ライフサイエンスコーパス: reverse transcription-PCR

1 A reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay of 45 specimens

2 A reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay was designed, a

3 RNA-seq, expressed sequence tags (EST), and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR).

4 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcription PCR were performed to screen for h

5 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and reverse transcription-PCR.

6 Subsequent Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses demonstrated

7 ABV-specific Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR indicate that ABV2 is not stri

8 Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR indicated the C-terminal forms

9 By Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR, both forms were detected in p

10 immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and reverse transcription-PCR, we demonstrate the location o

11 shedding was examined via tissue culture and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) testing of gill mucus

12 infection by microscopy, flow cytometry, and reverse transcription-PCR.

13 as verified by subcellular fractionation and reverse transcription-PCR, single-molecule fluorescence

14 In the present study, immunoblotting and reverse transcription-PCR demonstrated expression of IGF

15 r localization with immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-PCR and measured olivocochlear fun

16 By chromatin immunoprecipitation and reverse transcription-PCR, we find that the filamentous

17 Microarray and reverse transcription-PCR analyses revealed that gene re

18 Chromatin immunoprecipitation-PCR and reverse transcription-PCR assays as well as transgenic s

19 and TAp73 observed upon array profiling and reverse transcription-PCR.

20 DNA sequence and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses now reveal t

21 SDS-PAGE, immunoblot, mass spectrometry and reverse transcription-PCR.

22 nin esterase (HE) protein was truncated, and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) studies confirmed pre

23 te its functionality to perform both PCR and reverse-transcription PCR for lambda phage DNA and H3 in

24 Angiogenesis reverse transcription-PCR array data show reduced expres

25 al records of patients with EVD confirmed by reverse transcription PCR hospitalized in the Conakry ar

26 PAT mRNA was not detected by reverse transcription PCR in dodders.

27 Brk expression was determined by reverse transcription PCR on RNA extracted from surgical

28 dV species D, type 37 (HAdV-D37), we show by reverse transcription PCR and Sanger sequencing that mRN

29 RNA microarray profiling and validation by reverse transcription PCR reveals that the p53-inducible

30 e expression of AP-2 in IHCs was verified by reverse transcription PCR.

31 NDLIN-3 was detected in endothelial cells by reverse transcription-PCR and Western blots.

32 e only PAR subtype detected in A549 cells by reverse transcription-PCR.

33 stence of Bop1 intronic RNA was confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR and was increased after E2 tre

34 ption and protein synthesis were detected by reverse transcription-PCR and detection of latency-assoc

35 (PCI-1, PCI-13, and PCI-30) was detected by reverse transcription-PCR and immunohistochemistry.

36 g Tmem16f and Tmem16k, were also detected by reverse transcription-PCR in neonatal tracheal epitheliu

37 ion of argonaute and Dicer was determined by reverse transcription-PCR, and expression of protein was

38 Inflammation was evaluated by reverse transcription-PCR of proinflammatory cytokines,

39 amined for the presence of MCMV IE-1 mRNA by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with Southern analysi

40 ral expression of chimeric MV-H was shown by reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot.

41 Furthermore, as shown by reverse transcription-PCR, the immortalized human airway

42 ssion in miRNA-enriched RNA was validated by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

43 en of those novel variants for validation by reverse transcription-PCR.

44 the microarray, the results were verified by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) detection of 5 gastro

45 proteins containing the WxL domain which, by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and genomic analyses,

46 between expression of 732 genes, measured by reverse-transcription PCR, and clinical outcome in 942 p

47 In human breast cancers, reverse transcription-PCR results revealed that Smyd4 ex

48 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR analysis of dissociated green

49 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed expression o

50 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed expression o

51 Quantitative single-cell reverse transcription-PCR found lower GlyRalpha1 subunit

52 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR showed expression of VMAT1 in

53 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR showed that messenger RNAs for

54 ramidal neurons as determined by single-cell reverse transcription-PCR.

55 med with immunocytochemistry and single-cell reverse transcription-PCR.

56 d GII genotypes, were tested by conventional reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)/bidirectional sequenc

57 etect all known TBPVs, based on conventional reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with degenerate prime

58 outine immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, reverse transcription-PCR, and immunoblotting methodolog

59 re compared to those of laboratory-developed reverse transcription PCR tests for 498 nasopharyngeal s

60 r previously described poliovirus diagnostic reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays to a real-time

61 d transcript profiling and limiting-dilution reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) methodologies to expl

62 Finally, reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR)-based screening for t

63 Finally, reverse transcription-PCR analysis showed the presence o

64 ciency of 104.4% and similar sensitivity for reverse-transcription PCR for influenza H3 RNA.

65 on were observed, complementary results from reverse transcription-PCR experiments and gel-shift and

66 In this study, we used immunohistochemistry, reverse transcription PCR, and gene arrays to determine

67 resulting RNA was found to be amplifiable in reverse-transcription PCR.

68 Interestingly, reverse transcription PCR analysis indicated that the pr

69 ochemical studies of MM patient bone marrow, reverse transcription-PCR and protein analysis show that

70 We describe the development of a multiplex reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with Luminex microarr

71 ction influenza A/B virus (FluA/B) multiplex reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) method that amplifies

72 Quantitative PCR and single-cell multiplex reverse transcription-PCR demonstrated message for NBCe1

73 We had recently developed a rapid multiplex reverse transcription-PCR enzyme hybridization assay (Fl

74 eveloped a semiautomated real-time multiplex reverse transcription-PCR assay (Seasonal), employing th

75 We developed a multisegment reverse transcription-PCR (M-RTPCR) approach that simult

76 4 MDS patients disclosed no point mutations, reverse transcription-PCR results suggested that dysregu

77 Moreover, we describe a sensitive nested reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay allowing the ra

78 employed transcriptome sequencing and novel reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays to distinguish

79 the results were compared to the results of reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), direct fluorescent a

80 Using RACE PCR, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and RNA-seq, we show

81 itrated using the Gen-Probe/Prodesse ProFlu+ reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay.

82 and in vivo transcription, RNA purification, reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and restriction diges

83 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qPCR) studies confirmed that

84 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to analyze

85 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR and immunohistochemical studie

86 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR and Western blot analysis were

87 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR was used to analyze the mRNA e

88 Using a quantitative reverse transcription PCR assay specific for all HIV-1 m

89 say for influenza virus using a quantitative reverse transcription PCR-based endpoint assessment (qPC

90 e marrow chimeras, luminex, and quantitative reverse transcription PCR assays were performed to evalu

91 A staining, flow cytometry, and quantitative reverse transcription PCR for IL-17A mRNA.

92 on CHIKV viral replication and quantitative reverse transcription PCR was used to calculate virus yi

93 ith luciferase reporter assays, quantitative reverse transcription PCR, and immunoblot analyses.

94 cell tumor clinical samples by quantitative reverse transcription PCR analysis revealed that overall

95 th RFS were further examined by quantitative reverse transcription PCR in 291 lung adenocarcinoma tis

96 -derived microarray data and by quantitative reverse transcription PCR on both SQCCs and adenocarcino

97 independent set of specimens by quantitative reverse transcription PCR, we defined negative-associati

98 of all three genes, measured by quantitative reverse transcription PCR, were shown to be most abundan

99 gene networks were validated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

100 ancer, we developed a multiplex quantitative reverse transcription PCR method involving the purificat

101 analysis by downstream one-step quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR; SYBR Green chemistry

102 The quantitative reverse transcription PCR (QRT-PCR) proved the uniquenes

103 us T-cell lymphoma stages using quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

104 Validation by comparison with quantitative reverse transcription PCR showed a high correlation coef

105 copy number loss detected with quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

106 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses of the sigE

107 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses revealed th

108 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) data indicate that n

109 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) validated changes fr

110 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis of a select

111 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and nuclear run-on as

112 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) confirmed the presenc

113 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) measurements of RNAs

114 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) performed on patient

115 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of p53-knockdown CHRF

116 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed an approxima

117 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed decreased gl

118 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed higher level

119 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and Western analysis confirmed

120 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR revealed the presence of all f

121 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR validation of the sequencing d

122 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, immunoblot analysis, immunost

123 ice only infrequently, although quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) tests indicated earl

124 In situ hybridization, PCR, and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses confirm tha

125 expression microarray data and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) showed that the glob

126 Using microarray and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) studies, we found th

127 genome expression profiling and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) to monitor the macro

128 Microarray and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) experiments revealed

129 l gene expression profiling and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) validation indicated

130 Microarray and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis indicated that repres

131 Transcriptome analysis and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR showed that the type III secre

132 (5'ppp) RNA in reporter assays, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), and IRF3 phosphoryla

133 phoretic mobility shift assays, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and transcriptional reporter

134 nly miR-155-5p was validated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (P = 0.02).

135 selected genes were examined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qPCR) to verify microarray re

136 toxin L (SElL), as confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunoblotting.

137 ied GFP transgene expression by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemi

138 ion and assembly, as assayed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and transmission ele

139 unt of latency as determined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) of viral DNA in tota

140 CL13, and CCL19/21, as shown by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), flow cytometry, and

141 ed by BqsR/BqsS, as measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), is PA14_04180, whic

142 ion of miR-203 was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

143 s postinfection was analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

144 n read counts were validated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

145 expression in H. pylori J99 by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), demonstrating signif

146 y-antigen binding affinities by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

147 following genes was measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR): S100A7, IL1B, IL17A,

148 ific expression, as revealed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of a large panel of t

149 el of which was interrogated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and correlated with cell cultu

150 of MMP2 and MMP9, as assayed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and zymography.

151 Analysis by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR revealed that PKC-delta RNA wa

152 By quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, all three isoforms of microRN

153 biofilm growth was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and genetic complementation s

154 s were further characterized by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, Western blot, and flow cytome

155 urface adhesins, as assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

156 on microscopy and quantified by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

157 and ERG status was assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

158 (Ad5) mRNA level as measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

159 mutants, which was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

160 levels by >50% as determined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

161 supernatant was quantitated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

162 Time course quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis suggested that the co

163 Furthermore, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assays demonstrated that the C

164 es employing virB-lacZ fusions, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and immunoblot analysis showe

165 m digested sputum and tested in quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assays for several gene target

166 med infrared microspectroscopy, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR of cell wall biosynthetic gene

167 Moreover, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed elevated miR

168 re confirmed by using multiplex quantitative reverse transcription-PCR for 16 mRNA targets in an inde

169 nfirmed by protein array and/or quantitative reverse transcription-PCR to be preferentially expressed

170 wide transcriptional profiling, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and microRNA analyses were us

171 Using sensitive, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assays for several latent and

172 by a Yersinia 16S rRNA-specific quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and was detected later by the

173 developed a multiplex one-step quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) assay for detection

174 comparing the results with the quantitative reverse transcription-PCR method routinely used in two p

175 Through quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis, we have con

176 A real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) assay using the reco

177 of mRNA levels using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) further demonstrated

178 se reporter assay and real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

179 ng DNA microarray and real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR); these genes include

180 Independent real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR experiments confirmed 27 of th

181 ames was performed by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

182 MB-435 as measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

183 urface antigen, we used var Ups quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and sequencing with

184 To date, studies using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and microarrays have

185 speB mRNA level and decay using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and Northern blot an

186 Using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) to further character

187 Using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR), we found that most

188 Using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, we found that the expression

189 orsal hippocampal punches using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

190 rkA gene transcription by using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

191 d in MB231 and MCF7 cells using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

192 ource and GlpR, consistent with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and enzyme activity

193 hony SP/AS, in conjunction with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), to augment or poten

194 oductive tract, as confirmed by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemi

195 n of p63 mRNA was determined by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR).

196 were collected and analyzed by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR and histologic and biochemical

197 This was verified by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR using isoform-specific primers

198 Results of quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) demonstrated that ex

199 ormal tissues were subjected to quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (quantitative RT-PCR) in 3 coh

200 Also, we used quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) to quantify the tran

201 ustom TALE-TFs and TALENs using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR and Surveyor nuclease, respect

202 Using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR, we show that LvHirz is expres

203 (ECM) genes was analyzed using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR.

204 miR-26a through microarray and quantitative reverse-transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments as an mi

205 d with effective antitumor immune responses, reverse transcription-PCR arrays were performed using ce

206 by intron mutagenesis, and semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) showed that iron repr

207 ptional reporter system and semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), we demonstrated that

208 Both semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and quantitative real

209 , and sigG were examined by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and the corresponding sigmaF,

210 Using semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis, we observed that, un

211 Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq), reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), Western blot, and se

212 dently in a blinded fashion using the SMART, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), antigen (Ag) testing

213 A strand-specific reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay showed that pos

214 respiratory conditions using virus-specific reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays in addition to

215 e-cell mRNA transcripts by digital, one-step reverse transcription PCR in a simple microfluidic array

216 Assembly of the sequences and subsequent reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and rapid amplificati

217 TaqMan reverse transcription-PCR and in situ hybridization were

218 a microarray screen, quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qPCR) confirmed that a histor

219 has relied on complex, multi-step real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) assays; an accurate s

220 Real-time reverse transcription PCR indicated constitutive upregul

221 lated from the MAN and single-cell real-time reverse transcription PCR used to examine gene expressio

222 Quantitative proteomics, real time reverse transcription-PCR, and enzyme assays revealed th

223 transcript-selective quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (Q-RT-PCR) assays for the ISG5

224 Using semiquantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qPCR) and promoter-lux report

225 Analysis of RNA by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) confirmed that the b

226 , immunoblotting, and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) measuring csgA expre

227 to develop and evaluate new TaqMan real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays by the use of

228 In response, we developed two real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays targeting the

229 aboratory-developed DENV multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) proved more clinical

230 Compared to the real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) reference method, th

231 stic utility of an EV-D68-specific real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) that was recently de

232 Samples were also tested by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) to detect viral RNA.

233 Rinderpest virus (RPV), based on a real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR)system, was developed

234 DNA microarray and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses identified M

235 Subsequent real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis on a panel o

236 ommunity (EPIC) study, we compared real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and serology for the

237 d with viral culture and ProFlu(+) real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay results.

238 respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays for detection

239 6 weeks of travel were tested with real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays targeting the

240 o combine and validate HPeV and EV real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) detection assays with

241 We have developed a real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) method specific for g

242 hen mixed with Ag-Path-ID One Step real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) reagents and loaded i

243 KSHV mature microRNA expression by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) revealed differential

244 We show that both real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) tests reliably quanti

245 Using real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), PAF but not 5-HT(2A)

246 this was confirmed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

247 me-linked immunosorbent assays and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

248 ed cell sorting flow cytometry and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

249 ated using microarray analysis and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

250 Hedgehog signaling as monitored by real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis of Gli1 mRNA concentr

251 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis of RNA revealed signi

252 Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis of total RNA extracte

253 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR and anti-DENV IgM enzyme-linke

254 nd protein levels were measured by real-time reverse transcription-PCR and immunoblot assays.

255 rospinal fluid and identified with real-time reverse transcription-PCR and sequencing, which also yie

256 bs from PRRSV-seropositive pigs by real-time reverse transcription-PCR and sequencing.

257 genes as assessed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot analyses.

258 ce molecules were determined using real-time reverse transcription-PCR array.

259 We now show using real-time reverse transcription-PCR arrays that adipose tissue of

260 y identified by the USDA-validated real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay targeting the matrix gen

261 detection of influenza virus using real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay.

262 Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR in a site-directed migR mutant

263 ption was verified by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR in two mutant lines.

264 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR indicated that both genes are

265 ght polypeptide and microarray and real-time reverse transcription-PCR revealed decreased transcript

266 Immunohistochemistry and real-time reverse transcription-PCR revealed that WIF-1 was signif

267 Surprisingly, real-time reverse transcription-PCR showed that expression of MG_4

268 Analysis by real-time reverse transcription-PCR shows that an extracellularly

269 and the CDC human influenza virus real-time reverse transcription-PCR swine flu panel (CDC rRT-PCR)

270 cDNAs with an improved PV-specific real-time reverse transcription-PCR system and nucleotide sequence

271 anding of the epidemiology of IDV, real-time reverse transcription-PCR was performed on a set of 208

272 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR was used to determine changes

273 nalysis) and virological (SIV(smm) real-time reverse transcription-PCR) methods.

274 up A rotavirus RNA was detected by real-time reverse transcription-PCR, and positive samples were G a

275 pture microdissection coupled with real-time reverse transcription-PCR, we confirmed that co-downregu

276 Using real-time reverse transcription-PCR, we found that stroke substant

277 all EBV genes with a quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR-based array.

278 en-detection technologies based on real-time reverse transcription-PCR.

279 noroviruses by a custom multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR.

280 duced in GFP+ cells as measured by real-time reverse transcription-PCR.

281 lation of IFNbeta was confirmed by real-time reverse transcription-PCR.

282 sPLA2 isoforms was quantified via real-time reverse-transcription PCR (qRT(2)-PCR).

283 Microarray and quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis showed that

284 ure was confirmed by PEDV-specific real-time reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR), immunofluorescence a

285 A prototype, real-time reverse-transcription PCR assay, based on MultiCode-RTx

286 ochemical methods and quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR.

287 In the present study, we used reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) targeting viral mRNAs

288 Using reverse transcription-PCR, bisulfite genomic sequencing,

289 Using reverse transcription-PCR, we demonstrated that these ce

290 Using reverse transcription-PCR, we documented increased Csf1

291 23 IFN-induced genes was confirmed by using reverse transcription-PCR.

292 We validated transcriptional changes using reverse transcription-PCR, and further immunofluorescenc

293 genes (GFP and YFP) was also confirmed using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

294 be expressed in the plantar epidermis using reverse transcription-PCR, consistent with the phenotype

295 NoVs were identified using reverse transcription-PCR and probe hybridization.

296 ression of HOXA genes was investigated using reverse transcription-PCR in primary gliomas and gliobla

297 However, the USDA-validated reverse transcription-PCR assay targeting the fusion gen

298 Inclusion criteria were positive Ebola virus reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) test, age >/= 1 y, we

299 stics of three real-time influenza A/B virus reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays and two real-t

300 sequence of Aspergillus oryzae together with reverse-transcription-PCR and identified a transcribed s