ライフサイエンスコーパス: seat belt

1 children aged 4 to 8 years use only an adult seat belt.

2 goal support to promote consistent use of a seat belt.

3 lder children, adolescents, or adults to use seat belts (1 CCT, 2 RCTs); or counseling unselected pri

4 ack, or lower extremities, while children in seat belts alone had injuries to all body regions.

5 to 7-year-olds, including 1.95% of those in seat belts and 0.77% of those in belt-positioning booste

6 income patients and were less likely to wear seat belts and exercise.

7 hat two different hormone regions (i.e., the seat-belt and the intersubunit groove) appear to limit i

8 accelerometers attached to the seat and the seat belt, and a camera behind the windscreen.

9 upants to be ticketed solely for not wearing seat belts, and secondary laws allow ticketing only for

10 In contrast, the seat-belt appears not to discriminate between the TSH an

11 ose who thought that provider discussions of seat belts are at least sometimes appropriate (73% [CI,

12 ifference between groups in always wearing a seat belt at 12 weeks.

13 were significantly greater odds of wearing a seat belt at 6 and 12 weeks among SAVE participants vs c

14 njuries classically associated with improper seat belt fit in children.

15 -beta subunit confirms the importance of the seat belt in the family of pituitary and placental glyco

16 a passenger in a car without always using a seat belt in the past 2 weeks were eligible for recruitm

17 firms the independent effect of air bags and seat belts in reducing mortality.

18 aws allow ticketing only for failure to wear seat belts in the setting of other violations.

19 e due to the fact that the net charge of the seat-belt is similar in hTSH and hFSH but different from

20 Primary seat belt laws allow vehicle occupants to be ticketed so

21 ariate regression model, states with primary seat belt laws had lower MVC fatality rates than states

22 States with primary seat belt laws had lower rates of MVC fatalities than th

23 Adoption of primary seat belt laws may offer optimal occupant protection.

24 7 per 100 000 persons, 30 states had primary seat belt laws, and 19 states had secondary laws.

25 6 per 100 000 persons, 16 states had primary seat belt laws, and 33 states had secondary laws.

26 7 years in belt-positioning boosters than in seat belts (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0

27 Replacing the entire seat-belt of hTSHbeta with the hCG sequence conferred fu

28 , 95% CI: 0.58, 0.87) and any combination of seat belts (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.29) were both ass

29 The rate of always using a seat belt over the past 2 weeks at the 6-week follow-up

30 n of young adults reporting always wearing a seat belt over the past 2 weeks, collected at 6 weeks (a

31 At 12 weeks, the rate of always using a seat belt over the past 2-weeks was 42.8% (95% CI, 31.2%

32 Thus, exchanging the seat-belt region between hTSH and hCG switches hormonal

33 for the first time that domains outside the seat-belt region contribute to glycoprotein hormone spec

34 onstructed hTSH chimeras in which the entire seat-belt region Cys88-Cys105 or individual intercystein

35 subunits corresponds to the disulfide-linked seat-belt region.

36 In contrast, an hTSH chimera bearing hFSH seat-belt residues did not possess any follitropic activ

37 Conversely, introduction of the hTSHbeta seat-belt sequence into hCGbeta generated an hCG chimera

38 The presence of a seat belt sign (likelihood ratio [LR] range, 5.6-9.9), r

39 Abdominal seat belt sign (SBS) has historically entailed admission

40 RECENT FINDINGS: The importance of the seat belt sign on physical examination and screening lab

41 ed to estimate risk ratios adjusted for age, seat belt status, vehicle type, passenger car size, and

42 unit is predicted to form the "buckle" of a "seat belt" that surrounds the common alpha subunit and m

43 y behaviors (e.g., driving without wearing a seat belt), the magnitude of perceived benefit and risk

44 ted with added safety benefits compared with seat belts to children through age 7 years, including re

45 intervention was more effective at promoting seat belt use among targeted young adults than an attent

46 When examining ordered categories of seat belt use by seat position, there were significantly

47 ction associated with air bag deployment and seat belt use for drivers involved in head-on passenger

48 The control group received identical weekly seat belt use queries but no additional feedback.

49 ctive text message program, including weekly seat belt use queries with feedback and goal support to

50 Combined air bag and seat belt use reduced mortality by more than 80% (OR = 0

51 ed crash vehicles for air bag deployment and seat belt use were measured with matched-pair odds ratio

52 oster seats, adjusting for child age, driver seat belt use, and sex of driver.

53 regard to alcohol consumption, safe sex, and seat belt use.

54 s and select cognitive constructs related to seat belt use.

55 mple, suggest a scalable approach to improve seat belt use.

56 r victimization, perpetration of aggression, seat-belt use, bike-helmet use, substance use, discrimin

57 showed that the Cys95-Cys105 segment of the seat-belt was more important for TSH receptor binding an

58 ximately 1 in 10 adults do not always wear a seat belt, with the lowest use rates reported among youn