ライフサイエンスコーパス: reverse transcription-PCR

1 e expression of AP-2 in IHCs was verified by reverse transcription PCR.

2 from the HIV study were tested by real-time reverse transcription PCR.

3 gene networks were validated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

4 copy number loss detected with quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

5 us T-cell lymphoma stages using quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

6 chemistry, polychromatic flow cytometry, and reverse transcription-PCR.

7 SDS-PAGE, immunoblot, mass spectrometry and reverse transcription-PCR.

8 urface adhesins, as assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

9 en-detection technologies based on real-time reverse transcription-PCR.

10 orsal hippocampal punches using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

11 and ERG status was assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

12 rkA gene transcription by using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

13 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and reverse transcription-PCR.

14 infection by microscopy, flow cytometry, and reverse transcription-PCR.

15 (Ad5) mRNA level as measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

16 23 IFN-induced genes was confirmed by using reverse transcription-PCR.

17 mutants, which was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

18 ramidal neurons as determined by single-cell reverse transcription-PCR.

19 on microscopy and quantified by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

20 supernatant was quantitated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

21 and TAp73 observed upon array profiling and reverse transcription-PCR.

22 (ECM) genes was analyzed using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR.

23 resulting RNA was found to be amplifiable in reverse-transcription PCR.

24 ochemical methods and quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR.

25 Microarray and reverse transcription-PCR analyses revealed that gene re

26 Reverse transcription PCR analysis indicated that all ge

27 Interestingly, reverse transcription PCR analysis indicated that the pr

28 Lastly, quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR analysis of human epithelial-d

29 cell tumor clinical samples by quantitative reverse transcription PCR analysis revealed that overall

30 ific expression, as revealed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of a large panel of t

31 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR analysis of dissociated green

32 Hedgehog signaling as monitored by real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis of Gli1 mRNA concentr

33 Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis of total RNA extracte

34 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed decreased gl

35 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed expression o

36 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed expression o

37 Finally, reverse transcription-PCR analysis showed the presence o

38 Time course quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis suggested that the co

39 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR and immunohistochemical studie

40 dV species D, type 37 (HAdV-D37), we show by reverse transcription PCR and Sanger sequencing that mRN

41 ns (Zika cases) were identified by real-time reverse transcription PCR and serology in a community-ba

42 d gene expression changes using quantitative reverse transcription PCR and used the result as referen

43 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR and Western blot analysis were

44 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR and anti-DENV IgM enzyme-linke

45 el of which was interrogated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and correlated with cell cultu

46 ption and protein synthesis were detected by reverse transcription-PCR and detection of latency-assoc

47 TaqMan reverse transcription-PCR and in situ hybridization were

48 r localization with immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-PCR and measured olivocochlear fun

49 NoVs were identified using reverse transcription-PCR and probe hybridization.

50 ochemical studies of MM patient bone marrow, reverse transcription-PCR and protein analysis show that

51 rospinal fluid and identified with real-time reverse transcription-PCR and sequencing, which also yie

52 bs from PRRSV-seropositive pigs by real-time reverse transcription-PCR and sequencing.

53 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and tandem mass spectrometry p

54 by a Yersinia 16S rRNA-specific quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and was detected later by the

55 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and Western analysis confirmed

56 genes as assessed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot analyses.

57 NDLIN-3 was detected in endothelial cells by reverse transcription-PCR and Western blots.

58 were collected and analyzed by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR and histologic and biochemical

59 ustom TALE-TFs and TALENs using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR and Surveyor nuclease, respect

60 sequence of Aspergillus oryzae together with reverse-transcription-PCR and identified a transcribed s

61 In this study, we used immunohistochemistry, reverse transcription PCR, and gene arrays to determine

62 ith luciferase reporter assays, quantitative reverse transcription PCR, and immunoblot analyses.

63 ion of argonaute and Dicer was determined by reverse transcription-PCR, and expression of protein was

64 We validated transcriptional changes using reverse transcription-PCR, and further immunofluorescenc

65 es employing virB-lacZ fusions, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and immunoblot analysis showe

66 outine immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, reverse transcription-PCR, and immunoblotting methodolog

67 wide transcriptional profiling, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and microRNA analyses were us

68 up A rotavirus RNA was detected by real-time reverse transcription-PCR, and positive samples were G a

69 , and sigG were examined by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and the corresponding sigmaF,

70 phoretic mobility shift assays, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and transcriptional reporter

71 between expression of 732 genes, measured by reverse-transcription PCR, and clinical outcome in 942 p

72 CoV-2 infection cases confirmed by real-time reverse transcription PCR assay of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

73 Using a quantitative reverse transcription PCR assay specific for all HIV-1 m

74 We developed a novel reverse transcription-PCR assay targeting HHV-6B U38, wh

75 However, the USDA-validated reverse transcription-PCR assay targeting the fusion gen

76 y identified by the USDA-validated real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay targeting the matrix gen

77 detection of influenza virus using real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay.

78 e marrow chimeras, luminex, and quantitative reverse transcription PCR assays were performed to evalu

79 Chromatin immunoprecipitation-PCR and reverse transcription-PCR assays as well as transgenic s

80 Furthermore, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assays demonstrated that the C

81 say for influenza virus using a quantitative reverse transcription PCR-based endpoint assessment (qPC

82 oviral surveillance were tested by real-time reverse transcription PCR by the Instituto Nacional de I

83 Reverse transcription-PCR confirmed the downregulation o

84 Reverse-transcription PCR confirmed altered splicing in

85 ent- and postconvalescent-phase samples from reverse transcription-PCR-confirmed cases, including 25

86 xpression were quantified by droplet digital reverse transcription-PCR (ddRT-PCR), providing further

87 Quantitative PCR and single-cell multiplex reverse transcription-PCR demonstrated message for NBCe1

88 Reverse transcription-PCR demonstrated that thrombin mes

89 iagnosis exist, including pan-Trk IHC, FISH, reverse transcription PCR, DNA-based next-generation seq

90 Reverse transcription-PCR established that transcription

91 on were observed, complementary results from reverse transcription-PCR experiments and gel-shift and

92 Reverse transcription-PCR experiments revealed the expre

93 A staining, flow cytometry, and quantitative reverse transcription PCR for IL-17A mRNA.

94 re confirmed by using multiplex quantitative reverse transcription-PCR for 16 mRNA targets in an inde

95 ciency of 104.4% and similar sensitivity for reverse-transcription PCR for influenza H3 RNA.

96 te its functionality to perform both PCR and reverse-transcription PCR for lambda phage DNA and H3 in

97 Quantitative single-cell reverse transcription-PCR found lower GlyRalpha1 subunit

98 al records of patients with EVD confirmed by reverse transcription PCR hospitalized in the Conakry ar

99 th RFS were further examined by quantitative reverse transcription PCR in 291 lung adenocarcinoma tis

100 e-cell mRNA transcripts by digital, one-step reverse transcription PCR in a simple microfluidic array

101 PAT mRNA was not detected by reverse transcription PCR in dodders.

102 ression of HOXA genes was investigated using reverse transcription-PCR in primary gliomas and gliobla

103 ption was verified by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR in two mutant lines.

104 Reverse-transcription PCR in addition to liquid chromato

105 Validation by quantitative reverse-transcription-PCR in an additional 40 patients w

106 sitive for Zika virus infection by real-time reverse transcription PCR, including one neonate with mi

107 Real-time reverse transcription PCR indicated constitutive upregul

108 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR indicated that both genes are

109 Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR indicated the C-terminal forms

110 ancer, we developed a multiplex quantitative reverse transcription PCR method involving the purificat

111 comparing the results with the quantitative reverse transcription-PCR method routinely used in two p

112 nalysis) and virological (SIV(smm) real-time reverse transcription-PCR) methods.

113 ll agreement, respectively, with a validated reverse transcription-PCR nucleic acid amplification tes

114 med infrared microspectroscopy, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR of cell wall biosynthetic gene

115 Inflammation was evaluated by reverse transcription-PCR of proinflammatory cytokines,

116 Brk expression was determined by reverse transcription PCR on RNA extracted from surgical

117 The use of molecular diagnostics, such as reverse transcription PCR or unbiased metagenomic sequen

118 nly miR-155-5p was validated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (P = 0.02).

119 transcript-selective quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (Q-RT-PCR) assays for the ISG5

120 a microarray screen, quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qPCR) confirmed that a histor

121 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qPCR) studies confirmed that

122 Using semiquantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qPCR) and promoter-lux report

123 selected genes were examined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qPCR) to verify microarray re

124 The quantitative reverse transcription PCR (QRT-PCR) proved the uniquenes

125 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to analyze

126 analysis by downstream one-step quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR; SYBR Green chemistry

127 In situ hybridization, PCR, and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses confirm tha

128 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses of the sigE

129 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses revealed th

130 ource and GlpR, consistent with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and enzyme activity

131 toxin L (SElL), as confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunoblotting.

132 ied GFP transgene expression by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemi

133 To date, studies using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and microarrays have

134 speB mRNA level and decay using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and Northern blot an

135 urface antigen, we used var Ups quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and sequencing with

136 ion and assembly, as assayed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and transmission ele

137 developed a multiplex one-step quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) assay for detection

138 A real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) assay using the reco

139 Analysis of RNA by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) confirmed that the b

140 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) data indicate that n

141 of mRNA levels using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) further demonstrated

142 , immunoblotting, and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) measuring csgA expre

143 unt of latency as determined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) of viral DNA in tota

144 expression microarray data and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) showed that the glob

145 Using microarray and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) studies, we found th

146 aryngeal swabs and evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) subsequently confirm

147 ice only infrequently, although quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) tests indicated earl

148 Using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) to further character

149 genome expression profiling and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) to monitor the macro

150 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) validated changes fr

151 s confirmed by PCR, sequencing, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), and functional anal

152 CL13, and CCL19/21, as shown by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), flow cytometry, and

153 ed by BqsR/BqsS, as measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), is PA14_04180, whic

154 hony SP/AS, in conjunction with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), to augment or poten

155 n read counts were validated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

156 se reporter assay and real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

157 ion of miR-203 was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

158 s postinfection was analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

159 ng DNA microarray and real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR); these genes include

160 sPLA2 isoforms was quantified via real-time reverse-transcription PCR (qRT(2)-PCR).

161 Microarray and quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis showed that

162 oductive tract, as confirmed by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemi

163 Results of quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) demonstrated that ex

164 n of p63 mRNA was determined by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR).

165 miR-26a through microarray and quantitative reverse-transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments as an mi

166 ormal tissues were subjected to quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (quantitative RT-PCR) in 3 coh

167 ght polypeptide and microarray and real-time reverse transcription-PCR revealed decreased transcript

168 Analysis by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR revealed that PKC-delta RNA wa

169 Reverse transcription-PCR revealed that SMU.1147 is cotr

170 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR revealed the presence of all f

171 RNA microarray profiling and validation by reverse transcription PCR reveals that the p53-inducible

172 In response, we developed two real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays targeting the

173 aboratory-developed DENV multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) proved more clinical

174 Compared to the real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) reference method, th

175 stic utility of an EV-D68-specific real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) that was recently de

176 Samples were also tested by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) to detect viral RNA.

177 and on day 14 or 35 and tested by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR), IgM capture enzyme-

178 Rinderpest virus (RPV), based on a real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR)system, was developed

179 Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and sequencing reveal

180 has relied on complex, multi-step real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) assays; an accurate s

181 Inclusion criteria were positive Ebola virus reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) test, age >/= 1 y, we

182 Finally, reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR)-based screening for t

183 RNA-seq, expressed sequence tags (EST), and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR).

184 Our results show that quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-QPCR) amplification of PPR

185 The current quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) assay recommended fo

186 previously described multiplex quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) assays.

187 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) is one of the most e

188 Using Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR), we show that CHM mR

189 Subsequent Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses demonstrated

190 DNA microarray and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses identified M

191 DNA sequence and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses now reveal t

192 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis of a select

193 Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis of distal co

194 Subsequent real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis on a panel o

195 Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis showed that

196 Through quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis, we have con

197 In this study, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and fluorescence-acti

198 proteins containing the WxL domain which, by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and genomic analyses,

199 t performance characteristics for SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and highlight the imp

200 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and nuclear run-on as

201 Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and primer extension

202 Both semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and quantitative real

203 Assembly of the sequences and subsequent reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and rapid amplificati

204 Using RACE PCR, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and RNA-seq, we show

205 ommunity (EPIC) study, we compared real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and serology for the

206 Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and Western blotting

207 Moreover, we describe a sensitive nested reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay allowing the ra

208 A reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay of 45 specimens

209 d with viral culture and ProFlu(+) real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay results.

210 A strand-specific reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay showed that pos

211 itrated using the Gen-Probe/Prodesse ProFlu+ reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay.

212 stics of three real-time influenza A/B virus reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays and two real-t

213 respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays for detection

214 Many commercial SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays have received

215 respiratory conditions using virus-specific reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays in addition to

216 In the analytic stage, real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays remain the mol

217 6 weeks of travel were tested with real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays targeting the

218 employed transcriptome sequencing and novel reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays to distinguish

219 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) confirmed the presenc

220 o combine and validate HPeV and EV real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) detection assays with

221 the microarray, the results were verified by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) detection of 5 gastro

222 However, as molecular assays such as reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) have increased the se

223 Traditional reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) identification of kno

224 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) measurements of RNAs

225 We have developed a real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) method specific for g

226 ction influenza A/B virus (FluA/B) multiplex reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) method that amplifies

227 d transcript profiling and limiting-dilution reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) methodologies to expl

228 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) performed on patient

229 Our laboratory currently uses two real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) platforms, the Roche

230 We tested 125 patients who tested reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) positive for SARS-CoV

231 ome more than once, and Sanger sequencing of reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) products indicates th

232 hen mixed with Ag-Path-ID One Step real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) reagents and loaded i

233 KSHV mature microRNA expression by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) revealed differential

234 by intron mutagenesis, and semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) showed that iron repr

235 nin esterase (HE) protein was truncated, and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) studies confirmed pre

236 In the present study, we used reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) targeting viral mRNAs

237 Predeparture serological and viral reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) testing along with re

238 shedding was examined via tissue culture and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) testing of gill mucus

239 6 months old for whom routine CSF EV and PeV reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) testing was performed

240 piratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) testing.

241 We show that both real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) tests reliably quanti

242 l gene expression profiling and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) validation indicated

243 Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was used to screen or

244 etect all known TBPVs, based on conventional reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with degenerate prime

245 We describe the development of a multiplex reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with Luminex microarr

246 amined for the presence of MCMV IE-1 mRNA by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with Southern analysi

247 (5'ppp) RNA in reporter assays, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), and IRF3 phosphoryla

248 dently in a blinded fashion using the SMART, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), antigen (Ag) testing

249 expression in H. pylori J99 by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), demonstrating signif

250 the results were compared to the results of reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), direct fluorescent a

251 viral 757/3139 spliced transcripts by TaqMan reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), localization of infe

252 ptional reporter system and semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), we demonstrated that

253 Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq), reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), Western blot, and se

254 0%), exhibiting a positive response in 24/24 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 ca

255 ed cell sorting flow cytometry and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

256 ated using microarray analysis and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

257 this was confirmed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

258 ssion in miRNA-enriched RNA was validated by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

259 me-linked immunosorbent assays and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

260 y-antigen binding affinities by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

261 genes (GFP and YFP) was also confirmed using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

262 d GII genotypes, were tested by conventional reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)/bidirectional sequenc

263 following genes was measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR): S100A7, IL1B, IL17A,

264 Currently, several quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) assays are being use

265 Using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR), we found that most

266 and in vivo transcription, RNA purification, reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and restriction diges

267 ure was confirmed by PEDV-specific real-time reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR), immunofluorescence a

268 Also, we used quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) to quantify the tran

269 Validation by comparison with quantitative reverse transcription PCR showed a high correlation coef

270 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR showed expression of VMAT1 in

271 Transcriptome analysis and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR showed that the type III secre

272 as verified by subcellular fractionation and reverse transcription-PCR, single-molecule fluorescence

273 s and adenomas were analyzed by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR, single cell RNA sequencing, a

274 and the CDC human influenza virus real-time reverse transcription-PCR swine flu panel (CDC rRT-PCR)

275 cDNAs with an improved PV-specific real-time reverse transcription-PCR system and nucleotide sequence

276 rformed (for example, antigen testing versus reverse transcription-PCR testing or influenza A/B testi

277 (Ct) values provided by multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR testing.

278 re compared to those of laboratory-developed reverse transcription PCR tests for 498 nasopharyngeal s

279 Furthermore, as shown by reverse transcription-PCR, the immortalized human airway

280 on and laboratory tests, typically real-time reverse transcription PCR to detect viral RNA or rapid d

281 nfirmed by protein array and/or quantitative reverse transcription-PCR to be preferentially expressed

282 pment and validation of a triplex real-time, reverse transcription-PCR (triplex rRT-PCR) assay for th

283 lated from the MAN and single-cell real-time reverse transcription PCR used to examine gene expressio

284 This was verified by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR using isoform-specific primers

285 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR validation of the sequencing d

286 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR was used to analyze the mRNA e

287 on CHIKV viral replication and quantitative reverse transcription PCR was used to calculate virus yi

288 anding of the epidemiology of IDV, real-time reverse transcription-PCR was performed on a set of 208

289 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR was used to determine changes

290 independent set of specimens by quantitative reverse transcription PCR, we defined negative-associati

291 pture microdissection coupled with real-time reverse transcription-PCR, we confirmed that co-downregu

292 Using reverse transcription-PCR, we demonstrated that these ce

293 Using reverse transcription-PCR, we documented increased Csf1

294 By chromatin immunoprecipitation and reverse transcription-PCR, we find that the filamentous

295 Using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, we found that the expression

296 Using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR, we show that LvHirz is expres

297 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcription PCR were performed to screen for h

298 s were further characterized by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, Western blot, and flow cytome

299 Reverse transcription-PCR, Western blotting, and immunoh

300 ion of viral RNA using RT-qPCR (quantitative reverse transcription PCR), with many commercial kits no