コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 cose) or did not predict increased calories (saccharin).
2 tex and striatum, which were unresponsive to saccharin.
3 gonist were able to acquire CTAs to familiar saccharin.
4 increase in sucrose and chow intake but not saccharin.
5 -induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA) to saccharin.
6 s people more sensitive to the bitterness of saccharin.
7 o the bitterness of an artificial sweetener, saccharin.
8 antly associated with preferences for 1.6 mm saccharin.
9 and also preferred the noncaloric sweetener saccharin.
10 nduced larger increases in FLI than familiar saccharin.
11 rague-Dawley rats were given 5 min access to saccharin.
12 ent of a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) to saccharin.
13 y 2 times higher than the average loading of saccharin.
14 t off-target CAs (Ki > 50000 nM) compared to saccharin.
15 tes a so far unknown isomer that we call iso-saccharin.
16 this effect was replicated by D-fructose or saccharin.
18 ver for EtOH (10% v/v) and another lever for saccharin (0.05% or 0.75% g/v), then dose-response and t
19 o, or 5min after, a single pairing of sodium saccharin (0.125%, 10-min access) and LiCl or NaCl (0.15
23 f taste compounds (cycloheximide, 10 microm; saccharin, 2 mm; denatonium, 1 mm; SC45647, 100 microm).
25 eness to a surrogate nipple providing water, saccharin, 5% ethanol, or 10% ethanol was tested in newb
26 solution compared with a placebo containing saccharin (60.4 +/- 3.7 and 61.6 +/- 3.8 min, respective
27 Significant removal of aspartame (68.2%) and saccharin (90.3%) was found in WWTPs; however, sucralose
29 tocol of daily ingestion of a 3% solution of saccharin, a noncaloric sweetener, induced synaptic GluA
30 e results showed that rats avoided intake of saccharin after saccharin-cocaine pairings and that grea
31 ral-lesions displayed a CTA by rejecting the saccharin, although increases in c-FLI on the side of th
32 nstead given a low value reward (e.g., 0.15% saccharin), an effect termed successive negative contras
33 procedures and the same taste stimuli (0.15% saccharin and 1.0 M sucrose), the authors tested the hyp
36 small molecule artificial sweeteners such as saccharin and acesulfame K, and proteins such as monelli
37 ctivation of hTAS2R31 (formerly hTAS2R44) by saccharin and acesulfame K, two common artificial sweete
38 precursor cells with artificial sweeteners, saccharin and acesulfame potassium, enhanced adipogenesi
39 The structures of the conjugate bases of saccharin and iso-saccharin were also computed theoretic
40 pared with STDRLO, STDRHI mice consumed more saccharin and less quinine, exhibited greater ethanol-in
41 stered before (but not after) the pairing of saccharin and LiCl resulted in a significantly stronger
47 They were then given brief access to 0.15% saccharin and soon thereafter injected with either cocai
49 d, sucrose, and ethanol), those that do not (saccharin and water), and those lacking biological relev
50 responsive to natural rewards (in this case saccharin), and the stronger preference for saccharin se
51 he number of meals initiated for water, 0.1% saccharin, and 1.0 M sucrose solutions, but meal size wa
53 n and LiCl showed a decreased preference for saccharin, and OA administered before (but not after) th
58 es, and environmental emission of sucralose, saccharin, aspartame, and acesulfame were determined bas
59 Second, firing evoked by cues signalling saccharin availability shifted from a pattern of primari
60 ophobia, retarded acquisition of conditioned saccharin avoidance and apparently attenuated the magnit
64 Preexposure to a nipple providing ethanol or saccharin (but not a nipple alone or fluids alone) incre
65 sioned rats displayed a CTA by rejecting the saccharin, but increases in c-FLI were evident only on t
67 and testing occur in a novel environment, CS saccharin causes an increase in c-Fos expression, and wh
69 that rats avoided intake of saccharin after saccharin-cocaine pairings and that greater avoidance of
70 voided intake of the saccharin cue following saccharin-cocaine pairings; however, the rats in the yok
71 ed yogurt dietary supplements sweetened with saccharin compared with those fed glucose-sweetened diet
73 uppress intake of a normally preferred 0.15% saccharin conditioned stimulus (CS) when it is paired wi
77 ue-Dawley rats acquired a strong aversion to saccharin (conditioned stimulus; CS) and then underwent
80 d taste aversion learning induced by pairing saccharin consumption with LiCl injection, by making the
81 ce consumed less ethanol but were similar in saccharin consumption, sensitivity to ethanol-induced CP
83 he wide variety of interfering UV spectra in saccharin-containing beverage matrices, the same method
84 data suggest that rats suppress intake of a saccharin CS in anticipation of the availability of a pr
85 ructural analysis of licking) for a standard saccharin CS paired with the following: lithium chloride
90 aFosB in the striatum were given access to a saccharin cue and then injected with saline, 10 mg/kg co
92 othesis suggests that rats avoid intake of a saccharin cue following pairings with a drug of abuse be
93 Both cocaine groups avoided intake of the saccharin cue following saccharin-cocaine pairings; howe
96 hibit greater cocaine-induced avoidance of a saccharin cue relative to Fischer 344 rats; while reward
101 on of intraorally infused water, sucrose, or saccharin, demonstrating that ingestion analgesia does n
103 caused rats to significantly suppress their saccharin drinking (relative to controls) - indicating a
105 minister ethanol (10-15%, w/v) in 0.2% (w/v) saccharin during daily 30 min sessions and were surgical
107 t 1, water-deprived rats had 5-min access to saccharin followed by active or yoked intravenous delive
108 ischer rats were given 5 min access to 0.15% saccharin followed by an icv injection of either DAMGO (
109 g of intraoral infusion of 5-ml 0.15% sodium-saccharin followed by injection with LiCl (0.15 M, 20 ml
110 g of intraoral infusion of 5 ml 0.15% sodium-saccharin followed by injection with LiCl (0.15 M, 20 ml
111 al nicotine administration (100 mug/ml in 2% saccharin for 14 days), with special emphasis on amyloid
112 nstrate that the affinity and selectivity of saccharin for CA IX can be further modulated when linked
113 er pairing intake of a palatable glucose and saccharin (G+S) solution with magnetic field exposure.
114 h a fixed amount of a yogurt diet mixed with saccharin gained more weight and showed impaired caloric
115 m ascorbate, like other sodium salts such as saccharin, glutamate, and bicarbonate, produces urinary
116 reference for water flavored with sucrose or saccharin in a two-bottle free-choice drinking paradigm.
118 nduced CTA strongly decreased motivation for saccharin in an operant task to obtain the tastant.
121 immunoreactivity than the familiar taste of saccharin in the basolateral region of the amygdala, cen
122 esulfame potassium approximately sucralose > saccharin, in parallel with their ability to increase in
123 of neohesperidin dihydrochalcone (NHDC) and saccharin] included in piglets' feed reduces incidence o
125 charin with lithium or wheel-running reduced saccharin intake as well as lick cluster size, initial l
126 that greater morphine-induced suppression of saccharin intake by the Fischer rats is not likely media
127 infusions of 6% carbohydrate did not affect saccharin intake during the first ingestive bout, but la
131 l rats, morphine caused a rapid reduction in saccharin intake when the taste was novel but not when i
132 Pairing saccharin with amphetamine reduced saccharin intake without reducing the size of licking cl
137 onditionally preferred taste stimulus (e.g., saccharin) is reduced by contingent administration of a
140 tly reduced EtOH-maintained responding, with saccharin-maintained responding being reduced only with
145 all rats were exposed to the same number of saccharin-morphine pairings, only half of these animals
148 rent types of stimuli were used: taste (0.5% saccharin), olfactory (0.1% amyl acetate), and trigemina
149 These subjects consumed a higher percent saccharin on test day and their CTAs extinguished more r
154 lution of either 300 parts per million (ppm) saccharin or water with or without the addition of 500 p
155 hat HR rats display a greater preference for saccharin over cocaine compared with ST and HA whereas t
156 ats were then tested on their preference for saccharin over cocaine in a discrete-trial choice proced
160 both anions may be relevant in systems where saccharin participates, as is the case of the recently p
161 trains showed the strongest association with saccharin preference at three sites: nucleotide (nt) -79
162 ggest that the polymorphisms associated with saccharin preference do not act by blocking gene express
163 ify Tas1r3 sequence variants associated with saccharin preference in a large number of inbred mouse s
164 f recent studies suggest that the mouse Sac (saccharin preference) locus is identical to the Tas1r3 (
165 m six inbred mouse strains with high and low saccharin preference, including the strains in which the
168 ver, those subjects which were preexposed to saccharin prior to CS/US pairing displayed significantly
170 oning and testing occur in the home cage, CS saccharin produces a decrease in c-Fos expression relati
176 2 knockdown reduces methamphetamine, but not saccharin, SA on a progressive ratio schedule of reinfor
177 A was formed through 3 pairings of 0.3% oral saccharin (SAC) and 81 mg/kg i.p. lithium chloride (LiCl
178 ed a strong CTA [via 3 pairings of 0.3% oral saccharin (SAC; the CS) and 81mg/kg i.p. lithium chlorid
179 itly unpaired (EU) conditioned stimulus (CS; saccharin, SAC) and unconditioned stimulus (US; lithium
180 rats reached 90% reacceptance of a tastant (saccharin: SAC) that had previously been associated with
181 stration at doses that neither affected 0.2% saccharin self-administration nor locomotor activity.
186 lf of all subjects were preexposed to a 0.2% saccharin solution (CS) for 4 consecutive days prior to
189 -like state, and loss of taste preference in saccharin solution consumption test which pointed to the
190 l infusions of a cocaine-predictive flavored saccharin solution elicited aversive orofacial responses
191 Results revealed that the taste of the novel saccharin solution evoked more Fos immunoreactivity than
192 -like behaviors were assessed by sweet-taste Saccharin solution preference (SSP) and forced swimming
196 d food (15% sucrose), and non-nutrient (0.2% saccharin) solutions following intraperitoneal (i.p.) ad
197 ocity values for aqueous solutions of sodium saccharin (SS) has been measured as a function of concen
200 iment 2 established that a safe and familiar saccharin stimulus supports substantially weaker conditi
204 id not cause a conditioned taste aversion to saccharin, suggesting that the anorexic effect of NAc co
205 t study examined whether a novel taste (0.5% saccharin) supports a different pattern of c-Fos express
206 tassium; AceK) as well as in animals given a saccharin-sweetened base diet (refried beans) that was c
207 creased weight gain in response to consuming saccharin-sweetened compared with glucose-sweetened supp
208 ntake, weight gain, and adiposity when given saccharin-sweetened compared with glucose-sweetened yogu
210 g that body weight differences persist after saccharin-sweetened diets are discontinued and following
213 ion of the bile duct (BDL) was paired with a saccharin taste developed a persistent conditioned taste
216 rials these ICX rats consistently drank more saccharin than the ICX rats maintained on saccharin thro
217 ss for an unexpected low-value reward (0.15% saccharin) than did control subjects that only received
218 nded most positively to the nipple providing saccharin, the longest time spent on an empty nipple was
223 ly effective method to identify and quantify saccharin using HPLC with fluorescence detection (HPLC-F
224 sion could not be classically conditioned to saccharin using WRYamide as the unconditioned stimulus.
230 sweeteners such as aspartame, cyclamate, and saccharin were not enhanced by SE-1 whereas sucrose and
231 es to NaCl, HCI, quinine-HCl, sucrose and Na saccharin were recorded simultaneously in pairs of singl
232 study are similar to those seen with sodium saccharin when administered in a two-generation bioassay
238 eward value of the available solution (0.15% saccharin) with respect to the memory of the preferred s
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。