ライフサイエンスコーパス: right bundle branch

1 uding absence or severe abnormalities of the right bundle branch.

2 ) coronary artery most commonly perfuses the right bundle branch and left anterior fascicle, but not

3 ffect was neutral, regardless of morphology, right bundle branch block (HR=1.01, P=0.975), and intrav

4 Preoperative right bundle branch block (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% con

5 owever, SA was found to increase the risk of right bundle branch block (RBBB) (pooled odds ratio [OR]

6 s supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant right bundle branch block (RBBB) and left anterior hemib

7 nch block (LBBB) was present in 65 patients, right bundle branch block (RBBB) in 48 patients, and non

8 his study sought to test the hypothesis that right bundle branch block (RBBB) patients have larger sc

9 anterior hemiblock (RR: 1.62; p < 0.01), or right bundle branch block (RR: 2.89; p < 0.01) at baseli

10 avity with Lugol's solution induced complete right bundle branch block and converted the bidirectiona

11 Right bundle branch block and right ventricular (RV) dys

12 fascicular ventricular tachycardia, and the right bundle branch block and ST segment elevation syndr

13 eath in association with typical or atypical right bundle branch block and ST-segment elevations (Bru

14 rapy was applied in the presence of complete right bundle branch block by atrial-synchronized RV free

15 e structural heart disease associated with a right bundle branch block conduction pattern and ST-segm

16 One patient developed complete right bundle branch block during radiofrequency catheter

17 tration resulted in ST-segment elevation and right bundle branch block in all patients in group A and

18 We hypothesized that right bundle branch block is associated with specific RV

19 n be challenging because they present with a right bundle branch block morphology by electrocardiogra

20 d ventricular arrhythmias with a predominant right bundle branch block morphology, 13 of 27 (48%) sho

21 nch block, non-left bundle branch block, and right bundle branch block morphology.

22 acing after the procedure, three of whom had right bundle branch block preoperatively.

23 tion (P<0.001) along with elimination of the right bundle branch block QRS morphology, increase in RV

24 oped in 46% of septal myectomy patients, and right bundle branch block was evident in 58% of alcohol

25 heart (ii) heart with a conduction disorder (right bundle branch block) (iii) focal activation initia

26 aventricular conduction delay, or incomplete right bundle branch block, a much higher proportion than

27 heart rate, and with prevalent hypertension, right bundle branch block, and cardiovascular disease.

28 ural disease), normal QT intervals, apparent right bundle branch block, and sudden cardiac death, par

29 t versus persistent ST-segment elevation and right bundle branch block, as well as the effectiveness

30 to atrio-ventricular conduction block (AVB), right bundle branch block, bradycardia, and the Brugada

31 on-left bundle branch block (LBBB; including right bundle branch block, intraventricular conduction d

32 n patients with congenital heart disease and right bundle branch block, RV cardiac resynchronization

33 n described in patients with the syndrome of right bundle branch block, ST-segment elevation in leads

34 bundle branch block is far more common than right bundle branch block.

35 alcohol septal ablation, 21 (36%) developed right bundle branch block.

36 branch block/superior axis, case 2 showed a right bundle branch block/inferior axis, case 3 showed a

37 ped in the 9 patients; 9 of the 11 VTs had a right bundle branch block/left-axis morphology that mimi

38 d to supraventricular complexes with left or right bundle-branch block (L/RBBB) was investigated in a

39 lymorphic ventricular arrhythmias (n=6), and right bundle-branch block (n=5).

40 elay/block may be made when catheter-induced right bundle-branch block (RBBB) develops in patients wi

41 (LV) mapping, including all 4 patients with right bundle-branch block (RBBB) VT.

42 Right bundle-branch block (RBBB) was present in 11 patie

43 RV problems may include right bundle-branch block (RBBB), volume loading, and ch

44 rigin of ventricular tachycardia (VT) with a right bundle-branch block (RBBB)-type pattern and an R-S

45 ents, with few patients in subgroups such as right bundle-branch block (RBBB).

46 diagnostic ECG markers in the presence of a right bundle-branch block (RBBB).

47 nd 40 nontetralogy control subjects (20 with right bundle-branch block [group 4] and 20 with normal E

48 Right bundle-branch block and precordial injury pattern

49 ventricular fibrillation characterized by a right bundle-branch block and ST elevation in the right

50 into two groups: group 1 (n=16) patients had right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in V1

51 acemaker implantation after TAVR, with prior right bundle-branch block and transcatheter valve type a

52 ophysiological substrate and 6 patients with right bundle-branch block for comparison.

53 Unlike BrS, right bundle-branch block had delayed activation in the

54 a prolonged P-R interval, but not incomplete right bundle-branch block or early repolarization patter

55 ved in patients with a non-LBBB QRS pattern (right bundle-branch block or intraventricular conduction

56 ventricular fibrillation characterized by a right bundle-branch block pattern and ST elevation (STE)

57 or intraventricular conduction delay but not right bundle-branch block provided prognostic informatio

58 ction was relatively well preserved, and the right bundle-branch block type of BBR was frequently ind

59 Patients with either right bundle-branch block type or polymorphic complex ve

60 erted T waves on inferior leads, and all had right bundle-branch block ventricular arrhythmias.

61 Right bundle-branch block was found in 13% (n = 89) of t

62 Right bundle-branch block was not associated with arrhyt

63 Complete or incomplete right bundle-branch block was observed in 39.2% of the p

64 We identified 12 affected individuals (right bundle-branch block, > or =1-mm STE) with an autos

65 eexisting ECG abnormalities were as follows: right bundle-branch block, 65.2%; left bundle-branch blo

66 t bundle-branch block (LBBB), 228 (13%) with right bundle-branch block, and 308 (17%) with nonspecifi

67 Right bundle-branch block- or multiple-morphology EIVA i

68 and is frequently accompanied by an apparent right bundle-branch block.

69 imaging could differentiate between BrS and right bundle-branch block.

70 e of the right bundle branch correlated with right-bundle-branch block by ECG.

71 y efficacious as BiV CRT in hearts with pure right bundle branch conduction delay.

72 Absence of the right bundle branch correlated with right-bundle-branch

73 rmed adjacent to the His bundle and proximal right bundle branch (HB-RB), initially at high output to

74 mal left ventricular function, and VT with a right bundle-branch morphology was inducible in 4 patien

75 r epicardium and the proximal segment of the right bundle branch (RBB) were obtained using a high-spe

76 e His bundle, and then divided into left and right bundle branches that terminated in the Purkinje fi