ライフサイエンスコーパス: rhizobial

1 eased from surface-sterilized ferns with the Rhizobiales.

2 mbiotic and pathogenic bacteria in the order Rhizobiales.

3 h may be due to a high relative abundance of Rhizobiales.

4 mbioses between herbivorous ants and related Rhizobiales.

5 among themselves and relatives in the order Rhizobiales.

6 y associated with the Rhodobacterales or the Rhizobiales.

7 pecies confirmed persistent association with Rhizobiales.

8 hanges in the host-associated members of the Rhizobiales.

9 ding water and revealed species of the order Rhizobiales.

10 he abundance distribution of N-fixing trees (rhizobial, actinorhizal, and both types together) vary w

11 ts ubiquitination activity to fine-tune both rhizobial and AM root endosymbioses.

12 ssive stages of infection and development of rhizobial and AM symbioses.

13 in Medicago truncatula roots in response to rhizobial and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal signals.

14 controlled at multiple levels involving both rhizobial and host genes.

15 n the common signaling pathway shared by the rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbioses.

16 sociated with significant diminution of both rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbiotic colonization.

17 the transcriptional upregulation of several rhizobial and plant genes involved in S-assimilation, hi

18 rotein is involved in bacterial entry, while rhizobial and plant mutant studies suggest that Epr3 reg

19 riptomic and biochemical approaches to study rhizobial and plant sulfur (S) metabolism in nitrogen (N

20 sis signaling pathway, required for both the rhizobial and the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) endosymbio

21 of the 80-90% of land plants able to develop rhizobial and/or mycorrhizal endosymbiosis.

22 haproteobacteria, Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Rhizobiales) and Brevundimonas subvibrioides (Caulobacte

23 llination, seed dispersal, plant protection, rhizobial, and mycorrhizal mutualisms.

24 Here, we found VP of Mycoplasma, Rhizobiales, and Rickettsiales showed significantly high

25 stinct from the currently known chitin-based rhizobial/arbuscular mycorrhizal signaling molecules.

26 creasing numbers of reports suggest that the rhizobial association with legumes has recycled part of

27 e developed a light (lux)-dependent assay of rhizobial attachment to roots and demonstrated that muta

28 Rhizobial bacteria activate the formation of nodules on

29 Legumes form symbioses with rhizobial bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that

30 way to form symbiotic associations both with rhizobial bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

31 oscillations is similar for LCOs produced by rhizobial bacteria and by mycorrhizal fungi; however, My

32 llowing plant recognition of Nod factor from rhizobial bacteria and Myc factor from mycorrhizal fungi

33 to transduce two different signals, one from rhizobial bacteria and one from mycorrhizal fungi, by us

34 tion in both the symbiotic relationship with rhizobial bacteria and the plant defense response.

35 Rhizobial bacteria colonize legume roots for the purpose

36 Rhizobial bacteria enter a symbiotic association with le

37 Rhizobial bacteria enter a symbiotic interaction with le

38 he result of a symbiosis between legumes and rhizobial bacteria in soil.

39 Infection of legume hosts by rhizobial bacteria results in the formation of a special

40 bioses with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobial bacteria share a common signaling pathway in l

41 Nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria that associate with leguminous plants

42 microbial partners--namely, nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria that colonize roots of legumes and ar

43 It is known that in rhizobial bacteria these proteins form a network that re

44 Legumes develop symbiotic interactions with rhizobial bacteria to form nitrogen-fixing nodules.

45 rry out endosymbiotic nitrogen fixation with rhizobial bacteria, a process that takes place in a spec

46 en soils promote symbiotic interactions with rhizobial bacteria, leading to the formation of nitrogen

47 (RN) symbiosis, formed by legume plants and rhizobial bacteria, requires an ongoing molecular dialog

48 acid also inhibits the plant's responses to rhizobial bacteria, with direct effects on Nod factor-in

49 h mycorrhizal fungi and with nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria.

50 f both arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and rhizobial bacteria.

51 ates infection by both mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobial bacteria.

52 ungi and between legumes and nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria.

53 ect agriculturally important nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria.

54 e persistent but less abundant heterotrophic Rhizobiales bacteria possibly contributed to lowering O2

55 Gut-associated microbiota of ants include Rhizobiales bacteria with affiliation to the genus Barto

56 atively regulate the plant's response to the rhizobial bacterial signal, Nod factor.

57 ycorrhiza fungus Glomus intraradices and the rhizobial bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti as well as wi

58 Nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteroids import dicarboxylates by using the

59 e solubility and availability of Fe(III) for rhizobial bacteroids.

60 est to the involvement of core Nod factor in rhizobial biofilm establishment.

61 root surface and lectin-binding sites on the rhizobial cell surface.

62 ants that the same gene is also required for rhizobial colonization and nodulation.

63 med based on available nitrogen and previous rhizobial colonization.

64 fix nitrogen effectively due to ineffective rhizobial colonization.

65 plant gene expression responses caused by a rhizobial defect in succinoglycan production, rather tha

66 y M. truncatula for inducing and maintaining rhizobial differentiation within nodules, as demonstrate

67 legoid legumes and is involved in control of rhizobial differentiation.

68 Greater rhizobial diversity accumulated in association with the

69 asion of plant immune responses triggered by rhizobial effectors.

70 positive role for NAD1 in the maintenance of rhizobial endosymbiosis during nodulation.

71 um loti strain R7A and Lotus japonicus Gifu, rhizobial exopolysaccharide (EPS) plays an important rol

72 3, distinguishes compatible and incompatible rhizobial exopolysaccharides at the epidermis.

73 come apparent that rhizobial Nod factors and rhizobial exopolysaccharides play key roles in the initi

74 acellular loop 5 of FadLSm and further alpha-rhizobial FadL proteins contains determinants of specifi

75 oop 5 by the corresponding region from alpha-rhizobial FadL proteins transferred sensitivity for long

76 riation in target DNA sequences from diverse rhizobial genes for nodulation and symbiosis.

77 Two distinct nearly full-length Rhizobiales genomes were identified in leaf-pocket-enric

78 Bacteria of the rhizobial group employ the LuxR-type transcriptional act

79 ship between herbivory and the prevalence of Rhizobiales gut symbionts within ant genera.

80 The phylogeny of the Rhizobiales indicates that this mode of zonal growth may

81 plant leads to the activation of a number of rhizobial-induced genes.

82 revealed that mature miR172c increased upon rhizobial infection and continued increasing during nodu

83 se in Lotus japonicus increased the level of rhizobial infection and enhanced nodulation.

84 biotic receptor kinase, negatively regulates rhizobial infection and nodulation during the nitrogen-f

85 n extracellular nucleotides, is critical for rhizobial infection and nodulation.

86 heir nod+ parents, F487A and PI262090 during rhizobial infection and nodule initiation by using RNA-s

87 ial role of ERN1/ERN2 to coordinately induce rhizobial infection and nodule organogenesis.

88 key transcription factor that controls both rhizobial infection and nodule organogenesis.

89 In the nad1 mutant plants, rhizobial infection and propagation in infection threads

90 with M. truncatula mutants having defects in rhizobial infection and symbiosome development demonstra

91 PROTEIN COMPONENT1 (ARPC1) as essential for rhizobial infection but not for arbuscular mycorrhiza sy

92 and leads us to propose a two-step model for rhizobial infection initiation in legume RHs.

93 To allow rhizobial infection of legume roots, plant cell walls mu

94 Rhizobial infection of legumes is regulated by a number

95 mponent of the signaling pathway controlling rhizobial infection of legumes.

96 to a better understanding of tip growth, the rhizobial infection process, and also lead to improvemen

97 produced in roots and root hairs during the rhizobial infection process.

98 one for symbiotic association, whereas after rhizobial infection rip1 transcript is specifically asso

99 Plants mutated in this gene have abnormal rhizobial infection threads and fewer nodules, and in th

100 xin signaling is necessary for initiation of rhizobial infection threads.

101 eiches early hyphal root colonization, while rhizobial infection was clearly impaired.

102 tions in ARGONAUTE7, enhances nodulation and rhizobial infection, alters the spatial distribution of

103 ot growth but prevents nodule organogenesis, rhizobial infection, and the induction of two key nodula

104 resulted in improved root growth, increased rhizobial infection, increased expression of early nodul

105 at Os-POLLUX can restore nodulation, but not rhizobial infection, to a Medicago truncatula dmi1 mutan

106 ule formation in tissues underlying sites of rhizobial infection.

107 mediates ENOD11 expression during subsequent rhizobial infection.

108 nctate intermediates preceding intracellular rhizobial infection.

109 trol the extent of nodulation in response to rhizobial infection.

110 nesis, specifically at the site of impending rhizobial infection.

111 exhibit early symbiotic responses including rhizobial infection.

112 le primordia, and mutation of ARF16a reduced rhizobial infection.

113 loops that control Nod factor levels during rhizobial infection.

114 gnalling mediated by DELLA proteins inhibits rhizobial infections and controls the NF induction of th

115 suggest that LIN functions in maintenance of rhizobial infections and differentiation of nodules from

116 ry pathways modulating NF signalling control rhizobial infections and nodulation efficiency.

117 MtCEP1 increases nodulation by promoting rhizobial infections, the developmental competency of ro

118 der of magnitude in the number of persistent rhizobial infections.

119 activation of ERN1 transcription to regulate rhizobial infections.

120 Upon rhizobial inoculation, FLOT4 uniquely becomes localized

121 and also in nodule primordia in response to Rhizobial inoculation.

122 yrases, Mtapy2 and Mtapy3, was unaffected by rhizobial inoculation.

123 biotic features in a symrk null mutant where rhizobial invasion of the epidermis and nodule organogen

124 gene block the initiation and development of rhizobial invasion structures, termed infection threads,

125 izobium japonicum, yet little is known about rhizobial iron acquisition strategies.

126 excess hemin, whereas overexpression of the rhizobial iron regulator (rirA) has no effect on hut loc

127 Rhizobiales is typically the most abundant and taxonomic

128 To establish compatible rhizobial-legume symbioses, plant roots support bacteria

129 ave been largely confined to two models: the rhizobial-legume symbiotic association and pathogenesis

130 greatest similarity: Shewanella-like (SLP), Rhizobiales-like (RLPH), and ApaH-like (ALPH) phosphatas

131 These structural differences define the rhizobial lipid-A compounds as a potentially novel class

132 Rhizobial lipid-A differs significantly from previously

133 ssumed to lack the ability to respond to the rhizobial lipo-chitin Nod factors, which are the essenti

134 The symbiosis between rhizobial microbes and host plants involves the coordina

135 fixing symbiosis requires the recognition of rhizobial molecules to initiate the development of nodul

136 xpression pattern of hrrP and its effects on rhizobial morphology are consistent with the NCR peptide

137 We found that rhizobial N-fixing trees were nearly absent below 15 deg

138 The climate-envelope projection showed that rhizobial N-fixing trees will likely become more abundan

139 Finally, oxygen-sensitive rhizobial NifA proteins presumably bind a metal cofactor

140 Interestingly, rhizobial Nod factor signal oligosaccharides that induce

141 of several legume species in response to the rhizobial Nod factor signal.

142 ells requires appropriate recognition of the rhizobial Nod factor signaling molecule, and this recogn

143 , as well as other nonlegumes, recognize the rhizobial Nod factor via a mechanism that results in str

144 It has also recently become apparent that rhizobial Nod factors and rhizobial exopolysaccharides p

145 Rhizobial Nod factors are the key signaling molecules in

146 of iso/flavonoids is their ability to induce rhizobial nod gene expression and/or their ability to mo

147 In legume nitrogen-fixing symbioses, rhizobial nod genes are obligatory for initiating infect

148 t flavones might act as internal inducers of rhizobial nod genes, and that flavonols might act as aux

149 similarity to fungal chitin deacetylases and rhizobial NodB chitooligosaccharide deacetylases.

150 ctors from transgenic R. fredii carrying the rhizobial nodS gene were resistant to FAA II, suggesting

151 Rhizobial nodulation (Nod) factors activate both nodule

152 which is induced in roots and root hairs by rhizobial nodulation (Nod) factors via activation of the

153 es, such as chitin, peptidoglycan (PGN), and rhizobial nodulation factor (NF), that induce immune or

154 Rhizobial nodulation factors (NFs) activate a specific s

155 ess is initiated following the perception of rhizobial nodulation factors by the host plant.

156 three well-studied bacteria belonging to the Rhizobiales order: the plant symbiont Sinorhizobium meli

157 ants form nodules after infection with their rhizobial partner.

158 We also find that rhizobial phylotype diversity and composition of soils c

159 s used as the cofactor of multiple plant and rhizobial proteins (e.g. plant leghemoglobin and bacteri

160 Interactions among symbionts, from rhizobial quorum sensing to fusion of genetically distin

161 nt alphaproteobacterial group comprising the Rhizobiales, Rhodobacterales, Caulobacterales, Parvularc

162 Rhizobiales/Rhodobacterales/Rhodospirillaceae-like phosp

163 e soybean (Glycine max) ecto-apyrase GS52 in rhizobial root hair infection and root nodule formation,

164 elated, polarly growing members of the order Rhizobiales, setting the stage for in-depth analyses of

165 rides called Nod factors function as primary rhizobial signal molecules triggering legumes to develop

166 ation in legume root nodules is initiated by rhizobial signaling molecules [Nod factors (NF)].

167 chitooligosaccharide Nod factors are the key rhizobial signals which initiate infection/nodulation in

168 the plant genes required for transduction of rhizobial signals, the Nod factors, are also necessary f

169 These data suggest that both rhizobial species have an IHF homolog that stimulates Dc

170 of symbiotic exopolysaccharide produced by a rhizobial species is one of the factors involved in opti

171 In rhizobial species that nodulate inverted repeat-lacking

172 analysis reveals that ropA1 homologs in many Rhizobiales species are often found as two genetically l

173 Rhizobiales species, however, predominantly grow by PG s

174 oes not occur in response to a non-symbiotic rhizobial strain or a root pathogen.

175 both the host plant and the hrrP-expressing rhizobial strain, suggesting its involvement in symbioti

176 nodule senescence in an allele-specific and rhizobial strain-specific manner, and its function is de

177 ecreted during the infection process by some rhizobial strains can influence infection and modify the

178 Meanwhile, some rhizobial strains have evolved a peptidase to specifical

179 ctures formed on alfalfa roots only when the rhizobial strains produced Nod factor from the alfalfa-n

180 s biflorus, binds to Nod factors produced by rhizobial strains that nodulate this plant and has a ded

181 Compatible rhizobial strains were used for coinoculation of the pla

182 ials using nine native legume species and 40 rhizobial strains, we find that bacterial rRNA phylotype

183 in a large collection of Medicago-nodulating rhizobial strains.

184 These effects are strongly influenced by the rhizobial surface polysaccharides that affect NCR-induce

185 in response to treatment of the roots with a rhizobial symbiont or with a carbohydrate ligand.

186 The nitrogen-fixing rhizobial symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021 produces

187 the model legume Medicago truncatula and its rhizobial symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti, which include

188 oot nodule cell may contain several thousand rhizobial symbionts, each enclosed in a membrane envelop

189 nt of bacteria including plant pathogens and rhizobial symbionts.

190 ewly identified NF-YB and NF-YC subunits for rhizobial symbiosis and binding to the promoter of MtERN

191 However, the role of small RNAs in legume-rhizobial symbiosis is largely unexplored.

192 The legume-rhizobial symbiosis results in the formation of root nod

193 of ERN1 and the closely related ERN2 to the rhizobial symbiosis were then evaluated by comparing the

194 In the establishment of the legume-rhizobial symbiosis, bacterial lipochitooligosaccharide

195 several key proteins involved in initiating rhizobial symbiosis, including SICKLE, NUCLEOPORIN133, a

196 to the well-characterized role of MtSkl1 in rhizobial symbiosis, we show that MtSkl1 is involved in

197 nable investigation of the role of miRNAs in rhizobial symbiosis.

198 molecule in the establishment of the legume/rhizobial symbiosis.

199 to improve our understanding of the soybean-rhizobial symbiosis.

200 Glomus and Gigaspora spp., and they promote rhizobial symbiosis.

201 Rhizobial taxa dominate N-fixing tree richness at lower

202 However, within the Rhizobiales, there are many budding bacteria, in which n

203 Rhizobial trees were more abundant in dry than in wet ec

204 within the Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, Rhizobiales, Verrucomicrobiales, and Xanthomonadales, an

205 Sequence reads from a member of the Rhizobiales were identified in the data collected in a g

206 ants, bacteria from an ant-specific clade of Rhizobiales were more broadly distributed.

207 served among several genera within the order Rhizobiales, where bgsA encodes a glycosyl transferase w

208 s an ancestral and conserved trait among the Rhizobiales, which includes important mutualists and pat

209 of SAR11, classifying all but one strain as Rhizobiales with strong statistical support.

210 n recent research in the Actinomycetales and Rhizobiales, with emphasis on Mycobacterium and Agrobact

211 Fur, RirA, and BatR) described in the order Rhizobiales, with the greatest overall change in the tra