1 A multicenter
retrospective (
2001-2015) chart review.
2 etroviral AML transplantation, as well as in
retrospective analyses of adult patients with AML, the r
3 METHODS AND
Retrospective analyses were performed on 53,452 National
4 A
retrospective analysis (1977-2014) of 2378-TCDF and 2378
5 Key limitations include that this study is a
retrospective analysis and only compared wPRx with PRx i
6 Retrospective analysis at a university transplant center
7 In this
retrospective analysis carried out by propensity matchin
8 This
retrospective analysis comparing 24 microbiologically do
9 This
retrospective analysis demonstrated that more severe LA
10 METHODS AND This multicenter,
retrospective analysis evaluated 51 continuous-flow left
11 This
retrospective analysis examined data collected in the Su
12 This
retrospective analysis included 201 patients undergoing
13 This
retrospective analysis included 396 patients with ophtha
14 92% sensitivity of CSF RT-QuIC in a blinded
retrospective analysis matched the 100% specificity and
15 method used in this study was single-center
retrospective analysis of 207 liver transplant recipient
16 This study was a
retrospective analysis of 28018 Medicare patients 65 yea
17 MATERIAL/
Retrospective analysis of 30 histopathologically confirm
18 We conducted a multicenter,
retrospective analysis of 47 984 consecutive coronary ar
19 ional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant
retrospective analysis of 92 patients with HGSOC (median
20 Retrospective analysis of a consecutive, interventional
21 This univariate
retrospective analysis of a single center/organ procurem
22 A
retrospective analysis of all children (<15 years of age
23 locus sequence typing (MLST), which prompted
retrospective analysis of all MRSA isolates obtained fro
24 A
retrospective analysis of CAIS was conducted among child
25 The
retrospective analysis of clinical scans is a valuable s
26 This was a single-center,
retrospective analysis of electronic health records.
27 Retrospective analysis of health insurance claims data o
28 We did a
retrospective analysis of healthy controls and carriers
29 We did a
retrospective analysis of hospital admission statistics
30 This study was a
retrospective analysis of medical records in a prospecti
31 MATERIAL/We performed
retrospective analysis of MR images obtained from 34 pat
32 Single-center
retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
33 Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
34 A
retrospective analysis of responders to subcallosal cing
35 We performed a
retrospective analysis of the 100% Medicare inpatient cl
36 We conducted a
retrospective analysis of the largest reported cohort, c
37 This
retrospective analysis of the prospective Pediatric Emer
38 We did a
retrospective analysis using data from 30 239 participan
39 Material/
Retrospective analysis was conducted of 115 consecutive
40 A
retrospective analysis was conducted of 319 patients who
41 A
retrospective analysis was conducted, pooling data from
42 The aim of this
retrospective analysis was to investigate the brain amin
43 In this single-center,
retrospective analysis, an MPD diameter of 7.2 mm was id
44 For this
retrospective analysis, we analysed a training cohort (i
45 For this adjusted
retrospective analysis, we compiled data from a range of
46 In a
retrospective analysis, we estimated hospital resource u
47 2-10.2 ng/mL) were finally eligible for this
retrospective analysis.
48 shigelloides The study included prospective,
retrospective,
and prepared contrived specimens from 6 c
49 arin in this population was assessed in this
retrospective APEX trial substudy (Acute Medically Ill V
50 ed model association (MLM), and case-control
retrospective association test (CARAT) were mis-calibrat
51 blinded per prospective-specimen-collection,
retrospective-
blinded-evaluation (PRoBE) criteria.
52 Retrospective case control and descriptive study.
53 This
retrospective case review examined 1142 patch test cases
54 This
retrospective case series reviewed 806 cases of conjunct
55 In this
retrospective case series, we developed an online questi
56 Single-center
retrospective case series.
57 In two
retrospective case-control cohorts for the evaluation of
58 This
retrospective case-control study and medical record revi
59 We did a
retrospective case-control study of risk factors for inf
60 Retrospective chart review of 1,157 medical ICU admissio
61 A 13-year
retrospective chart review of Group D eyes treated initi
62 This is a
retrospective chart review study.
63 eitis and psoriasis Observational Procedure:
Retrospective chart review.
64 Retrospective chart reviews were used in one study.
65 Methods This
retrospective claims-based study used 2014 to 2015 data
66 to THV thrombosis through the combination of
retrospective clinical data analysis and in vitro imagin
67 Through review of preclinical studies,
retrospective clinical studies, and clinical trials, we
68 We conducted a
retrospective cohort analysis of pairs of deceased donor
69 For this national
retrospective cohort analysis, we extracted UK National
70 A
retrospective cohort constructed from a state trauma reg
71 A historical
retrospective cohort of 101 DLBCL/HCV-positive patients
72 Retrospective cohort of all comprehensive Medicaid manag
73 Using a
retrospective cohort of early stage NSCLC patients (Coho
74 propensity-adjusted analysis of a two-center
retrospective cohort of patients experiencing OHCA who r
75 We present a single-center,
retrospective cohort of patients with anterior circulati
76 Conclusion In this large, multicenter,
retrospective cohort of patients with non-del(5q) lower-
77 We analyzed a
retrospective cohort of reproductive-aged women presenti
78 Retrospective cohort study (January 1, 2010-December 31,
79 A
retrospective cohort study assessing clinical outcomes a
80 Retrospective cohort study at 2 tertiary academic center
81 Retrospective cohort study at tertiary neonatal intensiv
82 This
retrospective cohort study examined 38 patients after AI
83 This
retrospective cohort study focused on children hospitali
84 Retrospective cohort study from 1998 to 2014 at Vanderbi
85 We conducted a
retrospective cohort study in a population representativ
86 Nationwide population-based
retrospective cohort study in Sweden between January 1,
87 This
retrospective cohort study included patients admitted fr
88 Retrospective cohort study including 14480 hospitalizati
89 Population-based,
retrospective cohort study including all citizens in Ont
90 This was a
retrospective cohort study of 1,228 patients with AF who
91 A
retrospective cohort study of 1.2 million women 20 years
92 This is a multicenter,
retrospective cohort study of 2 ED HCV screening program
93 Retrospective cohort study of 218,186 patients with rese
94 Retrospective cohort study of 26 US hospitals in the Pre
95 Retrospective cohort study of 266,101 patients within th
96 METHODS AND We conducted a
retrospective cohort study of all patients >/=10 years o
97 We performed a
retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing HR
98 es were used to address selection bias for a
retrospective cohort study of children continuously enro
99 We performed a
retrospective cohort study of hospital discharges from O
100 A
retrospective cohort study of individuals with Lynch syn
101 the proportion of access-related deaths in a
retrospective cohort study of patients aged >/=18 years
102 We performed a
retrospective cohort study of patients in the Organ Proc
103 We performed a multicenter
retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing surgic
104 Methods We performed a population-based,
retrospective cohort study of patients with AML who were
105 A multinational
retrospective cohort study of patients with BSI due to E
106 METHODS AND We performed a
retrospective cohort study of patients with implantable
107 This
retrospective cohort study of preterm infants younger th
108 Retrospective cohort study of U.S. acute care hospitals
109 We conducted a
retrospective cohort study to describe ODAT donors and t
110 A
retrospective cohort study using administrative claims d
111 METHODS AND We performed a
retrospective cohort study using data from the North Car
112 Retrospective cohort study using data from the Taiwan Na
113 We performed a
retrospective cohort study using inpatient and outpatien
114 We performed a
retrospective cohort study using multilevel logistic reg
115 This was a
retrospective cohort study using national explant pathol
116 A
retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Dat
117 We conducted a
retrospective cohort study using U.S. Medicare claims da
118 A multicenter
retrospective cohort study was conducted at tertiary ref
119 This single-center,
retrospective cohort study was conducted between January
120 This single-center,
retrospective cohort study was conducted from either Sep
121 A multicenter
retrospective cohort study was performed studying patien
122 of Prematurity (G-ROP) Study (a multicenter
retrospective cohort study).
123 mpliant, institutional review board-approved
retrospective cohort study, an institutional database wa
124 In this
retrospective cohort study, we assessed 428 primary medu
125 In this
retrospective cohort study, we included patients with cl
126 Multicenter,
retrospective cohort study.
127 A single centre
retrospective cohort study.
128 etic testing performed were included in this
retrospective cohort study.
129 This is a
retrospective cohort study.
130 A
retrospective cohort study.
131 Single-center,
retrospective cohort study.
132 In the
retrospective cohort, luminal B prostate cancers exhibit
133 Among the
retrospective cohort, sensitivities ranged from 72% for
134 In the
retrospective cohort, the primary outcomes were treatmen
135 In this
retrospective cohort, we report on the success of antivi
136 Retrospective cohort.
137 genome evolution have been limited to small
retrospective cohorts.
138 of mcr-1-negative E coli infections from the
retrospective collection between 2012 and 2015 (infectio
139 Retrospective combination of mpMRI and PET/CT had an acc
140 Retrospective comparative study of a consecutive cohort
141 In this
retrospective comparison, the accelerated approach was e
142 Retrospective consecutive case series and image analysis
143 Retrospective,
consecutive sample sepsis cohort over 10
144 stic value of MRI biomarkers was assessed by
retrospective correlations with pathological hallmarks H
145 Retrospective cross-sectional analysis using publicly av
146 Retrospective cross-sectional study.
147 MATERIAL/A
retrospective,
cross-sectional study was carried out on
148 In a single center,
retrospective,
Cross-sectional, observational study, 20
149 We collected
retrospective data from 384 Chinese children and used di
150 Retrospective data indicate prophylactic CNS-directed th
151 tic regression analysis of cannabis use from
retrospective data on same-sex male and female twin pair
152 nical data was developed in order to collect
retrospective data on the cases.
153 Published
retrospective data on the natural course of PVD, retinal
154 We conducted a
retrospective database analysis of the national Veterans
155 A
retrospective database review was conducted of adults ad
156 Retrospective deidentified data collected between 2005 a
157 Analysis of
retrospective depressive trajectories over 28 years, usi
158 This is a
retrospective,
descriptive cohort study using nationwide
159 Using data from the TREAT-AF (
Retrospective Evaluation and Assessment of Therapies in
160 A
retrospective evaluation of 207 consecutive patients (13
161 We assessed
retrospective exacerbations during the 12 months before
162 We present our
retrospective experience of 25 consecutive previously tr
163 In a
retrospective fashion, clinical data were collected from
164 We did a
retrospective follow-up survey of randomly selected bite
165 In
retrospective forecasts of historical influenza outbreak
166 We generated
retrospective forecasts of peak timing, peak incidence,
167 odium species infections and can be used for
retrospective genetic studies.
168 l review boards of each center approved this
retrospective,
HIPAA-compliant, multicenter study; infor
169 aluate internal and external validity with a
retrospective institutional validation sample (2013 and
170 Materials and Methods In this
retrospective,
institutional review board-approved study
171 Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant
retrospective interpretation of prospectively acquired d
172 Retrospective interventional cohort.
173 CRPC treated with (223)RaCl2This study was a
retrospective investigation of a Danish cohort of mCRPC
174 (CRE) isolates were evaluated, including 191
retrospective isolates (122 CP-CRE and 69 non-CP isolate
175 This was a
retrospective log analysis of the online activity of mil
176 is is a hospital-based, exposure-matched and
retrospective longitudinal study.
177 This
retrospective,
longitudinal cohort study examined youths
178 In this single-center,
retrospective,
longitudinal study, disease progression w
179 Retrospective,
matched, case-control study of consecutiv
180 vic MRI and CT images are interchangeable in
retrospective measurements of peripouch fat, which will
181 This is a
retrospective multi-institutional cohort study of patien
182 brain size and research site effects in this
retrospective multi-site study of 134 children from eigh
183 Retrospective multicenter cohort study.
184 This
retrospective multicenter study included patient data co
185 Retrospective,
multicenter cohort study of 5-year cancer
186 Retrospective multicentric analysis of patients treated
187 We did a
retrospective,
nationwide, cohort study comparing risks
188 The main limitations were the
retrospective nature of the study, missing patient infor
189 Limitations of the study included the
retrospective nature, dataset obtained from a single eye
190 In this
retrospective,
nested case-control study, we assessed th
191 Retrospective non-comparative laboratory case series.
192 This is a
retrospective,
non-comparative interventional case serie
193 Retrospective noncomparative case series.
194 btained and informed consent waived for this
retrospective noninferiority cohort study.
195 Our
retrospective,
noninterventional, national, multicenter
196 Multicenter,
retrospective,
nonrandomized clinical study.
197 Retrospective,
nonrandomized, interventional case series
198 Retrospective observational case series.
199 A
retrospective observational cohort study of 991 Oregon r
200 Retrospective observational longitudinal cohort study.
201 We conducted a
retrospective observational pre-post study of residents
202 We performed a
retrospective observational study in adults (>/=18 years
203 Retrospective observational study of 1996 adult first ki
204 Retrospective observational study of 94474 patients with
205 Retrospective observational study.
206 Retrospective,
observational case series.
207 In this
retrospective,
observational cohort study, we compared t
208 A single-center,
retrospective,
observational cohort study.
209 Multicenter,
retrospective,
observational cohort study.
210 Retrospective,
observational cohort study.
211 A
retrospective,
observational, multicenter, international
212 igh-CO2 perturbation experiment results, and
retrospective ocean transport simulations, we investigat
213 Retrospective pooled analysis of prospectively collected
214 Retrospective population epidemiology study of patients
215 This study was a
retrospective population-based cohort study using data f
216 A
retrospective,
population-based case-control study was c
217 Multicenter,
retrospective,
propensity-matched cohort study.
218 We conducted a
retrospective,
propensity-matched study using administra
219 meta- analysis of visual acuity, including 9
retrospective reports and one randomized clinical trial,
220 This
retrospective review analyzed the claims data of 145527
221 Retrospective review identified severe cellulitis was th
222 Materials and Methods A single-institution
retrospective review of 100 women who underwent breast l
223 A
retrospective review of 290992 live births within the In
224 This was an institutional
retrospective review of 74 patients with SCID undergoing
225 Retrospective review of a prospective database.
226 This was a single-center,
retrospective review of children with DCM who underwent
227 Retrospective review of consecutive clinical case series
228 A
retrospective review of de-identified region-wide donor
229 This
retrospective review of medical records included 412 OTR
230 A
retrospective review of medical records was conducted fr
231 A
retrospective review of MRI images of patients with meta
232 In this institutional review board-approved
retrospective review of prospectively acquired data, men
233 Materials and Methods
Retrospective review of scrotal ultrasonographic (US) ex
234 Retrospective review of the CMS database for payments to
235 A
retrospective review was conducted at 20 centers in Nort
236 A
retrospective review was conducted of all nonfederally f
237 Methods This
retrospective safety review on data from three trials (p
238 ats are limited because they largely rely on
retrospective self-report.
239 tive processes linked to action control, and
retrospective '
sense-making' causal inferences.
240 siting that parietal cortex mainly codes for
retrospective sensory information, while frontal cortex
241 A
retrospective single-center review of Employee Health an
242 Retrospective single-center study of all LT since the st
243 l review board approved this HIPAA-compliant
retrospective single-center study, which included 100 co
244 A
retrospective single-institution study was performed on
245 Retrospective,
single-center quasi-experimental study of
246 itation facility stays) were collected via a
retrospective structured interview at 2 years, with pros
247 e increasingly common worldwide and numerous
retrospective studies have indicated that ART-conceived
248 Previous
retrospective studies of paediatric ulcerative colitis h
249 ctive comparative observational studies, and
retrospective studies published from 2000 through 2015.
250 ILACS, CINAHL, and SCOPUS for prospective or
retrospective studies reporting data on overall survival
251 Purpose
Retrospective studies suggest that metastasis-directed t
252 and one randomized clinical trial, and five
retrospective studies were included in visual field meta
253 e results reveals major differences from the
retrospective studies, namely that the small molecules t
254 These data, along with findings from two
retrospective studies, support use of oral cholera vacci
255 The authors conducted a
retrospective study comprising the 606 patients with LQT
256 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study included 1040 consecutive patients (
257 This
retrospective study included 85 patients with 85 breast
258 This was a single-institution
retrospective study involving children with PCG who unde
259 We performed a
retrospective study of 21 patients treated with ceftoloz
260 We present a
retrospective study of 27 eyes of 17 MFS patients that u
261 A
retrospective study of 330 cataract surgeries performed
262 This is a
retrospective study of 46 patients with HCV recurrence p
263 ted with higher risk of ESRD, we performed a
retrospective study of 899 African American Study of Kid
264 A 5-y
retrospective study of all adult patients who underwent
265 We performed a
retrospective study of all eligible veterans in the VA C
266 A
retrospective study of data from the Australian and New
267 This
retrospective study of inpatient delivery admissions in
268 A multicenter
retrospective study of patients admitted with a diagnosi
269 This is a hospital-based
retrospective study of patients presenting to TIO follow
270 Materials and Methods This was a
retrospective study of patients who underwent thrombecto
271 ional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study of prospectively collected data incl
272 In this
retrospective study of US kidney transplant recipients u
273 A
retrospective study of whole-body computed tomographic (
274 The
retrospective study recruited 509 consecutive CRC patien
275 This
retrospective study reviewed records of 551 patients who
276 Our
retrospective study showed that the likelihood of achiev
277 We conducted a
retrospective study to evaluate PGD incidence, trends, a
278 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional bo
279 Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
280 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
281 Materials and Methods This single-center,
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
282 Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study was completed after institutional re
283 A
retrospective study was conducted for iris melanoma pati
284 In this
retrospective study with over 5000 patients, implantatio
285 In this
retrospective study, 116 patients were divided into two
286 Materials and Methods For this
retrospective study, 15 PD + VH patients, 40 PD - VH pat
287 tional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study, adult patients with cirrhosis and M
288 hreshold foci decay ratio, determined in our
retrospective study, correctly classified 23 of 28 patie
289 tional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study, picture archiving and communication
290 In this
retrospective study, we examined symptom onset, and gene
291 For this exploratory
retrospective study, we selected a cohort of patients wi
292 In this
retrospective study, we used the Rescu Epistry cardiac a
293 underwent abdominal CT were enrolled in this
retrospective study.
294 d consent was waived in this HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study.
295 The Cancer Registry Regulation approved this
retrospective study.
296 t a single institution were included in this
retrospective study.
297 hnique in 37 patients were evaluated in this
retrospective study.
298 Neuropathological evaluations and
retrospective telephone clinical assessments (including
299 Retrospective,
uncontrolled, cross-sectional study.
300 lity calculations, summarize the large-scale
retrospective validation results, and discuss limitation