1 This study is "
retrospective study".
3 Clinic-based
retrospective study.
4 ned, and patient consent was waived for this
retrospective study.
5 er or not a nodule is subsolid varied in the
retrospective study.
6 hnique in 37 patients were evaluated in this
retrospective study.
7 The present study was a single-institution
retrospective study.
8 underwent abdominal CT were enrolled in this
retrospective study.
9 rmed consent waived for this HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study.
10 s is an Institutional Review Board-approved,
retrospective study.
11 consent was waived for this HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study.
12 and these 58 patients were included in this
retrospective study.
13 d consent was waived in this HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study.
14 The Cancer Registry Regulation approved this
retrospective study.
15 t a single institution were included in this
retrospective study.
16 A 16-year multicenter
retrospective study.
17 review board approval was obtained for this
retrospective study.
18 An 8-year (2008-2015) monocenter
retrospective study.
19 Noninterventional, observational,
retrospective study.
20 iple sclerosis centres were included in this
retrospective study.
21 eiving cancer treatment has been reported in
retrospective studies.
22 ury have been described in single-center and
retrospective studies.
23 rent levels of risk as reported in empirical
retrospective studies.
24 rence rates are low according to small-scale
retrospective studies.
25 een associated with risk of breast cancer in
retrospective studies.
26 In a multicenter
retrospective study,
103 patients transplanted for hered
27 We included in this multinational
retrospective study 112 recipients diagnosed with probab
28 In this
retrospective study,
116 patients were divided into two
29 In this
retrospective study 12 eyes of 12 consecutive patients,
30 Materials and Methods For this
retrospective study,
15 PD + VH patients, 40 PD - VH pat
31 This report describes a
retrospective study (
1995 to 2015) of primary pediatric
32 Into the
retrospective study,
251 patients (458 eyes) were enroll
33 In this
retrospective study,
366 patients with primary (n = 92)
34 In a group of 270 ES-SCLC cases
retrospective study,
78 patients (28.9%) had oligometast
35 In this single centre
retrospective study,
85 patients with ALS, 215 disease c
36 In this
retrospective study,
a cohort of 234 patients fulfilled
37 tional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study,
adult patients with cirrhosis and M
38 tional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study,
adult patients with healthy livers
39 he findings of a multicenter cross-sectional
retrospective study aimed at determining the proportion
40 Multicenter, binational,
retrospective study aimed to assess the impact of compen
41 This
retrospective study aims to assess compliance to support
42 MATERIAL/It is a
retrospective study analyzing a radiology report databas
43 Prospective and
retrospective studies and randomised controlled trials w
44 The institutional review board approved this
retrospective study and informed consent was waived.
45 Materials and Methods This single-center
retrospective study and meta-analysis was approved by th
46 Retrospective study and pilot, prospective, open-label,
47 ear period (n = 1,070) were included in this
retrospective study and screened for metabolic signs of
48 An institutional review board approved this
retrospective study and waiver of informed consent was o
49 s, randomized controlled trials, prospective-
retrospective studies,
and prospective comparative obser
50 Materials and Methods This was a
retrospective study approved by the institutional review
51 This
retrospective study assessed whether the degree of FDG u
52 A
retrospective study at a single hospital in the United K
53 We conducted a
retrospective study based on a unique, long-term life-hi
54 A
retrospective study based on the hospital charts of pati
55 In this
retrospective study,
both HLA-C*06:02-positive and -nega
56 a was restricted to symptomatic cases in the
retrospective study,
but was regularly monitored in the
57 We performed a
retrospective study by reviewing the medical records of
58 In this
retrospective study,
circumferential trabeculotomy affor
59 This
retrospective study compares the diagnostic performance
60 Design, Setting, and Participants: This
retrospective study compares the diagnostic performance
61 METHODS AND This
retrospective study compares time to first appropriate I
62 d the clinical impact of Cw/DP DSA through a
retrospective study,
comparing 48 patients transplanted
63 The authors conducted a
retrospective study comprising the 606 patients with LQT
64 A
retrospective study concluded that measurements of IgA-T
65 Design, Setting, and Participants: In this
retrospective study conducted from February 2015 to Apri
66 tional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study consisted of 195 recipients of pedia
67 hreshold foci decay ratio, determined in our
retrospective study,
correctly classified 23 of 28 patie
68 In this
retrospective study,
DCD LTx recipients (n = 59) were co
69 Retrospective study design and nonrandom treatment assig
70 Materials and Methods In this
retrospective study,
Doppler waveforms were obtained fro
71 This
retrospective study examines 212 implants inserted in 67
72 l review board exempted this HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study from the requirement for informed co
73 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study had institutional review board appro
74 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study had institutional review board appro
75 e increasingly common worldwide and numerous
retrospective studies have indicated that ART-conceived
76 everal recently published single institution
retrospective studies have reported conflicting relation
77 Previous
retrospective studies have suggested an OS advantage for
78 Retrospective studies have suggested proton pump inhibit
79 A2R1 epitopes have been characterized, and a
retrospective study identified PLA2R1 epitope spreading
80 We included prospective and
retrospective studies in which MSCs were administered to
81 We conducted a
retrospective study in a population of 548 KT recipients
82 A
retrospective study in all renal transplant patients tre
83 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study included 1040 consecutive patients (
84 mpliant, institutional review board-approved
retrospective study included 108 patients (33 with BRCA
85 ompliant institutional review board-approved
retrospective study included 159 patients (129 men, 30 w
86 This
retrospective study included 42 eyes of 33 patients (age
87 mpliant, institutional review board-approved
retrospective study included 51 patients (mean age, 57.8
88 onal review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant,
retrospective study included 52 women who underwent brea
89 This
retrospective study included 85 patients with 85 breast
90 This
retrospective study included patients admitted to 119 Ve
91 This
retrospective study included pediatric patients (aged </
92 This
retrospective study incorporated a crossover cohort stud
93 Purpose
Retrospective studies indicate that expression of excisi
94 Retrospective studies indicate that the use of regional
95 This
retrospective study investigated the relationship betwee
96 A
retrospective study involving 7 centers over a 5-year pe
97 This was a single-institution
retrospective study involving children with PCG who unde
98 A
retrospective study involving eight cases of high myopia
99 This
retrospective study is limited by the lack of informatio
100 The aim of this
retrospective study is to determine our experience of te
101 This
retrospective study is to identify differentially expres
102 In a recent
retrospective study,
late radiation toxicity was found t
103 As a
retrospective study,
limitations include the small size
104 Conclusions and Relevance: In this
retrospective study,
lower vitamin D levels were associa
105 In this
retrospective study,
lower vitamin D levels were associa
106 Several large prospective and
retrospective studies,
mostly from the United States and
107 a virus (ZIKV) infection in case reports and
retrospective studies,
mostly on the basis of serologica
108 e results reveals major differences from the
retrospective studies,
namely that the small molecules t
109 Retrospective studies of hemorrhage utilize the concept
110 Previous
retrospective studies of paediatric ulcerative colitis h
111 Pre-clinical and
retrospective studies of patients using statins to reduc
112 Thirteen
retrospective studies of patients with stage II CRC who
113 o target information obtained via tandem MS,
retrospective studies of the same sample via high-resolu
114 We performed a
retrospective study of 155 consecutive patients with sev
115 We undertook a comprehensive
retrospective study of 162 affected female subjects.
116 We performed a
retrospective study of 21 patients treated with ceftoloz
117 We present a
retrospective study of 27 eyes of 17 MFS patients that u
118 Retrospective study of 2840 patients with pathologically
119 A multicentric and
retrospective study of 31 patients (22 men, 9 women) wit
120 The institutional review board approved this
retrospective study of 31 patients with rectal cancer wh
121 A
retrospective study of 330 cataract surgeries performed
122 Retrospective study of 35,000 randomly selected inpatien
123 The institutional review board approved this
retrospective study of 403 patients from August 1, 2012,
124 This multinational,
retrospective study of 4301 pancreatoduodenectomies invo
125 This is a
retrospective study of 46 patients with HCV recurrence p
126 y number, and expression profiling data in a
retrospective study of 510 breast cancer patients as a t
127 Design, Setting, and Participants: In a
retrospective study of 52 consecutive patients with eryt
128 In a
retrospective study of 52 consecutive patients with eryt
129 This is a single-center,
retrospective study of 594 adults with PCKD who had rena
130 A
retrospective study of 823 patients from 65 explosive ev
131 ted with higher risk of ESRD, we performed a
retrospective study of 899 African American Study of Kid
132 In this
retrospective study of acute coronary syndrome patients
133 A 5-y
retrospective study of all adult patients who underwent
134 AND In this single-center, community-based,
retrospective study of all consecutive primary HF hospit
135 We performed a
retrospective study of all eligible veterans in the VA C
136 We conducted a
retrospective study of all LNB cases verified by a posit
137 Retrospective study of consecutive patients treated with
138 A
retrospective study of data from the Australian and New
139 s with temporal mapping of teeth enables the
retrospective study of early life developmental disrupti
140 A
retrospective study of eyes with idiopathic macular hole
141 n, Setting, and Participants: We performed a
retrospective study of hospitalizations at an academic m
142 We now report a
retrospective study of human biopsy samples using biomar
143 We performed a
retrospective study of individuals diagnosed with CRC at
144 This
retrospective study of inpatient delivery admissions in
145 A
retrospective study of Medicaid claims data for 28,794 u
146 Retrospective study of Medicare fee-for-service benefici
147 Retrospective study of patients admitted for septic shoc
148 Longitudinal,
retrospective study of patients admitted to five ICUs at
149 A multicenter
retrospective study of patients admitted with a diagnosi
150 Here, using
retrospective study of patients and intravital imaging o
151 We performed a
retrospective study of patients diagnosed with lower GI
152 A multicenter,
retrospective study of patients infected with carbapenem
153 This is a hospital-based
retrospective study of patients presenting to TIO follow
154 Method: Cross-sectional French nationwide
retrospective study of patients screened through the Nat
155 Retrospective study of patients undergoing endoscopic dr
156 This was a
retrospective study of patients who had a characteristic
157 We did a population-based,
retrospective study of patients who tested positive for
158 Materials and Methods This was a
retrospective study of patients who underwent thrombecto
159 In a
retrospective study of patients with PPG values measured
160 Retrospective study of patients with UM treated by enucl
161 ional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study of prospectively collected data incl
162 We conducted a
retrospective study of RTC with LTBI treated with either
163 Conclusions and Relevance: In this
retrospective study of sequelae in a large cohort of unt
164 This
retrospective study of singleton pregnancies from 2 tert
165 This is a
retrospective study of sixty-six school-age children who
166 In this
retrospective study of treatment-naive PLWH initiating a
167 In this
retrospective study of US kidney transplant recipients u
168 In a
retrospective study of veterans who underwent outpatient
169 A
retrospective study of whole-body computed tomographic (
170 We conducted a
retrospective study on two independent cohorts of patien
171 In the
retrospective study,
patients contributed medical record
172 , and Participants: In this cross-sectional,
retrospective study,
patients in a hospital-based referr
173 This was a
retrospective study performed from January 2014 to June
174 This was a
retrospective study,
performed from 2004 to 2015 at Ange
175 tional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study,
picture archiving and communication
176 ctive comparative observational studies, and
retrospective studies published from 2000 through 2015.
177 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study received institutional review board
178 The
retrospective study recruited 306 consecutive RCC patien
179 The
retrospective study recruited 509 consecutive CRC patien
180 Previous
retrospective studies reported that around 25% of childr
181 In all but one of the
retrospective studies reported to date, bortezomib and l
182 ILACS, CINAHL, and SCOPUS for prospective or
retrospective studies reporting data on overall survival
183 e searched systematically for prospective or
retrospective studies reporting oncological results for
184 This multicenter
retrospective study reports on 19 new cases aged 35 (15-
185 mpliant, Institutional Review Board-approved
retrospective study reviewed 25 PET/CT-guided thermal ab
186 This
retrospective study reviewed records of 551 patients who
187 A
retrospective study reviewed the data from January 1, 19
188 We performed a
retrospective study reviewing history, symptoms and phys
189 Representation within a 2,478-specimen
retrospective study set was established by comparison to
190 While
retrospective studies show large-scale declines in coral
191 Our
retrospective study showed that the likelihood of achiev
192 ctive trials in double-hit lymphoma, however
retrospective studies strongly suggest that aggressive i
193 In this institutional review board-approved
retrospective study,
subjects were selected from 327 con
194 relieved from the complications of GER, and
retrospective studies suggest improved lung function.
195 Purpose
Retrospective studies suggest that metastasis-directed t
196 Retrospective studies suggest that nonlinear imputation
197 Prior
retrospective studies suggest that statins may benefit p
198 Retrospective studies suggested a benefit of covering th
199 Evidence from
retrospective studies suggests that disease progression
200 These data, along with findings from two
retrospective studies,
support use of oral cholera vacci
201 eption to April 1, 2016, for prospective and
retrospective studies that reported the risk of gastroin
202 We conducted a
retrospective study that included all children who were
203 ecause of the results of multiple, primarily
retrospective, studies that indicate superior detection
204 In this
retrospective study,
the aim was to determine the outcom
205 In this observational,
retrospective study,
the Centers for Medicare and Medica
206 tional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study,
the pretreatment (18)F fluorodeoxyg
207 In this
retrospective study,
the sensitivity and specificity of
208 In this
retrospective study,
the use of sunitinib in the adjuvan
209 In a proof-of-concept
retrospective study,
the virtual heart test significantl
210 We performed a
retrospective study to assess prognostic factors of surv
211 We conducted a
retrospective study to compare the admission rate of pat
212 This is a
retrospective study to document the intensified resource
213 We conducted a
retrospective study to evaluate PGD incidence, trends, a
214 We conducted a
retrospective study to evaluate the patterns of relapse
215 hyroid carcinoma over time, we carried out a
retrospective study to illustrate the evolutionary featu
216 Design: This
retrospective study used 133 DSCMs from 64 Mohs tissue e
217 This observational
retrospective study used 134 clinical and dermoscopic im
218 This
retrospective study used data from the Michigan Bariatri
219 This
retrospective study used state inpatient data from Janua
220 nd livestock population data and performed a
retrospective study using generalized additive models to
221 We conducted a
retrospective study using healthcare databases in Ontari
222 Design, Setting, and Participants:
Retrospective study using population-based administrativ
223 This large
retrospective study using structured EMR data quantified
224 Retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample
225 We conducted a
retrospective study using the Scientific Registry of Tra
226 This is a
retrospective study utilizing a propensity score-weighte
227 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by an ethics review boa
228 The
retrospective study was approved by the ethics board and
229 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional bo
230 This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional et
231 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional et
232 Methods This HIPAA-compliant, single-center
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
233 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
234 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
235 Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
236 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
237 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
238 Materials and Methods This single-center,
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
239 This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
240 This HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
241 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
242 This single-center
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
243 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
244 This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
245 Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
246 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
247 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
248 This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
249 Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
250 Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
251 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was approved by the institutional re
252 This
retrospective study was based on hospital records, revie
253 This
retrospective study was caried out in an independent, na
254 Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study was completed after institutional re
255 Materials and Methods This
retrospective study was compliant with HIPAA and approve
256 This
retrospective study was conducted at Jackson Memorial-Mi
257 A
retrospective study was conducted for iris melanoma pati
258 A
retrospective study was conducted from prospectively col
259 A cross-sectional
retrospective study was conducted using data collected f
260 This
retrospective study was HIPAA compliant and approved by
261 This
retrospective study was HIPAA compliant.
262 This
retrospective study was Institutional Review Board appro
263 This
retrospective study was institutional review board appro
264 This
retrospective study was institutional review board appro
265 A
retrospective study was performed assessing the positivi
266 A
retrospective study was performed by analyzing RI admini
267 This
retrospective study was performed by the Canadian Pharma
268 A multicenter, international
retrospective study was performed from October 1, 2012,
269 onal review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant,
retrospective study was performed in 13 consecutive pati
270 ods This institutional review board-approved
retrospective study was performed in a single large acad
271 METHODS AND A multicenter
retrospective study was performed on patients with CHD w
272 A multicenter,
retrospective study was performed using the Spanish Cong
273 rmed consent was obtained, a HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study was performed.
274 A multicenter,
retrospective study was then conducted to validate it.
275 The aim of this
retrospective study was to assess the level of agreement
276 The aim of this
retrospective study was to compare the heart-to-mediasti
277 The aim of this
retrospective study was to evaluate the detection rate o
278 In this longitudinal
retrospective study,
we analysed post-mortem brain tissu
279 In this
retrospective study,
we analyzed (1) rates of epinephrin
280 In this
retrospective study,
we demonstrated that ctDNA is corre
281 In this
retrospective study,
we determined by flow cytometry lev
282 ting, and Participants: For this monocentric
retrospective study,
we exained 81 patients screened for
283 For this monocentric
retrospective study,
we exained 81 patients screened for
284 In this
retrospective study,
we examined symptom onset, and gene
285 In a
retrospective study,
we found that in some patients the
286 In a
retrospective study,
we further illustrate the applicati
287 In this
retrospective study,
we report outcome and changes in le
288 For this exploratory
retrospective study,
we selected a cohort of patients wi
289 In this
retrospective study,
we used the Rescu Epistry cardiac a
290 randomized clinical trial and 18 prospective-
retrospective studies were found to have evaluated the c
291 and one randomized clinical trial, and five
retrospective studies were included in visual field meta
292 Retrospective study with linear regression analysis and
293 In this
retrospective study with over 5000 patients, implantatio
294 tional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study with waiver of informed consent incl
295 ods This institutional review board-approved
retrospective study,
with waived informed consent, inclu
296 The institutional review board approved this
retrospective study,
with waiver of informed consent.
297 proval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant
retrospective study,
with waiver of informed consent.
298 s was an institutional review board-approved
retrospective study,
with waiver of the need to obtain i
299 ods Institutional review board approved this
retrospective study,
with waiver of written informed con
300 images is being increasingly investigated in
retrospective studies,
yet the interpretation of PET-der