ライフサイエンスコーパス: semantic variant

1 mporo-parietal junction in patients with the semantic variant.

2 the uncinate fasciculus of patients with the semantic variant.

3 lexical access was less impaired than in the semantic variant.

4 luding logopenic, non-fluent/agrammatic, and semantic variants.

5 of the sample into agrammatic, logopenic and semantic variants.

6 tia, right-temporal frontotemporal dementia, semantic variant and non-fluent variant primary progress

7 emporal components of the dorsal pathways in semantic variant, and in the temporoparietal component o

8 Patients with semantic variant aphasia did not overestimate functionin

9 ally unclassifiable patients showed that the semantic variant can be preceded by a prodromal stage of

10 In contrast, patients with the semantic variant exhibited normal rate and very few spee

11 c variant (n = 12, age = 71 +/- 8 years) and semantic variant (n = 13, age = 65 +/- 7 years) using ma

12 The semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is

13 The semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA)

14 TRODUCTION: Semantic dementia, including the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA),

15 variant frontotemporal dementia (rtFTD), (3) semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA),

16 the anatomical basis for distinguishing the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia from the

17 or is more common in patients with bvFTD and semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia than in

18 Patients with the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia, also kn

19 otemporal dementia (bvFTD), 89 patients with semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia, and 30

20 ) with bvFTD, 24 of 89 patients (27.0%) with semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia, and 6 o

21 nisotropy and radial and mean diffusivities; semantic variant patients had severe changes in all metr

22 bvFTD), 7 non-fluent variant PPA (nfvPPA), 6 semantic variant PPA (svPPA) and 25 patients with subjec

23 sentation of word meaning in a discussion of semantic variant PPA, grammatical comprehension and expr

24 avioural variant frontotemporal dementia and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (also calle

25 frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), eight with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), fi

26 showed that the seed region derived from the semantic variant primary progressive aphasia analysis wa

27 We asked 15 patients with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia and 57 pati

28 Both semantic variant primary progressive aphasia and Alzheim

29 We found that both semantic variant primary progressive aphasia and Alzheim

30 We conclude that both semantic variant primary progressive aphasia and Alzheim

31 ol subjects (P < 0.001), while patients with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia discounted

32 Moreover, patients with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia had a signi

33 Observations in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia have inspir

34 he selective impairment for natural kinds in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia is related

35 se findings suggest that cortical atrophy in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia may follow

36 havioral variant frontotemporal dementia and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia patients al

37 rophy in 100% of individual patients in both semantic variant primary progressive aphasia samples.

38 Within semantic variant primary progressive aphasia the right-h

39 Regression analyses related performance in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia to ventral

40 rominent and consistent region of atrophy in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia using corti

41 havioral variant frontotemporal dementia and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia were most l

42 alth of neuroimaging research has associated semantic variant primary progressive aphasia with distri

43 nt frontotemporal dementia, 14 patients with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia, 25 patient

44 resembled the distributed atrophy pattern in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.

45 pe C, the subtype seen in most patients with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.

46 contribute to the semantic memory deficit in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.

47 study in healthy subjects and patients with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.

48 gnificant deficits in the non-fluent and the semantic variant remained after partialling out effects

49 ng emotional prosody, whereas those with the semantic variant show more widespread deficits in social

50 with primary progressive aphasia (eight with semantic variant, six with non-fluent/agrammatic variant

51 A subset of patients with the semantic variant were also impaired, though less severel