コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 l electrophoresis, and RT-qPCR (quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction).
2 nvestigated by conventional and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
3 bined, and tested for influenza by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
4 with urinary tract infection using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
5 ein 1 (MCP-1) expression were assessed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
6 of infants with HPeV infection confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
7 ackflux transporter Mrp4, as determined with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
8 T1, PHOX2B, CCND1, and ISL1) by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
9 ence of transcriptional activity measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
10 Stool was tested for norovirus by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
11 es was measured using real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
12 sed by commercial miR array and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
13 V and other respiratory viruses by multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
14 entiation markers were assessed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
15 ve loci databases and validated by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
16 ut not TRPM8 was detected in odontoblasts by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
17 RA fusion transcripts were still detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
18 ometry, immunofluorescence, and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
19 6-O kidney cells in culture as determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
20 nit I (Cox-1) was determined by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
21 illness and tested each for influenza using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
22 sted for 11 respiratory viruses by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
23 ence in situ hybridization, and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
24 collected and analyzed histologically and by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
25 Nicaragua were tested for DENV by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
26 and 234 human immune genes via quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
27 hroat swab was tested for influenza virus by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
28 RNAs (mRNAs) were evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
29 n matched rat plasma samples by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
30 m development was determined by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
31 d medium were found in transcriptomes and by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
32 enes in mouse CLL was confirmed by real time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
33 ession levels were estimated by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
34 a denticola (Td), and Escherichia coli using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
35 NA transcripts were detected by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
36 and tested for influenza virus by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
37 anin, and LYVE-1 by quantitative (real-time) reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
38 patterns verified by quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
39 s of RNAs in adipose tissues by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
40 and by immunohistochemistry and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
41 10 individuals per group) was analyzed using reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
42 8 expression were assessed by zymography and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
43 al swabs for viral detection using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
44 enterocytes were measured using quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
45 immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
46 1 expression was assessed using quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
47 ecimens were tested for RSV, using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
48 nza respiratory viral infection by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
49 swab specimens for RSV testing by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
50 ion of ompA was determined with quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
51 zed with CAP were tested for RV by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
52 Stool samples were tested for norovirus by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
53 year were quantified using duplex real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
54 ed and analyzed via quantitative (real-time) reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
55 ted negative for Ebola virus by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
56 tory viruses were identified by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
57 Using Roche 454 sequencing of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction amplicon
58 transcriptional, mutational and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses
59 ied by immunohistochemistry, immunoblot, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses
60 We performed reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses
61 unofluorescence, histology, and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses
62 Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses
63 Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis
64 Messenger RNA was analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis
65 Whole-exome sequencing, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis
66 Transcriptome and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis
67 ytokine production by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis
68 lts were confirmed by real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis
69 ration, RNA extraction, and amplification by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis
70 Additionally, quantitative (real-time) reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis
71 y positive results of WNV-specific real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis
72 and HRTV was detected in premortem blood by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and by i
74 efensins and other molecules by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and flow
75 ession of CCL21 was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and immu
76 argets of miRs were analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and immu
78 ured in tissues from mice using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and in s
79 rize transcription at this locus by coupling reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and long
80 pression of TRP channels was determined with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and rati
81 oscopy, and transcriptional profiling (using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and RNA-
85 techniques such as microarrays, NanoString, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and adva
86 AGL15 by using a combination of quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and chro
87 ollowed in the current study by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and conf
88 X enables applications such as single-enzyme reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and dire
91 tency of iPSCs was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and immu
92 ative genes were verified using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Nano
95 cytokines and chemokines using quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and enzy
96 man patients were quantified by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and enzy
97 specific M1 and M2 markers were measured by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and expr
98 were collected and analyzed by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and immu
99 ected and immunohistochemical, quantitative, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and immu
100 nts for miR-204 downregulation (quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) and the
101 urified and characterized by flow cytometry, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and ado
102 istologic, immunohistochemical, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and flo
103 Drosophila melanogaster by deep sequencing, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and Nor
104 accuracy of techniques such as microarrays, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and who
105 tions was validated using DNA-blot analysis, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and GUS
106 otyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and tar
107 and analyzed by immunoblotting, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and cel
108 were quantified by flow cytometry, real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and enz
110 We used immunohistochemistry, real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and flu
111 istology, immunohistochemistry, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and imm
112 were measured by flow cytometry, immunoblot, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and mic
113 ar mRNA expression of IL-6 was determined by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and the
114 ents and contacts were tested with real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and vir
115 helial growth factor receptors 1 and 2 using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; and wit
116 sis of MM cells using quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction arrays f
117 and throat swabs for EV-D68 using real-time reverse- transcription polymerase chain reaction assay.
121 allow the released RNAs to be quantified in reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction assays.
123 arget 1 and major groove binder quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assays,
124 appeared relatively modest, and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction associat
125 which was identified by Ebola virus-specific reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction-based te
126 of PDGFB were identified using quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, biochem
127 that compared the odds of vaccination among reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-confirme
128 ally diagnosed influenza infection (SDI) and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction-confirme
129 convalescent phase serum/plasma samples from reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction-confirme
130 alidated for PSMA expression-by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, flow cy
131 analyzed by immunofluorescence, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, flow cy
132 miRNA microarray analysis, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, fluores
133 , and the presence of LRV1 was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, followe
134 ntigen-binding B lymphocytes and single-cell reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction followed
135 stored plasma/serum samples by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for RSV
136 through prospective strain surveillance with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for 3 ye
137 s study reports the routine use of real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction for the
138 ness were tested using a multiplex real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction for ZIKV
139 ical features, the need to rely on real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction from res
140 icing ratios from RNA-seq by high resolution reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (HR RT-P
141 alpha [TNF-alpha], and IL-6) by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, IL-6 im
142 orters were characterized using quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunob
143 ) and proteins were analyzed by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunob
144 iology, isometric contractility measurement, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunob
145 We used quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunof
146 We performed quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunof
147 Real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, immunof
148 ) mice (controls) and analyzed by histology, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunoh
149 in skin lesion was confirmed by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunoh
150 ND4C, as well as the downregulated cTHSD1 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in cultu
151 cted and viral load quantitated by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in C cas
153 r detection of common respiratory viruses by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in hospi
154 nes were validated by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in PBMCs
155 ls were determined by real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction in 33 co
157 The virus was detected and quantified by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction in seque
158 erculosis gene expression was quantified via reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction in seria
159 ases were influenza infections (confirmed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction) in adul
160 enous molecular clock system by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction is depen
161 the bacterial numbers were evaluated by the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction method.
163 ns were tested using real-time and multiplex reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction methods
164 The median time of reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction negativi
165 ous viral and bacterial samples using Nested-Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (nRT-PCR
167 ene2, a splice prediction program and by the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of illeg
169 munostaining, plaque assay, and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of ZIKV
170 d decreased miR-126 expression (quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; P<0.01)
171 nd mRNA levels were measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
172 amined for malaria parasites by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
173 ixed, paraffin-embedded tissue and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction performe
174 Influenza pneumonia, confirmed by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction performe
175 Using a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction platform
176 were collected and analyzed in angiogenesis, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, polyA t
177 Using high-throughput quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction profilin
178 arteries were examined for gene expression (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction), protei
179 emistry, in situ hybridization, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qPCR),
180 and results were validated with quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
181 her relevant techniques such as quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
182 erase chain reaction (qPCR) and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
184 Targeted gene expression using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
185 sed whole-genome microarray and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
187 ng analysis on 10 samples and a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
188 titis (H), using microarray and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
190 e microarray studies, real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
191 s, and the time to diagnosis by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
192 inflammatory transcripts using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR
193 elopment and qualification of a quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
194 able by existing methods, e.g., quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
195 hmark miRNA-quantitation method-quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
196 s diagnostics rely primarily on quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
197 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
198 Gene expression was analyzed by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
199 entiation were characterized by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
200 study, we developed a real-time quantitative reverse-transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR
201 periments followed by real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction(qRT-PCR)
202 6 on) and correlated highly positively with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction quantifi
203 were tested by immunoassay and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, respect
204 examined by immunoblotting and the real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, respect
206 ivity compared to serum anti-HCV and HCV RNA reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction results.
207 of ribosomal RNA species using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction revealed
208 Deep sequencing and real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction revealed
210 I 12, his serum tested positive by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR
211 were retrospectively confirmed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR
212 re tested for influenza A virus by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR
213 tested and compared to results of real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR
214 alth department laboratories can perform the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
215 Up to 481 samples were received per day for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
217 munohistochemistry, histology, and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
218 om overexpression lines used high-resolution reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
219 analyzed by Western blotting and TTN gene by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
220 ir serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
221 in blood from Q fever patients by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
222 erred from the cycle threshold (Ct) value of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
223 tly labeled DNA and parallel purification of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
224 NA expression was determined by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
226 mine the diagnostic performance of real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
227 were assessed by semiquantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR
229 f acute or recent Marburg virus infection by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
230 s detected in stool by enzyme immunoassay or reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
231 from a 50 muL whole blood input to allow for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
232 We used transcriptome analysis and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
233 in the tissues and in HGFs were analyzed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
234 pression of PRRs was determined by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
235 re, antigen-detection testing, and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
237 malaria, using the RealStar Filovirus Screen reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
239 unoglobulin M (IgM) testing was negative and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
240 variable region-1 was amplified using nested reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
241 firmed some of these changes using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
243 ing rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
244 Virus etiology was determined by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
246 istochemistry, hydroxyproline determination, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
247 analyzed in biopsy specimens by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
248 ctiva and pterygia samples were subjected to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
249 h (Carassius auratus) neural tissue and used reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
250 se retina of wildtype and Panx1-null mice by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
252 opharyngeal washes for testing by singleplex reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
253 respiratory virus targets using a multiplex reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
254 Recent ZIKV infection was confirmed by urine reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
255 of microscopy, immunofluorescence, real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
258 iruses, molecular detection methods, such as reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
259 y conventional SYBR green-based quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR
260 llenged as inpatients with GII.4 virus (4400 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR]
262 pancreatic tumor cell lines and analyzed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, sequenc
263 ration sequencing and quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction showed r
264 pression profiling by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction showed t
265 ells were analyzed by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, single-
266 esh, dissociated myocardium for quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction studies.
267 Furthermore, RNA in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction studies
268 was detected in a plasma sample by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing
270 g technique for RNA isolation and subsequent reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, the exp
272 anti-HCV test to screen, followed by HCV RNA reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction to confi
274 man infectious dose was calculated to be 3.3 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction units (a
275 p UltraSens Virus kit, followed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction using a
276 lated and used as a template in quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions using M
277 hythmic genes were confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using mo
278 Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction validate
280 Gene expression analysis by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was comp
281 erimental time, animals were sacrificed, and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was perf
283 oic acid, MS-275, or siRNA, and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was perf
284 induce MMP-13 mRNA expression, and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was perf
286 he c.5461-10T-->C variant on RNA splicing by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction was anal
290 s Kcnip2 and Kcnd2, assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, was hig
292 stology, immunohistochemistry, and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were per
293 y experiments and semiquantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were per
294 Fluorescence microscopy and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions were us
295 n and localisation of KCa3.1 was analysed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, Western
296 -) and CFBE41o(-) cells were evaluated using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, Western
297 chromatin immunoprecipitation, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, western
298 tivity were assessed by histology, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, Western
299 from stool and serum samples by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) with se
300 ated among 100 influenza cases (confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) with th
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。