コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 bular carcinoma, 1 invasive papilloma, and 4 sentinel lymph nodes).
2 tastatic disease correctly identified in the sentinel lymph node.
3 ected by immunohistochemical analysis of the sentinel lymph node.
4 ve nodes, 36 of whom had at least one mapped sentinel lymph node.
5 ients had successful mapping of at least one sentinel lymph node.
6 hese, 72 (79%) had metastases in the hottest sentinel lymph node.
7 ts and 19 of 91 patients (21%) with positive sentinel lymph nodes.
8 (IQR 4.1-8.0) for the patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes.
9 Micrometastasis was detected in 1 of 5 sentinel lymph nodes.
10 atic system to these intramammary in-transit sentinel lymph nodes.
11 iposomes specific for lymph vessels from the sentinel lymph nodes.
12 gene expression in metastatic lesions within sentinel lymph nodes.
13 nificance of colon cancer micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes.
14 decreased VEGF-A would limit angiogenesis in sentinel lymph nodes.
15 he promotion of cancer metastasis beyond the sentinel lymph nodes.
16 rs that mediate their efficient transport to sentinel lymph nodes.
17 chnique's potential beyond merely localizing sentinel lymph nodes.
18 lap in tumor-involved relative to tumor-free sentinel lymph nodes.
19 Ninety-one patients (19%) had positive sentinel lymph nodes.
20 0 pmol of near-infrared quantum dots permits sentinel lymph nodes 1 cm deep to be imaged easily in re
22 B7-H3 expression was highly correlated to sentinel lymph node and overall number of lymph nodes wi
23 rtant role in promoting cancer metastasis to sentinel lymph nodes and beyond and also promotes organ
25 isolated tumor cells and micrometastases) in sentinel lymph nodes and bone marrow micrometastases (BM
26 oma metastases in the hottest and nonhottest sentinel lymph nodes and factors that correlate with dis
27 atric patients more frequently have positive sentinel lymph nodes and increased tumor thickness, yet
29 The primary endpoint, sensitivity of the sentinel-lymph-node-based detection of metastatic diseas
30 h nodes, 11% developed metastases beyond the sentinel lymph node basin and 3.4% recurred in the basin
31 ammation; the results clearly identified the sentinel lymph node basin and delineated the lymphatic d
34 change in approach to patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsies has increased the complexit
36 ial mastectomy (PM), partial mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy (PM SLNB), laparoscopic chole
39 y lymph node assessment (ALNA) consisting of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone if sentinel lymp
40 that disconcerting lymphedema rates in both sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph nod
41 oscintigraphy is standardly performed before sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer.
45 evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) frozen section (FS) ex
47 after identification of nodal metastases by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been questioned.
48 iate clinical setting for the application of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the management of c
51 ent as clinically localized T1 melanoma, yet sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is controversial in th
54 500, and 800 sec/mm(2)), followed by either sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node
55 ing regional lymph node evaluation by either sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or complete lymph node
56 ociated with lower- and higher-than-expected sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) positivity rates and w
58 l recurrence rates of patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using radiocolloid gui
60 surgical axillary evaluation, categorized as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), axillary lymph node d
61 ospective pediatric melanoma database, using sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), from 1992 to 2006, id
62 negative biopsy results underwent subsequent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), which yielded negativ
64 neoadjuvant chemotherapy could safely permit sentinel lymph node biopsy alone when the index node has
65 ruct surgeons in a standardized technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy and to educate those same sur
67 been done to select appropriate patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy based on multiple prognostic
73 of the studies in the past 2 years regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy have been concerned with iden
75 review suggested that these new methods for sentinel lymph node biopsy have clinical potential but g
77 d in the decision about whether to perform a sentinel lymph node biopsy in 16% of patients (67 of 420
78 rge number of surgeons capable of performing sentinel lymph node biopsy in a standardized fashion wit
79 ce for the efficacy of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in predicting prognosis, redu
84 t findings, it seems reasonable to recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy or at least strict regional l
85 Therefore, it may be reasonable to consider sentinel lymph node biopsy or close nodal surveillance a
86 It may therefore be reasonable to consider a sentinel lymph node biopsy or strict regional lymph node
87 Results Exercise and physical activity and sentinel lymph node biopsy reduce risk, and overweight a
89 ecurrence of melanoma (16%) after a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy result was similar to that in
91 ematic review to assess three techniques for sentinel lymph node biopsy that are not radioisotope dep
98 inically and radiologically normal axilla is sentinel lymph node biopsy with a radioisotope and blue
99 ine patients underwent lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy, and 10 had a positive axilla
101 underwent intraoperative lymphatic mapping, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and inguinal femoral lymphad
102 left shoulder underwent wide local excision, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and lymph node dissection.
103 ry nodal burden, deselection of patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy, and provision of radiotherap
104 ng the appropriate selection of patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy, especially among patients wi
105 ographic characteristics, trends in usage of sentinel lymph node biopsy, rates of local and distant r
113 ngoing clinical trials will evaluate whether sentinel-lymph-node biopsy can be avoided altogether in
114 section for staging has now been replaced by sentinel-lymph-node biopsy for patients with clinically
119 andomly assigned women with breast cancer to sentinel-lymph-node biopsy plus axillary dissection or s
121 not only the indications and techniques for sentinel-lymph-node biopsy, but also lymph-node sampling
122 n was assessed in primary tumors and matched sentinel lymph nodes by a quantitative real-time PCR ass
124 proved survival for patients with a positive sentinel lymph node compared with patients with clinical
126 no palpable axillary adenopathy, and 1 or 2 sentinel lymph nodes containing metastases, 10-year over
128 s with tumor present, but not in the hottest sentinel lymph node, counts ranged from 26% to 97% of th
129 existing nonratiometric protease sensors and sentinel lymph node detection methods, which give no inf
132 s treated with breast-conserving therapy and sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) alone without axil
134 ed axillary dissection (TAD), which includes sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) and selective loca
137 r overall survival for patients treated with sentinel lymph node dissection alone was noninferior to
138 ds from all patients who underwent selective sentinel lymph node dissection at the UCSF Melanoma Cent
140 aining both the ear and upper extremity, and sentinel lymph nodes draining different anatomic locatio
141 pecific fluorescent probe (MFP) to visualize sentinel lymph nodes during surgery, highlighting abnorm
142 duces expansion of lymphatic networks within sentinel lymph nodes, even before the onset of metastasi
144 actice gap exists in the surgical removal of sentinel lymph nodes, from removal of only the most radi
146 patients regarding the appropriate use of a sentinel lymph node identification and sampling procedur
147 hesia, is a safe and effective technique for sentinel lymph node identification in breast cancer pati
152 ence and outcomes of intramammary in-transit sentinel lymph nodes (IMSLN) from primary malignant mela
154 Many of the published controversies about sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer can be resolved by
158 e intraoperative visualization of tumors and sentinel lymph nodes in real-time without disrupting nor
161 d for detection and targeted excision of the sentinel lymph node is preoperative lymphoscintigraphy w
164 number of melanocytes at both the proximal (sentinel) lymph node (LN) and the distal LN from the inj
165 In cancer patients, visual identification of sentinel lymph nodes (LNs) is achieved by the injection
166 ver, overexpression of Adm in tumors induced sentinel lymph node lymphangiogenesis and led to an incr
168 examples of their applications ranging from sentinel lymph node mapping and tumor imaging to long-te
170 junct use of NIRF-ICG for (a) intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping for cancer staging, (b) vide
171 se of the GAINS to guide tumor resection and sentinel lymph node mapping promises to improve surgical
172 aspiration from the iliac crests and in vivo sentinel lymph node mapping were performed during open s
174 e quantum dots allow a major cancer surgery, sentinel lymph node mapping, to be performed in large an
175 D conjugates have been used successfully for sentinel lymph node mapping, tumor targeting, tumor angi
176 sensitivity and negative predictive value of sentinel-lymph-node mapping compared with the gold stand
177 cervical injection of indocyanine green and sentinel-lymph-node mapping followed by pelvic lymphaden
179 s with node-positive disease with successful sentinel-lymph-node mapping who had metastatic disease c
181 gate how the presence of neoplastic cells in sentinel lymph nodes may trigger pathways associated wit
182 FAM-labeled UNO (FAM-UNO) homed to tumor and sentinel lymph node MEMs in different cancer models: 4T1
183 he 10-year overall survival of patients with sentinel lymph node metastases treated with breast-conse
184 but enables the direct PET visualization of sentinel lymph node metastases, eliminating the need for
185 sentinel lymph node, presence or absence of sentinel lymph node metastases, primary tumor characteri
188 3, 2.2-cm invasive ductal carcinoma that is sentinel lymph node negative, estrogen receptor positive
190 Nodal metastases were identified in the sentinel lymph nodes of 35 (97%) of these 36 patients, y
194 gh ALND may be safely avoided in a subset of sentinel lymph node positive, Z0011-eligible patients, o
196 I melanoma, either via clinical detection or sentinel lymph node positivity, were eligible for enroll
198 odes removed, technetium-99m counts for each sentinel lymph node, presence or absence of sentinel lym
200 r lymphatics-mediated melanoma metastasis to sentinel lymph node prompted by tumor-derived epidermal
204 cutive patients with cutaneous melanoma with sentinel lymph nodes resected from January 5, 2004, to J
206 istopathology following surgical excision of sentinel lymph node(s), which is an invasive, time consu
209 include: noninvasive imaging of the breast, sentinel lymph nodes, skin, thyroid, eye, prostate (tran
212 an 20% of patients with melanoma who undergo sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy based on American Socie
213 entify the rate of axillary recurrence after sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer.
217 uideline on the use of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in staging patients wit
218 To address this potential overtreatment, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is currently being eval
220 e recent advancements and refinements of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy technique in breast can
221 under increased scrutiny due the use of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy technique to assess the
224 There is no consensus regarding the need for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy when regression is pres
225 urrence after a histopathologically negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy will demonstrate occult
226 utine examination of draining lymph nodes by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, the most important pre
229 lymphoscintigraphy on overall and bilateral sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in cervical cancer p
230 tivariate analysis, patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) had significantly reduced mela
232 ard of care for patients with a positive (+) sentinel lymph node (SLN) is axillary dissection; howeve
234 rovide convenient and accurate targeting for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping during robotic-assiste
237 tyrosinase mRNA in the detection of melanoma sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases and correlated the
238 outcomes of patients with melanoma who have sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases can be highly varia
241 odds ratios-to calculate the probability of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis for a specific pati
242 nal study to determine factors predictive of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in thin melanoma.
246 of presence or absence of various factors on sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis was assessed using
247 s from 65 patients undergoing resection with sentinel lymph node (SLN) or level I and II ALN dissecti
249 ed a false-negative rate (FNR) of 12.6% with sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery after neoadjuvant chem
250 ported a 12.6% false-negative rate (FNR) for sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery after neoadjuvant chem
252 scopic surgery, the accuracy of the isotopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique correlated with hype
255 etection of micrometastatic breast cancer in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) and nonsentinel ALN has not b
258 se of the B-32 trial is to establish whether sentinel-lymph-node (SLN) resection can achieve the same
261 detect the fluorescent signal emanating from sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) approximately 2 d after inje
262 0 or T2N0 breast cancer with 1 or 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are recommended to undergo a
263 for the selective assessment of nonenlarged sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) for diagnosing metastases in
265 atients with breast cancer metastasis to the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) generally undergo completion
266 h cT1-2N0 breast cancers and 1 to 2 involved sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) having breast-conserving the
267 ratins (CK) is common practice in evaluating sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast carc
269 etastases (clip-containing nodes) as well as sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) may provide more accurate as
270 gional recurrence for patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) randomized either to axillar
271 f sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone if sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were negative, SLNB with axi
272 rall survival between patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) who did and did not undergo
273 with breast cancer with one to two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) who undergo lumpectomy, radi
276 termine whether lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) for sentinel lymph node (SNL) mapping in a woman with a brea
280 , a prospective, multicenter study assessing sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemothera
284 Once the metastatic cells arrived at the sentinel lymph nodes, the extent of lymphangiogenesis at
286 portance, in mice with metastasis-containing sentinel lymph nodes, tumors that expressed VEGF-C were
288 acity to delineate metastases and to map the sentinel lymph nodes via tandem PET-computed tomography
292 Patients who had mapping of at least one sentinel lymph node were included in the primary analysi
294 d from patients with pathologically negative sentinel lymph nodes were centrally evaluated for occult
297 ory stimuli triggers recruitment of IPC into sentinel lymph nodes, whether the stimuli are able to di
299 e operative protocol led to resection of all sentinel lymph nodes with radioactivity greater than 10%
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。