ライフサイエンスコーパス: satisfaction

1 proved access to care, outcomes, and patient satisfaction.

2 ong-term postoperative morbidity and patient satisfaction.

3 low trial withdrawal rate and better patient satisfaction.

4 networks, support and perceived support and satisfaction.

5 f them reporting high level of post-surgical satisfaction.

6 g patient adherence to treatment and patient satisfaction.

7 p issues, and overall sexual functioning and satisfaction.

8 ed quality of life and patient and clinician satisfaction.

9 e, pain, ankle motion, mobility, and patient satisfaction.

10 e; quality of care; and patient and provider satisfaction.

11 health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction.

12 expressed significantly less pain and higher satisfaction.

13 erlipidemia), functional status, and patient satisfaction.

14 th surrounding tissues, and patient esthetic satisfaction.

15 nctional outcome in addition to high patient satisfaction.

16 ng times to have a greater impact on patient satisfaction.

17 plications, health resource use, and patient satisfaction.

18 h VAS and the Questionnaire of Oral Esthetic Satisfaction.

19 h a high level of visual quality and patient satisfaction.

20 adverse events, cost per patient and patient satisfaction.

21 nd training and practice characteristics and satisfaction.

22 /dL]) and reported higher HRQL and treatment satisfaction.

23 points included adverse effects and patient satisfaction.

24 performed exceptionally in terms of patient satisfaction.

25 c and periodontal parameters; and 5) patient satisfaction.

26 S and CPVT have high levels of postoperative satisfaction.

27 incentives for donation and optimize patient satisfaction.

28 th outcomes, access to care, and beneficiary satisfaction.

29 and possibly lead to much greater physician satisfaction.

30 training experience but also improve trainee satisfaction.

31 detrimental effects of time pressure on life satisfaction.

32 s of both spectacle independence and patient satisfaction.

33 ery is a new approach to assess symptoms and satisfaction.

34 on time-saving services report greater life satisfaction.

35 e performance and excellent patient-reported satisfaction.

36 ty improvement initiatives targeting patient satisfaction.

37 evel of concern and low level of therapeutic satisfaction.

38 events and improved patient and care partner satisfaction.

39 Inventory, as well as self-esteem, and life satisfaction.

40 ength of stay, cosmetic outcome, and patient satisfaction.

41 spent in severe pain, pain interference, and satisfaction.

42 hysicians or how childbearing affects career satisfaction.

43 pretation, and ultimately their professional satisfaction.

44 are associated with enhanced patient/parent satisfaction.

45 vement, motivation/insight, and overall work satisfaction.

46 s, clinical throughput, and patient care and satisfaction.

47 as staff sickness (-0.12, 0.37) and patient satisfaction (-0.06, 0.64), were not.

48 The program has been met with high patient satisfaction (4.95 of 5).

49 1; 95% CI, 3.0 to 13.3; P = .002); treatment satisfaction (67.7 vs 59.8; mean difference, 7.8; 95% CI

50 symptoms (3.06 to 3.20, p<0.0001), and life satisfaction (7.58 to 7.61; p=0.0034) slightly increased

51 Federal policymakers have made patient satisfaction a core measure for the way hospitals are ev

52 stic regression was performed to compare job satisfaction across racial and ethnic groups while adjus

53 grafting reported significantly lower breast satisfaction (adjusted mean difference [AMD], -4.74; 95%

54 nd functional outcome parameters and patient satisfaction after implantation of this new artificial i

55 e fat-grafted cohort reported similar breast satisfaction (AMD, -0.68; 95% CI, -4.42 to 3.06; P = .72

56 serious complications are higher and patient satisfaction and ability to return to normal activities

57 Assessing the satisfaction and burden within an academic animal care a

58 general quality of life and VKA perception (satisfaction and convenience) were measured at inclusion

59 ospital staff regarding improving attitudes, satisfaction and feelings of caring efficacy, in provisi

60 he level of disease control, enhance patient satisfaction and increase effectiveness of preventive in

61 ssue harvesting appear to have reported more satisfaction and less discomfort after treatment.

62 It may increase patients' satisfaction and lower the cost of wound care.

63 effective interventions based on participant satisfaction and perceived value.

64 ality: people high in well-being (i.e., life satisfaction and positive emotion) were central to netwo

65 was associated with an improvement in breast satisfaction and psychosocial well-being.

66 Satisfaction and quiting imaging studies after finding a

67 rship is considered a key element for career satisfaction and retention in academic surgery.

68 Given the importance of mentorship to career satisfaction and retention, development of formal mentor

69 nal culture also have implications for nurse satisfaction and retention.

70 into activity patterns associated with life satisfaction and self-reported disease.

71 .1), with best VA at 60 cm; and high patient satisfaction and spectacle independence 3 months postope

72 Patients' satisfaction and spectacle independence were evaluated w

73 ults could have a strong impact for consumer satisfaction and the food industry.

74 sured through ACS NSQIP, as well as resident satisfaction and well-being measured through a survey de

75 Patients reported high satisfaction and were willing to pay out of pocket for a

76 ticles reporting on questionnaires on family satisfaction and/or needs in the ICU were included.

77 n organisational change linked to checkpoint satisfaction and/or obligatory changes in kinetochore me

78 arch on hedonic (work, educational, and life satisfaction) and eudaimonic (career calling, meaning, e

79 n episodes or time between episodes, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects.

80 tors on surgical complication rates, patient satisfaction, and anxiety.

81 f-reported mental health, self-reported life satisfaction, and body mass index.

82 eased rates of job turnover, reduced patient satisfaction, and decreased quality of care.

83 CatQuest-9SF, spectacle independence, vision satisfaction, and dysphotopsia) and visual function meas

84 the treatment; and 3) perceptions, level of satisfaction, and impact on patient quality of life (QoL

85 Factors concerning recurrence, reoperations, satisfaction, and improved QoL were analyzed.

86 ion and recurrence), operative time, patient satisfaction, and intraoperative and postoperative pain

87 sical workload, lower job strain, higher job satisfaction, and less musculoskeletal symptoms.

88 advance care planning, patient and caregiver satisfaction, and lower health care utilization.

89 Excellent outcomes for graft survival, satisfaction, and morbidity suggest that the combined op

90 as manifested in clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and overall system savings.

91 icant predictor of burnout, decreased career satisfaction, and poorer QOL.

92 associations between activity patterns, life satisfaction, and self-reported disease.

93 fractive and visual acuity outcomes, patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence at 3 months of

94 Visual and refractive performance, patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence were evaluated.

95 glucose-to-ileum altered VAS-rated fullness, satisfaction, and thoughts of food compared with saline-

96 quality of information; 9) level of patient satisfaction; and 10) QoL.

97 5 subscales, higher scores indicating better satisfaction; and adverse events.

98 onsider 1) OHRQoL and 2) patients' treatment satisfaction as patient-reported outcomes in conjunction

99 Survey subscales included breast satisfaction, as well as psychosocial, physical, and sex

100 re change in knowledge (quiz and recall) and satisfaction, assessed by questionnaires at baseline and

101 e symptoms, and resulted in higher levels of satisfaction at 1, 2, and 3 years follow-up.

102 Data suggested small differences in satisfaction at 3 months, with patients more satisfied w

103 was high, with no statistical difference in satisfaction between therapies at any time point.

104 judged they had a high to very high level of satisfaction, but most CHWs (approximately 75%) in Burki

105 l carbon footprints while improving customer satisfaction by lowering the "soft costs" to consumers o

106 rs, comorbidities, side-effects, and patient satisfaction by means of shared decisions.

107 y outcomes included patient and care partner satisfaction, care plan concordance, and resource utiliz

108 es, including quality of life, knowledge and satisfaction, caregiver burden, time tradeoffs, and out-

109 When balanced with patient-reported satisfaction, clinical rankings of esthetics, and contro

110 safety issues, function, knowledge, patient satisfaction, confidence in care received, mental health

111 provements in confidence and competence, job satisfaction, critical thinking and reductions in stress

112 er satisfaction, with women reporting higher satisfaction currently.

113 ciations between personality traits and life satisfaction depended on neighborhood characteristics.

114 ntermediate, and near distance; high patient satisfaction despite some optical phenomena; and high sp

115 Only in life satisfaction did health inequality fall during this peri

116 Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction did not show any difference between the 2 g

117 Change in satisfaction differed between groups (intervention, 1.2%

118 ifference, 32.4; 95% CI, 24.9-39.8), and VAS satisfaction (difference, 33.2; 95% CI, 25.4-41.0) score

119 designed to examine safety, cost and patient satisfaction during 12 months follow-up.

120 nts exposed to preoperative VR had increased satisfaction during the surgical encounter.

121 s in their QoL combined with a low treatment satisfaction, emphasizing the need for adequate treatmen

122 cribe social support, networks and perceived satisfaction, explore the clinical correlates of these o

123 To develop PRO measures to assess satisfaction, eye-related symptoms, and their effect on

124 Four program operation metrics (patient satisfaction, eyeglass remakes, disease detection, and v

125 ternity leave and its relationship to career satisfaction for female physicians in procedural and non

126 amily leave policies may help improve career satisfaction for female physicians.

127 Participants drew satisfaction from trauma team members' demeanor, experti

128 Mental well-being, defined as life satisfaction, fulfilling social relationships, purpose i

129 titutions in the highest quartile of patient satisfaction had the higher process of care performance

130 An individual's satisfaction has been found to affect health-related dec

131 , we examined if hospitals with high patient satisfaction have lower levels of performance on accepte

132 Secondly, use of medication and treatment satisfaction in AR and NAR was assessed.

133 ficant improvements in attitudes towards and satisfaction in caring for people with dementia and feel

134 Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (ADQ), satisfaction in caring for people with dementia was capt

135 e, Impact of Event Scale-Revised, and Family Satisfaction in the ICU were collected prior to ICU disc

136 e Family Satisfaction Survey, and the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit.

137 an effective search strategy for constraint satisfaction, including structure prediction from predic

138 ter PCI has the potential to improve patient satisfaction, increase bed availability, and reduce hosp

139 al nurses is associated with decreased nurse satisfaction, increased turnover and negative patient ou

140 were observed for orgasmic function, sexual satisfaction, intercourse frequency, relationship intima

141 Understanding minority nurses' job satisfaction is a critical first step to inform strategi

142 However, it remains unclear whether patient satisfaction is an accurate marker of high-quality surgi

143 Patient satisfaction is an increasingly common feature of qualit

144 Patient satisfaction is an increasingly important component of h

145 Subject satisfaction is improved significantly with minimal ocul

146 f recovery (directly associated with patient satisfaction) is an important clinical outcome measureme

147 rison is a known determinant of overall life satisfaction, it is not clear how it affects moment-to-m

148 nal words (P = .025), and exhibited a higher satisfaction level regarding nurses' interventions (P =

149 Although satisfaction levels are generally high among patients ch

150 th, but also encompassing happiness and life satisfaction, meaning and purpose, character and virtue,

151 nication, health-related quality-of-life and satisfaction measures and a manualised consultation-codi

152 al health-related function, and overall life satisfaction more than usual care.

153 eatures or tension from biorientation to SAC satisfaction nor how these possible cues change during a

154 Furthermore, we find that SAC satisfaction occurs despite the absence of large changes

155 mes at the cost of some independence and the satisfaction of being able to call oneself a scientist.

156 However, job satisfaction of employees working fixed nights was reduc

157 se, protease, and integrase-and have had the satisfaction of knowing that the fundamental knowledge g

158 We studied the expectations, experiences and satisfaction of patients who participated in clinical tr

159 s workload, but the safety, cost and patient satisfaction of such an extended role for nurses in opht

160 Expectation and satisfaction of treatment effect and safety were also ev

161 em to be sufficient to bring about change in satisfaction or caring efficacy.

162 of surgeons discouraging CPM on patient care satisfaction or decisions to seek treatment from another

163 There was no significant change in patient satisfaction (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.87-1.33; P = 0.507).

164 CPM group continued to report higher breast satisfaction (P = .046) and psychosocial well-being (P =

165 Improvements in ICU costs, family satisfaction, patient experience, medical goal achieveme

166 negative affectivity (positive), and (5) job satisfaction (positive).

167 ical procedures, hospitals with high patient satisfaction provided more efficient care and were assoc

168 effectiveness, safety, function, knowledge, satisfaction, psychological status, quality of life, cos

169 Fat grafting may improve breast satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-b

170 Patients completed a visual satisfaction questionnaire between 9 and 12 months after

171 ndicating worse symptoms; Overactive Bladder Satisfaction questionnaire; range, 0-100; includes 5 sub

172 d outcome measure, or QuickDASH, and patient satisfaction questionnaires were administered.

173 entration of melanin and hemoglobin, patient satisfaction questionnaires, clinical photography, subje

174 ission (72.5% vs 49.3%, P < .001) and higher satisfaction rate (92.8% vs 78.0%, P < .001) compared wi

175 cipated in patient encounters and calculated satisfaction rates for provider-provider pairs.

176 Satisfaction rates seem to vary across different teams o

177 Participants' behavioral responses (i.e., satisfaction ratings) were modulated systematically by t

178 d significantly higher than expected patient satisfaction ratings.

179 complications, and resident perceptions and satisfaction regarding their well-being, education, and

180 early-stage breast cancer, and high decision satisfaction regardless of second opinion use suggests l

181 ce care planning, site of death, health care satisfaction, resource utilization, and health care expe

182 me voided of 109 mL) and IIEF score (overall satisfaction score of 8 from a maximum of 10) were norma

183 The median satisfaction score was 64.

184 the 180 hospitals, the overall mean patient satisfaction score was 68.0% (first quartile mean, 58.7%

185 95% CI, -0.54 to 1.29) for the SAQ treatment satisfaction score, -0.14 (95% CI, -1.41 to 1.14) for th

186 95% CI, -0.51 to 1.27) for the SAQ treatment satisfaction score, -0.42 (95% CI, -1.65 to 0.79) for th

187 and physical symptoms on 0-5 scale, and life satisfaction scored 0-10 on the Cantril ladder) to exami

188 ed a significant association between patient satisfaction scores and several objective measures of su

189 fidence interval, 0.01-0.05; r(2)=0.01), and satisfaction scores decreased in patients with new comed

190 admission rates, length of stay, and patient satisfaction scores for common medical conditions.

191 admission rates, length of stay, and patient satisfaction scores for common medical conditions.

192 fessionals, patient-reported convenience and satisfaction scores, and rates of complications.

193 ther complication rates nor patient-reported satisfaction scores, but it improves patient-reported co

194 s in the number of telephone communications, satisfaction scores, or complication rates.

195 elated quality of life (HRQL), and treatment satisfaction (secondary outcomes).

196 bolism prophylaxis, diet administration, job satisfaction, stress reduction, perception of management

197 ified in this study are consistent with past satisfaction studies and may aid dermatologists in optim

198 s Questionnaire-Appearance Scales Body Areas Satisfaction subscale, and the Center for Epidemiologic

199 y Needs Assessment, the Critical Care Family Satisfaction Survey, and the Family Satisfaction in the

200 ACT was also associated with greater patient satisfaction than was NCI text alone.

201 It may be useful to explore DCD donor family satisfaction to identify other options for improving DCD

202 , -0.40; 95% CI, -0.78 to -0.02), lower life satisfaction (turnaway-births, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.38 to 0

203 Patient satisfaction was >90% for both procedures.

204 Median career satisfaction was 4 (IQR, 4-5) out of 5, and 76% would du

205 Participant satisfaction was assessed with a Likert-scale questionna

206 Patient satisfaction was explored using face-to-face, semi-struc

207 Patient satisfaction was found to be higher with oxycodone-nalox

208 rm" and CTG + CAF sites "more firm." Patient satisfaction was high, with no statistical difference in

209 mes to assessment and diagnosis, and patient satisfaction was high.

210 The patient satisfaction was high.

211 On unadjusted analysis, mean breast satisfaction was higher in the CPM group (60.4 v 57.9, P

212 so had a lower depersonalization scores; job satisfaction was independently associated with having le

213 23 of 572) reported that a personal sense of satisfaction was likely to motivate them to communicate

214 Patient satisfaction was maintained with the CBE program.

215 l group (88.4% vs 83.5%, P = 0.035), whereas satisfaction was maintained with the intervention (85.6%

216 Patient satisfaction was measured by using the decisional confli

217 Evidence on patient satisfaction was mixed and insufficient.

218 t-study anonymous survey and widespread user satisfaction was noted.

219 Patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction was similar after breast conservation and a

220 medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) signals the satisfaction we expect from imminent actions.

221 nt parameters, esthetic indices, and patient satisfaction were also assessed.

222 s, and a questionnaire evaluating individual satisfaction were also estimated.

223 r depth, anterior chamber angle, and patient satisfaction were assessed.

224 tion with BRCA knowledge, understanding, and satisfaction were assessed.

225 No predictors for recurrence or satisfaction were identified.

226 Four contributing factors to patient satisfaction were identified: ample consultation time, i

227 adverse events, quality of life, and patient satisfaction were not significantly different between th

228 gagement was associated with higher decision satisfaction when compared with low PCP engagement (adju

229 6%) surgeons demonstrated the highest career satisfaction, whereas a portion of plastic surgeons (33%

230 Adjusted mean scores of patient-reported satisfaction with and deliberation about the surgical tr

231 ed no impairment during therapy and improved satisfaction with appearance at end therapy ( P = .03).

232 Satisfaction with blood-pressure care was high in both t

233 autologous reconstruction group had improved satisfaction with breasts (difference, 8.0; P = .002) an

234 d with decreased anxiety levels and improved satisfaction with breasts for women who underwent implan

235 Although satisfaction with breasts was equal to or greater than b

236 Baseline Satisfaction With Care and Information was positively as

237 icacy in Patient-Physician Interactions, and Satisfaction With Care and Information.

238 care improves symptom management and patient satisfaction with care and reduces hospital costs in ser

239 on of measures of patient comfort and family satisfaction with care is needed to identify which patte

240 Satisfaction with care was similar across services.

241 ervice users' quality of life, autonomy, and satisfaction with care were assessed in a standardised m

242 th practices including health service usage, satisfaction with care, and costs.

243 se in evaluating adherence, adverse effects, satisfaction with care, and routine clinical practice.

244 amily functioning, pain/itching, appearance, satisfaction with care, and worry/concern up to 48 month

245 ssion, anxiety, and acute stress, as well as satisfaction with care.

246 out-of-pocket costs, care coordination, and satisfaction with care.

247 reatest perceived patient comfort and family satisfaction with care.

248 Satisfaction with chemotherapy decisions was high and di

249 ality of life and patterns and correlates of satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes overall and, more sp

250 a, 0.323; 95% CI, 0.236 to 0.504; P < .001), satisfaction with current glaucoma care (beta, -0.222; 9

251 afety and effectiveness, and false beliefs), satisfaction with current glaucoma management, relevance

252 Mean satisfaction with current handoff process was rated as 6

253 ith higher scores on the core 10-item FACE-Q satisfaction with facial appearance scale.

254 d overall or circumscribed aspects of family satisfaction with ICU care.

255 l showed no evidence of a benefit of SCPs on satisfaction with information and care.

256 For males, satisfaction with information on fertility risks was hig

257 on was associated with significantly greater satisfaction with information on FP options (chi(2) = 11

258 Improvements in patient satisfaction with information received demonstrate the p

259 dy evaluated the program's impact on patient satisfaction with information received.

260 For females, satisfaction with information was significantly greater

261 ded pain medication use, global improvement, satisfaction with intervention, and health-related quali

262 eye symptoms, satisfaction with vision, and satisfaction with LASIK surgery in the Patient-Reported

263 eye symptoms, satisfaction with vision, and satisfaction with LASIK surgery.

264 Health Survey version 2 (optional) for the "satisfaction with life and personal enjoyment" and "pain

265 [SD] age, 34 [8] years), global disability, satisfaction with life, neurobehavioral symptom severity

266 elanoma-related knowledge, health behaviors, satisfaction with melanoma care, unmet needs, and health

267 delivered primarily by telephone, addressed satisfaction with outcomes, relapse-prevention planning,

268 and no significant difference in residents' satisfaction with overall well-being and education quali

269 e score, time to completion, and comfort and satisfaction with robotic surgery simulation.

270 The overall provider satisfaction with SCM was 88.3%.

271 15-0.888; p = 0.003 compared with mobility), satisfaction with social roles and activities (0.85; 95%

272 , and refers to people's involvement in, and satisfaction with social roles, responsibilities, and ac

273 aily studying (13 [4-23]; P = .02), and high satisfaction with study materials (P < .001).

274 ncluded the number of friends, self-reported satisfaction with support and social network size and cl

275 discussion about it with 3 outcomes: patient satisfaction with surgery decisions, receipt of a second

276 Product-moment correlations of satisfaction with surgery with visual symptom scales at

277 Patients' satisfaction with surgery, quality of life, and delayed

278 ommendations, level of discussion about CPM, satisfaction with surgical decision making, receipt of s

279 A significant difference in satisfaction with the amount of information received was

280 Satisfaction with the communication support program was

281 Consumer satisfaction with the DTC PGT experience; whether and, i

282 Although the results revealed overwhelming satisfaction with the IACUC administrative office and th

283 d value of some suggested modifications, and satisfaction with the IACUC administrative office and th

284 roQol 5-dimensional descriptive system), and satisfaction with the monitoring program.

285 e houses for 6-9 months, residents expressed satisfaction with the new design, especially the second-

286 Patient satisfaction with the overall result was 8.91+/-1.51 of

287 better access to support and advice, greater satisfaction with the support they received, and improve

288 m depression scale (PHQ-9), patient-reported satisfaction with their blood-pressure care and blood-pr

289 erwent autologous reconstruction had greater satisfaction with their breasts than those who underwent

290 Both groups expressed a high degree of satisfaction with their career choice (GS, 94%; SS, 90%)

291 The proportion expressing strong satisfaction with their current vision correction method

292 factors that affect consent rates and family satisfaction with their decision and the process.

293 ts that affect families' decisions or family satisfaction with their decisions.

294 tipation, trial withdrawal rate, and patient satisfaction with treatment.

295 -reported visual symptoms, dry eye symptoms, satisfaction with vision, and satisfaction with LASIK su

296 e, halos, and starbursts), dry eye symptoms, satisfaction with vision, and satisfaction with LASIK su

297 ary endpoints included the wound pain score, satisfaction with wound care, and cost of wound care.

298 r starbursts), dry eye symptoms, participant satisfaction (with vision and LASIK surgery), and clinic

299 omen reported similar, high levels of career satisfaction, with women reporting higher satisfaction c

300 There was a significant decline in satisfaction within the control group (88.4% vs 83.5%, P