

193 We assessed trends in inpatient resource utilization for children with NI with a Mantel-

194 s than intravenous diuretics, reduces 90-day resource utilization for HF, and is an effective alterna

195 We describe mortality and resource utilization for inpatient care of hepatitis C (

196 ng algorithms and can do this with practical resource utilization for large scale networks that exist

197 e severity immediately pretransplantation on resource utilization for liver transplantation was asses

198 Defining the cost-effectiveness of increased resource utilization for novel antiviral therapies and l

199 The aim of this study was to evaluate resource utilization for patients admitted to the U.S. h

200 no-scan group, balanced by lower and higher resource utilization for subjects with normal CAC scans

201 Resource utilization forms were completed at five time p

202 Clinical results and resource utilization from a randomized clinical trial th

203 Conventional applications of resource utilization functions (RUFs) suggest that estim

204 sease, CMV DNAemia, death, other infections, resource utilization, ganciclovir resistance, quality of

205 searchers are often seeking ways to maximize resource utilization given a set of SNP-based gene-mappi

206 ificant percentage of patients has important resource utilization implications.

207 d its associated mortality and critical care resource utilization in a large, state-wide population-b

208 nt counseling and more useful for estimating resource utilization in a managed population.

209 tiveness, complication rates, and associated resource utilization in actual clinical practice.

210 ith a measure of early neurologic status and resource utilization in children with traumatic brain in

211 re, timeliness of referral and consultation, resource utilization in clinical practice, comparative e

212 epresent a potential target for reduction of resource utilization in higher use institutions.

213 taffing to improve both patient outcomes and resource utilization in intensive care units (ICUs).

214 s associated with improved outcomes and less resource utilization in mixed medical and surgical ICUs.

215 ing strategies but also clinical benefit and resource utilization in order to identify optimal platel

216 Gender bias may influence resource utilization in patients with coronary artery di

217 ed to improve outcomes and/or reduce medical resource utilization in patients with heart failure, dia

218 dels may improve patient outcomes and health resource utilization in specialized cardiac surgical ICU

219 ty, and substantially changes management and resource utilization in the emergency department.

220 (CRF) profile on healthcare expenditure and resource utilization in the United States among those wi

221 em drinkers decreases alcohol use and health resource utilization in the US health care system.

222 Further studies comparing costs and resource utilization in this patient population are need

223 d work/school days lost; reducing healthcare resource utilizations, in particular hospitalizations, h

224 Unintended effects on resource utilization include effects on costs, as well a

225 Resource utilization included engraftment parameters, le

226 Measures of resource utilization included the duration of hospitaliz

227 Measures of resource utilization included: referral sources; Therape

228 We analyzed differences in early mortality, resource utilization including intensive care unit (ICU)

229 Healthcare resource utilization is increased in patients sustaining

230 This resource utilization is shown to reduce the public goods

231 ect of diabetes on cardiovascular health and resource utilization is sobering.

232 Resource utilization (length of stay, hospital charges)

233 and clopidogrel copayments on cardiovascular resource utilization, major coronary events, and insurer

234 Resource utilization measured by the days in the intensi

235 group mortality risk (p < 0.001), and lower resource utilization measures compared with those withou

236 Resource utilization measures were inflation-adjusted co

237 were found in other PBC harvest outcomes or resource utilization measures.

238 poral distribution of bacteria was used in a resource utilization model to map the conditions under w

239 Our study aimed to detail medical resource utilization (MRU) and related direct cost for P

240 m measures designed to capture all unplanned resource utilization, not just those to index hospitals,

241 ut the incidence, prevalence, mortality, and resource utilization of digestive and liver diseases in

242 has been a paucity of data on the healthcare resource utilization of infectious disease-related compl

243 rges per patient fell over time, the overall resource utilization of prolonged mechanical ventilation

244 study was designed to assess the effects on resource utilization of routine coronary computed tomogr

245 res, and guide allotment of limited clinical resources, utilization of preventive interventions, and

246 ts of care vary markedly among countries but resource utilization on this trial did not, and a random

247 erms of clinical, quality of life and health resource utilization outcomes.

248 did not significantly differ in outcomes or resource utilization over 40 months.

249 odes resulted in shorter survival and higher resource utilization (P <.0001).

250 60 years or older (28% [$53813] greater mean resource utilization; P=.005); recipient age of 60 years

251 posal based on MDRI architecture in terms of resource utilization, path blocking probability, network

252 luate the effect of quetiapine on mortality, resource utilization, post-intensive care unit cognition

253 evolution based on global transcription and resource utilization profiles, with L seeming to encroac

254 ished across payor categories based on their resource utilization, proximity to the hospital, DRG, LO

255 ng cancers) and symptoms, along with data on resource utilization, quality of life, impairments to wo

256 eriatric patients had a higher mortality and resource utilization regardless of their mechanism of in

257 stics, posttransplant events, and healthcare resource utilization related to these posttransplant eve

258 purpose of this investigation is to measure resource utilization required for procurement of transpl

259 djusted, composite VLBW infant morbidity and resource utilization score.

260 calculate their own composite morbidity and resource utilization scores that estimate NICU CQI profi

261 rehensive management strategy for subsurface resource utilization should be developed.

262 Resource utilization similarly escalated by grade.

263 plicative rather than an additive effect for resource utilization since these measures were highly sk

264 racteristics, we observed different hospital resource utilization; some values differed greatly, with

265 ies seen in the SICU and impacts measures of resource utilization such as length of stay and duration

266 Endovascular repair significantly reduces resource utilization (surgical time, blood replacement,

267 Hospital-acquired severe sepsis had greater resource utilization than both healthcare-associated sev

268 as associated with both higher mortality and resource utilization than community-acquired severe seps

269 d "rationing" to describe all limitations on resource utilization that result from human choice, the

270 on the impact of fluconazole prophylaxis on resource utilization, the distribution of non-albicans s

271 s an important determinant of posttransplant resource utilization; therefore, standardized measuremen

272 growing health care costs can improve their resource utilization through peer management of testing

273 orts-related ocular trauma may be useful for resource utilization, training, and prevention efforts.

274 ltered cell survival, perhaps by redirecting resource utilization under nutrient-limiting conditions.

275 (ESRD) after liver transplantation (LT) and resource utilization using a data linkage between the Sc

276 Clinical practices and resource utilization varied considerably among transplan

277 Neither death nor higher global resource utilization was associated with any preoperativ

278 Higher adjusted resource utilization was associated with donor age of 60

279 Health care resource utilization was estimated based on the number o

280 Resource utilization was higher in patients who underwen

281 We conclude that resource utilization was similar between treatment group

282 One-year resource utilization was slightly lower among alemtuzuma

283 tus, comorbidities, medications, and medical resource utilization) was applied to estimate the hazard

284 ip, communication, contingency planning, and resource utilization were addressed by the nontechnical

285 rm and stroke free survival, restenosis, and resource utilization were analyzed by univariate and mul

286 erative complications, major infections, and resource utilization were comparable between groups.

287 Outcomes and resource utilization were compared with other common ind

288 on outcome as well as parameters of patient resource utilization were examined.

289 tion alone; however, the bleeding events and resource utilization were higher in the CDT group.

290 Overall, surgery-related complications and resource utilization were increased in the ABO-incompati

291 Significantly shorter survival and higher resource utilization were observed among the 20% of pati

292 ugh small nonsignificant trends toward lower resource utilization were present in the PAC group.

293 At baseline, medical costs and resource utilization were similar in the two groups.

294 of cost-effective pathways to lower overall resource utilization while improving outcomes in CABG pa

295 allozyme polymorphisms through differential resource utilization will be sporadic and ephemeral in r

296 had lower pneumonia rates and less hospital resource utilization with early fixation.

297 lymphoma, death or melanoma, and healthcare resource utilization within 1 year.

298 nt example of opportunities to reduce excess resource utilization within the ICU.

299 formity of care and significant reduction of resource utilization without adverse sequelae.

300 sociated with reduced hospital mortality and resource utilization without changes in readmission rate