ライフサイエンスコーパス: rinse

1 analyzed at 25 min (7 min after the sucrose rinse).

2 rinse, or (3) the Ca rinse followed by the F rinse.

3 y increases salivary F from a subsequent NaF rinse.

4 ly exceeded the corresponding F from the NaF rinse.

5 procedure was repeated with the alternative rinse.

6 rowth of Group A Streptococcus applied after rinse.

7 l saturation of plaque fluid after a sucrose rinse.

8 remineralization than did the 250-ppm-F NaF rinse.

9 observed, which was also independent of the rinse.

10 F NaF rinse, or (3) 228-ppm-F two-solution F rinse.

11 ste, and greater drowsiness than the placebo rinse.

12 and water, respectively, as a preprocedural rinse.

13 n of the ICG pHLIP construct, incubated, and rinsed.

14 inhibited/reduced by chlorhexidine and honey rinses.

15 ing, systemic antibiotics, and antimicrobial rinses.

16 ing, systemic antibiotics, and chlorhexidine rinses.

17 ates, as verified by analysis of the surface rinses.

18 twice a day with placebo or 0.5% cimetidine rinses.

19 al activity of premenopausal epithelial cell rinses.

20 e leaves decreased significantly after water rinses.

21 erning byproduct is readily removed by water rinsing.

22 state upon being released from inhibition by rinsing.

23 ) was the oral hygiene phase, which included rinsing.

24 peration or to use high pressures for column rinsing.

25 eted NP concentrations in response to serial rinsing.

26 umber of showers); and timing (pause) before rinsing.

27 raft surface after phosphate-buffered saline rinsing.

28 evels subsiding within 50-100 bed volumes of rinsing.

29 se, or who used a 228-ppm CR or NaF fluoride rinse 1 hr before being sampled.

30 xperimental gum for 15 min, and subsequently rinsed 1 min with a mass fraction 10% sucrose solution.

31 stically greater following the use of the CR rinse (153 micromol/L) compared with the NaF rinse (17 m

32 rinse (153 micromol/L) compared with the NaF rinse (17 micromol/L).

33 ly assigned to bathe patients either with no-rinse 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths or with no

34 minute rinse with 20 mL of (1) 250-ppm-F NaF rinse, (2) 1000-ppm-F NaF rinse, or (3) 228-ppm-F two-so

35 with a commercial non-antibacterial etch-and-rinse adhesive (N) or an experimental antibacterial adhe

36 r (HL) created by a self-etch or an etch-and-rinse adhesive after 1 y.

37 5; E', 3.85 +/- 0.24) created by an etch-and-rinse adhesive in the presence or absence of biomimetic

38 resin-dentin interfaces created by etch-and-rinse adhesives.

39 In both cases, the surface was rinsed after each application of IgE to remove sample co

40 oncentrations between 6.6 and 200 nM and HCl rinsing after each exposure.

41 fluid F by 12x and 5x, compared with the NaF rinse alone.

42 However, 7 min after the sucrose rinsing, an increase in these concentrations was seen wh

43 BacR was detected in 18% of hand rinse and 27% of floor samples.

44 Oral rinse and anal swab samples were collected semiannually

45 Both water rinse and backwash showed effectiveness to restore the m

46 Oral rinse and cervical-vaginal lavage samples were concurren

47 E. coli were detected in a quarter of hand rinse and floor samples.

48 cipants (N = 5579) provided a 30-second oral rinse and gargle with mouthwash.

49 ation with chlorhexidine washcloths and oral rinse and intranasal povidone-iodine decreased the SSI r

50 were given chlorhexidine washcloths and oral rinse and nasal povidone-iodine solution to be used the

51 ) studies with 2 different systems (etch-and-rinse and self-etch).

52 The modified two-step etch-and-rinse and single-step systems showed less Rhodamine B pe

53 fecal contamination was estimated using hand rinse and stored water fecal indicator bacteria concentr

54 out after a complete reprocessing cycle; 420 rinse and swabs samples were collected from BCs and inte

55 In the present study, the two-solution rinse and two NaF rinses with F contents of 250 ppm and

56 The particle-antibody-BuChE product was rinsed and directly digested with pepsin.

57 ts were imaged in air after the samples were rinsed and dried, since RNA also has low affinity for th

58 Placental tissue was rinsed and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen to dete

59 period follows, after which the cultures are rinsed and placed on solid selective medium.

60 Circuits were rinsed and retained for gamma counting after the 4-hr ru

61 Cells were then rinsed and shifted to chase medium containing unlabeled

62 obust that patterned domains survive solvent rinsing and drying.

63 protein through the membrane and subsequent rinsing and elution yield purified polyhistidine-tagged

64 ein and isoflavones are dissociated by water rinsing and prolonged cooking, but these have no equival

65 differences in slopes between "handled + not-rinsed" and "handled + rinsed" stents (p = 0.004), and b

66 ts (p = 0.004), and between "untouched + not-rinsed" and "untouched + rinsed stents" (p = 0.037).

67 ) for a time t(i) (c(i) = 0 corresponds to a rinse) and measure the protein adsorption by optical wav

68 e under gentle agitation and, then, removed, rinsed, and analyzed directly by DESI-MS (MS/MS).

69 hardness levels and chlorine concentrations, rinsed, and covered with chambers to determine the effec

70 otential sweep, the microfluidic channel was rinsed, and the junction was re-formed with a subsequent

71 ene, scaling and root planing, chlorhexidine rinses, and periodontal maintenance.

72 ed from 29 participants, by use of mouthwash rinses, and were split into equal aliquots, with one ali

73 ection management, use of antimicrobial oral rinses, and withdrawal of bisphosphonates are preferable

74 concentrations, exposure times, and mixing, rinsing, and pH conditions.

75 ary steps: tip pretreatment, sample loading, rinsing, and sample elution.

76 Oral rinse-and-gargle samples and questionnaire data were obt

77 of the cohort who provided two or more oral rinse-and-gargle samples with valid HPV results and who

78 EDC for both the self-etch and the etch-and-rinse approaches results in the reduction but not comple

79 in a 50 mM trehalose, 10-15% (w/w) glycerol rinse, are preserved and chemically profiled.

80 The rinse assay can be used as a screening tool for oral inf

81 An oral rinse assay was also performed to determine the total le

82 ing and root planing plus chlorhexidine oral rinse at baseline and supportive periodontal therapy at

83 nd pH 7.1) and the deposited MWNTs were then rinsed at different electrolyte solutions to induce the

84 intent, 124 had 1 or more posttreatment oral rinses available and were included in this study.

85 tivates E-selectin so that leukocytes may be rinsed away 60% more efficiently than with a buffer cont

86 Residual RF could be rinsed away within 1 hour.

87 ruvate-free slice maintenance medium and not rinsed away, exposing the slices to a range of 1-5 mM gl

88 is elicited when sweet-taste inhibitors are rinsed away.

89 A "controlled-release" (CR) fluoride rinse, based on the controlled release of fluoride in th

90 to fresh blood allowed to clot and were then rinsed before scanning electron microscopy evaluation.

91 SERS spectra degrade if the capillary is not rinsed between experiments.

92 conjugated to a gold particle label, (ii) a rinse buffer, and (iii) a signal amplification reagent t

93 sed as a component in a rinse with H202, the rinse can decrease the level of gingivitis.

94 pared with handled, stents (p = 0.04) and in rinsed, compared with not-rinsed, stents (p < 0.001).

95 rcent stenosis were significantly reduced in rinsed, compared with not-rinsed, stents (p = 0.002, p =

96 e exposure times, concentrations, and pH and rinsing conditions.

97 se, 1-minute pause, or 2-minute pause before rinsing), containing 20 participants each.

98 ial DNA was greater than that in reagent and rinse controls, and communities were markedly dominated

99 periodontal therapy and chlorhexidine (CHX) rinse could affect nitrite levels, leading to negative e

100 ight samples simultaneously and performs its rinse cycle parallel to sample injection, resulting in m

101 After several days of rinsing, decellularized liver samples were histologicall

102 spersed with five licks of artificial saliva rinse delivered on a VR5 schedule.

103 way (from which FM2-10 but not FM1-43 can be rinsed) delivers vesicles via infoldings and cisternae s

104 hole analytical procedure (i.e., extraction, rinsing, desorption, and LC-MS/MS analysis) was performe

105 contamination of DNA samples; a simple water rinse diminishes or eliminates the formation of multi-io

106 No-rinse disposable wash gloves are increasingly implemente

107 e evidence that topical 0.5% cimetidine oral rinse enhances the antibacterial function of crevicular

108 however, activated PBMC recovered HIV-1 from rinsed epithelial cells and rarely from replated epithel

109 The F in each extract after the Ca rinse/F rinse greatly exceeded the corresponding F from

110 Consequently, the Ca rinse/F rinse increased the total plaque F and the plaqu

111 g F), (2) 150 mmol/L Ca rinse, or (3) the Ca rinse followed by the F rinse.

112 We collected water, hand rinse, food, soil, and fly samples from 608 households.

113 ients dosed twice daily using a 1% dyclonine rinse for 1 week.

114 were randomly assigned to an EO or a placebo rinse for 90 days (40 mL/day).

115 e lowest MICs compared with honey and saline rinses for all test species examined.

116 ection in Men (HIM) Study, we evaluated oral rinses for HPV DNA and baseline sera for HPV-6, -11, -16

117 cavity of eyes with retinal breaks and then rinsed from the eye.

118 Apical rinses from polarized epithelial cells recovered from wo

119 othesis is that removal of the stimulus upon rinsing generates a receptor-based, positive, off-respon

120 The F in each extract after the Ca rinse/F rinse greatly exceeded the corresponding F from the NaF

121 erial killing was observed in the cimetidine rinse group; in the cimetidine group, 63.4% of bacteria

122 The chlorhexidine gluconate rinse had the lowest MICs compared with honey and saline

123 Calcium phosphate disks were then rinsed in 5% sodium hypochlorite to remove adherent oste

124 n pen previously used with high inocula, but rinsed in ethanol and stored dry (6 months).

125 membranes, cross-linked with glutaraldehyde, rinsed in NaOH, restained with Ponceau S, and finished b

126 Then the specimens were rinsed in saline solution.

127 luated by exposure to a series of stringency rinses in solutions of successively lower ionic strength

128 H, restained with Ponceau S, and finished by rinsing in acid water at pH 3.

129 Consequently, the Ca rinse/F rinse increased the total plaque F and the plaque fluid

130 gG is drawn through the membrane followed by rinsing, insertion of an electrode assembly, and additio

131 tudies show that a two-solution fluoride (F) rinse is significantly more effective than a NaF rinse o

132 on of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in oral rinses is associated with HPV-OPC, but its potential as

133 , persistent HPV16 DNA in posttreatment oral rinses is associated with poor prognosis and is a potent

134 Human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in oral rinses is common at diagnosis but rare after treatment f

135 ollowing acidification suggests that the new rinse may provide an improved cariostatic effect.

136 Subsequently, child hand rinses (n = 44) and floor sponge samples (n = 44) from l

137 e is significantly more effective than a NaF rinse of the same F content of 250 microg/g (ppm) in rem

138 al cryptdin peptides have been purified from rinses of adult mouse small intestine by gel filtration

139 ing was constructed in situ with alternating rinses of positively and negatively charged polymers.

140 le PEM is constructed in situ by alternative rinses of the cationic polymer poly(l-lysine) and the an

141 Extensive rinsing of the crystals in organic solvents such as meth

142 cific proteolytic peptides, while subsequent rinsing of the deposited sample removes contaminants.

143 etry items that remained on the skin or were rinsed off and household and functional items.

144 believed that GSE should be applied and then rinsed off in a separate step, which in effect increases

145 topically, there are additional issues with rinsing off unbound probe, which can be nonuniform and i

146 six parabens were determined in 170 PCPs (41 rinse-off and 109 leave-on), including 20 baby care prod

147 oacervation is the primary mechanism used in rinse-off formulations to deliver topical agents to the

148 Phthalates were less frequently found in rinse-off PCPs but were more frequently found in perfume

149 Parabens were found in approximately 40% of rinse-off products and approximately 60% of leave-on pro

150 ed before and at 3 and 7 min after a sucrose rinse on consecutive weeks and analyzed for organic acid

151 to examine the effects of topical cimetidine rinse on neutrophil function in the gingival crevice.

152 Upon rinsing, only a fraction of Cry1Ab desorbed, suggesting

153 ts were randomly allocated to a doxepin oral rinse or a placebo for the treatment of radiotherapy-rel

154 Dentin substrates were bonded with etch-and-rinse or self-etch adhesives and prepared for microtensi

155 s (irrespective of whether they are etch-and-rinse or self-etch) can activate these endogenous protea

156 Virus was not recovered from the rinsed or replated cocultures with resting PBMC; however

157 activated PBMC was tested by culturing with rinsed or trypsinized and replated HIV-1-exposed epithel

158 (1) 250-ppm-F NaF rinse, (2) 1000-ppm-F NaF rinse, or (3) 228-ppm-F two-solution F rinse.

159 ol/L NaF (228 microg/g F), (2) 150 mmol/L Ca rinse, or (3) the Ca rinse followed by the F rinse.

160 fluid from subjects (n = 11) who received no rinse, or who used a 228-ppm CR or NaF fluoride rinse 1

161 after incubation, the digested substrate was rinsed out.

162 Oral rinse, penile swab, and vaginal swab specimens were eval

163 After rinsing, peroxidase-conjugated anti-IgG is drawn through

164 nterior surface of capillary, an appropriate rinsing procedure by hydrochloric acid and water was opt

165 he 1000-ppm-F NaF and 228-ppm-F two-solution rinses produced a greater (p < 0.05) remineralization th

166 lters were used to optimize sample dilution, rinsing protocol, flow rate, and pore size, leading to >

167 on-woven waffled fibers, saturated with a no-rinse, quickly vaporizing skin cleaning and caring lotio

168 a higher plaque fluid fluoride after the new rinse relative to NaF, no statistically significant diff

169 parallel the psychophysical responses-water rinses remove the inhibitor from the heteromeric sweeten

170 o less than once daily, 84% flossed, and 70% rinsed, respectively, less than once a week.

171 sed from, the monoliths after a desalination rinse, resulting in femtomole limits of detection via ma

172 uential showers; and a 1-minute pause before rinsing results in maximal skin surface (16.5 microg/cm2

173 An oral rinse sample, risk factor survey, cancer history, and or

174 s the detection of HPV genomic DNA from oral rinse samples and may result in exposure misclassificati

175 enomic DNA detection in Scope mouthwash oral rinse samples and the reproducibility of HPV detection i

176 ed from fecal, egg shell, fluff, and carcass rinse samples as part of a previously reported temporall

177 controls without oral cancer) collected oral rinse samples at home or work under the direction of a n

178 and the reproducibility of HPV detection in rinse samples collected 7 days apart were investigated.

179 s were compared among equal aliquots of oral rinse samples collected from a subset of individuals.

180 Of the 420 rinse samples collected from the BC of the GI endoscopes

181 nterviewed on risk factors and provided oral-rinse samples for HPV DNA typing by polymerase chain rea

182 he spectrum of HPV type distribution in oral rinse samples from 2 populations: 52 human immunodeficie

183 Culturing rinse samples obtained from BCs provides a better indica

184 milk detection, to be used directly in final rinse samples of cleaning in place systems (CIP) of food

185 Oral rinse samples were collected at diagnosis and after trea

186 Oral rinse samples were evaluated for 36 types of HPV DNA usi

187 Venous blood and oral rinse samples were obtained from five healthy participan

188 were also higher for Puregene-processed oral rinse samples when a fixed volume (10 mul) rather than a

189 forearm skin swabs, genital skin swabs, oral rinse samples, and anal swabs.

190 ent, 98%; kappa value, 0.57) in matched oral rinse samples.

191 No fluoride release was seen in the no-rinse samples.

192 A protocol for rinsing samples to remove the adventitious glutathione s

193 stress ulcer prophylaxis, chlorhexidine oral rinse, selective digestive decontamination, short-course

194 this study was to determine whether Carolina rinse solution (CRS) used at the end of cold ischemic st

195 of the KR, namely, the presence/absence of a rinse solution and the sample acidity.

196 solution and the lactated Ringer poststorage rinse solution.

197 dent external mass spectrometric analysis of rinse solutions of the collected spots, either by the ne

198 Oral rinse specimens from 35 (67%) of 52 HIV-positive individ

199 Oral rinse specimens were collected semiannually for up to 5

200 Self-collected anal swab and oral rinse specimens were tested for HPV DNA (37 types) by L1

201 e present in 2.1% of tonsil and 6.3% of oral-rinse specimens.

202 ecipitation with chloroform before different rinsing stages for removing methanol and water interfere

203 A stent-cleaning chamber was developed to rinse stents at a sustained hydrodynamic pressure of 4 a

204 itro analysis revealed fewer contaminants on rinsed stents compared with untouched (p = 0.01) and han

205 en "untouched + not-rinsed" and "untouched + rinsed stents" (p = 0.037).

206 manual stent re-crimping on the balloon; 3) rinsed stents: pressure-rinsed with the stent-cleaning c

207 Rinsing stents under high pressure immediately before co

208 This study evaluates whether rinsing stents with high pressure immediately before imp

209 etween "handled + not-rinsed" and "handled + rinsed" stents (p = 0.004), and between "untouched + not

210 (p = 0.04) and in rinsed, compared with not-rinsed, stents (p < 0.001).

211 icantly reduced in rinsed, compared with not-rinsed, stents (p = 0.002, p = 0.007, p = 0.008 respecti

212 ity and can be easily regenerated by a short rinsing step for multiple biosensing analyses.

213 ed biochip can be restored by a simple water-rinsing step, making it highly convenient for use in poi

214 Multiple rinse steps provide both structural control and thermody

215 Derivatization, extraction and rinsing steps are not required to separate the analytes

216 excess, eliminating the need for repetitive rinsing steps.

217 e any additional hybridization, labeling, or rinsing steps.

218 (rotavirus, enterovirus, adenovirus) in hand rinses, stored water, and source waters in Bagamoyo, Tan

219 th adjunctive chlorhexidine therapies (e.g., rinsing, subgingival irrigation, tongue brushing).

220 A quantitative analysis of rinsed surfaces showed that the overall solution-to-solu

221 f-etch system was compared with the etch-and-rinse system.

222 For extended analyses, a sample rinsing system flushes the sample collection reservoir p

223 t tissue grafts, post-surgical chlorhexidine rinses, systemic antibiotics, and dressings.

224 Rinsing the cathodes with deionized water did not restor

225 removing coupons from the reactor channels, rinsing the coupons to remove planktonic cells, scraping

226 or by keeping the lids open, or ex vivo, by rinsing the denuded cornea before incubating the enuclea

227 After a very brief rinsing the hybridized electrode is incubated in pH 3.0

228 aim of the present study was to observe how rinsing the mouth with solutions containing glucose and

229 After rinsing, the lenses were measured for fluorescence and t

230 After 14 days of twice-daily rinsing, the level of each of the target subgingival org

231 k = 914 +/- 29 kJ) significantly faster when rinsing their mouths with a 6.4% glucose solution compar

232 les were centrifuged and the precipitate was rinsed to remove more than 99.8% of the Ba2+ along with

233 the brush-alone treatment and the brush-plus-rinse treatment.

234 Subjects rinsed twice a day during periods 1 and 3 with placebo a

235 volving 21 healthy adults, in which subjects rinsed twice a day with placebo or 0.5% cimetidine rinse

236 h/gum brushing plus 0.12% chlorhexidine oral rinse, twice per day, plus upright positioning during fe

237 Independently of rinse type, in the FMS group, nitrite correlated negativ

238 differences in antibiotics and chlorhexidine rinse usage may have masked differences in the other cli

239 emineralization produced by the two-solution rinse was not statistically different (p > 0.05) from th

240 reeze dried products, determined by a hexane rinse, was 98.2%.

241 alyte and adequate recoveries from CIP final rinse wash samples.

242 The volume of rinse water had little influence on the recovery, due to

243 ause the shared use of cookers, cottons, and rinse water was highly correlated, a summary variable wa

244 sociated with syringe-sharing and sharing of rinse water were elevated but not significant.

245 lower income, and more likely to have shared rinse water, cotton, or cooker.

246 in a reaction between the nantokite and the rinsing water.

247 ommercially-available detergent, followed by rinsing, we were able to reuse pipettes 10 times with no

248 onstrate eight-pen parallel writing, ink and rinsing wells, and "molecular corralling" via a nanoplot

249 Subjects using the test rinse were also six times more likely to exhibit an impr

250 females were recruited, and 15-second saline rinses were collected to measure OIL as represented by c

251 Semiannually collected oral rinses were evaluated for 37 HPV genotypes using the Roc

252 ams termed rapid inertial solution exchange (RInSE), which utilizes inertial lift forces at finite Re

253 e protocol is completed by a deionized water rinse, which was also studied.

254 Mixture of methanol and water was used for rinsing, while acetonitrile and n-hexane were used as el

255 bedtime), the subjects received a one-minute rinse with 20 mL of (1) 250-ppm-F NaF rinse, (2) 1000-pp

256 ent (p > 0.05) from that produced by the NaF rinse with 4x the F content (1000 ppm F).

257 ntiseptic and, when used as a component in a rinse with H202, the rinse can decrease the level of gin

258 flux was fully recoverable following a short rinse with the feed solution and no added cleaning agent

259 in all control experiments and a cross-flow rinse with the feed solution failed to induce flux recov

260 All individuals were instructed to rinse with their respective mouthwash twice daily.

261 perative antibiotics were used, but patients rinsed with 0.12% chlorhexidine for the first 3 months p

262 Patients rinsed with 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate after debridem

263 The silver powder was annealed, rinsed with a dilute acid, and consolidated either in a

264 ) were easily reversible when the column was rinsed with DI water.

265 ther 1 or 5 sec, during which the tongue was rinsed with distilled water.

266 d NaCl and CaCl2 concentrations before being rinsed with eluents of different solution chemistries to

267 When MWNTs on SLBs were rinsed with low ionic strength solutions at pH 7.3, only

268 ed and the interior surface of the FLECs was rinsed with methanol to determine the surface concentrat

269 orescein dye was then placed into both eyes, rinsed with saline solution, and scanned at 5, 10, 15, a

270 After the cartridge was rinsed with tetrahydrofuran and water, (18)F-TFB was elu

271 subgingival sampling, 37 qualifying subjects rinsed with the essential oil mouthrinse or a negative c

272 g on the balloon; 3) rinsed stents: pressure-rinsed with the stent-cleaning chamber.

273 Filters were rinsed with water and albuterol concentrations determine

274 d suspension with gentle agitation (2-16 h), rinsed with water, and scanned.

275 e was trapped on a cation-exchange resin and rinsed with water, and the (63)Zn was eluted using 0.05

276 plied to dry hair, left for 10 minutes, then rinsed with water.

277 nt study, the two-solution rinse and two NaF rinses with F contents of 250 ppm and 1000 ppm were eval

278 oating is constructed in situ by alternating rinses with positively and negatively charged polymers,

279 the association of HPV DNA detection in oral rinses with survival was evaluated using Cox regression

280 teeth with toothpaste, brushing the tongue, rinsing with 5 mL of 3% hydrogen peroxide, breakfast ing

281 On-column rinsing with a 40% solution of citric acid rejuvenated t

282 3.2 ml kg(-1) min(-1)) tested the effect of rinsing with a 6.4% maltodextrin solution on exercise pe

283 hibit leaching of lipophilic additives after rinsing with a direct water jet and exhibited resistance

284 ld be made with the same sensing films after rinsing with acetone between each measurement.

285 n these surface-modified plates, followed by rinsing with an acetic acid solution, addition of matrix

286 this study was to investigate the effect of rinsing with an essential oil antimicrobial mouthrinse o

287 aliva was significantly decreased after oral rinsing with antibacterial chlorhexidine.

288 After rinsing with buffer solution to remove the sodium dodecy

289 ic proteins, such as albumin, are removed by rinsing with buffer.

290 ulatory levels) of nitrosamines upon initial rinsing with lab-grade water, with levels subsiding with

291 porosity formation on both length scales via rinsing with protic solvents.

292 ible dehybridization was achieved by intense rinsing with pure water.

293 UV cross-linking, they withstand a thorough rinsing with SDS.

294 Rinsing with the essential oil antiplaque/antigingivitis

295 Milk bottles were likely contaminated by rinsing with untreated well water prior to filling or by

296 ness and astringency that were lower than if rinsing with water or if presented alone without alterna

297 aping off salt crystals from its surface and rinsing with water.

298 irteen individuals accumulated plaque before rinsing with: (1) 12 mmol/L NaF (228 microg/g F), (2) 15

299 ich can be conveniently removed afterward by rinsing without disrupting the sheets.

300 Mouthwash rinses yield a higher quality and quantity of DNA than c