1 couples testing, and sexual behaviour after
self-testing.
2 ntigen tests are available to the public for
self-testing.
3 pletely replaced facility-based testing with
self-testing.
4 for use at the point-of-care or for patient
self-testing.
5 Using PCR as the gold standard, rapid
self-testing achieved high specificity (99.1%; 95% confi
6 HIV
self-testing allows HIV testing at any place and time an
7 nticoagulation-clinic care vs primary care),
self-testing alone versus self-management, and sex.
8 Expanding home and mobile testing,
self-testing and outreach to key populations with facili
9 fects of self-monitoring or self-management (
self-testing and self-dosage) of anticoagulation compare
10 Uptake of
self-testing and self-management of oral anticoagulation
11 ex, key populations, campaign, workplace and
self-testing)
and facility approaches by population reac
12 In this study, HIV
self-testing appeared to be safe and increased recent an
13 Participants in the HIV
self-testing arms almost completely replaced facility-ba
14 f point-of-care INR devices to either weekly
self-testing at home or monthly high-quality testing in
15 itiated ART within the first 6 months of HIV
self-testing availability.
16 nswer it affirmatively by providing explicit
self-testing correlations for all such states.
17 HIV
self-testing could play an important role in supporting
18 pala, Uganda, to measure the effect of 2 HIV
self-testing delivery models on HIV testing and linkage
19 monthly high-quality clinic testing, weekly
self-testing did not delay the time to a first stroke, m
20 Self-testing for HIV infection may contribute to early d
21 Studies have demonstrated that
self-testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is h
22 At 2 years of follow-up, the
self-testing group also had a small but significant impr
23 Over the entire follow-up period, the
self-testing group had a small but significant improveme
24 ndomization of clusters allocated to the HIV
self-testing group of a parent trial.
25 r rates of clinical outcomes except that the
self-testing group reported more minor bleeding episodes
26 ry event was not significantly longer in the
self-testing group than in the clinic-testing group (haz
27 emphasis on pretest counseling and that HIV
self-testing has been adopted in a number of settings.
28 women aged 18-39 y were randomized to an HIV
self-testing (
HIVST) group or a comparison group.
29 HIV
self-testing (
HIVST) may play a role in addressing gaps
30 nvestigated a novel alternative based on HIV
self-testing (
HIVST).
31 luated the cost-effectiveness of introducing
self-testing in 2015 over a 20-year time frame in a coun
32 Self-testing is an emerging approach with high acceptabi
33 In the intervention scenario,
self-testing is introduced at a unit cost of $3.
34 Empirical research on
self-testing is limited, resulting in a lack of an evide
35 In the reference scenario,
self-testing is not available, and the rate of first-tim
36 y criteria could lead to situations in which
self-testing is not cost-effective.
37 ions in assumptions; however, higher cost of
self-testing,
lower linkage to care for people whose dia
38 HIV
self-testing may thus be particularly useful for female
39 HIV
self-testing offers an approach to scaling up testing th
40 This analysis suggests that introducing
self-testing offers some health benefits and may well sa
41 Among Malawian adults offered HIV
self-testing,
optional home initiation of care compared
42 se results do not support the superiority of
self-testing over clinic testing in reducing the risk of
43 s further consideration as countries develop
self-testing policies and programmes.
44 nable consideration of developing formalized
self-testing programs.
45 idence interval (CI) = 47-54%) and home with
self-testing reached the highest proportion of young adu
46 Device-independent
self-testing refers to the most complete such certificat
47 Secondary outcomes were uptake of HIV
self-testing,
reporting of positive HIV self-test result
48 (n = 16,660) who received access to home HIV
self-testing through resident volunteers.
49 Although HIV
self-testing was first considered >20 years ago, it has
50 Self-testing was first demonstrated for the singlet stat
51 Uptake of HIV
self-testing was high in both the home (5287/8194, 64.9%
52 Two adverse events related to HIV
self-testing were reported: interpersonal violence and m
53 ucted a review of policy and research on HIV
self-testing,
which indicates that policy is shifting to
54 We predict that the introduction of
self-testing would lead to modest savings in healthcare