ライフサイエンスコーパス: reverse transcription

1 ol to a level that cannot support productive reverse transcription.

2 l nucleic acids, which may both hamper HIV-1 reverse transcription.

3 primer binding site (PBS) essential for ERV reverse transcription.

4 he combined process of TNA transcription and reverse transcription.

5 the DNA genome from a specific viral RNA by reverse transcription.

6 postentry stages of infection, most notably reverse transcription.

7 understanding of the mechanisms in viral RNA reverse transcription.

8 ting T cells in which HIV failed to complete reverse transcription.

9 onfirms that proofreading is compatible with reverse transcription.

10 into the CRISPR array, which is followed by reverse transcription.

11 ), which depletes free nucleotides, blocking reverse transcription.

12 ed 5' mRNA fragments with template-switching reverse transcription.

13 osphates (dNTPs), which are needed for HIV-1 reverse transcription.

14 ions by binding viral capsids and preventing reverse transcription.

15 t, increases cellular dNTP content and HIV-1 reverse transcription.

16 cleoside triphosphates (dNTP) and thus HIV-1 reverse transcription.

17 e trigger for relocalization occurs prior to reverse transcription.

18 r that harnesses recombination events during reverse-transcription.

19 tative determination of mRNA by quantitative reverse transcription analysis (qRT-PCR), and semiquanti

20 cleocapsid assembly, facilitating subsequent reverse transcription and acting as a nucleation complex

21 Adenine-specific mutagenesis occurs during reverse transcription and does not involve dUTP incorpor

22 However, the early steps of reverse transcription and integration appear to be unimp

23 terminal repeats (LTRs) for retrovirus-like reverse transcription and integration into the genome.

24 d throughout the genome through a process of reverse transcription and integration.

25 This block to HIV replication occurs between reverse transcription and nuclear entry, and passaging e

26 life cycle, including the postentry steps of reverse transcription and nuclear import.

27 ta sequences from total T-cell RNA, enabling reverse transcription and PCR amplification of these seq

28 voiding bias due to enzymatic processes like reverse transcription and PCR amplification.

29 d incorporated into DNA by primer extension, reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (PCR

30 otective capsid lattice to ensure subsequent reverse transcription and productive infection in target

31 ective capsid cores to facilitate subsequent reverse transcription and productive infection in target

32 tic basis for DNA polymerase fidelity during reverse transcription and provide a free energy profile.

33 anscription by RNA polymerase II followed by reverse transcription and re-integration into the host g

34 -pair with adenines during the completion of reverse transcription and result in A3G signature G-to-A

35 while 18 nt tRFs specifically interfere with reverse transcription and retrotransposon mobility.

36 luding genome replication via protein-primed reverse-transcription and utilization of structurally re

37 .IMPORTANCE Human tRNA(Lys3), the primer for reverse transcription, and LysRS are essential host fact

38 sed on m(1)A-induced misincorporation during reverse transcription, and report distinct classes of m(

39 ically deficient roadblocks that may inhibit reverse transcription.APOBEC3G inhibits HIV-1 viral repl

40 Using a targeted quantitative PCR with reverse transcription approach in an additional 2,763 in

41 Using reverse-transcription at low dNTP concentrations followe

42 to HIV-1 in these cells, which acts at HIV-1 reverse transcription, but remains independent of restri

43 f the two arms of RNA duplexes via a linker; reverse transcription; cDNA library amplification; and f

44 llular proteins that interact first with the reverse transcription complex and later with the preinte

45 we developed a method to visualize HIV-1 DNA reverse transcription complexes by the incorporation and

46 precipitously to a value below that of a pre-reverse transcription core, and the capsid undergoes par

47 The reverse transcription CPA system was further optimized f

48 The reverse transcription CPA-NATS detection system establis

49 Reverse transcriptase-catalyzed reverse transcription critically relies on the proper ge

50 However, the basis of this reverse transcription defect is unknown.

51 Indeed, pharmacological inhibition of reverse transcription did not rescue the meiotic defect.

52 transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and reverse transcription-digital PCR (RT-dPCR) for quantify

53 , allowing efficient quantification of HIV-1 reverse transcription events.

54 als how protein structural features used for reverse transcription evolved to promote the splicing of

55 and probes was designed for one-step pan-IAV reverse-transcription fluorescence resonance energy tran

56 al nucleocapsids and the initiation of viral reverse transcription for conversion of the pgRNA to vir

57 converts protein levels to DNA levels, with reverse transcription for mRNA detection.

58 nduce premature core disassembly and prevent reverse transcription; however, viral infection is still

59 nhances human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 reverse transcription in HIV-1-infected cells.

60 DNA products generated by inefficient viral reverse transcription in these cells.

61 sults in higher levels of mutagenesis during reverse transcription in vitro and in cells.

62 of isolated HIV-1 cores during the course of reverse transcription in vitro We found that, during an

63 e anti-HIV-1 efficacy of nucleotide analogue reverse transcription inhibitors presumably as a result

64 nd user-friendly diagnostic assay based on a reverse transcription-insulated isothermal PCR (RT-iiPCR

65 These vectors generated mismatched reverse transcription intermediates, with proviral produ

66 itized [DES] and non-DES control groups) for reverse transcription into cDNA, preamplification and th

67 e viral life cycle-assembly, compartment for reverse transcription, intracellular trafficking, and nu

68 containing RNA and/or nascent DNA and follow reverse transcription kinetics.

69 use of different enzyme mixtures in one-step reverse-transcription loop-mediated amplification (RT-LA

70 chikungunya, and dengue viruses by coupling reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplifica

71 resent report describes an immunoassay-based reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplifica

72 We report on a highly sensitive reverse-transcription loop-mediated, isothermal amplific

73 Reverse-transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplifica

74 ning the availability of building blocks for reverse transcription, namely dNTPs.

75 ting and regulate downstream events, such as reverse transcription, nuclear entry, and integration si

76 es, followed by depletion of rRNA molecules, reverse transcription of 5'P mRNAs and Illumina high-thr

77 ic mobile genetic elements that transpose by reverse transcription of an RNA intermediate and are der

78 y animal viruses that replicate their DNA by reverse transcription of an RNA intermediate.

79 man immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is reverse transcription of genomic RNA to DNA, a process t

80 for mRNA expression analysis start with the reverse transcription of mRNA into cDNA, a process that

81 Retroduplications come from reverse transcription of mRNAs and their insertion back

82 ity purification of tagged Smt1p followed by reverse transcription of the associated RNA and PCR ampl

83 Here we show that reverse transcription of the Bordetella phage DGR is pri

84 Although HIV-1 uncoating has been linked to reverse transcription of the viral genome in target cell

85 ir DNA counterparts via 'transcription' and 'reverse transcription' or, more importantly, that PCR-am

86 Products of reverse transcription originating from endogenous retroe

87 has relied on complex, multi-step real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) assays; an accurate s

88 Inclusion criteria were positive Ebola virus reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) test, age >/= 1 y, we

89 Finally, reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR)-based screening for t

90 dV species D, type 37 (HAdV-D37), we show by reverse transcription PCR and Sanger sequencing that mRN

91 Real-time reverse transcription PCR indicated constitutive upregul

92 In this study, we used immunohistochemistry, reverse transcription PCR, and gene arrays to determine

93 gene networks were validated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

94 copy number loss detected with quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

95 us T-cell lymphoma stages using quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

96 Results of quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) demonstrated that ex

97 ochemical methods and quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR.

98 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses revealed th

99 To date, studies using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and microarrays have

100 Compared to the real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) reference method, th

101 ommunity (EPIC) study, we compared real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and serology for the

102 Moreover, we describe a sensitive nested reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay allowing the ra

103 6 weeks of travel were tested with real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays targeting the

104 employed transcriptome sequencing and novel reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays to distinguish

105 We have developed a real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) method specific for g

106 ction influenza A/B virus (FluA/B) multiplex reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) method that amplifies

107 Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq), reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), Western blot, and se

108 y-antigen binding affinities by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

109 genes (GFP and YFP) was also confirmed using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

110 Time course quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis suggested that the co

111 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR and anti-DENV IgM enzyme-linke

112 ochemical studies of MM patient bone marrow, reverse transcription-PCR and protein analysis show that

113 med infrared microspectroscopy, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR of cell wall biosynthetic gene

114 ght polypeptide and microarray and real-time reverse transcription-PCR revealed decreased transcript

115 on microscopy and quantified by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

116 supernatant was quantitated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

117 and TAp73 observed upon array profiling and reverse transcription-PCR.

118 ous viral and bacterial samples using Nested-Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (nRT-PCR

119 nd mRNA levels were measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

120 amined for malaria parasites by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

121 titis (H), using microarray and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR

122 Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR

123 ng analysis on 10 samples and a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR

124 Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

125 mine the diagnostic performance of real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

126 alth department laboratories can perform the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

127 Microarray, RNA-seq and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR

128 We performed reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses

129 Whole-exome sequencing, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis

130 Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and immu

131 rize transcription at this locus by coupling reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and long

132 Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and tran

133 sis of MM cells using quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction arrays f

134 ntigen-binding B lymphocytes and single-cell reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction followed

135 ical features, the need to rely on real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction from res

136 Expression analysis by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of extra

137 Using a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction platform

138 ration sequencing and quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction showed r

139 esh, dissociated myocardium for quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction studies.

140 was detected in a plasma sample by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing

141 p UltraSens Virus kit, followed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction using a

142 y experiments and semiquantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were per

143 stology, immunohistochemistry, and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were per

144 arteries were examined for gene expression (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction), protei

145 l electrophoresis, and RT-qPCR (quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction).

146 istologic, immunohistochemical, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and flo

147 alidated for PSMA expression-by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, flow cy

148 miRNA microarray analysis, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, fluores

149 alpha [TNF-alpha], and IL-6) by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, IL-6 im

150 We performed quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunof

151 were collected and analyzed in angiogenesis, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, polyA t

152 g technique for RNA isolation and subsequent reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, the exp

153 METHODS AND By reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, we eval

154 tivity were assessed by histology, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, Western

155 n and localisation of KCa3.1 was analysed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, Western

156 that compared the odds of vaccination among reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-confirme

157 collected and analyzed histologically and by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

158 Nicaragua were tested for DENV by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

159 nvestigated by conventional and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

160 bined, and tested for influenza by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

161 with urinary tract infection using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

162 ometry, immunofluorescence, and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

163 ence in situ hybridization, and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

164 Fluorescence microscopy and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions were us

165 and throat swabs for EV-D68 using real-time reverse- transcription polymerase chain reaction assay.

166 emistry, in situ hybridization, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qPCR),

167 Recent ZIKV infection was confirmed by urine reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

168 of microscopy, immunofluorescence, real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

169 By real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

170 Influenza was confirmed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

171 unoglobulin M (IgM) testing was negative and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

172 iruses, molecular detection methods, such as reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

173 h (Carassius auratus) neural tissue and used reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

174 opharyngeal washes for testing by singleplex reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

175 ration, RNA extraction, and amplification by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis

176 Additionally, quantitative (real-time) reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis

177 y positive results of WNV-specific real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis

178 lts were confirmed by real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis

179 HCV RNA was measured using a reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assay.

180 Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assays w

181 arget 1 and major groove binder quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assays,

182 ness were tested using a multiplex real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction for ZIKV

183 The median time of reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction negativi

184 ivity compared to serum anti-HCV and HCV RNA reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction results.

185 anti-HCV test to screen, followed by HCV RNA reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction to confi

186 he c.5461-10T-->C variant on RNA splicing by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction was anal

187 ases were influenza infections (confirmed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction) in adul

188 and analyzed by immunoblotting, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and cel

189 Pneumoniae, using flow cytometry, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and enz

190 ents and contacts were tested with real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and vir

191 orters were characterized using quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunob

192 iology, isometric contractility measurement, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunob

193 in skin lesion was confirmed by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunoh

194 pancreatic tumor cell lines and analyzed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, sequenc

195 convalescent phase serum/plasma samples from reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction-confirme

196 ally diagnosed influenza infection (SDI) and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction-confirme

197 Stool samples were tested for norovirus by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

198 ted negative for Ebola virus by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

199 and tested for influenza virus by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

200 year were quantified using duplex real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

201 ed and analyzed via quantitative (real-time) reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

202 tory viruses were identified by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

203 anin, and LYVE-1 by quantitative (real-time) reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

204 8 expression were assessed by zymography and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

205 ion of ompA was determined with quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

206 zed with CAP were tested for RV by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

207 s diagnostics rely primarily on quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR

208 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR

209 e microarray studies, real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR

210 hmark miRNA-quantitation method-quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR

211 tested and compared to results of real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR

212 re, antigen-detection testing, and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

213 Two real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

214 malaria, using the RealStar Filovirus Screen reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

215 The RealStar Filovirus Screen reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

216 We used transcriptome analysis and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

217 X enables applications such as single-enzyme reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and dire

218 tency of iPSCs was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and immu

219 Cases were identified by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and sero

220 through prospective strain surveillance with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for 3 ye

221 cted and viral load quantitated by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in C cas

222 Ang-2 gene expression was measured by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in endot

223 the bacterial numbers were evaluated by the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction method.

224 munostaining, plaque assay, and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of ZIKV

225 Furthermore, RNA in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction studies

226 Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing

227 erimental time, animals were sacrificed, and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was perf

228 otyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and tar

229 , and the presence of LRV1 was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, followe

230 s Kcnip2 and Kcnd2, assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, was hig

231 ession levels were estimated by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

232 a denticola (Td), and Escherichia coli using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

233 NA transcripts were detected by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

234 and 234 human immune genes via quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

235 allow the released RNAs to be quantified in reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction assays.

236 -1 recruits human tRNA(Lys3) to serve as the reverse transcription primer via an interaction between

237 sequencing strategy to characterize nascent reverse transcription products and their precise 3'-term

238 photonic microring resonators to detect cDNA reverse transcription products via a subsequent enzymati

239 mRNA synthesis.IMPORTANCE The fates of HIV-1 reverse transcription products within infected cells are

240 acellular viral DNA as well as intracellular reverse transcription products, without affecting HBV RN

241 analysis, and gametocytes were quantified by reverse-transcription qPCR analysis.

242 WW) and phosphate buffer (PB) as assessed by reverse transcription-qPCR (RT-qPCR).

243 Here, using a sensitive reverse transcription-qPCR approach, we demonstrate the

244 Our quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)-PCR results showed that our

245 analyzed the oligomer reaction kinetics with reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and qua

246 of ammonium were analyzed by microarray and reverse transcription quantitative PCR, and linked with

247 9 were assessed for occult HCV infection by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reac

248 ars) using TaqMan assays and high-throughput reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reac

249 stric tissues were collected and analyzed by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reac

250 complex biological samples using a real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reac

251 lyzed by immunoblot, immunofluorescence, and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reac

252 The tissue samples were analyzed by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reac

253 We used a real-time reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reac

254 Reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reac

255 Plasma microRNA was quantified with reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reac

256 Results were validated in real-time reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reac

257 Plasma miRNA levels were measured by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reac

258 Total RNAs were isolated for reverse transcription- quantitative real-time polymerase

259 ted to MIC testing, whole-genome sequencing, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR), and ca

260 This study compares the accuracies of reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and rev

261 A real-time reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay u

262 nscript abundance estimation, mainly through reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), is a c

263 ompared to those from conventional viral RNA reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)-based a

264 by microarray and was confirmed by real-time reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR).

265 K-deficient leukemias either directly, using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR, microarrays, and

266 as determined by promoter fusions to gfp and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR, were distinct fr

267 Equivalent performance was found using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reac

268 r concordance between RNA-seq/exon-array and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reac

269 as tested by allele-specific oligonucleotide reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reac

270 RNA sequencing and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reac

271 samples ( 60% of cohort) were reanalyzed by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reac

272 By quantitative reverse transcription-real-time PCR (qPCR) sapovirus was

273 om 507 norovirus-positive stool samples with reverse transcription-real-time PCR cycle threshold (CT)

274 It can also perform reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplificati

275 In PBLs, the block occurs at the level of reverse transcription, reducing the accumulation of earl

276 ppress infection, e.g., prior to (or during) reverse transcription, remain to be defined.

277 Recent findings have implicated a non-reverse transcription role for Pol in evading host innat

278 e, we discover the topological inhibition of reverse transcription (RT) and obtain different RT-PCR p

279 D4 T cells, HIV encounters a block, limiting reverse transcription (RT) of the incoming viral RNA gen

280 en lysed and mRNA is barcoded (indexed) by a reverse transcription (RT) reaction.

281 able for analysis by techniques that rely on reverse transcription (RT) such as RT-qPCR and RNA-Seq.

282 SAMHD1 suppresses viral reverse transcription (RT) through depletion of cellular

283 eatment of poliovirus RNA followed by random reverse transcription (RT), amplification, and the use o

284 ere validated with the current gold standard reverse transcription (RT)-PCR approach with 100% concor

285 Viral loads determined by real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR confirmed the presence of

286 titative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse-transcription (RT) PCR were applied to nasophary

287 transcription, they are blocked at an early reverse transcription stage in target cells.

288 re noninfectious and are blocked at an early reverse transcription stage in target cells.

289 by NRTIs appears to take place at either the reverse transcription step of the viral genome prior to

290 roduction of sample-specific barcodes during reverse transcription supports pooled library constructi

291 tomic force microscopy, we found that during reverse transcription the pressure inside the capsid inc

292 itro We found that, during an early stage of reverse transcription the pressure inside the capsid inc

293 contain all of the components necessary for reverse transcription, they are blocked at an early reve

294 e structural hallmarks of target-site primed reverse transcription (TPRT) and mobilized efficiently i

295 which is incorporated into HIV-1 DNA during reverse transcription (U/A pairs), resulting in pre-inte

296 Uniquely, the HBV P protein initiates reverse transcription via a protein priming mechanism us

297 al coincidence or a functional limitation of reverse transcription, we attempted to evolve a high-fid

298 otinylated nucleotide is incorporated during reverse transcription, which greatly facilitates the pro

299 - and sequence-independent interference with reverse transcription, which requires the specific inter

300 d HIV-1 infection mainly by decreasing HIV-1 reverse transcription, while knockdown of YTHDF1-3 in ce