ライフサイエンスコーパス: riparian

1 tivity at 14 survey locations, stratified in riparian and upland habitat, in mixed-conifer forest hab

2 We found differential use of riparian and upland habitats among the phonic groups, ye

3 have spread rapidly to dominate over 600,000 riparian and wetland hectares.

4 gher in SCM (1.2 mg N kg(-1) hr(-1)) than in riparian areas (0.4 mg N kg(-1) hr(-1)).

5 Both species became more attracted to riparian areas as air temperature increased, with prefer

6 ering practices) and forested and herbaceous riparian areas in Baltimore, MD.

7 heir ability to remove N compared to natural riparian areas is not well-known.

8 well as to sustain ecological functions that riparian areas provide.

9 changes in runoff have impaired streams and riparian areas that previously reduced watershed nitroge

10 Riparian areas, particularly those with both water and w

11 igher potential denitrification than natural riparian areas.

12 riparian zones, which helps to explain high riparian biodiversity.

13 s and the physical characteristics of stream-riparian boundaries.

14 tural environmental conditions, we studied a riparian broadleaf angiosperm species, Populus angustifo

15 lidar data can be used to estimate forested riparian buffer canopy height within diverse vegetation

16 in mapping can effectively estimate forested riparian buffer H and FC within a range of riparian vege

17 red with field measurements from 80 forested riparian buffer plots.

18 wn as biogeochemical hotspots in landscapes, riparian buffer zones exhibit considerable potential con

19 habitat analyses to investigate the diet of riparian Coleoptera in relation to inundation risk and r

20 loss in emergence reduces prey subsidies to riparian communities at concentrations considered safe f

21 In addition, riparian communities obeying neutral dynamics seem to ex

22 de in marine communities and tetrodotoxin in riparian communities.

23 spatial statistics to quantify variation of riparian condition in each measurement section.

24 Evaluation of riparian condition is essential to achieve and maintain

25 had been the main human disturbances to the riparian condition, which were increased from 1976 to 20

26 land-use patterns had an important effect on riparian condition.

27 This manuscript is aimed to evaluate riparian conditions of Songhua River, the fifth longest

28 be 35 traits that enable plants to cope with riparian conditions.

29 zation, bottom substrate, shallow pools, and riparian cover).

30 streams in eastern North America shows that riparian deforestation causes channel narrowing, which r

31 ntain elk (Cervus elaphus) in high-elevation riparian drainages in northern Arizona, where elk impact

32 e explore linkages between components of the riparian ecosystem in Arctic Alaska since the 1960s, inc

33 Groundwater-fed riparian ecosystems and associated fluvial deposits abou

34 iversity of these foundation species affects riparian ecosystems and determines a much larger communi

35 Our relict riparian ecosystems from the PdT basin are indicative of

36 Global biodiversity in river and riparian ecosystems is generated and maintained by geogr

37 In semiarid western North American riparian ecosystems, increased drought and lower streamf

38 gasoline deposits may remain in the combined riparian/estuarine system for decades.

39 The strength of this subsidy in active riparian floodplains is thought to underpin local biodiv

40 ults are consistent with the hypothesis that riparian flow-pathways and seasonality in riparian soil

41 treams, and play a vital role in aquatic and riparian food webs.

42 st evidence that algal toxins propagate into riparian food webs.

43 nt policy of the United States that endorses riparian forest buffers as best management practice and

44 nhabited a latest Quaternary mosaic savannah-riparian forest ecosystem on the Aru Islands of Eastern

45 Habitat (vernal pool, upland or riparian forest floor) and site of collection explained

46 affected ~20% of the Basin and up to ~50% of riparian forests in some regions.

47 orrelations with organic soils (wetlands and riparian forests) persisted during mild drought and were

48 Along with comparable riparian forms on other Pacific Islands, var. newellii a

49 e measurements of H2 O and CO2 fluxes over a riparian grassland, shrubland, and woodland.

50 Here we aim to assess and to compare two riparian gray alder forests in terms of gaseous N2O and

51 of denitrification and N2O reduction in both riparian gray alder stands.

52 isotopologue ratios of N2O dissolved in the riparian groundwater in order to support our assumption

53 verage (15)N site preferences of N2O (SP) in riparian groundwater ranged between 11 and 44 per thousa

54 gical processes contributing to the expanded riparian habitat and range of snowshoe hares (Lepus amer

55 Riparian habitats are subjected to frequent inundation (

56 feed on predatory invertebrates in adjacent riparian habitats.

57 ease the processing of external subsidies in riparian habitats.

58 ite not being riparian specialists, and that riparian invaders disperse in more ways, including by wa

59 o examine possible causes of high degrees of riparian invasion.

60 Riparian land use across the region had only small effec

61 predictor of present-day diversity, whereas riparian land use and watershed land use in the 1990s we

62 present the first global-scale assessment of riparian litter quality by determining latitudinal varia

63 formation on large-scale trait variation for riparian litter.

64 The experiment demonstrates that riparian management targeting salmonids strongly affects

65 treams) to investigate whether four types of riparian management, including those proposed to reduce

66 restrial and aquatic origins irrespective of riparian management.

67 m insects are important prey for aquatic and riparian predators, and widespread planting of Bt crops

68 centrations, potentially due to in-stream or riparian processes.

69 nd federal and state programs that subsidize riparian reforestation for stream restoration and water

70 er Basin, site of one of the largest aquatic/riparian restoration programs in the United States, woul

71 that some Costa Rican forest birds will use 'riparian' (river margin) corridors to get back home, but

72 s suggest that increased aridity will reduce riparian seedling growth despite elevated CO(2), and wil

73 derate positive effects of elevated CO(2) on riparian seedlings are unlikely to counteract the large

74 re, we address whether this applies to urban riparian settings, where discharging groundwater may pot

75 dients in mute swan (Cygnus olor) herbivory, riparian shading, water temperature and distance downstr

76 an shrub height are consistent with observed riparian shrub expansion in the region.

77 ring discharge and the estimated increase in riparian shrub height are consistent with observed ripar

78 ents show that snowshoe hares require a mean riparian shrub height of at least 1.24-1.36 m, a thresho

79 lations between cumulative summer warmth and riparian shrub height to reconstruct annual changes in s

80 e stimulated a 78% increase in the height of riparian shrubs.

81 A first-order linear model fit best at the riparian site, indicating consistent growth increases in

82 at the upland site and a 36% increase at the riparian site.

83 dry upland tundra site and an adjacent mesic riparian site.

84 ing upland region, groundwater access at the riparian sites increased net carbon uptake (NEP) and eva

85 at riparian flow-pathways and seasonality in riparian soil concentrations are the major controls on t

86 Discharge, and simulated riparian soil water concentrations profiles, represented

87 four parameters to represent seasonality in riparian soil water THg and MeHg concentrations profiles

88 ved Hg induced by flooding of a contaminated riparian soil, we performed laboratory microcosm experim

89 k where a continuum of lateral flows through riparian soils determines streamflow concentrations.

90 metal sulfide nanoparticles in contaminated riparian soils may influence the availability of Hg for

91 ve invaded riparian zones, despite not being riparian specialists, and that riparian invaders dispers

92 en-community (beta) diversity, implying that riparian species are distributed in a more localized pat

93 x spp., Ulmus pumila) western North American riparian species in a CO(2)-controlled glasshouse, using

94 Cottonwoods are foundation riparian species, and hybridization among species is kno

95 abscission and the establishment of invasive riparian species.

96 model that approximately 55% of MeHg in two riparian spiders is derived from riverine sources while

97 In a California riparian system, the most diverse natural assemblages ar

98 white elm (Ulmus laevis Pallas), a European riparian tree species whose populations have been fragme

99 Field elm (Ulmus minor) is a riparian tree that grows in rare, small populations scat

100 cottonwood, Populus angustifolia, a dominant riparian tree.

101 s, our results reveal how planting deciduous riparian trees along temperate headwaters as an adaptati

102 The single island-endemic form, riparian var. newellii, showed especially strong differe

103 Shading by riparian vegetation also had a greater depressing effect

104 While riparian vegetation between the river and the main levee

105 Riparian vegetation is exposed to stress from inundation

106 ashington state, USA, replicated large-scale riparian vegetation manipulations implemented with the l

107 Changes in riparian vegetation or water turbidity and browning in s

108 d riparian buffer H and FC within a range of riparian vegetation types.

109 dietary impact of t-POC (from the leaves of riparian vegetation) and various phytoplankton on Daphni

110 r example, human activity can strongly alter riparian vegetation, potentially impacting both economic

111 e will modify the recruitment and quality of riparian vegetation, the timing of leaf abscission and t

112 the dynamics and patterns of biodiversity of riparian vegetation.

113 dystrophic lake > dystrophic lake/wetland > riparian wetland.

114 These results illustrate the importance of riparian wetland/floodplain areas as sources of fluvial

115 al resources where cover is extensive (>60 m riparian width).

116 For example, riparian woodland is advocated widely as shade to reduce

117 Analysis of land use patterns of riparian zone in the cold and hot spots found that land-

118 Riparian zone is crucial to the health of streams and th

119 alled three of these 4 m deep HR-MLWs in the riparian zone of a third-order river and analyzed for hy

120 north-facing slope, south-facing slope, and riparian zone, there were clear differences in fluoresce

121 emented to identify the vulnerability of the riparian zone.

122 ns (20-38 m from stream), outside the stream riparian zone.

123 ir range beyond the lake up to 40 m into the riparian zone.

124 ment sections indicated that over 60% of the riparian zones have been disturbed by human activities.

125 Possible applications range from riparian zones, agricultural field sites to contaminated

126 s in the regional species pools have invaded riparian zones, despite not being riparian specialists,

127 at there are many ways of sustaining life in riparian zones, which helps to explain high riparian bio

128 ic diversity, regardless of reforestation of riparian zones.