ライフサイエンスコーパス: rheumatologist

1 h prescriptions and type of physician (e.g., rheumatologist).

2 were identified (n = 57; 37 radiologists, 20 rheumatologists).

3 as 0.64 (0.62 for nephrologists and 0.67 for rheumatologists).

4 t were not significantly related to seeing a rheumatologist.

5 pronounced for patients under the care of a rheumatologist.

6 ncome to a university by a clinical-academic rheumatologist.

7 ear to be associated with lower trust in the rheumatologist.

8 dentify factors associated with trust in the rheumatologist.

9 istances between each county and the nearest rheumatologist.

10 tionnaire by each patient at each visit to a rheumatologist.

11 ritis patients were clinically examined by a rheumatologist.

12 a variety of diseases that may be seen by a rheumatologist.

13 orted at least 1 symptom were evaluated by a rheumatologist.

14 tension, especially the significance for the rheumatologist.

15 , 11% see a physical therapist, and 6% see a rheumatologist.

16 ecific Disease Activity Score performed by a rheumatologist.

17 patients discussed their CAM use with their rheumatologist.

18 received a biologic, including 12% who saw a rheumatologist.

19 istances to see an SLE physician, especially rheumatologists.

20 nee examinations was assessed by experienced rheumatologists.

21 ents with AL amyloidosis to the attention of rheumatologists.

22 or male rheumatologists and 2,800 for female rheumatologists.

23 ots and fill rates, and practice patterns of rheumatologists.

24 xceed supply by 2,576 adult and 33 pediatric rheumatologists.

25 ermit lactation and nursing is important for rheumatologists.

26 ight associations of particular relevance to rheumatologists.

27 was reviewed by an expert Delphi panel of 6 rheumatologists.

28 feasibility panel of community and academic rheumatologists.

29 y not be uncommon among patients referred to rheumatologists.

30 tic challenge to primary care physicians and rheumatologists.

31 rviews and periodic updates on severity from rheumatologists.

32 ly be a medical problem increasingly seen by rheumatologists.

33 chieve higher accuracy than more experienced rheumatologists.

34 vational cohort identified through community rheumatologists.

35 he diagnosis and treatment of sarcoidosis by rheumatologists.

36 he CLASI as a reliable instrument for use by rheumatologists.

37 Of 21 rheumatologists, 11 were randomly assigned to a 3-part i

38 tients with RA were under the supervision of rheumatologists; 15 of the patients with RA were being t

39 R criteria and diagnosis by an ACR-certified rheumatologist, 4) > or = 3 ACR criteria, or 5) diagnosi

40 E-guided injections performed by more senior rheumatologists (83% versus 66%; P = 0.010).

41 indicating that at only some visits was the rheumatologist acting as the principal caregiver.

42 cipants were recruited from the practices of rheumatologists affiliated with a major urban hospital.

43 RA patients are rare, and more than half of rheumatologists agree that a less stringent monitoring r

44 A Delphi panel of rheumatologists agreed that data generally available in

45 Rheumatologists, along with other specialists, may be th

46 d States live within 50 miles of a pediatric rheumatologist and nearly 90% live within 50 miles of a

47 Recent studies have shown both that rheumatologist and patient approaches to achieving welln

48 Twenty-five rheumatologists and 132 patients with rheumatoid arthrit

49 er rheumatologist per year is 3,758 for male rheumatologists and 2,800 for female rheumatologists.

50 th rheumatoid arthritis who were followed by rheumatologists and 98 controls matched on age, sex, and

51 e more geographically diffuse than pediatric rheumatologists and act as substitutes for pediatric rhe

52 d justifiable optimism in recent years among rheumatologists and among patients with rheumatic diseas

53 earch continue to be of interest to clinical rheumatologists and arthritis researchers interested in

54 ely understood and represent a challenge for rheumatologists and cardiologists.

55 ldhood rheumatic disorders present pediatric rheumatologists and critical care physicians with diagno

56 ignificant collaborative effort by groups of rheumatologists and dermatologists regarding development

57 is being optimized by close collaboration of rheumatologists and gastroenterologists, leading to a mo

58 FM were recruited from a national sample of rheumatologists and interviewed by phone at baseline and

59 ons and are more likely to rely on internist rheumatologists and nonrheumatologists to address rheuma

60 be fostered between pediatricians, pediatric rheumatologists and ophthalmologists to effectively moni

61 Rheumatologists and patients had low interrater reliabil

62 Rheumatologists and pharmaceutical companies might work

63 This information is important for rheumatologists and primary care physicians who care for

64 For osteoarthritis of the hip, rheumatologists and primary care providers reported usin

65 Family members were assessed by rheumatologists and radiologists.

66 Attending rheumatologists and rheumatology fellows accessed the RO

67 A group of seven American Dermato-Rheumatologists and the "American College of Rheumatolog

68 ified as being from private-practicing adult rheumatologists and were the focus of this study.

69 The productivity of younger rheumatologists and women, who will make up a greater pe

70 espondents age > or =65, 37% had seen a plan rheumatologist, and 11% reported being unable to obtain

71 ge was almost universal, 60% had seen a plan rheumatologist, and 17% had been unable to obtain referr

72 ses commonly encountered by the physiatrist, rheumatologist, and internist in clinical practice, incl

73 volving obstetricians, obstetric physicians, rheumatologists, and clinical hematologists.

74 SRQ are well received by rheumatologists, and following a training program almost

75 t visits in the practices of 339 urologists, rheumatologists, and general internists.

76 least some patients under care of almost all rheumatologists, and it appears likely that they will be

77 ed a range of clinical experience, access to rheumatologists, and practice settings.

78 ories ("paper cases") sent to 100 practicing rheumatologists, and the clinic data set, obtained from

79 Pediatric rheumatologists are divided in their attitudes regarding

80 Male and female rheumatologists are equally distributed up to age 44; ab

81 Rheumatologists are faced with multiple challenges in th

82 Newer agents of particular interest to rheumatologists are increasingly associated with vasculi

83 Our analysis suggests that internist rheumatologists are more geographically diffuse than ped

84 nowledge, though beyond the usual purview of rheumatologists, are essential to understanding the vasc

85 aid patients were equally as likely to see a rheumatologist as non-Medicaid patients.

86 e types of CAM, and patients who rated their rheumatologist as using a more participatory decision-ma

87 The rheumatologist as well as the primary care physician sho

88 These findings indicate that rheumatologists as a group and nephrologists as a group

89 ieval rate) and blindly reviewed, two expert rheumatologists assessed only a minority of the cases as

90 Selected rheumatologists at 5 ambulatory practice sites received

91 We queried 35 rheumatologists at the Robert Breck Brigham Arthritis Ce

92 ent to individuals with arthritis who saw 23 rheumatologists at universities and private practice cli

93 y the metric was not met, and performance of rheumatologists based on years of experience were evalua

94 ly reported cohort of patients examined by a rheumatologist because of chronic joint pain or evidence

95 idoses has historically been the province of rheumatologists, because of the relation to long-standin

96 32 unique physicians including 255 different rheumatologists between the years 1999 and 2003.

97 Possible cases were evaluated by a rheumatologist blinded to serological findings and vacci

98 These data indicate that rheumatologists broadly adopted the coxib class of NSAID

99 We surveyed United States rheumatologists by mailed questionnaire.

100 Rheumatologist can facilitate effective management of pa

101 Rheumatologists can provide 2 distinct types of care for

102 or demographics and disease characteristics, rheumatologist care (compared with nonrheumatologist car

103 troversy surrounds the cost-effectiveness of rheumatologist care compared with generalist care for pa

104 Rheumatologist care is not more costly than generalist c

105 A significant number of adult rheumatologists care for children.

106 Pediatric Rheumatologists caring for children with SLE face many c

107 oeconomics appear to play a dominant role in rheumatologists' choice of treatment regimens, at times

108 nal and consultative support for these adult rheumatologist colleagues.

109 Six months later 221 rheumatologists completed a survey regarding their exper

110 ritis, or osteoarthritis receiving care from rheumatologists completed mailed questionnaires that inc

111 Seven nephrologists and 22 rheumatologists completed the ratings.

112 teria against the gold standard of an expert rheumatologist definition.

113 Pediatric rheumatologists demonstrated excellent interrater reliab

114 We studied 953 subjects with rheumatologist-diagnosed RA from a US cohort using a nes

115 lected semiannually from 5,384 subjects with rheumatologist-diagnosed RA.

116 ons with the medical record gold standard of rheumatologists' diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS

117 f performance and disease outcomes will help rheumatologists document and improve the quality of rheu

118 ferred to radiographs and MR examinations by rheumatologists due to chronic back pain.

119 that may bring patients to the attention of rheumatologists, evaluate Ig V(L) gene usage in this sub

120 Four dermatologists, 3 pulmonologists, and 4 rheumatologists evaluated facial cutaneous sarcoidosis i

121 Diagnoses of familial SSc were verified by rheumatologist evaluation and/or review of medical recor

122 Adult rheumatologists expressed interest in continuing medical

123 ese diagnostic and treatment challenges that rheumatologists face.

124 s were evaluated by an ophthalmologist and a rheumatologist following a predefined visit schedule.

125 se testing positive were to be referred to a rheumatologist for standard clinical assessment.

126 The number of rheumatologists for adult patients in the US in 2005 is

127 ed 55 consecutive patients referred by three rheumatologists for MR imaging of the spine and sacroili

128 ephritis were sent to 8 nephrologists and 29 rheumatologists for rating.

129 n Massachusetts were recruited through their rheumatologists for study.

130 en and adolescents are referred to pediatric rheumatologists for the evaluation of suspected rheumato

131 mprovement using this core set, 21 pediatric rheumatologists from 14 countries met, and, using consen

132 the number of K08/K23 awards, and recruiting rheumatologists from underrepresented demographic groups

133 Fifty individuals (most of them rheumatologists) from 15 countries participated in the s

134 pediatric rheumatologists rely on internist rheumatologists, general pediatricians, or other physici

135 ng in their offices, whereas mixed-referring rheumatologists had 6.40-times increase in that setting.

136 risk patients whose SLE or RA was managed by rheumatologists had a 77.4% increased likelihood of regu

137 ighest prevalence; areas with the fewest ACR rheumatologists had the lowest prevalence.

138 Provision of arthritis care by rheumatologists has become more discretionary and is str

139 To rheumatologists, he is important as the author of the fi

140 ness of this new pathogen is warranted among rheumatologists, hematologists, oncologists, and infecti

141 lderly patients with RA or SLE are seen by a rheumatologist in a given year; access is particularly l

142 ialty care, defined as at least 1 visit to a rheumatologist in the previous year.

143 logics-naive RA patients under the care of a rheumatologist in the US were identified from the Consor

144 out the availability of an on-site pediatric rheumatologist in their institution, the availability of

145 RA were recruited from a national sample of rheumatologists in 1987 and 1998.

146 types of conditions treated by office-based rheumatologists in 1991-1995.

147 d are in equilibrium in 2005, the demand for rheumatologists in 2025 is projected to exceed supply by

148 Eight rheumatologists in 3 states abstracted 378 patient offic

149 heumatology practices and 30 community-based rheumatologists in 60 contiguous counties.

150 eview of 1,062 unique RA patients seen by 15 rheumatologists in a 1-year period was performed.

151 This is a significant problem for clinical rheumatologists in academic medicine who are often expec

152 tients with RA (n = 1,130) under the care of rheumatologists in Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK was perf

153 s needed to understand the role of internist rheumatologists in caring for children with rheumatic di

154 s, and changes in QOL; and agreement between rheumatologists in confirming the initial diagnosis.

155 Internist rheumatologists in private practice were 3 times as like

156 state of Washington who were listed as adult rheumatologists in the American College of Rheumatology

157 Rheumatologists in the clinic are faced with different p

158 merican College of Rheumatology (ACR) member rheumatologists in the state and SES using a validated c

159 The pediatric rheumatologists in this study agree on the presence of m

160 logists and act as substitutes for pediatric rheumatologists in those regions that lack such provider

161 Impediments to referring to a pediatric rheumatologist included distance (median distance 35 mil

162 ion, when cost was not considered, 217 (65%) rheumatologists included new disease-modifying antirheum

163 tations were also videotaped and scored by a rheumatologist independently.

164 Two rheumatologists independently evaluated the abstracted i

165 ficant predictors of a prescription included rheumatologist-initiated discussion about exercise (odds

166 nd are 4 times more likely to occur when the rheumatologist initiates the discussion.

167 itional antirheumatic medications, pediatric rheumatologists intervene to control disease early and m

168 Most patient visits to rheumatologists involve patients with rheumatic diseases

169 In 1991-1995, most visits to rheumatologists involved the provision of specialized or

170 Rheumatologist involvement is generally limited to diagn

171 Although pediatric rheumatologists' involvement in 4 curriculum areas relev

172 The rheumatologist is especially aware of the devastating po

173 mand under current scenarios, the demand for rheumatologists is expected to exceed supply in the comi

174 The challenge remaining for rheumatologists is how to effectively communicate the ri

175 e (HRQOL) patient questionnaires by clinical rheumatologists is limited.

176 Study rheumatologists listed all persons meeting criteria for

177 ting in the Western Consortium of Practicing Rheumatologists long-term observational study of early s

178 enerally utilized by nonrheumatologists, and rheumatologists may diagnose fibromyalgia in patients wh

179 tologists work and seeks new evidence of how rheumatologists might work in the future.

180 mon finding amongst patients presenting to a rheumatologist; more often than not, it is being overloo

181 Rheumatologists must be aware of the risk of infection,

182 by academic-based dermatologists (n = 5) and rheumatologists (n = 5).

183 universal in programs with on-site pediatric rheumatologists, nearly two-thirds of programs without o

184 Rheumatologists need to recognize the need to improve de

185 medicine has become an important subject for rheumatologists, not least because many patients try com

186 Rheumatologists obtained extramural funds (21.3%) and in

187 ly or general practitioners, patients seeing rheumatologists (odds ratio [OR] 3.4, 95% confidence int

188 was chart documentation of RA diagnosis by a rheumatologist on > or =2 visits >6 weeks apart.

189 responding programs did not have a pediatric rheumatologist on site.

190 Programs without pediatric rheumatologists on site are less likely to have pediatri

191 Surveys of rheumatologist opinion and of outpatient practice show t

192 arly 90% live within 50 miles of a pediatric rheumatologist or an internist rheumatologist who treats

193 ltidisciplinary care can be coordinated by a rheumatologist or other physician with appropriate refer

194 among patients prescribed glucocorticoids by rheumatologists (OR 1.48 [95% CI 1.06-2.08]).

195 Moreover, self-referring podiatrists and rheumatologists order radiographic examinations of incre

196 Self-referring podiatrists and rheumatologists ordered bilateral studies up to 3.25 tim

197 For the purpose of our analysis, we defined rheumatologists, orthopedists, and physical therapists a

198 ported difficulties referring to a pediatric rheumatologist outside of one's managed care plan.

199 (n = 127) seen predominantly by one academic rheumatologist over one month of clinic were followed fo

200 gnificant benefit on testing or treatment by rheumatologists over a 6-month followup period.

201 ose who lived within 10 miles of a pediatric rheumatologist (P < 0.001).

202 were significantly more likely to be seen by rheumatologists (P < 0.001).

203 In this study involving 4 rheumatologists, patients were found to differ in their

204 The mean number of visits per rheumatologist per year is 3,758 for male rheumatologist

205 For acute mono- and oligoarthritis, rheumatologists performed arthrocentesis more appropriat

206 areas, and knowledge and skills required by rheumatologists performing MUS.

207 isciplinary consensus of recommendations for rheumatologists performing MUS.

208 luded the presence and quantity of visits to rheumatologists, primary care physicians, other care pro

209 When assessment measures were ranked, rheumatologist ranked ACR 20, radiography, and erythrocy

210 Sixteen pediatric rheumatologists rated 10 juvenile IIM paper patient case

211 Seven nephrologists and 22 rheumatologists rated each scenario as demonstrating com

212 of all patients started on HCQ by NorthShore rheumatologists received doses in excess of the recommen

213 The remaining 10 rheumatologists received no special education.

214 At each of 1,074 patient visits, the rheumatologists recorded up to 3 diagnoses and 3 patient

215 ntly influences the diagnostic confidence of rheumatologists regarding clinical features and overall

216 thirds of programs without on-site pediatric rheumatologists rely on internist rheumatologists, gener

217 Most rheumatologists reported that they utilize the ACR recom

218 A rheumatologist, research librarian, and clinician-ethici

219 Few rheumatologists routinely gather such information as par

220 ted for validity compared with the pediatric rheumatologist's assessment and deficiencies in adult GA

221 bcutaneously) according to the patient's and rheumatologist's choice (TNF inhibitor group).

222 e visit compensation applied to the academic rheumatologist's salary.

223 Two blinded rheumatologists scored the images using Kellgren-Lawrenc

224 dings show that overall, the way in which UK rheumatologists select patients for starting and discont

225 A rheumatologist should be aware of the genetic causes of

226 ul both diagnostically and prognostically, a rheumatologist should be familiar with autoantibodies fo

227 Rheumatologists should be aware of this distinctive form

228 Rheumatologists should be aware of this trend as such re

229 Rheumatologists should consider assessing depressive sym

230 Pediatric rheumatologists should provide both educational and cons

231 ciencies can predispose to autoimmunity, and rheumatologists should understand the basis for and mani

232 ds of collaboration between radiologists and rheumatologists so as to optimize the diagnostics and tr

233 Forty-seven percent of the responding rheumatologists stated that none of their patients compl

234 Although academic rheumatologists struggle to bill their salaries through

235 ortance: Dermatologists, pulmonologists, and rheumatologists study and treat patients with sarcoidosi

236 Participants received usual care from their rheumatologists throughout the trial.

237 therapy who were judged by their consultant rheumatologist to be in remission and 17 normal control

238 ment who had been judged by their consultant rheumatologist to be in remission, as well as 17 normal

239 Improving the ability of the rheumatologist to predict prognosis and guide therapeuti

240 There is an urgent need for rheumatologists to accept the challenges posed by hyperm

241 likely than those without on-site pediatric rheumatologists to have an on-site pediatric rheumatolog

242 er revenues to quality indicators, requiring rheumatologists to measure, document, and improve their

243 munosuppressive agents in collaboration with rheumatologists to obtain the best possible visual outco

244 Provision of principal care by rheumatologists to patients with RA is not currently wid

245 More outreach by community rheumatologists to primary care physicians through educa

246 To study the adherence of rheumatologists to the hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) dosing g

247 m and assessment process to ensure competent rheumatologist ultrasonographers.

248 We sought to learn how rheumatologists use evaluative laboratory tests in the c

249 Orthopedists, podiatrists, and rheumatologists use extremity radiography at a higher ra

250 Our findings suggest that if rheumatologists use more participatory styles of decisio

251 In the management of gout, rheumatologists used colchicine during the introduction

252 Prior to the start of the program, 18% of rheumatologists used self-report questionnaires, 6 month

253 Fifteen rheumatologists used the EMR-embedded disease activity c

254 rd diagnosis was confirmed by the consulting rheumatologist using radiography and magnetic resonance

255 Additionally, academic rheumatologists usually cannot generate revenue through

256 Of patients with at least 1 rheumatologist visit, 41% received a DMARD in 1996 compa

257 eumatologist visits and 102 (28%) had only 1 rheumatologist visit, mostly for diagnostic confirmation

258 steroid complications had significantly more rheumatologist visits (P < 0.001).

259 One hundred forty-four (40%) patients had no rheumatologist visits and 102 (28%) had only 1 rheumatol

260 The mean number of generalist and rheumatologist visits per person-years of follow-up duri

261 was a steady decline in both generalist and rheumatologist visits.

262 Medical care or consultation by a rheumatologist was a highly significant predictor of a l

263 Having seen a plan rheumatologist was associated with more positive evaluat

264 etal complaint recorded, indicating that the rheumatologist was likely acting as a primary care provi

265 considering only primary care, such care by rheumatologists was, again, not associated with higher t

266 Older patients and those not seeing a rheumatologist were less likely to receive a DMARD and m

267 US-guided injections performed by a trainee rheumatologist were more accurate than the CE-guided inj

268 who live 200 or more miles from a pediatric rheumatologist were more than twice as likely to treat c

269 Rheumatologists were 4.5 times more likely to advocate i

270 e visits between 79 women with SLE and their rheumatologists were coded for active patient participat

271 Early-career rheumatologists were defined as practicing physicians wh

272 from a random sample of Northern California rheumatologists were interviewed annually between 1994 a

273 from a random sample of northern California rheumatologists were interviewed annually between 1999 a

274 ere evaluated by primary care physicians and rheumatologists were more likely to have undergone bone

275 Most rheumatologists were not aware of any guidelines for mon

276 rheumatoid arthritis, patients cared for by rheumatologists were prescribed significantly more disea

277 Programs with on-site pediatric rheumatologists were significantly more likely than thos

278 n conducted, on the same day, by a pediatric rheumatologist who classified children as having abnorma

279 f a pediatric rheumatologist or an internist rheumatologist who treats children.

280 questionnaires were distributed to pediatric rheumatologists who are members of the Children's Arthri

281 Rheumatologists who completed a training course in the u

282 ntion group with those in a control group of rheumatologists who did not receive the intervention.

283 Rheumatologists who did not use questionnaires placed le

284 Likewise, internist rheumatologists who live 200 or more miles from a pediat

285 Rheumatologists who received the intervention had a sign

286 Of the 976 rheumatologists who received the questionnaire, 575 resp

287 Rheumatologists who used the questionnaires reported non

288 Of 99 rheumatologists who were contacted, 53 responses were re

289 Rheumatologists who would control their own destinies mu

290 e remodeling of the traditional "pyramid" by rheumatologists, who now treat rheumatoid arthritis earl

291 eristics that were associated with internist rheumatologists' willingness to treat children.

292 Better QI performance was seen in rheumatologists with <or=10 years versus >10 years of ex

293 ently available assessment tools may provide rheumatologists with a more precise working framework, w

294 development of biologic agents has provided rheumatologists with a variety of new and effective trea

295 A panel of rheumatologists with extensive clinical experience was c

296 To acquaint rheumatologists with pay-for-performance and the America

297 The patients were referred by a senior rheumatologist, with symptoms of the chronic back pain.

298 This review looks at reports of how rheumatologists work and seeks new evidence of how rheum

299 re poorly understood and often overlooked by rheumatologists worldwide.