ライフサイエンスコーパス: rooting

1 change based on branch lengths and outgroup rooting.

2 ers and tissue initials resulting in reduced rooting.

3 s, and promotion of adventitious and lateral rooting.

4 s of both species have enhanced adventitious rooting.

5 control the complex process of adventitious rooting.

6 ar strengths > 4500 Pa) and contained deeper rooting.

7 e marsh surface, coinciding with the base of rooting.

8 angiosperms, most analyses favor the former rooting.

9 idely used in agriculture because it induces rooting.

10 a sativa (rice) identified a role for DEEPER ROOTING 1 (DRO1) in influencing the orientation of the r

11 reduced CCFN had between 33% and 40% deeper rooting, 28% lighter stem water oxygen isotope enrichmen

12 reduced CCFN had between 15% and 60% deeper rooting, 78% greater stomatal conductance, 36% greater l

13 agule dispersal, greater leaf area, and deep-rooting access to nutrients and the water table are all

14 s in light-grown plants, excess adventitious rooting and incomplete leaf vascularization.

15 low salinity marshes is subject to shallower rooting and is susceptible to erosion during large magni

16 ping expression profiles during adventitious rooting and that they regulate each other's expression a

17 avior such as time spent sniffing, mounting, rooting and without contact.

18 n, DupTree allows users to examine alternate rootings and to weight the reconciliation costs for gene

19 stimulatory effect of auxin on adventitious rooting, and auxin can further increase the number of ad

20 nce was associated with late phenology, deep rooting, and several other traits.

21 ignaling pathways in regulating adventitious rooting appears to be more complex.

22 o act independently to suppress adventitious rooting, as cytokinin mutants are strigolactone responsi

23 Elucidating the genetic control of rooting behavior under water-deficit stress is essential

24 ood tests, and find that several alternative rootings cannot be rejected by the data.

25 constructing the cell surface of tip-growing rooting cells is conserved among land plants and was act

26 Feral swine rooting commonly exceeds 20 cm in depth, especially in s

27 ORMATION4, resulting in a mass of cells with rooting competence that resembles callus formation.

28 Plant rooting depth affects ecosystem resilience to environmen

29 The resulting patterns of plant rooting depth bear a strong topographic and hydrologic s

30 The lack of clear differences in maximum rooting depth between these two functional groups, howev

31 which functional rooting profiles with equal rooting depth but different depth distributions (i.e., s

32 er low-N conditions, RCA formation increased rooting depth by 15% to 31%, increased leaf N content by

33 In well-drained uplands, rooting depth follows infiltration depth; in waterlogged

34 The maximum rooting depth for the ecosystem was approximately 25 m.

35 d vertical community composition and maximum rooting depth of the Edwards Plateau of central Texas we

36 and chemical stressors alter root lifespan, rooting depth or mycorrhizal colonization directly.

37 Results reveal strong sensitivities of rooting depth to local soil water profiles determined by

38 lected by differences in maximum or physical rooting depth, and 2) subtle, difficult-to-detect differ

39 ence posits that trees and grasses differ in rooting depth, with grasses exploiting soil moisture in

40 ith large CCS had between 21% and 27% deeper rooting (depth above which 95% of total root length is l

41 ith large CCS had between 32% and 41% deeper rooting (depth above which 95% of total root length is l

42 This framework explains the contrasting rooting depths observed under the same climate for the s

43 r table or its capillary fringe within plant rooting depths.

44 ynamics may require incorporating fine-scale rooting differences between these functional groups and

45 inputs are stochastic, coexistence based on rooting differences is viable under a wide range of cond

46 however, published studies based on outgroup rooting disagree regarding the position of the archaeal

47 (IBA) is an endogenous auxin used to enhance rooting during propagation.

48 oots over shoots and substantially increased rooting efficiency with most genes tested.

49 ulti-stemmed trees with spatially segregated rooting environments: aerial litter caches, aerial decay

50 If P. australis deep rooting favors the decomposition of deep-buried SOM accu

51 gametophyte and sporophyte, with a specific rooting function evolving later in the land plant lineag

52 ls the development of tip-growing cells with rooting functions among most extant land plants.

53 Root hairs and rhizoids are cells with rooting functions in land plants.

54 The rooting horizon is a dark grey sandy mudstone showing li

55 rs, flooded roots (aerenchyma), adventitious rooting in hypocotyls, and leaf abscission zones.

56 The macrophytes, rooting in metal contaminated, hypoxic, and sulfide rich

57 Selection, pruning, filtering or re-rooting in one representation is immediately reflected i

58 We propose a model in which adventitious rooting is an adaptive developmental response involving

59 Adventitious rooting is an essential but sometimes rate-limiting step

60 he promotive effect of auxin on adventitious rooting is influenced by ethylene responsiveness.

61 The rolB (for rooting locus of Agrobacterium rhizogenes) oncogene has

62 ibit root elongation, stimulate adventitious rooting, mediate root gravitropism, and stimulate transc

63 Ca2+ in rooting medium is essential for root elongation, even in

64 as though the PM were bathed directly in the rooting medium with no effect from the cell wall (CW).

65 relate poorly with ion concentrations in the rooting medium.

66 ndicate that coexistence mechanisms based on rooting niche differentiation are more viable under some

67 ts that trees and grasses occupy overlapping rooting niches, and that stochastic events such as fires

68 uced root elongation, increased adventitious rooting, no root gravitropism, and ectopic expression fr

69 ly evolution of lophotrochozoans, suggesting rooting of brachiopods into the sessile lophotrochozoans

70 Rooting of chromosomal band sequences by outgroup compar

71 Tuber yields were reduced and rooting of cuttings was strongly inhibited in POTM1 supp

72 ease the rate of flower wilting, promote the rooting of cuttings, and facilitate the nodulation of le

73 ulfolobus spp.) to phyla, and of preliminary rooting of deep-branching candidate divisions, including

74 d-type plants but had little or no effect on rooting of NR plants.

75 In addition, subclade rooting of the C branch revealed unequal evolutionary ra

76 between species can shed new light into the rooting of the tree of life and the origin of eukaryotes

77 ukarya lends further support to the archaeal rooting of the tree of life.

78 To evaluate the effect of deep rooting on SOM decomposition we designed a mesocosm expe

79 osomes from males belonging to a set of deep-rooting pedigrees was used to estimate a conservative av

80 lator PtRR13 (DeltaDDKPtRR13) have a delayed rooting phenotype and cause misregulation of CONTINUOUS

81 RO1 in Prunus domestica (plum) led to deeper-rooting phenotypes.

82 s is well established, but of three possible rooting positions the Mandibulata hypothesis receives th

83 analysis and a modification of the midpoint-rooting procedure, this partitioning was used to infer t

84 ) subtle, difficult-to-detect differences in rooting profiles between the two functional groups may b

85 this view are: 1) we lack data on functional rooting profiles in trees and grasses, and these profile

86 ironmental conditions under which functional rooting profiles with equal rooting depth but different

87 perimental results directly support theories rooting selfhood in the neural monitoring of internal or

88 ic analyses place SAGMEG Archaea as a deeply rooting sister clade of the Thermococci, leading us to p

89 morphology led to the hypothesis that their rooting (stigmarian) systems were modified leafy shoot s

90 ls we suggest that the evolution of lycopsid rooting structures displays two contrasting patterns - c

91 The evolution of rooting structures was a crucial event in Earth's histor

92 542 543 References 543 The evolution of rooting structures was a crucial event in Earth's histor

93 review the anatomy and evolution of lycopsid rooting structures.

94 mechanisms that controlled the growth of the rooting system in the earliest land plants, we identifie

95 ew information is emerging on the origins of rooting systems, their interactions with fungi, and thei

96 hat PtAIL1 is a positive regulator of poplar rooting that acts early in the development of adventitio

97 In our analysis, four species were used for rooting the Plasmodium phylogenetic tree: two from close

98 Further, rooting the VacA tree with outgroup sequences from the c

99 In spite of the importance of adventitious rooting, the mechanism behind this developmental process

100 cent and can explain the canonical bacterial rooting typically recovered from sequence analysis.

101 traviolet B exposure and grown in restricted rooting volumes; conversely, it was lost when ir-CAD pla

102 167, are positive regulators of adventitious rooting, whereas ARF17, a target of miR160, is a negativ

103 Rooting with Ochrobactrum anthropi reveals that the B. o

104 for 104 taxa, and (iii) tests of alternative rootings with the nonparametric bootstrap and the likeli

105 ionship of C1qDC proteins reveals an ancient rooting, with clear members found in eubacterial species

106 o permanently immobilize contaminants in the rooting zone, often requiring addition of an amendment t

107 k soil and 27 times greater than the aerobic rooting zone.

108 These data indicate that distinctive rooting zones of D. corymbosa contribute to spatial segr