1 Prospective, cross-
sectional.
2 two 24-h recalls collected during the cross-
sectional 2011-2012 Australian National Nutrition and Ph
3 studies comprising 29 longitudinal, 49 cross-
sectional,
22 qualitative, two mixed methods, four mathe
4 Four cross-
sectional active case detection surveys were conducted b
5 tion) were subjected to a systematical cross-
sectional AMR screening and, in parallel, TTV quantifica
6 Cross-
sectional analyses demonstrated inverse associations bet
7 Cross-
sectional analyses explored associations between prevale
8 Prior cross-
sectional analyses have demonstrated an association betw
9 Cross-
sectional analyses investigated associations between ald
10 Cross-
sectional analyses of adiposity and sleep duration in yo
11 Cross-
sectional analyses were performed between 2003 and 2013
12 Cross-
sectional analyses were performed in two independent pop
13 as well as with sleep disturbances in cross-
sectional analyses.
14 This cross-
sectional analysis included 183 elderly individuals with
15 We performed a cross-
sectional analysis of 3,150 study participants.
16 The trial was a cross-
sectional analysis of 775 healthy women in the Women's L
17 This baseline cross-
sectional analysis of a cohort study performed from Augu
18 This is a cross-
sectional analysis of a prospective cohort of 26 proband
19 We conducted a cross-
sectional analysis of four automated immunoassays (BioPl
20 Serial cross-
sectional analysis of Medicare fee-for-service beneficia
21 A cross-
sectional analysis of prevalence of hepatitis B virus in
22 This cross-
sectional analysis of women enrolled in a cohort study c
23 This retrospective, cross-
sectional analysis used the 2014 State Inpatient Databas
24 Retrospective cross-
sectional analysis using publicly available FDA data.
25 For anchor-based cross-
sectional analysis, composite score MID (95% CI) was 6.3
26 In cross-
sectional analysis, current H. pylori infection at age 6
27 In this cross-
sectional analysis, we used a type 1 diabetes genetic ri
28 Cross-
sectional analysis.
29 Cross-
sectional and case-control studies have shown evidence o
30 the HIV cascade of care are typically cross-
sectional and do not include the population stages befor
31 ion biomarkers, but most work has been cross-
sectional and does not separate the effects of trauma ex
32 igher symptom reporting scores in both cross-
sectional and longitudinal analyses, as well as with sle
33 ted the association of SCT status with cross-
sectional and longitudinal changes in fitness and risk f
34 been refined and strengthened by many cross-
sectional and longitudinal studies linking eczema as the
35 ese findings are confirmed with larger cross-
sectional and prospective analyses, these approaches may
36 We investigated both cross-
sectional and prospective associations between serum bil
37 Low MMA% was cross-
sectional and prospectively associated with higher HOMA2
38 ion should be longitudinal rather than cross-
sectional and start with the population stages preceding
39 21 prospective cohort, cross-
sectional,
and case-control studies including participan
40 -4.8 at 56 days; P<0.05) and increased cross-
sectional area (mean+/-SEM: 21.9+/-0.4 microm(2) in cont
41 Thus, reduced cross-
sectional area (theta) and tortuosity largely accounted
42 Muscle fibre cross
sectional area and protein synthesis of the myofibrillar
43 ost-burn recovery of both muscle fibre cross-
sectional area and volume (P < 0.05).
44 ERPRETATION: Group average spinal cord cross-
sectional area in HAM/TSP and progressive MS show spinal
45 4) correlate with T4 to T9 spinal cord cross-
sectional area in HAM/TSP.
46 Spinal cord cross-
sectional area was measured in individuals (24 healthy c
47 ent of specific force (isometric force/cross-
sectional area) and unloaded shortening velocity; (iii)
48 , these genotypes had 43% smaller root cross-
sectional area, 32% greater root length, 58% greater sho
49 secondary growth had 39% smaller root cross-
sectional area, 60% less root respiration, 27% greater r
50 maging measurements (thickness, width, cross-
sectional area, echogenicity) and 3.0-T MR imaging measu
51 maging measurements (thickness, width, cross-
sectional area, volume, and fat-water separation) of the
52 as associated with thinner spinal cord cross-
sectional area.
53 s showed a significant increase in the cross-
sectional areas of the internal carotid, basilar, and mi
54 We did a retrospective cross-
sectional assessment of prevalence of MCRPE infection fr
55 posure.This metabolomics study shows a cross-
sectional association between stunting and low serum ome
56 Cross-
sectional associations between engagement in mentally st
57 We examined whether there are cross-
sectional associations of mean relative leukocyte telome
58 ucted a two-stage meta-analysis of the cross-
sectional associations of systolic and diastolic BP with
59 Cross-
sectional associations support the view that enhancing c
60 ive periodontitis case definitions for cross-
sectional associations with lifestyle factors among part
61 tified studies (randomised, cohort, or cross-
sectional)
by searching MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and gr
62 Observational, cross-
sectional case series at a referral institutional practi
63 This prospective cross-
sectional case series was conducted at the Department of
64 We conducted a multisite, cross-
sectional,
case-control study in U.S. pulmonary and prim
65 This investigation was a cross-
sectional,
case-control, functional magnetic resonance i
66 searched five electronic databases for cross-
sectional,
case-control, or cohort studies published up
67 A cross-
sectional clinic-based study, the Singapore Diabetes Man
68 Masked Hypertension Study (n = 811), a cross-
sectional clinical investigation of systematic differenc
69 s after delivery, and a second matched cross-
sectional cohort (n = 81) was additionally recruited for
70 individuals was further validated in a cross-
sectional cohort of 381 participants.
71 This investigation was a cross-
sectional cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries undergo
72 Prospective, cross-
sectional,
comparative instrument validation study.
73 uttled in a peristaltic wave driven by cross-
sectional contractions of tubes.
74 Cross-
sectional,
correlational, observational study.
75 valuated in another phase 2 study with cross-
sectional data (n = 215) and longitudinal data (n = 142/
76 Since cross-
sectional data does not allow causal inference it could
77 ductive age (WRA) (age range: 15-49 y).Cross-
sectional data for PSC (8 surveys; n = 8413) and WRA (4
78 ep characteristics.This study included cross-
sectional data from 119,859 white European adults, aged
79 country and infection-burden category.Cross-
sectional data from 16 surveys (n = 29,293) from the Bio
80 We overviewed cross-
sectional data from 16 surveys for preschool children (P
81 k in Costa Rican Hispanics.We analyzed cross-
sectional data from 1932 case subjects with a first nonf
82 We analyzed cross-
sectional data from 230 asymptomatic members of families
83 We analyzed cross-
sectional data from 5,187 adults and 853 adolescents in
84 lgorithms to account for these effects.Cross-
sectional data from 8 surveys for PSC (n = 8803) and 4 s
85 Cross-
sectional data from the 1999 to 2006 US National Health
86 ductive age (WRA) (age range: 15-49 y).Cross-
sectional data from the Biomarkers Reflecting Inflammati
87 egories of BP using Markov modeling of cross-
sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Ex
88 ng nationally representative, repeated cross-
sectional data from the US National Health Interview Sur
89 Our modelling study used cross-
sectional data on treatment for fever and RDT status for
90 nalysis that combined case-control and cross-
sectional data sets.
91 Cross-
sectional data suggest that accelerated biological aging
92 t use advanced imaging, those that use cross-
sectional data to explore structure-function relationshi
93 Cross-
sectional data were analyzed using structural equation m
94 These findings rely on cross-
sectional data, preventing assessment of relationships b
95 ent Data Project to construct a repeat cross-
sectional database, which was analyzed by using a differ
96 a subset of the UK Biobank Resource, a cross-
sectional dataset including 247 diseases and 117,392 par
97 A prospective, cross-
sectional,
descriptive study.
98 dependent studies have been limited by cross-
sectional design and small cohort size.
99 The study used a repeated cross-
sectional design involving 3 waves of data collection (2
100 mice (5-20 mo) were investigated in a cross-
sectional design using (18)F-FDG (n = 43) and translocat
101 tional magnetic resonance imaging in a cross-
sectional design.
102 tes characterized for a wider range of cross-
sectional diabetic kidney disease phenotypes.
103 Material/The study is a cross-
sectional diagnostic study performed in 66 patients with
104 due to the variation in the effective cross-
sectional diameter of DNA duplex and the thickness of DN
105 METHODS AND We examined cross-
sectional differences in MD by age and menopausal status
106 volume of distribution (VT) to assess cross-
sectional differences in plaque load.
107 This investigation was a cross-
sectional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study at an out
108 hotonic Needles probes have sub-10 mum cross-
sectional dimensions, lengths greater than 3 mm-surpassi
109 Cross-
sectional distribution- and anchor-based approaches were
110 METHOD: We estimate cross-
sectional,
ecological regression models with data from 2
111 annotation, bit-block encoded genotypes and
sectional fast access to text lines to address three fun
112 ifferentially associated with age, and cross-
sectional florbetapir positron emission tomography reten
113 arvard Aging Brain Study who underwent cross-
sectional flortaucipir F 18 (previously known as AV 1451
114 Cross-
sectional functional magnetic resonance imaging study in
115 T1-weighted MRI, was used to identify cross-
sectional group differences in brain volume.
116 During the decryption process, each
sectional image of the 3-D object is recovered by convol
117 that is positioned at the same depth as the
sectional image.
118 Patients underwent cross-
sectional imaging analysis at 3 months or later after th
119 Cross-
sectional imaging helps in differentiating it from a ter
120 h respect to endoscopic procedures and cross-
sectional imaging varies widely.
121 e of the effect of the same genes on a cross-
sectional measure of average drinking.
122 study included availability of only 2 cross-
sectional measurements of malaria and the limited availa
123 In this cross-
sectional mega-analysis, we used the data from the inter
124 -diet interaction was confirmed in the cross-
sectional Metabolic Syndrome Berlin Potsdam study (p = 0
125 valuated, along with their surface and cross
sectional microstructure.
126 Observational cross-
sectional mixed-methods study.
127 From the planform shape and cross-
sectional morphologies of iceberg-keel plough marks, we
128 Cross
sectional morphology showed that silica particles were d
129 methods that have rectangular channel cross-
sectional morphology.
130 We analyzed cross-
sectional MUAC and triceps (triceps skinfold thickness)
131 This investigation was a cross-
sectional,
multicenter observational study in the settin
132 Cross-
sectional,
multicenter paper-pencil survey on personal a
133 This study is a cross-
sectional,
multilevel analysis of the 2010-11 Mental Hea
134 s index, and central fat mass index.In cross-
sectional multivariable analyses, higher intake of antho
135 and/or osteopenia, assessed via total cross-
sectional muscle area and bone density at the L3 vertebr
136 /del), NKG2C(del/del)) were studied in cross-
sectional (
n = 253) and prospective (n = 122) KTR cohort
137 nadian, longitudinal, N = 520; French, cross-
sectional,
N = 830) found that, qualitatively, 3 profile
138 or rural residence) in nonpregnant WRA.Cross-
sectional,
nationally representative data from 10 survey
139 Because of the cross-
sectional nature of the analysis, the findings do not pr
140 advantages over classifying eyes using cross-
sectional normative databases.
141 We used cross-
sectional observational data from UK Biobank.
142 uantitative strands were most commonly cross-
sectional observational studies, which relied heavily on
143 This was a cross-
sectional,
observational study in which adult patients w
144 In a single center, retrospective, Cross-
sectional,
observational study, 20 volunteers with no re
145 ic or environmental variations.In this cross-
sectional,
observational study, milk was collected from
146 A cross-
sectional,
observational study.
147 The addition of cross-
sectional OCTA along with en face OCTA improved the sens
148 ection with en face OCTA combined with cross-
sectional OCTA approaches that of the gold standard of F
149 alone, and en face OCTA combined with cross-
sectional OCTA for the presence of CNV.
150 e, and with en face OCTA combined with cross-
sectional OCTA.
151 S-affected families, we administered a cross-
sectional online survey across North America from April
152 ching MEDLINE and Embase databases for cross-
sectional or cohort studies published in English between
153 weight (kg)/height (m)2) derived using cross-
sectional or longitudinal random-effects models may be b
154 associated with dysanapsis in both the cross-
sectional (
OR, 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.62-
155 ering either average levels over time (cross-
sectional)
or change in levels over time (longitudinal).
156 We did two cross-
sectional PET studies at the Pacific Parkinson's Researc
157 Cross-
sectional population-based study of US 2015 National Hea
158 A cross-
sectional,
population-based random sample of participant
159 Nationwide, cross-
sectional,
population-based survey.
160 In this cross-
sectional,
population-based, observational study, we use
161 ents' own experiences, and only record cross-
sectional,
professional impressions at the point of care
162 cted formulation that accounts for the cross-
sectional profile of the blood flow is proposed and adap
163 The overall cross-
sectional progression rate of 0.56 points on the Spastic
164 This cross-
sectional prospective study was conducted from March 1,
165 Cross-
sectional,
prospective, comparative case series.
166 for original studies that examined the cross-
sectional relationship between LLD and HCV or TBV, and 4
167 Prior cross-
sectional research in adults has shown that anhedonia is
168 formed partial correlation analysis of cross-
sectional resting-state (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positro
169 These cross-
sectional results show a strong dose-response associatio
170 This cross-
sectional retrospective multicenter study analyzed the c
171 We used a US cross-
sectional sample of 1 545 634 patients (959 153 fasting
172 Cohort A included a cross-
sectional sample of 34 MDD and 26 healthy control (HC) s
173 This study examined a cross-
sectional sample of 98 right-handed, high-functioning ad
174 s was used to select a representative, cross-
sectional sample of adults 50 years and older from Janua
175 19 recipients), who were identified on cross-
sectional screening of 741 patients, were randomly assig
176 mochemical piles and have asymmetrical cross-
sectional shape.
177 Cross-
sectional,
single-center, observational study.
178 This research was cross-
sectional,
so we cannot be sure of the temporal sequence
179 ion mapping is a powerful tool for the cross-
sectional strain analysis of complex 1D nanostructures.
180 oach, we non-destructively explore the cross-
sectional strain and the related strain-relief defect st
181 Many cross-
sectional studies have evaluated risk factors for dry ey
182 In cross-
sectional studies increased vaginal bacterial diversity
183 Cross-
sectional studies suggested that allergy prevalence in c
184 Pooled analysis of the 7 cross-
sectional studies suggested that those with SDB had slig
185 hirteen studies (1 cohort study and 12 cross-
sectional studies) were included, involving 38263 partic
186 CI], .99-1.48; P = .061) in cohort and cross-
sectional studies, and the odds ratio to be 1.85 (95% CI
187 ive impairment and dementia in various cross-
sectional studies, but whether hypoperfusion precedes ne
188 For the cross-
sectional studies, the pooled odds ratio from the random
189 ies and standard mean differences from cross-
sectional studies, using random-effect models.
190 In previous cross-
sectional studies, we found an association between pesti
191 suggest caution in using biomarkers in cross-
sectional studies.
192 causal effects cannot be inferred from cross-
sectional studies.
193 ata from only two case-control and two cross-
sectional studies.
194 ted 9.4 +/- 0.4 years after the Fontan Cross-
Sectional Study (Fontan 1) and compared with previous va
195 This investigation was a cross-
sectional study at a single academic tertiary referral c
196 This cross-
sectional study comprised a study group of 30 eyes from
197 Cross-
sectional study conducted from January 6, 2014, to Novem
198 This was a cross-
sectional study conducted from May 23, 2014, to January
199 This cross-
sectional study demonstrates that sIL-2R is a useful mar
200 This is a cross-
sectional study designed to evaluate the histologic char
201 This cross-
sectional study estimated potential for cartilage fatigu
202 This cross-
sectional study examined all Cochrane reviews that addre
203 Cross-
sectional study from a tertiary-care retinal referral pr
204 Cross-
sectional study from August 2014 through June 2017.
205 Cross-
sectional study from the 2010-2014 National Health Inter
206 We conducted a cross-
sectional study in a network comprising an ACH and 5 clo
207 Cross-
sectional study in the National Prostate Cancer Register
208 This cross-
sectional study included 122 diabetic patients from the
209 METHOD: This cross-
sectional study included 159 young social drinkers who c
210 This cross-
sectional study included 669 women with intracranial ima
211 This cross-
sectional study included patients undergoing procedures
212 Cross-
sectional study including 40 KTR with more than 10 years
213 c value of ptc characteristics in this cross-
sectional study including 85 biopsies of patients with d
214 diagnosis of PCOS was undertaken in a cross
sectional study involving 65 women without PCOS and 110
215 The objective of this cross-
sectional study is to investigate levels of salivary and
216 We performed a cross-
sectional study of 104 consecutive adults (56.7% female)
217 We performed a cross-
sectional study of 1530 nondiabetic adults in the 2011-2
218 A prospective cross-
sectional study of 31 patients with ERM from retinal dis
219 tography-tandem mass spectrometry in a cross-
sectional study of 400 Malawian children aged 12-59 mo,
220 milk consumption and height.This was a cross-
sectional study of 5034 healthy Canadian children aged 2
221 A cross-
sectional study of a school-based cohort in late adolesc
222 This investigation was a cross-
sectional study of CSME grading in monoscopic images usi
223 A cross-
sectional study of former elite, male, rugby players (n
224 Thus, in the current cross-
sectional study of healthy young adults, we tested the w
225 ence of antibodies to Ebola virus in a cross-
sectional study of household contacts of the survivors.
226 ve age (25-44 y).The HEIRS Study was a cross-
sectional study of iron status and HFE mutations in prim
227 We performed a cross-
sectional study of matrix turnover in HIV type 1 (HIV-1)
228 In a prospective, cross-
sectional study of more than 100 patients, we found MRE
229 In the separate cross-
sectional study of patients who underwent psychometric a
230 In this cross-
sectional study of primary eye care practices in Birming
231 es ambiguous information, and detailed cross-
sectional study of the microscale soft noble metal objec
232 In a cross-
sectional study of U.S. adults, we observed some positiv
233 A cross-
sectional study on patients who were healthy and partial
234 d (written informed consent acquired), cross-
sectional study performed in a consecutively selected pa
235 We conducted a cross-
sectional study to evaluate the correlation of retinal n
236 This cross-
sectional study used the American College of Cardiology
237 Cross-
sectional study using baseline (2013-2015) data from the
238 Serial cross-
sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.
239 Materials and Methods This cross-
sectional study was approved by the institutional review
240 MATERIAL/A retrospective, cross-
sectional study was carried out on CBCT and OPG data of
241 A cross-
sectional study was conducted among HIV-infected patient
242 A cross-
sectional study was conducted for 3 years in eastern Chi
243 This population-based cross-
sectional study was conducted from 2004 to 2011 and incl
244 Community based cross -
sectional study was conducted on 701 adults 35 and above
245 This cross-
sectional study was conducted on 90 participants, includ
246 In 2014, a population-based cross-
sectional study was performed in two previously trachoma
247 This pre-post, cross-
sectional study was performed using data from 17,114 pat
248 METHODS AND A retrospective cross-
sectional study was performed.
249 In a separate cross-
sectional study we analysed the relation between perceiv
250 Here, we describe a cross-
sectional study where subjects at different stages of T2
251 In a cross-
sectional study with 40 healthy students recalling their
252 A cross-
sectional study with a 2-stage cluster sample design (at
253 JOA and explored this association in a cross-
sectional study with human patients.
254 and asthma multimorbidity at baseline (cross-
sectional study) and (iii) to follow-up using visual ana
255 sed screening study in Germany.In this cross-
sectional study, 15,950 participants aged >/=55 y underw
256 In this cross-
sectional study, 239 former preterm infants with gestati
257 In this cross-
sectional study, 352 subjects were carefully characteriz
258 In this cross-
sectional study, genome-wide microarray was used to eval
259 In this prospective cross-
sectional study, OCTA was used to examine the eyes of pa
260 In this cross-
sectional study, patellofemoral joint alignment (bisect
261 In this cross-
sectional study, the authors used a comprehensive 2014 p
262 icipants aged 20 years or older from a cross-
sectional study, the National Health and Nutrition Exami
263 se of electronic purchase data.In this cross-
sectional study, we examined household store purchases o
264 data from a nationally representative cross-
sectional study, What About Youth, which enrolled a rand
265 nformed consent to participate in this cross-
sectional study.
266 age-matched patients participated in a cross-
sectional study.
267 Observational, cross-
sectional study.
268 urrogate for glaucoma severity in this cross-
sectional study.
269 Population-based cross-
sectional study.
270 to measure cerebral metabolism in this cross-
sectional study.
271 hy controls (HC) were enrolled in this cross-
sectional study.
272 althy controls were recruited for this cross-
sectional study.
273 e were enrolled in a population-based, cross-
sectional study.
274 Retrospective, uncontrolled, cross-
sectional study.
275 Prospective, cross-
sectional study.
276 Retrospective cross-
sectional study.
277 sease, and cerebrovascular pathology.A cross-
sectional subset of the Nutrition, Aging, and Memory in
278 gene diversification can allow precise cross-
sectional surveillance with a desirable temporal range o
279 ion analysis, we collected data from a cross-
sectional survey collected 1 year after the flooding eve
280 A cross-
sectional survey design was used to collect data from pr
281 er 2015, we conducted a representative cross-
sectional survey of 8-17-year-olds living in the 7 commu
282 HRAM was introduced, we did a baseline cross-
sectional survey of adults randomly selected from the el
283 A cross-
sectional survey of categorical general surgery interns
284 toring the Future, a national, annual, cross-
sectional survey of students in secondary schools in the
285 A cross-
sectional survey was conducted in a general population s
286 A comprehensive cross-
sectional survey was performed in Curacao in June and Ju
287 In this cross-
sectional survey, data were collected from a randomized
288 Nationally representative cross-
sectional survey.
289 ttish Health Surveys are record-linked cross-
sectional surveys representative of the adult population
290 Four cross-
sectional surveys were conducted in conjunction with Men
291 Two cross-
sectional surveys were conducted in Lake Victoria in Jan
292 Cross-
sectional surveys were conducted in Madang Province in 2
293 rse of this study, in population-based cross-
sectional surveys, 5,206 men and 3,106 women aged 18-49
294 l clinic (ANC) attendees enrolled in 2 cross-
sectional surveys, exposure was categorized in 2004 acco
295 A cross-
sectional twin study was conducted from August 27, 2014,
296 ely equal to the length of the corresponding
sectional uniform line source.
297 udy of TENOR I patients using a single cross-
sectional visit in 2013/2014.
298 However, diffuse cross-
sectional volume deficits across all subfields were foun
299 Whereas this has been shown for cross-
sectional volume, it is unclear whether volume changes o
300 4) and two independent MS cohorts: (1) cross-
sectional with paired serum and CSF samples (n = 142), a