ライフサイエンスコーパス: reverse transcription-PCR

1 e expression of AP-2 in IHCs was verified by reverse transcription PCR.

2 gene networks were validated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

3 copy number loss detected with quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

4 us T-cell lymphoma stages using quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

5 SDS-PAGE, immunoblot, mass spectrometry and reverse transcription-PCR.

6 urface adhesins, as assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

7 on microscopy and quantified by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

8 en-detection technologies based on real-time reverse transcription-PCR.

9 orsal hippocampal punches using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

10 and ERG status was assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

11 rkA gene transcription by using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

12 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and reverse transcription-PCR.

13 infection by microscopy, flow cytometry, and reverse transcription-PCR.

14 (Ad5) mRNA level as measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

15 23 IFN-induced genes was confirmed by using reverse transcription-PCR.

16 mutants, which was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

17 ramidal neurons as determined by single-cell reverse transcription-PCR.

18 d in MB231 and MCF7 cells using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

19 med with immunocytochemistry and single-cell reverse transcription-PCR.

20 supernatant was quantitated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

21 en of those novel variants for validation by reverse transcription-PCR.

22 levels by >50% as determined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

23 noroviruses by a custom multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR.

24 duced in GFP+ cells as measured by real-time reverse transcription-PCR.

25 and TAp73 observed upon array profiling and reverse transcription-PCR.

26 (ECM) genes was analyzed using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR.

27 ochemical methods and quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR.

28 resulting RNA was found to be amplifiable in reverse-transcription PCR.

29 By quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, all three isoforms of microRN

30 Reverse transcription-PCR also demonstrated tissue and s

31 Microarray and reverse transcription-PCR analyses revealed that gene re

32 Reverse transcription PCR analysis indicated that all ge

33 Interestingly, reverse transcription PCR analysis indicated that the pr

34 cell tumor clinical samples by quantitative reverse transcription PCR analysis revealed that overall

35 ific expression, as revealed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of a large panel of t

36 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR analysis of dissociated green

37 Hedgehog signaling as monitored by real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis of Gli1 mRNA concentr

38 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis of RNA revealed signi

39 Reverse transcription-PCR analysis of selected viral tra

40 Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis of total RNA extracte

41 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed decreased gl

42 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed expression o

43 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed expression o

44 Finally, reverse transcription-PCR analysis showed the presence o

45 Time course quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis suggested that the co

46 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR and immunohistochemical studie

47 dV species D, type 37 (HAdV-D37), we show by reverse transcription PCR and Sanger sequencing that mRN

48 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR and Western blot analysis were

49 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR and anti-DENV IgM enzyme-linke

50 el of which was interrogated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and correlated with cell cultu

51 ption and protein synthesis were detected by reverse transcription-PCR and detection of latency-assoc

52 nd protein levels were measured by real-time reverse transcription-PCR and immunoblot assays.

53 (PCI-1, PCI-13, and PCI-30) was detected by reverse transcription-PCR and immunohistochemistry.

54 TaqMan reverse transcription-PCR and in situ hybridization were

55 r localization with immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-PCR and measured olivocochlear fun

56 NoVs were identified using reverse transcription-PCR and probe hybridization.

57 ochemical studies of MM patient bone marrow, reverse transcription-PCR and protein analysis show that

58 rospinal fluid and identified with real-time reverse transcription-PCR and sequencing, which also yie

59 bs from PRRSV-seropositive pigs by real-time reverse transcription-PCR and sequencing.

60 by a Yersinia 16S rRNA-specific quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and was detected later by the

61 stence of Bop1 intronic RNA was confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR and was increased after E2 tre

62 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and Western analysis confirmed

63 genes as assessed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot analyses.

64 ral expression of chimeric MV-H was shown by reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot.

65 NDLIN-3 was detected in endothelial cells by reverse transcription-PCR and Western blots.

66 were collected and analyzed by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR and histologic and biochemical

67 ustom TALE-TFs and TALENs using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR and Surveyor nuclease, respect

68 sequence of Aspergillus oryzae together with reverse-transcription-PCR and identified a transcribed s

69 In this study, we used immunohistochemistry, reverse transcription PCR, and gene arrays to determine

70 ith luciferase reporter assays, quantitative reverse transcription PCR, and immunoblot analyses.

71 Quantitative proteomics, real time reverse transcription-PCR, and enzyme assays revealed th

72 ion of argonaute and Dicer was determined by reverse transcription-PCR, and expression of protein was

73 We validated transcriptional changes using reverse transcription-PCR, and further immunofluorescenc

74 biofilm growth was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and genetic complementation s

75 es employing virB-lacZ fusions, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and immunoblot analysis showe

76 outine immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, reverse transcription-PCR, and immunoblotting methodolog

77 wide transcriptional profiling, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and microRNA analyses were us

78 up A rotavirus RNA was detected by real-time reverse transcription-PCR, and positive samples were G a

79 , and sigG were examined by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and the corresponding sigmaF,

80 phoretic mobility shift assays, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and transcriptional reporter

81 between expression of 732 genes, measured by reverse-transcription PCR, and clinical outcome in 942 p

82 Angiogenesis reverse transcription-PCR array data show reduced expres

83 We now show using real-time reverse transcription-PCR arrays that adipose tissue of

84 d with effective antitumor immune responses, reverse transcription-PCR arrays were performed using ce

85 Using a quantitative reverse transcription PCR assay specific for all HIV-1 m

86 eveloped a semiautomated real-time multiplex reverse transcription-PCR assay (Seasonal), employing th

87 However, the USDA-validated reverse transcription-PCR assay targeting the fusion gen

88 y identified by the USDA-validated real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay targeting the matrix gen

89 detection of influenza virus using real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay.

90 e marrow chimeras, luminex, and quantitative reverse transcription PCR assays were performed to evalu

91 Chromatin immunoprecipitation-PCR and reverse transcription-PCR assays as well as transgenic s

92 Furthermore, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assays demonstrated that the C

93 Using sensitive, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assays for several latent and

94 say for influenza virus using a quantitative reverse transcription PCR-based endpoint assessment (qPC

95 all EBV genes with a quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR-based array.

96 Using reverse transcription-PCR, bisulfite genomic sequencing,

97 By Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR, both forms were detected in p

98 Reverse transcription-PCR confirmed the downregulation o

99 be expressed in the plantar epidermis using reverse transcription-PCR, consistent with the phenotype

100 In the present study, immunoblotting and reverse transcription-PCR demonstrated expression of IGF

101 Quantitative PCR and single-cell multiplex reverse transcription-PCR demonstrated message for NBCe1

102 Reverse transcription-PCR demonstrated that all three ge

103 Reverse transcription-PCR demonstrated that thrombin mes

104 Reverse transcription PCR detected changes in expression

105 We had recently developed a rapid multiplex reverse transcription-PCR enzyme hybridization assay (Fl

106 Reverse transcription-PCR established that transcription

107 on were observed, complementary results from reverse transcription-PCR experiments and gel-shift and

108 Reverse transcription-PCR experiments revealed the expre

109 A staining, flow cytometry, and quantitative reverse transcription PCR for IL-17A mRNA.

110 re confirmed by using multiplex quantitative reverse transcription-PCR for 16 mRNA targets in an inde

111 ciency of 104.4% and similar sensitivity for reverse-transcription PCR for influenza H3 RNA.

112 te its functionality to perform both PCR and reverse-transcription PCR for lambda phage DNA and H3 in

113 Quantitative single-cell reverse transcription-PCR found lower GlyRalpha1 subunit

114 al records of patients with EVD confirmed by reverse transcription PCR hospitalized in the Conakry ar

115 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, immunoblot analysis, immunost

116 th RFS were further examined by quantitative reverse transcription PCR in 291 lung adenocarcinoma tis

117 e-cell mRNA transcripts by digital, one-step reverse transcription PCR in a simple microfluidic array

118 PAT mRNA was not detected by reverse transcription PCR in dodders.

119 Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR in a site-directed migR mutant

120 g Tmem16f and Tmem16k, were also detected by reverse transcription-PCR in neonatal tracheal epitheliu

121 ression of HOXA genes was investigated using reverse transcription-PCR in primary gliomas and gliobla

122 ption was verified by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR in two mutant lines.

123 Reverse-transcription PCR in addition to liquid chromato

124 ABV-specific Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR indicate that ABV2 is not stri

125 Real-time reverse transcription PCR indicated constitutive upregul

126 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR indicated that both genes are

127 Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR indicated the C-terminal forms

128 ancer, we developed a multiplex quantitative reverse transcription PCR method involving the purificat

129 comparing the results with the quantitative reverse transcription-PCR method routinely used in two p

130 nalysis) and virological (SIV(smm) real-time reverse transcription-PCR) methods.

131 med infrared microspectroscopy, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR of cell wall biosynthetic gene

132 Inflammation was evaluated by reverse transcription-PCR of proinflammatory cytokines,

133 -derived microarray data and by quantitative reverse transcription PCR on both SQCCs and adenocarcino

134 Brk expression was determined by reverse transcription PCR on RNA extracted from surgical

135 nly miR-155-5p was validated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (P = 0.02).

136 transcript-selective quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (Q-RT-PCR) assays for the ISG5

137 a microarray screen, quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qPCR) confirmed that a histor

138 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qPCR) studies confirmed that

139 Using semiquantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qPCR) and promoter-lux report

140 selected genes were examined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qPCR) to verify microarray re

141 The quantitative reverse transcription PCR (QRT-PCR) proved the uniquenes

142 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to analyze

143 analysis by downstream one-step quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR; SYBR Green chemistry

144 In situ hybridization, PCR, and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses confirm tha

145 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses of the sigE

146 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses revealed th

147 ource and GlpR, consistent with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and enzyme activity

148 toxin L (SElL), as confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunoblotting.

149 ied GFP transgene expression by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemi

150 To date, studies using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and microarrays have

151 speB mRNA level and decay using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and Northern blot an

152 urface antigen, we used var Ups quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and sequencing with

153 ion and assembly, as assayed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and transmission ele

154 developed a multiplex one-step quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) assay for detection

155 A real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) assay using the reco

156 Analysis of RNA by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) confirmed that the b

157 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) data indicate that n

158 of mRNA levels using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) further demonstrated

159 , immunoblotting, and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) measuring csgA expre

160 unt of latency as determined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) of viral DNA in tota

161 expression microarray data and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) showed that the glob

162 Using microarray and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) studies, we found th

163 ice only infrequently, although quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) tests indicated earl

164 Using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) to further character

165 genome expression profiling and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) to monitor the macro

166 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) validated changes fr

167 CL13, and CCL19/21, as shown by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), flow cytometry, and

168 ed by BqsR/BqsS, as measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), is PA14_04180, whic

169 hony SP/AS, in conjunction with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), to augment or poten

170 se reporter assay and real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

171 ion of miR-203 was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

172 s postinfection was analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

173 n read counts were validated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

174 ng DNA microarray and real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR); these genes include

175 sPLA2 isoforms was quantified via real-time reverse-transcription PCR (qRT(2)-PCR).

176 Microarray and quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis showed that

177 oductive tract, as confirmed by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemi

178 Results of quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) demonstrated that ex

179 n of p63 mRNA was determined by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR).

180 miR-26a through microarray and quantitative reverse-transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments as an mi

181 ormal tissues were subjected to quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (quantitative RT-PCR) in 3 coh

182 In human breast cancers, reverse transcription-PCR results revealed that Smyd4 ex

183 4 MDS patients disclosed no point mutations, reverse transcription-PCR results suggested that dysregu

184 ght polypeptide and microarray and real-time reverse transcription-PCR revealed decreased transcript

185 Analysis by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR revealed that PKC-delta RNA wa

186 Reverse transcription-PCR revealed that SMU.1147 is cotr

187 Immunohistochemistry and real-time reverse transcription-PCR revealed that WIF-1 was signif

188 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR revealed the presence of all f

189 RNA microarray profiling and validation by reverse transcription PCR reveals that the p53-inducible

190 to develop and evaluate new TaqMan real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays by the use of

191 In response, we developed two real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays targeting the

192 aboratory-developed DENV multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) proved more clinical

193 Compared to the real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) reference method, th

194 stic utility of an EV-D68-specific real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) that was recently de

195 Samples were also tested by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) to detect viral RNA.

196 Rinderpest virus (RPV), based on a real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR)system, was developed

197 has relied on complex, multi-step real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) assays; an accurate s

198 Inclusion criteria were positive Ebola virus reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) test, age >/= 1 y, we

199 Finally, reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR)-based screening for t

200 RNA-seq, expressed sequence tags (EST), and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR).

201 Subsequent Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses demonstrated

202 DNA microarray and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses identified M

203 DNA sequence and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses now reveal t

204 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis of a select

205 Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis of distal co

206 Subsequent real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis on a panel o

207 Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis showed that

208 Through quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis, we have con

209 proteins containing the WxL domain which, by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and genomic analyses,

210 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and nuclear run-on as

211 Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and primer extension

212 Both semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and quantitative real

213 Assembly of the sequences and subsequent reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and rapid amplificati

214 Using RACE PCR, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and RNA-seq, we show

215 ommunity (EPIC) study, we compared real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and serology for the

216 Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and Western blotting

217 Moreover, we describe a sensitive nested reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay allowing the ra

218 A reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay of 45 specimens

219 d with viral culture and ProFlu(+) real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay results.

220 A strand-specific reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay showed that pos

221 A reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay was designed, a

222 itrated using the Gen-Probe/Prodesse ProFlu+ reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay.

223 stics of three real-time influenza A/B virus reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays and two real-t

224 respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays for detection

225 respiratory conditions using virus-specific reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays in addition to

226 6 weeks of travel were tested with real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays targeting the

227 r previously described poliovirus diagnostic reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays to a real-time

228 employed transcriptome sequencing and novel reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays to distinguish

229 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) confirmed the presenc

230 o combine and validate HPeV and EV real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) detection assays with

231 the microarray, the results were verified by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) detection of 5 gastro

232 Microarray and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) experiments revealed

233 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) measurements of RNAs

234 We have developed a real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) method specific for g

235 ction influenza A/B virus (FluA/B) multiplex reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) method that amplifies

236 d transcript profiling and limiting-dilution reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) methodologies to expl

237 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) performed on patient

238 hen mixed with Ag-Path-ID One Step real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) reagents and loaded i

239 KSHV mature microRNA expression by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) revealed differential

240 by intron mutagenesis, and semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) showed that iron repr

241 nin esterase (HE) protein was truncated, and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) studies confirmed pre

242 In the present study, we used reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) targeting viral mRNAs

243 shedding was examined via tissue culture and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) testing of gill mucus

244 We show that both real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) tests reliably quanti

245 l gene expression profiling and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) validation indicated

246 Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was used to screen or

247 etect all known TBPVs, based on conventional reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with degenerate prime

248 We describe the development of a multiplex reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with Luminex microarr

249 amined for the presence of MCMV IE-1 mRNA by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with Southern analysi

250 (5'ppp) RNA in reporter assays, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), and IRF3 phosphoryla

251 dently in a blinded fashion using the SMART, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), antigen (Ag) testing

252 expression in H. pylori J99 by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), demonstrating signif

253 the results were compared to the results of reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), direct fluorescent a

254 Using real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), PAF but not 5-HT(2A)

255 ptional reporter system and semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), we demonstrated that

256 Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq), reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), Western blot, and se

257 ated using microarray analysis and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

258 this was confirmed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

259 genes (GFP and YFP) was also confirmed using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

260 ssion in miRNA-enriched RNA was validated by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

261 me-linked immunosorbent assays and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

262 ed cell sorting flow cytometry and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

263 y-antigen binding affinities by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

264 d GII genotypes, were tested by conventional reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)/bidirectional sequenc

265 following genes was measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR): S100A7, IL1B, IL17A,

266 Using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR), we found that most

267 and in vivo transcription, RNA purification, reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and restriction diges

268 ure was confirmed by PEDV-specific real-time reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR), immunofluorescence a

269 Also, we used quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) to quantify the tran

270 Validation by comparison with quantitative reverse transcription PCR showed a high correlation coef

271 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR showed expression of VMAT1 in

272 Surprisingly, real-time reverse transcription-PCR showed that expression of MG_4

273 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR showed that messenger RNAs for

274 Transcriptome analysis and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR showed that the type III secre

275 Analysis by real-time reverse transcription-PCR shows that an extracellularly

276 as verified by subcellular fractionation and reverse transcription-PCR, single-molecule fluorescence

277 and the CDC human influenza virus real-time reverse transcription-PCR swine flu panel (CDC rRT-PCR)

278 cDNAs with an improved PV-specific real-time reverse transcription-PCR system and nucleotide sequence

279 re compared to those of laboratory-developed reverse transcription PCR tests for 498 nasopharyngeal s

280 Furthermore, as shown by reverse transcription-PCR, the immortalized human airway

281 nfirmed by protein array and/or quantitative reverse transcription-PCR to be preferentially expressed

282 lated from the MAN and single-cell real-time reverse transcription PCR used to examine gene expressio

283 This was verified by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR using isoform-specific primers

284 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR validation of the sequencing d

285 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR was used to analyze the mRNA e

286 on CHIKV viral replication and quantitative reverse transcription PCR was used to calculate virus yi

287 anding of the epidemiology of IDV, real-time reverse transcription-PCR was performed on a set of 208

288 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR was used to determine changes

289 independent set of specimens by quantitative reverse transcription PCR, we defined negative-associati

290 pture microdissection coupled with real-time reverse transcription-PCR, we confirmed that co-downregu

291 immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and reverse transcription-PCR, we demonstrate the location o

292 Using reverse transcription-PCR, we demonstrated that these ce

293 Using reverse transcription-PCR, we documented increased Csf1

294 By chromatin immunoprecipitation and reverse transcription-PCR, we find that the filamentous

295 Using real-time reverse transcription-PCR, we found that stroke substant

296 Using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, we found that the expression

297 Using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR, we show that LvHirz is expres

298 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcription PCR were performed to screen for h

299 s were further characterized by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, Western blot, and flow cytome

300 Reverse transcription-PCR, Western blotting, and immunoh