コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ts who experienced relapse responded well to salvage treatment.
2 dder cancer (MIBC), reserving cystectomy for salvage treatment.
3 specific antigen levels >/= 0.2 ng/mL or any salvage treatment.
4 mechanism, it may offer a fine strategy for salvage treatment.
5 pendymomas located in eloquent areas or as a salvage treatment.
6 loped early disease progression and required salvage treatment.
7 o have isolated local recurrence amenable to salvage treatment.
8 lant (SCT) was compared with chemotherapy as salvage treatment.
9 Patients that relapse require salvage treatment.
10 cutive follow-up visits or the initiation of salvage treatment.
11 tify resistance patterns to select effective salvage treatments.
12 icant advances in supportive care and better salvage treatments.
13 ions unanswered about optimal first-line and salvage treatments.
14 e cancer, including 89 (22%) who received no salvage treatment, 18 (11%) who received salvage radioth
15 success rate with stem-cell transplantation salvage treatment administered among patients in both tr
16 l tolerated and show substantial efficacy as salvage treatment and equal or even superior efficacy co
18 ould result in additional neurotoxicity from salvage treatments and brain damage by relapsing tumor.
20 splatin resistance, which requires intensive salvage treatment, and have a 50% risk of cancer-related
23 juvant treatment for all high-risk cases vs. salvage treatment at the time of prostate-specific antig
26 d the safety and efficacy of gene therapy as salvage treatment for older XSCID children with inadequa
27 erapy; immunotherapy is emerging as a viable salvage treatment for patients in whom first-line chemot
29 matologic effects of single-agent CEP-701 as salvage treatment for patients with refractory, relapsed
30 medicine methods for detecting and planning salvage treatment for prostate cancer local recurrence a
33 c survival relative to those who received no salvage treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32 [95% confiden
36 s indicated by the possibility of successful salvage treatment in more than 70% of PET2-positive pati
38 ogenetic abnormalities, sex, and response to salvage treatment is considered, t(8;21) and inv(16) AML
39 Clinically, with such high cure rates after salvage treatments, most of the controversy focuses now
40 ical and/or local recurrence and received no salvage treatment (n = 397), salvage radiotherapy alone
42 this study were to quantify the prospects of salvage treatment of patients who did not undergo transp
46 osurgery has a promising role in primary and salvage treatment of select prostate cancer patients.
47 Radioembolization is a safe and effective salvage treatment option in advanced NET patients with l
48 al fusion apparatus, has been relegated to a salvage treatment option mostly due to poor in vivo stab
49 recurrence, or assessment for suitability of salvage treatment or as response assessment within 1-6 m
51 high-dose therapy compared with conventional salvage treatment (OS: 54% v 47%, P = .25; EFS: 53% v 27
53 irst remission (<12 months vs >/=12 months), salvage treatment phase (first vs second), and age (<55
55 g trimodality therapy, for whom surveillance/salvage treatment plays a lesser role,(1) in the BMT pop
59 l to identify recurrence earlier and perform salvage treatments, thereby possibly improving survival
60 or PET2-positive patients (regardless of the salvage treatment they received) and 81% for PET2-negati
61 wever, the ability to effectively administer salvage treatment to patients with radiorecurrent diseas
62 is has been based on historically controlled salvage treatment trials in patients failing or intolera
66 apsed after fludarabine therapy responded to salvage treatment, usually with fludarabine-based regime
67 emia who were due to receive first or second salvage treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) via an in
68 agnosis, what are the optimal first-line and salvage treatments, what is the role of maintenance ther
70 In patients with a long REM1 (>/=3 years), salvage treatment with either repeat FCR or lenalidomide
72 majority of patients eventually relapse, and salvage treatments with non-cross-resistant compounds ar
73 matologic malignancies subsequently received salvage treatment, with either alkylating agents alone (
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。