ライフサイエンスコーパス: respiratory care

1 career dissatisfaction, and job turnover in respiratory care.

2 a and may be useful in guiding perioperative respiratory care.

3 and may be useful for guiding perioperative respiratory care.

4 30 versus 31.6 +/- 30.5), or days requiring respiratory care (4.2 +/- 5.2 versus 4.1 +/- 3.6).

5 86 +/- 16% [L]) than did physician-directed respiratory care (64 +/- 21% [S] and 72 +/- 23% [L]) (p

6 to comply with the American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) Clinical Practice Guidelines.

7 eived data from the American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC), The National Board for Respirat

8 of Chest Physicians/American Association for Respiratory Care/American College of Critical Care Medic

9 in all cost departments examined, except for respiratory care and intensive care unit room costs.

10 ovides a short history of the development of respiratory care and its historical relationship with cr

11 by delineating the historical development of respiratory care as a profession, the development of its

12 ratory Therapy Consult Service (RTCS) versus respiratory care by managing physicians.

13 Total hospitalization respiratory care costs for COPD patients were higher, $4

14 .5 days COPD vs. 5 days other, p = .11), ICU respiratory care costs for patients with COPD were $2,42

15 may serve as target areas for reductions in respiratory care costs, it may also be true that these m

16 l (L) criterion for agreement, RTCS-directed respiratory care demonstrated better agreement with the

17 e mandatory overtime is a common practice in respiratory care departments, it was not overwhelming ut

18 at examined the use of mandatory overtime in respiratory care departments.

19 NBRC), and the Committee on Accreditation of Respiratory Care education (CoARC) relative to their mem

20 cted a randomized controlled trial comparing respiratory care for adult non-ICU inpatients directed b

21 Costs of ICU and non-ICU respiratory care for patients with COPD are higher than

22 Advances in palliative respiratory care have increased the incidence of heart d

23 rcapnia, or nursing requirements for complex respiratory care) impairment.

24 re maintained (n = 74), or (2) RTCS-directed respiratory care, in which the physician's respiratory c

25 to assign patients to (1) Physician-directed respiratory care, in which the prescribed physician resp

26 urgical techniques and adjunctive therapies, respiratory care, intensive care technology and monitori

27 Although respiratory care is a relatively new profession, its pra

28 tments was slightly lower with RTCS-directed respiratory care (mean, $235.70 versus $255.70/pt, p = 0

29 piratory Care (AARC), The National Board for Respiratory Care (NBRC), and the Committee on Accreditat

30 Appropriateness of respiratory care orders was assessed as agreement betwee

31 tory care, in which the prescribed physician respiratory care orders were maintained (n = 74), or (2)

32 d respiratory care, in which the physician's respiratory care orders were preempted by a respiratory

33 assessed as agreement between the prescribed respiratory care plan and an algorithm-based "standard c

34 respiratory care orders were preempted by a respiratory care plan generated by the RTCS (n = 71).

35 aluated by an RTCS therapist evaluator whose respiratory care plan was based on sign/symptom-based al

36 ve care unit (ICU) beds per actual number of respiratory care practitioners (RCPs) and ICU beds per p

37 pist-driven protocol (TDP) that included 117 respiratory care practitioners (RCPs) managing 1,067 pat

38 An education program directed toward respiratory care practitioners and intensive care unit n

39 This experience suggests that respiratory care practitioners employing a weaning proto

40 In this one-center pilot study, respiratory care practitioners reported experiencing mor

41 Fifty-seven of 115 (49.6%) of respiratory care practitioners responded to the survey.

42 n during the control period was conducted by respiratory care practitioners using a previously publis

43 During the intervention period, respiratory care practitioners weaned patients using a h

44 xploration of the factors that contribute to respiratory care practitioners' moral distress is needed

45 Although current evidence suggests that respiratory care protocols can enhance allocation of res

46 between RTCS-directed and physician-directed respiratory care regarding hospital mortality rate (5.7

47 ts; and (2) compared with physician-directed respiratory care, RTCS-directed respiratory care showed

48 l to the Society of Critical Care Medicine's Respiratory Care Section members and members of the RC_W

49 prescribed a similar number and duration of respiratory care services at a slight savings (that did

50 ory care protocols can enhance allocation of respiratory care services while conserving costs, a rand

51 e intensive care units and the Department of Respiratory Care Services.

52 nts whose physicians had prescribed specific respiratory care services.

53 ian-directed respiratory care, RTCS-directed respiratory care showed greater agreement with Clinical

54 de that (1) compared with physician-directed respiratory care, the RTCS prescribed a similar number a

55 embers, with physicians, social workers, and respiratory care therapists showing increases in signifi

56 - 9.0 versus 7.7 +/- 7.3 d), total number of respiratory care treatments delivered (30.3 +/- 30 versu

57 Finally, the true cost of respiratory care treatments was slightly lower with RTCS

58 to self-report symptoms during the period of respiratory care unit treatment.

59 Respiratory Care was the third largest category of hospi

60 on-nursing, physical therapy, physician, and respiratory care-were identified to facilitate changes i