ライフサイエンスコーパス: sampling error

1 t is invasive, and results are vulnerable to sampling error.

2 ssessment of the entire liver, thus avoiding sampling error.

3 ents but it is invasive, costly and prone to sampling error.

4 cceptability to relatives, but risks greater sampling error.

5 nty intervals that indicate sampling and non-sampling error.

6 hich are invasive, expensive, and subject to sampling error.

7 , before it enters an absorbing state due to sampling error.

8 s, and assessment is subjective and prone to sampling error.

9 opsy and lavage often subject to problems of sampling error.

10 ific counts and is markedly robust to severe sampling error.

11 ith other introduced North American pines or sampling error.

12 piration (FNA) of lung lesions is subject to sampling errors.

13 imprecision than expected under pure Poisson sampling errors.

14 vity require biopsy samples and are prone to sampling errors.

15 hich is not only invasive, but also prone to sampling errors.

16 nd we used synaptic size data to correct for sampling errors.

17 16.1% of the variation, and statistical and sampling error accounted for 38.5% of the variation.

18 tures uncertainty caused by sampling and non-sampling error across data types.

19 typically minimal, compared with that due to sampling error alone, for population samples up to 1000.

20 for quantitative imaging protocols, temporal sampling error analysis techniques and selected calculat

21 The combined effect of severe sampling error and age- or stage-specific counts leads t

22 timates for each measurement, capturing both sampling error and consistency between replicates.

23 We point out the relative impacts of sampling error and estimation error, calling attention t

24 pecific for CNI toxicity but are affected by sampling error and limited reproducibility.

25 conducted to reduce the potential effects of sampling error and methodological differences in data ac

26 rosis markers avoid biopsy complications and sampling error and provide results as a continuous varia

27 However, given the possibility of sampling error and the nature of breast disease, close m

28 t, particularly in view of biopsy-associated sampling errors and heterogeneous receptor expression in

29 iginal sample, thereby producing significant sampling errors and potentially erroneous conclusions.

30 luding the invasive nature of the procedure, sampling error, and interobserver variability.

31 trict, working [strict conditioned by tissue sampling error], applied [working conditioned by concord

32 We suggest that sampling errors are principally the result of inaccuraci

33 suspension serially is prone to statistical sampling errors as the cell suspension becomes more dilu

34 al survey error) comprising sampling and non-sampling error, both of which must be considered when in

35 the chronology of extinctions suggests that sampling error can explain the absence of terminal Pleis

36 e patchy nature of dysplasia, which leads to sampling error caused by insufficient biopsy by endoscop

37 This paper examines the impact of the sampling error caused by the small size of the focused l

38 igibility did not account for the effects of sampling error, clustering, and stratification; 62 (54.4

39 gain and loss, pervasive secondary loss, and sampling error collectively render microRNA-based infere

40 have separated the analytical error from the sampling error for the target compounds.

41 sapphire substrate to minimize experimental sampling errors for a set of 144 pattern arrays with cir

42 d from weak signals and can be attributed to sampling error from specimens with low concentrations (<

43 Second, enforcing sparsity helps prevent sampling errors from swamping out the true signal in hig

44 the pronounced accuracy of EM estimates once sampling error has been accounted for.

45 alysis with a small laser spot can lead to a sampling error (i.e., undersampling) much like that foun

46 rrow involvement (BMI) can be low because of sampling error if the BMI is focal and not diffuse.

47 and bias are the most common sources of non-sampling error in household survey estimates and we reco

48 Sampling error in sequential biopsy samples was frequent

49 However, liver biopsy is associated with sampling error, interobserver variability, and potential

50 nges and complications still exist including sampling error, interobserver variability, bleeding, art

51 ug selection, non-drug-related evolution, or sampling error introduced by the sequencing process.

52 The potential for sampling error is a concern.

53 contrast, the direction and magnitude of non-sampling error is almost always unmeasurable, and theref

54 Sampling error is usually thought of as the precision of

55 Mechanisms other than pathologic SLN sampling error may contribute to the failure of the SLN

56 Sampling error may contribute to the lack of outcome dif

57 stribution of neurons in the ganglion led to sampling errors of up to 50%.

58 era from this time interval is the result of sampling error or temporally staggered extinctions is un

59 ry is performed for lesions with anticipated sampling error or when CNB findings are discordant with

60 he three organisms are unlikely to be due to sampling errors or any potential bias in the methods use

61 These are caused by sampling error, sequencing error, nonuniqueness, and non

62 5% for the analytical error and 20% for the sampling error, suggesting that the latter is the greate

63 f statistical convergence reveals systematic sampling errors that correlate with reorganization of th

64 After accounting for sampling error, the directions of viability (positive) a

65 regression with adjustments for bias and non-sampling error to synthesise the data for under-5 mortal

66 The contribution of sampling error to the measurement is delineated first by

67 at individual markers, and is susceptible to sampling error, typing error and joint selection involvi

68 ities) is confounded by the addition of high sampling error variation.

69 The influence of sampling error was tested by re-sampling with different

70 e estimator that corrects for sequencing and sampling errors was applied to a SAGE library (137 832 t

71 Acceptable sampling errors were set in consultation with government

72 of viral molecular adaptation by considering sampling error when computing nucleotide site-frequencie

73 nce early upgrading likely represent initial sampling error, whereas later upgrading may reflect tumo

74 rs, noting that much of this error is due to sampling error, which is inherent in all studies, even w

75 The latter has some risks and potential of sampling error with a single biopsy.