コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ultidrug tolerant, and that they are able to resuscitate.
2 uscitate; and 2,051 patients were non-do-not-resuscitate.
3 t on goals of care and designation of do not resuscitate.
4 All animals were fluid resuscitated.
5 sed long-term mortality in patients who were resuscitated.
6 rmothermic control animals, all animals were resuscitated.
7 Each animal was resuscitated.
9 computer decision support system was used to resuscitate 32 subsequent patients with severe burns (co
10 as "allow natural death" rather than do not resuscitate (49% vs 61%, odds ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.35-
11 within 24 hrs of presentation ("early do-not-resuscitate"), adjusted for age, gender, Glasgow Coma Sc
12 o cohorts were defined: patients with do not resuscitate advance directives on day 1 of ICU admission
15 primary PCI is feasible and safe in patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest due to acute myocardia
17 port the case of a 52-yr-old Caucasian woman resuscitated after initial cardiac arrest, with normal p
18 eous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)
23 age who suffered nontraumatic OHCA and were resuscitated and discharged alive from the hospital betw
24 and December 31, 2009, and were successfully resuscitated and discharged alive from the hospital foll
25 urther neonatal care (n=815), those who were resuscitated and had neonatal care for symptoms of encep
26 er 8 minutes of cardiac arrest, animals were resuscitated and submitted to a normothermic follow-up (
28 e found that such hearts can be successfully resuscitated and transplanted without increasing recipie
30 esuscitate orders, both overall ("any do-not-resuscitate") and within 24 hrs of presentation ("early
32 hen placed on a mechanical ventilator, fluid resuscitated, and monitored for 48 hours in a conscious
33 ents was collected: 389 patients were do-not-resuscitate; and 2,051 patients were non-do-not-resuscit
35 rrences of either primary end point-death or resuscitated arrest or arrhythmia- or shock-related inju
36 arction, stroke, hospitalization for angina, resuscitated arrest, and coronary revascularization.
37 ndpoint of death or death-equivalent events (resuscitated arrest, successful defibrillation for ventr
38 dy of Parents and Children: infants who were resuscitated at birth but were asymptomatic for encephal
40 d emulsion has been shown to be effective in resuscitating bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest but its
41 added aggressive postresuscitation care for resuscitated but comatose patients that includes therape
42 astatic cells, the defects in which could be resuscitated by alternative pathways of NF-kappaB activa
46 hington, with prehospital cardiac arrest and resuscitated by paramedics were eligible and 1359 patien
51 s having the illness in his late 40s after a resuscitated cardiac arrest and regularly followed up on
52 antable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, or resuscitated cardiac arrest in nonpaced, mild to moderat
53 rovolt T wave alternans added information on resuscitated cardiac arrest or arrhythmic death at multi
54 death or first arrhythmic event (defined as resuscitated cardiac arrest or spontaneous ventricular t
55 nt was survival free of death or arrhythmia (resuscitated cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tac
57 antable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, or resuscitated cardiac arrest) occurred in 25 of 172 patie
60 plantable cardioverter-defibrillator firing, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and hospitalization for hea
61 lar events, including myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, angina, stroke, and death,
62 by revascularization, myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, coronary heart disease deat
63 cond coprimary outcome additionally included resuscitated cardiac arrest, heart failure, and revascul
64 ease (CHD, defined as myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or CHD death), cardiovascul
69 art disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, revascularization, or angin
70 ome of the study was the composite of death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, significant ventricular arr
71 171 hard CVD events (myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, stroke and CV death), and 8
72 tion, angina resulting in revascularization, resuscitated cardiac arrest, stroke, cardiovascular deat
73 omponents of the composite outcome of death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, sustained ventricular tachy
78 lated MACE (HF hospitalization, successfully resuscitated cardiac death, or cardiac death) and events
81 ate comfort care-arrest patients with do-not-resuscitate comfort care patients, those with more sever
84 do-not-resuscitate patients, 194 were do-not-resuscitate comfort care-arrest patients and 91 were do-
85 d the clinical/demographic factors of do-not-resuscitate comfort care-arrest patients were compared w
88 ness, longer ICU stay before making a do-not-resuscitate decision, and being cared for by only one in
91 y to explore the associations between do not resuscitate (DNR) designations, quality of care, and out
94 rding the frequency and timing of the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order in children, little is known abo
96 es play important roles in discussing do not resuscitate (DNR) orders with patients and surrogates.
97 were the proportion of patients with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, timing of DNR orders, and plac
98 suscitation preferences (Full Code or do-not-resuscitate [DNR]) was obtained from medical records thr
99 outcome of recipients of organs coming from resuscitated donors when compared with recipients of non
102 ting of TH and/or PCI in particular patients resuscitated following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (O
103 greater numbers when they were functionally resuscitated following replacement of the initial source
105 sheep were mechanically ventilated and fluid resuscitated for the entire duration of the 24-hr experi
107 els that cause them to lose their ability to resuscitate from starvation, leaving intact nondividing
108 maintaining the ability of P. aeruginosa to resuscitate from starvation-induced dormancy and that HP
109 e presence of an acute lesion among patients resuscitated from a cardiac arrest (integrated discrimin
114 tation registry, 26183 patients successfully resuscitated from an in-hospital cardiac arrest between
120 rospectively identified consecutive patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest, regardless of time to
122 l trials to improve the survival of patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular fibrillation an
123 y assigned 120 consecutive comatose patients resuscitated from OHCA in a double-blind, 2-center trial
124 In-hospital mortality in comatose patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)
126 e ages of 9 and 10 years, and another 2 were resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with do
128 rvival or neurological status among patients resuscitated from prehospital VF or those without VF.
129 nt rate (death, defibrillator discharge, and resuscitated from sudden death) at 30 days, 1 year, and
130 ernal cardioverter defibrillator discharges, resuscitated from sudden death, documented stroke, and a
133 eric bacteremia, and survival between the 12 resuscitated grafts and the 55 nonresuscitated grafts.
135 were both significantly higher in the do-not-resuscitate group (33.9% vs 18.4% and 60.7% vs 40.2%; p
137 xperiments were designed in a mouse model of resuscitated hemorrhagic shock and tissue trauma (HS/T).
141 ith nasopharyngeal cooling were successfully resuscitated in contrast to only two animals resuscitate
143 resuscitated in contrast to only two animals resuscitated in the cold saline infusion group (p = .02)
144 risk of a low IQ score was recorded in both resuscitated infants asymptomatic for encephalopathy (od
146 This study also suggested that Ohio's Do-Not-Resuscitate Law, clearly indicating two different protoc
151 arrest, 24.1% (582/2,417) were successfully resuscitated, of whom 24.1% (140/582) received postarres
153 06), and took longer to transition to do not resuscitate or comfort care (median, 4 vs 3 d; p = 0.048
155 llow-up up to 15 years, we assessed incident resuscitated or fatal SCD in relation to the presence of
156 s 10 to 75 years old who presented with SCD (resuscitated or not) during competitive or recreational
157 e associated with lower likelihood of do-not-resuscitate order (adjusted OR, 0.439; 95% CI, 0.296 to
158 tanding of the meaning and scope of a do-not-resuscitate order and 2) a need for discussions around g
159 ion and hospice referral and having a Do Not Resuscitate order at the time of death, whereas an inten
160 literature, we propose that a partial do-not-resuscitate order contradicts this "best" management int
161 ndergoing surgery with a pre-existing do-not-resuscitate order did not increase the risk of having a
163 p = .003), and less likely to want a do-not-resuscitate order if hospitalized (51% vs. 60%; z = 3.03
164 hdrawing of life support had a formal do-not-resuscitate order in place at the time of their death.
166 patients, 1,239 patients (6.5%) had a do-not-resuscitate order on the first day of ICU admission and
167 ts who received a tracheostomy, had a do-not-resuscitate order placed, or died prior to first extubat
169 ischarge data, death occurrences, and do-not-resuscitate order placements were collected over an 8-ye
170 cations were analyzed, a pre-existing do-not-resuscitate order remained independently associated only
173 o-not-resuscitate order, those with a do-not-resuscitate order were significantly more likely to be o
175 iterature available regarding partial do-not-resuscitate order(s) suggests the practice is clinically
176 nd recommendations on the use of full do-not-resuscitate order(s) with little mention of partial do-n
178 ment limitation discussion, 67% had a do-not-resuscitate order, 40% were admitted to a medical intens
179 than half of the patients (52%) had a do-not-resuscitate order, and 65% of them still had the ICD sho
180 r heroics, and advance care planning (do-not-resuscitate order, living will, and health care proxy/du
182 Compared with patients without a do-not-resuscitate order, those with a do-not-resuscitate order
186 more than half of the patients with a do-not-resuscitate order; almost one fourth of these patients r
188 , p = 0.03), were more likely to have do-not-resuscitate orders (65.9% vs 48.2%, p < 0.001), and unde
189 [81.8%]) patients having pre-existing do-not-resuscitate orders (DNR group) with 6,002 non-do-not-res
190 on significantly changed the trend of do-not-resuscitate orders (p < 0.001) but had no impact on hosp
191 ility of reintubation, with death and do-not-resuscitate orders after extubation modeled as competing
192 kely than non-Hispanic whites to have do-not-resuscitate orders after intracerebral hemorrhage althou
194 s no association between pre-existing do-not-resuscitate orders and occurrence of any major complicat
196 rly patients were more likely to have do-not-resuscitate orders and to undergo withdrawal of life sup
197 ikely than non-Hispanic whites to use do-not-resuscitate orders at any time point, although the 95% c
200 ent trend toward less frequent use of do-not-resuscitate orders in Mexican-Americans suggests that fu
201 as non-Hispanic whites to have early do-not-resuscitate orders in unadjusted analysis (odds ratio 0.
204 kely than non-Hispanic whites to have do-not-resuscitate orders written at any time point (odds ratio
205 al care unit, 66 were associated with do-not-resuscitate orders, 73% of which were obtained after tra
206 or associations between ethnicity and do-not-resuscitate orders, both overall ("any do-not-resuscitat
207 indicating two different protocols of do-not-resuscitate orders, facilitated early do-not-resuscitate
216 ons for ventricular tachyarrhythmias (n=31), resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n=20), or h
219 The clinical/demographic factors of do-not-resuscitate patients were compared with those of non-do-
220 survived to hospital discharge and 86 do-not-resuscitate patients who eventually did not, only eight
223 d by emergency medical services providers to resuscitate patients with OOH cardiac arrest and to dete
225 ients were compared with those of non-do-not-resuscitate patients, and the clinical/demographic facto
226 r lung water increased in 17 of 22 liberally resuscitated patients (77%); eight of these patients dev
228 recommend performing coronary angiography in resuscitated patients after cardiac arrest with or witho
236 RF1 proteins: a modern human one (111p), its resuscitated primate ancestor (555p) and a mosaic modern
237 26+/-0.6% at 5 mins, n=3), but was unable to resuscitate rats pretreated with higher doses of CVT (0.
241 diagnostic yield in patients presenting with resuscitated SCD or SMVT and incrementally identifies cl
244 sium channel pore inhibition in awake, fluid-resuscitated septic rats, and the extent to which these
245 zation of a goal-directed, TEG-guided MTP to resuscitate severely injured patients improves survival
247 Among patients with septic shock, do-not-resuscitate status acts as a strong confounder that may
249 neumonia in hematologic patients, and do-not-resuscitate status as independent predictors of mortalit
250 transfer from the same hospital ward, do-not-resuscitate status at the recognition of severe sepsis/s
251 tions of the treating team related to do-not-resuscitate status could also be causally responsible fo
254 amined the strength of confounding of do-not-resuscitate status on the association between activated
255 onia in hematologic malignancies, and do-not-resuscitate status predicted mortality, whereas patients
258 with outcome only when correction for do-not-resuscitate status was excluded, and functional outcomes
259 investigated the association of early do-not-resuscitate status with in-hospital mortality among pati
260 sing age, impaired functional status, Do-Not-Resuscitate status, impaired respiratory function, ascit
262 sions (enrollment on a phase I study, do not resuscitate status, or terminal care) for 58 patients re
266 rhythmia (sustained ventricular tachycardia, resuscitated sudden cardiac death, or appropriate implan
268 urrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia/resuscitated sudden cardiac death/sudden cardiac death/a
270 ction, stroke, cardiovascular disease death, resuscitated sudden death, coronary artery or renal arte
271 argues that there is sufficient evidence to resuscitate the allosteric hypothesis, at least for some
273 DCD: (1) facilitates aerobic metabolism and resuscitates the DCD heart, (2) provides functional and
274 r albumin were administered and animals were resuscitated to a mean arterial blood pressure of 70 mm
276 ast 70%; and the lactate clearance group was resuscitated to normalize central venous pressure, mean
277 mentally changed the way trauma patients are resuscitated today with substantially improved outcomes.
280 scitation were observed in patients who were resuscitated using automated mechanical chest compressio
283 (n=58), and the reference group who were not resuscitated, were asymptomatic for encephalopathy, and
284 s that disrupting ceramide glycosylation can resuscitate wild-type p53 expression and p53-dependent a
285 that restoring active ceramide to cells can resuscitate wild-type p53 function in p53-mutant cells,
287 r in cardiac mitochondria isolated from rats resuscitated with 20% lipid emulsion compared to the gro
291 ubjected to 8 minutes of normothermic CA and resuscitated with chest compression and mechanical venti
293 laced on assisted ventilation, awakened, and resuscitated with lactated Ringer's solution titrated to
295 sent a case report of a patient successfully resuscitated with lipid emulsion therapy after prolonged
297 ansient, and such hearts can be successfully resuscitated with resolution of LVSD, then transplanted.
300 myeloperoxidase activity was higher in lambs resuscitated with stored than with fresh RBCs (11 +/- 2
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。