ライフサイエンスコーパス: revision

1 elephant evolution is in need of substantial revision.

2 -tetrahydropyran[3,2-b]pyran-2-one} requires revision.

3 erlying causes of death utilizing the ICD-11 revision.

4 f early galaxy assembly requires substantial revision.

5 ural mechanism behind WM are currently under revision.

6 assification of Diseases for Oncology, third revision.

7 cations of allergic disorders for the ICD-11 revision.

8 sulting in expedient structure validation or revision.

9 reactivity, suggestive of excessive receptor revision.

10 of all indigenous populations, is in need of revision.

11 den estimates in India and worldwide require revision.

12 cal community was incorporated into the 2016 revision.

13 Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision.

14 ternational Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.

15 systematic process for model evaluation and revision.

16 patients with MTC and to suggest a possible revision.

17 Visual acuity remained unchanged following revision.

18 perative resection, such as stoma closure or revision.

19 of signals of exclusion require significant revision.

20 of current theories of motor coding requires revision.

21 erations were pacemaker placement and Fontan revision.

22 d the 2010 McDonald criteria and recommended revisions.

23 ISIC members through 2 rounds of scoring and revisions.

24 tion prior to completion of formal taxonomic revisions.

25 xperience followed by 2 rounds of rating and revisions.

26 ing to confusing or conflicting requests for revisions.

27 from the larger clinical community informed revisions.

28 in patients who had maculopathy (7.6 vs. 1.9 revisions/100 person-years; for maculopathy versus no ma

29 lation (34%), stress testing (16%), and lead revision (11%).

30 International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision 360.0x) and a "tap-and-inject" procedure (Curre

31 An arterial thrombus required urgent revision 8 h after the operation.

32 sions with the representatives of the ICD-11 revision, a face-to-face meeting was held at the United

33 into the importance of young age and risk of revision after total hip or knee replacement.

34 is transparent as advised in the WHO ICD-11 revision agenda, we report the advances and use of the p

35 Samet (1994-2008) oversaw a major curriculum revision and expanded the Department significantly, and

36 are provided to principle investigators for revision and publication.

37 ses the recommendations with minor suggested revisions and highlights three areas that warrant furthe

38 Neuromodulation device revisions and removals occurred in 3%.

39 Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision) and drug prescriptions (categorized according

40 mortality, device-related infection, device revision, and lead extraction at 1 and 5 years for the e

41 y and its potential contribution to taxonomy revision are described, particularly within the context

42 ulation based lifetime-risk data for implant revision are not available to aid patient decision makin

43 More than 25% of revisions are attributed to these infections, which are

44 included 499 consecutive patients undergoing revision arthroplasty from whom 1,437 periprosthetic tis

45 eal shunt placement, with a subsequent shunt revision at age 6 years.

46 r after surgery elsewhere followed by repair/revision at LPCHS (n=142).

47 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision-based injury severity score, and ICU admission

48 concepts in population biology will require revision because of reliance on approaches that do not a

49 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, billing codes from the calendar year 2003-2012

50 ernational Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, C22) were obtained from 30 countries for 1993-

51 of 2813; 30%) were the most frequent type of revision, changes involving device design (n = 667; 24%)

52 nternational Classification of Diseases 10th revision chapter of the primary diagnosis at admission.

53 The revision clarifies the diagnosis and management of lesio

54 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 428 disc

55 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code of "360.

56 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes, and st

57 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes.

58 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis cod

59 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] code 007.1) f

60 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] code 377.41).

61 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification billing codes were used

62 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 368.2).

63 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code and associated risk

64 ational of Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code.

65 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 299.0, 299.8, or 2

66 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 402.x1, 404.x1, 40

67 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for each hospitali

68 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for severe sepsis

69 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes for severe sepsis/

70 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes or positive influe

71 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify the in

72 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to condu

73 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes) were matched 1:1

74 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes.

75 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes.

76 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis and procedural

77 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for SSI

78 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes indicati

79 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes.

80 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis of "362.16: Re

81 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis of septicemia

82 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification discharge diagnosis code

83 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification firearm-related cause-of

84 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes.

85 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes.

86 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes.

87 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification).

88 tatistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification).

89 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification, 747.0) and respiratory

90 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes from emergency de

91 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, cohort and externally v

92 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, were used to identify p

93 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification.

94 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification.

95 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification.

96 ternationalClassification of Diseases, Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification codes to identify patient

97 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification diagnosis codes.

98 ternational Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-CM codes 35.05 and 35.06) between January and N

99 Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code 121]) between the enrollment date and Dece

100 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 427.31 and confirmed by linkage to medical

101 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 431 from June 1, 2000, to August 31, 2014,

102 ternational Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision code of 745 to 747 from the State Inpatient Dat

103 Diseases and Health Related Problems, Tenth Revision, code F42) in the Swedish National Patient Regi

104 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code search and medical record review.

105 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, coded diagnosis of primary AID who were seen a

106 International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision codes 428.x via linkage with Centers for Medica

107 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and clinical data, the sensitivity and sp

108 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and clinical data.

109 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th revision codes and use by prescription medication fills,

110 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes available in the Premier Healthcare Datab

111 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes for ASCVD on 2 or more different dates in

112 ternational Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision codes for each year of follow-up.

113 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes using the Angus method.

114 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were obtained on patients undergoing cole

115 ternational Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision codes, body mass index, history of diabetes mel

116 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes, partially mediated the PD-TBI associatio

117 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th revision codes, using a validated algorithm.

118 ternational Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision codes, we identified 11 888 525 adult (>/=18 ye

119 onal Classification of Disease, 9th and 10th Revision codes, who were assessed between the years 1991

120 ional Classification of Diseases 9th or 10th Revision codes.

121 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes; and drug prescriptions as per National D

122 f Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, codes F00-F99), including schizophrenia-spectr

123 ernational Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes in quarterly intervals.

124 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, codes, for 79.6% of patients, and suspected, b

125 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, codes.

126 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, coding.

127 ernational Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision comorbidity diagnoses and demographic and socio

128 anual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision criteria.

129 al of Mental Disorders [Fourth Edition, Text Revision] criteria).

130 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision dementia code during a hospitalization.

131 Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnoses showed a lower risk of psychosis, wit

132 International Classification of Diseases-9th revision diagnosis and Current Procedural Terminology co

133 rnational Classification of Diseases, Tenth, Revision, diagnosis as covariate-38 different common and

134 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis codes for exfoliation syndrome or ex

135 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis of HF.

136 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, diagnostic codes for rhabdomyolysis or an anti

137 anual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM -IV-TR), along with assessment of severity

138 that female gender, aspirin intolerance and revision FESS were associated with higher prevalence of

139 The median time to revision for patients who had surgery younger than age 6

140 ic and Statistical Manual, 4th Edition, Text Revision, for delirium diagnosis.

141 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 201

142 Based on those, further revisions have been made to the criteria.

143 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision head region severity score of 3 or greater, and

144 The development of a structural revision hypothesis, its testing, and corroboration are

145 Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (I00-II69).

146 ternational Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes or using disorder phenotypic sim

147 nternational Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (ICD-10) since 2004.

148 nternational Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (ICD-10).

149 ernational Classification of Diseases, tenth revision (ICD-10).

150 nternational Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) code for syphilis and uveitis or (2) IC

151 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes for their respective diagnoses.

152 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes to identify severe sepsis, explic

153 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, ECG data, and manual EMR review.

154 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, including treatment specific to

155 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes: laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bi

156 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coding (Dombrovskiy method).

157 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) procedure codes and were admitted to a

158 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), code 136.3, for PCP, or free text docu

159 Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] codes F20 to F29 and International Cla

160 Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-10]) in inpatient records from 1969 onward

161 rnational Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revision [ICD-8] codes 299.00, 299.01, 299.02, and 299.0

162 rnational Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revision [ICD-8], International Classification of Diseas

163 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] codes 295, 297 and 298, except 298A and

164 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] codes 296.2 and 296.3) and 2296 (9%) wi

165 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] codes) and prescription drug fills.

166 ernational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9], and the International Statistical Clas

167 ternational Classification of Diseases, 10th revision [ICD] D50-89) were estimated for 28 EU countrie

168 ostoperative complications were tarsorrhaphy revision in 52.1% (25 of 48 eyes), retinal detachment in

169 y reports have described the outcomes of AGV revision in adults.

170 However, the outcomes of AGV revision in children are poorly documented.

171 Although the short-term success rate of AGV revision in children is high, with longer follow-up the

172 s study was to determine the outcomes of AGV revision in children.

173 systems for PTC and argue for considering a revision in how we anticipate prognosis for patients wit

174 that depend on the evaporating sites require revision in light of our findings, including that experi

175 re was a higher unadjusted incidence of bleb revision in patients who had maculopathy (7.6 vs. 1.9 re

176 ations and required endovascular revision or revisions in 42% of patients.

177 reater than current estimates owing to large revisions in isotope source signatures.

178 cient to identify misassignments and suggest revisions in most cases (16 structures are revised).

179 Recent revisions in professional society guidelines moved away

180 Modern revisions in the terminology and diagnostic criteria for

181 e FDA's PMA pathway have undergone extensive revisions, including serial design and labeling changes,

182 ontext of septic shock phenotypes prompted a revision incorporating platelet count.

183 than 70 years, however, the lifetime risk of revision increased for younger patients, up to 35% (95%

184 The revision is aided by fast and accurate computations of p

185 e Chlorella clade, suggesting that taxonomic revision is needed for one or both genera.

186 nergy requirements of patients with SBS, and revision is needed to prevent underfeeding and improve l

187 ange of existing research suggests that this revision may be valid, but systematic integration of the

188 ould take into consideration that cumulative revisions may render the clinical evidence that supporte

189 s a bottom-up approach to cognitive ontology revision: Neuroscientists should revise their taxonomies

190 n the first and the same-site trabeculectomy revision of <3 years, worse baseline visual acuity, and

191 The total synthesis and structural revision of (+)-cryptoconcatone H are described.

192 together, these data engender the structural revision of (-)-galipeine to (S)-N(1)-methyl-2-[2'-(3''-

193 The significant revision of a few previously published resistance phenot

194 al intervention required and 1 that required revision of a previous filtration surgery.

195 Based on a systematic revision of all published histologically proven cases, t

196 ed at research and development level a brief revision of commercially available kits is also included

197 We support the revision of current lion taxonomy, as recognition of a n

198 The present communication offers a revision of fetal dosimetry values calculated from recen

199 ne, T cell-depleting antibodies, and delayed revision of immunosuppression were associated with an in

200 d language processing, as well as suggesting revision of many existing theoretical accounts.

201 In turn, these advances have enabled a major revision of our understanding of the origin and evolutio

202 ew should give rise to a national review and revision of provisions that impede access to opioids, di

203 eric versions, and syntheses that led to the revision of structures or stereochemistries are summariz

204 specialty societies, have completed a 2-part revision of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coron

205 We propose herein a revision of the classification of histiocytoses based on

206 n play in ecosystem restoration and call for revision of the common restoration practice of establish

207 Results may lead to the revision of the conclusions of many previous studies usi

208 These results require a revision of the current computational theories of binocu

209 A revision of the current concept of lamellar macular hole

210 as "aquatic noses," supporting a substantial revision of the current definition of the chemical sense

211 The degradation system informs revision of the current structural model of rhamnogalact

212 the old solid model but rather as a refined revision of the fluid model, which incorporates a new la

213 ience has advanced considerably, thus making revision of the guidelines timely.

214 As part of the development of the eleventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases

215 However, a significant revision of the MAC servicing rate, coupled with a reass

216 Moreover, a revision of the mechanism of the deoxygenation reaction

217 A revision of the nearly 8-year-old World Health Organizat

218 Our findings prompt revision of the notion that alpha activity reflects exci

219 e results may be used to determine whether a revision of the nutrient's DRI is an immediate priority

220 y new results have been found, necessitating revision of the original interpretations.

221 These studies have guided a structural revision of the predicted metabolite precolibactin A (fr

222 The 2016 edition represents a revision of the prior classification rather than an enti

223 ogical reductant flavodoxin reported a major revision of the rate-limiting step from MoFe protein and

224 Structure revision of the recently characterized natural products,

225 tabolic potential of Archaea and argue for a revision of the role of Archaea in the carbon cycle of m

226 This suggests that a revision of the source distribution given by the emissio

227 With the revision of the South African food-based dietary guideli

228 The revision of the structure of the sesquiterpene aquatolid

229 tes trimer assembly, and our results support revision of the subunit order typically presented in lam

230 Vascular revision of the ulnar artery was required a few hours po

231 A revision of the web of trophic interactions among rabbit

232 A major revision of the WHO classification of lymphoid and myelo

233 The 2016 revision of the WHO Classification of Tumours of Haemato

234 The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classifi

235 The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classifi

236 We reinterpret these results and suggest a revision of their conclusions.

237 Delays often occur between CLSI and FDA revisions of antimicrobial interpretive criteria.

238 Our syntheses suggest that structural revisions of curcusones I and J are needed.

239 tients with CIS to provide evidence to guide revisions of multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria.

240 o factors could be considered during further revisions of multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria.

241 as already underway that will support future revisions of the DC/TMD.

242 However, we also observed revisions of the initial choice and/or confidence.

243 of the heart in the eighth, ninth, and tenth revisions of the International Classification of Disease

244 xic chemicals and discusses whether the TSCA revisions offer greater public protection against existi

245 Multiple lip revision operations are often required throughout childh

246 1 sites with the Raindrop Near Vision Inlay (ReVision Optics, Lake Forest, CA); 340 eyes underwent th

247 cally significant and did not require device revision or reprogramming.

248 has now placed it under review for potential revision or rescission.

249 arly complications and required endovascular revision or revisions in 42% of patients.

250 ation between extraction and mortality, lead revision, or lead extraction at 5 years.

251 udies indicate that increased peripheral BCR revision, or selective peripheral expansion of BCR-revis

252 Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision primary admission diagnoses), and readmissions

253 nt infections very often require complicated revision procedures that are troublesome to patients and

254 omponent of an empirically guided diagnostic revision process is the use of developmental field trial

255 the allergy community and to ensure that the revision process is transparent as advised in the WHO IC

256 llect performance data from users during the revision process, and summative field trials, which aim

257 ets, a process being continued in the ICD-11 revision process.

258 Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision psychotic disorders.

259 on of FAAH reversed the increase in receptor revision, RAG expression, and polyreactive autoantibodie

260 come quartile (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24); revision replacement (OR, 1.82, 95% CI, 1.75-1.90); live

261 t with clinical decisions as to whether lead revision should be performed prophylactically.

262 pper corroles has been a topic of debate and revision since the advent of corrole chemistry.

263 ndium summarizes novel species and taxonomic revisions specific to bacteria derived from human clinic

264 ease implant lifetime and avoid failures and revision surgeries.

265 use was associated with a decreased risk of revision surgery (adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) =

266 RT: A 49-year-old patient was admitted for a revision surgery after L3-L5 fusion.

267 stics and used to generate lifetime risks of revision surgery based on increasing age at the time of

268 underwent MR imaging within 1 year prior to revision surgery from 2012 to 2014.

269 The lifetime risk of requiring revision surgery in patients who had total hip replaceme

270 designs: 1) case-control (each patient with revision surgery matched to 4 controls), 2) time-depende

271 ) underwent surgery, and 4 (18.2%) underwent revision surgery.

272 underwent surgery, and 27 (48.2%) underwent revision surgery.

273 Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision taxonomy.

274 national Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 revision timeline, we here propose real-life application

275 s higher in the index TKA cohort than in the revision TKA cohort.

276 tive predictive values for the index TKA and revision TKA cohorts.

277 diagnostic accuracy differs in index versus revision TKA, and interobserver and intraobserver reliab

278 ic accuracy is higher for index TKA than for revision TKA.

279 2006) default value of 0.0025 and a downward revision to 0.0012 for EF5g and 0.0002 for EF5r is recom

280 uding device removal, device replacement, or revision to a different bariatric procedure (eg, a gastr

281 , functional models of HVC activity may need revision to account for the parallel input architecture

282 To analyze the capacity of the new ICD-11 revision to capture anaphylaxis deaths.

283 Therefore, there is a clear need for a revision to the current classification.

284 comprehensive application was submitted as a revision to the existing cancer medicines on the WHO Mod

285 statement not requiring revision, to propose revisions to algorithms included in the initial scientif

286 xercise recommendations and help guide their revisions to optimize the skeletal muscle function that

287 and Drug Administration mandated significant revisions to product labeling for the commercially avail

288 The revisions to the categories of myeloid neoplasms and acu

289 the United States federal government issued revisions to the Common Rule under which scientists who

290 nts of behavioral learning and suggest major revisions to the rules for synaptic plasticity in the ce

291 Recent studies suggest revisions to the SNARE paradigm of membrane fusion.

292 e initial scientific statement not requiring revision, to propose revisions to algorithms included in

293 Delphi study with 5 rounds of ratings and revisions until relative consensus was achieved.

294 w: Delphi study with 5 rounds of ratings and revisions until relative consensus was achieved.

295 Until additional studies inform a revision, we suggest leaving it to each pathologist's di

296 Classification of Diseases, ninth and tenth revisions) were collated from the World Health Organizat

297 age at the time of same-site trabeculectomy revision, were included.

298 less than 15 years of age who underwent AGV revision with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 6 mon

299 dication reduction, same-site trabeculectomy revision with MMC should be considered as a viable optio

300 Such revision would halve current estimates of N2O emissions