コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 entional resolutions (2-3 mm voxel width, 3T scanner).
2 N2, N3; control condition: N0) inside the MR scanner.
3 e scanned twice on an integrated PET and MRI scanner.
4 of images acquired in a cylindrical 1.5T MR scanner.
5 behavior during gait initiation outside the scanner.
6 fter injection on the same calibrated PET/CT scanner.
7 hantom and patients were scanned in a PET/CT scanner.
8 ia simulation prior to deployment in the MRI scanner.
9 canning retro-reflective optical path length scanner.
10 nts with MTLE with normal MRI on a 1.5-Tesla scanner.
11 emission tomography using a high-resolution scanner.
12 ay imaging using a nano-computed tomographic scanner.
13 a-unrelated emotional processing task in the scanner.
14 he brightness of images scanned by an office scanner.
15 imization (OSEM) reconstructions on a PET/CT scanner.
16 complexity of such investigation in the MRI scanner.
17 120 min) were obtained on a 16-slice PET/CT scanner.
18 clinical 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner.
19 e: 1) were investigated with a hybrid PET/MR scanner.
20 ancer can be obtained with a clinical 3T MRI scanner.
21 ars underwent Turboprop-DTI on a 3-Tesla MRI scanner.
22 y task performed in a magnetoencephalography scanner.
23 rescence scanner as well as the upconversion scanner.
24 used patients unable to perform tasks in the scanner.
25 d in a functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner.
26 rmed an anxious rumination task while in the scanner.
27 creened for CV risks and scanned on a 3T MRI scanner.
28 R on the high resolution research tomography scanner.
29 r a cued-recall test in a magnetic resonance scanner.
30 g facial expressions measured outside of the scanner.
31 ET imaging to avoid deadtime losses for this scanner.
32 atic uniform magnetic field inside a 7 T MRI scanner.
33 uation correction maps currently used in the scanner.
34 in SUVs and image quality with the reference scanner.
35 Participants performed the task in an MRI scanner.
36 time-of-flight-enabled simultaneous PET/MRI scanner.
37 actions ("The Office", NBC Universal) in the scanner.
38 single-source fast-switching dual-energy CT scanner.
39 was inserted between the GeminiTF PET and CT scanner.
40 ineral density by peripheral quantitative CT scanner.
41 imaging with a second-generation dual-source scanner.
42 participants generated new sentences in the scanner.
43 ntraarterial CT was performed using 64-slice scanner.
44 F-FDG when the dogs was placed in the PET/MR scanner.
45 ical scanners: a PET/CT scanner and a PET/MR scanner.
46 , and eye status (open or closed) in the MRI scanner.
47 ement seen with time of flight on the PET/CT scanner.
48 nal magnetic resonance imaging using a 1.5-T scanner.
49 ree precession (SSFP) sequences using a 3.0T scanner.
50 uence was implemented on a 9.4T small animal scanner.
51 task while listening to phonemes in the MRI scanner.
52 ey freely recalled all videos outside of the scanner.
53 red using a combined clinical PET/MR imaging scanner.
54 surements were performed in a 3-tesla PET/MR scanner.
55 e period and across time periods for a given scanner.
56 off-chip detection using conventional laser scanner.
57 SPGR sequence on a standard 3 T clinical MRI scanner.
58 sly been evaluated for a clinical whole-body scanner.
59 tural MRI data were acquired on a 3 Tesla MR scanner.
60 angiography performed with a whole-heart CT scanner.
61 imization (OSEM) reconstructions on a PET/CT scanner.
62 poral dynamics of fMRI without using the MRI scanner.
63 the sensing area visually or using a flatbed scanner.
64 ed activity limits were established for each scanner.
65 patial or motor cues while lying in the fMRI scanner.
66 rently available on the Siemens Biograph mMR scanner.
67 tivity observed behaviorally, outside of the scanner.
68 rols and a brain phantom using a 3 T MRI/MRS scanner.
69 egrated non-time-of-flight (non-TOF) PET/MRI scanners.
70 nal, printed coils for 1.5- and 3-T clinical scanners.
71 attenuation correction in integrated PET/MR scanners.
72 to enable measurements next to small-animal scanners.
73 ical advance in the field of fast speed beam scanners.
74 ry disease), and CMR imaging on 1.5- and 3-T scanners.
75 higher, with good correlation between the 2 scanners.
76 100% and true-positive rate was 78% for both scanners.
77 ts were scanned on PET/MR imaging and PET/CT scanners.
78 partial-volume bias than non-time-of-flight scanners.
79 ed to a small fraction of clinical-scale MRI scanners.
80 and longitudinally using clinically relevant scanners.
81 uality control tests were performed for both scanners.
82 asis of patient size for each of a site's CT scanners.
83 staining and cutting protocols and different scanners.
84 unting rates, and 2%-10% on the investigated scanners.
87 ntity discrimination performance outside the scanner, (2) visual cortical fMRI responses for intact a
88 aphy (EEG) application, the Smartphone Brain Scanner-2 (SBS2), to detect epileptiform abnormalities c
89 -ray machines (13%), 13 computed tomographic scanners (22%), 21 adult (21%) and 5 pediatric (19%) ven
94 exchange saturation transfer) images on a 3T scanner after intravenous administration of a pH-respons
98 3 muL plasma sample was imaged by a portable scanner and analyzed through a custom algorithm for colo
99 quency filters reduced emission into the MRI scanner and prevented cable/surface pad heating during i
100 aper based device were captured by a flatbed scanner and processed in MATLAB((R)) using a RGB model a
101 etween diagnostic groups, accounting for MRI scanner and sequence, age, sex and total GM+WM volume.
102 compare standard cMRI sequences from an HFO scanner and those from a cylindrical, 1.5T MR system.
103 ated virtual acoustic environment within the scanner and were then instructed to retrieve selectively
105 The use of different diagnostic criteria, scanners and imaging sequences may, however, obscure fur
107 e and 11 healthy subjects using a 3T MRI/MRS scanner, and IR in the obese subjects was documented by
108 mu mapUTE), which are both calculated by the scanner, and the R2-based mu map presented in this work
109 mage-reconstruction software for traditional scanners, and dedicated cardiac scanners emerged and fac
110 hanges in sample preparation, differences in scanners, and other potential batch effects are often un
111 exemplars from multiple different sites, and scanners, and then independently validating on almost 20
112 ng alteplase at the computed tomography (CT) scanner; and (3) registering the patient as unknown to a
113 c hyperlipidemia by using a 320-detector row scanner (Aquilion One Vision; Toshiba, Otawara, Japan).
114 st within a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner are currently removed from the bore and then fro
116 lectronic devices (e.g. smartphones, flatbed scanner) are considered promising approaches for disease
118 eativity task on the same objects out of the scanner, as well as a battery of psychometric creativity
119 activation and a battery of objective out-of-scanner assessments that index lower and higher-level so
120 organoid swelling model, we established a 3D-scanner-assisted quantification method to evaluate the a
122 maged with a third-generation dual-source CT scanner at various radiation dose index levels (range, 0
123 well-characterized phantom datasets from 237 scanners at 170 imaging sites covering the spectrum of c
126 Two readers used lumen boundary to determine scanner blur and then optimized component densities and
127 at model with a dedicated small-animal SPECT scanner by targeting the glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor
128 itself contains uniform regions suitable for scanner calibration assessment, lung fields, and 6 hot s
129 and use the RGB-based imaging sensors of the scanner/camera to measure the light transmitted to the o
132 field, such as in magnetic resonance imaging scanners, can induce a perception of whole-body rotation
137 ces at 26 Berkeley stores; (2) point-of-sale scanner data on 15.5 million checkouts for beverage pric
139 Sales-unweighted mean price change from scanner data was +0.67 cent/oz (p = 0.00) (sales-weighte
140 sed by the limited spatial resolution of PET scanners degrades the quantitative accuracy of PET image
145 develop a first-generation total-body PET/CT scanner, discuss selected application areas for total-bo
147 traditional scanners, and dedicated cardiac scanners emerged and facilitated the performance of MPI
155 ha error of .05 was 286 subjects for same-CT scanner follow-up and 753 subjects with different-vendor
158 s designed a real-time handheld optoacoustic scanner for human use, based on a concave 8-MHz transduc
160 d cost-effective alternative to fluorescence scanners for the analysis of low-density microarrays.
162 were obtained in vivo on an 11.7T animal MRI scanner from 7 cuprizone-treated and 7 control capital E
163 lic acid or placebo by liver biopsy and MRI (scanners from different manufacturers, at 1.5T or 3T).
164 rallel measurements with a ChemiDoc MP plate scanner gave indications of aggregation; however, the re
165 esults At least one acquisition paradigm per scanner had iodine biases (range, -2.6 to 1.5 mg/mL) wit
168 As another illustrative application, the scanner has been employed to investigate goethite spheru
170 troduction of simultaneous whole-body PET/MR scanners has enabled new research taking advantage of th
173 egration with other NMR spectrometers or MRI scanners (i.e., this is a multiplatform design), (ii) re
174 erformed on two 128 multi-detector (MDCT) CT scanners: - iCT (Philips Healthcare with iDose(4)); - De
175 r phantoms and scanned with a dual-source CT scanner in both DE and single-energy modes with matched
176 ients, PET imaging was performed on a 4-ring scanner in dual cardiac and respiratory gating mode.
178 he was affected by the resolution of the PET scanners in rodents, whereas monkeys and humans showed a
179 ts engaged in an incentive delay task in the scanner, in which they received erotic or monetary rewar
180 conducted independently on two Discovery MI scanners installed at Stanford University and Uppsala Un
184 bjects performed plantar flexions in a 7T MR-scanner, leading to PCr changes ranging from barely noti
186 eration, and possibility of using a portable scanner make the proposed muPAD suitable for on-site amm
188 ) into a multicenter trial with a variety of scanner makes and models along with the variety of press
190 inical studies, mostly performed on a single scanner model or data format, as there is no flexible wa
192 pecificity, and were related to the brand of scanner, NSCLC subtype, FDG dose, and country of study o
194 l of adults with NASH, PDFF estimated by MRI scanners of different field strength and at different si
195 roduction of open, high-field, 1.0T (HFO) MR scanners offers advantages for examinations of obese, cl
196 aging scans were obtained using a 3T Achieva scanner on a subset of 59 people with schizophrenia or s
197 settings on each of two computed tomography scanners, one equipped with a DC detector and the other
200 ed to decide on the applicability of a given scanner or transducer for a particular kind of examinati
208 After listening to a radio story in the scanner, participants were asked how much time had elaps
211 technique, the magnetic gradients of an MRI scanner perform image-based steering of magnetically-lab
214 TEMO is equipped with a computed tomographic scanner plus a point-of-care laboratory and telemedicine
216 uted tomographic/magenetic resonance imaging scanner, premix of tPA ahead of time, initiation of tPA
222 quently, each model was scanned in a microCT scanner, reconstructed into three-dimensional virtual ob
227 Results from this unusually large, single-scanner sample provide one of the most extensive charact
228 cts naturally read paragraphs of text in the scanner, showing the involvement of action/motion percep
229 g techniques (e.g., digital cameras, flatbed scanners); signal-to-noise ratios are a factor of 3-10 h
231 first-generation radioligand, low-resolution scanners, small sample sizes, and psychotic patients bei
233 went repeat CT performed with a different CT scanner (Somatom Force; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany [gro
234 assessment system (QCT-LAS), which includes scanner-specific imaging protocols for lung assessment a
235 method to estimate computed tomographic (CT) scanner-specific mean size-specific dose estimates (SSDE
238 diagnostic accuracy according to type of PET scanner (standalone PET vs. integrated PET/CT) or indica
240 g, careful imaging protocol design, reliable scanner technology, reproducible software algorithms, an
243 tic resonance imaging sequence on a clinical scanner that makes it possible to image an entire intact
244 , we evaluate feasibility of a 3-dimensional scanner that relies on Raman Spectroscopy to assess the
246 arametric imaging with the integrated PET/MR scanner, the VOIs from DWI and (18)F-FDG PET were both w
247 scovery bismuth germanium oxide-based PET/CT scanners, the IQ with 5-ring detector blocks has the hig
248 increasing availability of integrated PET/MR scanners, the utility and need for MR contrast agents fo
249 recent work has shown that in modern TOF PET scanners there is an improved tradeoff between lesion co
250 pidly digitize whole slide images with slide scanners, there has been interest in developing computer
252 for age, sex, and magnetic resonance imaging scanner to 222 patients with AD without microbleeds.
253 We used a 7 T magnetic resonance imaging scanner to acquire T1-weighted images, diffusion tensor
254 esus monkeys were obtained on a small-animal scanner to assess the pharmacokinetic and in vivo bindin
256 we use is demonstrated by the ability of LT-scanner to identify the known targets of FDA-approved ki
257 We applied a combined functional MRI-PET scanner to simultaneously probe mothers' dopamine respon
258 tly introduced by GE Healthcare on their PET scanners to improve clinical image quality and quantific
259 ), technology commonly used in business card scanners, to rapidly collect low-noise colorimetric data
260 chest CT scan was performed using a 64-rows scanner (Toshiba, Aquilion 64, Japan) before and after i
261 repeated on a separate day with the same CT scanner (Toshiba, group 1); 20 subjects underwent repeat
264 ing (fMRI) scans were acquired with a 3T MRI scanner using a blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) prot
265 The women were scanned with a 1.5 T Philips scanner using a breath-hold multiecho gradient echo sequ
266 ed our pulse sequence on a standard clinical scanner using millimetre-scale particles and demonstrate
267 ted scanning of the same patient on the same scanner using the same protocol no more than a few days
269 erosclerosis imaged on a simultaneous PET/MR scanner, using MR for both attenuation correction and de
270 g data on doses for auditing patient safety, scanner utilization, and productivity, all of which have
272 PET/CT examinations and participated in the scanner validation program of the Society of Nuclear Med
275 preclinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners vs (13)C detection, which is limited to a small
277 procedure in a 3T magnetic resonance imaging scanner was used to measure neural correlates of respons
279 (more than 450 times lower than clinical MRI scanners) we demonstrate (2.5 x 3.5 x 8.5) mm(3) imaging
280 ontinuous flash suppression (CFS) in the MRI scanner, we manipulated visual awareness of fearful face
281 With the advent of combined PET/MR imaging scanners, we are entering an era wherein the relationshi
282 isual interaction of subjects in linked fMRI scanners, we characterize cross-brain connectivity compo
286 After ingestion, participants entered an MRI scanner where abdominal scans and oral appetite ratings
287 ta acquisition was performed using 1.5 T MRI scanners where images were obtained using similar protoc
289 ation exposure of a computed tomography (CT) scanner with 16-cm coverage and 230-microm spatial resol
290 was acquired using a Siemens 3 Tesla Prisma scanner with 80 mT/m gradients and a 32-channel head coi
292 rom Griess (1879) and using a common flatbed scanner with a limit of detection about 1.7 mumol L(-1).
295 ostic performance of a digital PET prototype scanner with time-of-flight (DigitalTF), compared with a
297 d the quantitative variability among similar scanners, with postreconstruction smoothing filters bein
298 c), using various tissue sizes and different scanners, with unprecedented throughput and reproducibil
299 Using a unique, small-footprint, 1.5-T MRI scanner within our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU),
300 Quantitative results were compared across scanners within a given time period and across time peri
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。