戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                 Definitive diagnosis remains serologic.
2                       We collected clinical, serologic, (1)H-MRS PDFF, and liver biopsy data from 94
3                                              Serologic analyses showed that the 93 isolates cross-rea
4 lar diagnostic assays and highly multiplexed serologic analyses, as well as the development of animal
5              Following immunization of mice, serologic analysis demonstrated that the covalently coup
6              Usually, immunoglobulin M (IgM) serologic analysis is not sufficiently specific to confi
7                    We compared findings from serologic analysis with findings from biopsy analyses, f
8  patients, and 5 were identified by means of serologic analysis, all in samples obtained 13 days or m
9  but who test negative by reference 2-tiered serologic analysis.
10                                              Serologic and cerebrospinal fluid testing confirmed the
11 ficiency virus, which were ruled out through serologic and clinical examinations.
12        Therefore, it is important to include serologic and direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosti
13                                         Both serologic and genetic data show an association between P
14 cteristics, treatments, clinical course, and serologic and genetic markers.
15       A diagnosis of celiac disease based on serologic and histologic evidence requires patients to b
16 ated with tumor viral status, as assessed by serologic and immunohistochemical testing.
17                                              Serologic and immunologic deficits were most frequent in
18                   The data also suggest that serologic and molecular testing using blood and cerebros
19                                              Serologic and neutralization responses against the spike
20                          In this report, the serologic and phylogenetic relationships of the Uukuniem
21  in mCRC demonstrated that it safely induced serologic and T-cell responses.
22  disease is made based on clinical, genetic, serologic, and duodenal morphology features.
23 cted Fs antigen was confirmed in structural, serologic, and flow-cytometric studies.
24                    We provide morphological, serologic, and genetic evidence that Upolu virus (UPOV)
25                                 Symptomatic, serologic, and histological outcomes evaluated gluten to
26 going integration of advances in histologic, serologic, and molecular diagnostic techniques to produc
27                                    Clinical, serologic, and virologic features were compared between
28                                The clinical, serologic, and virologic features were compared between
29                    Results of urine culture, serologic,and polymerase chain reaction testing were pos
30 ns can have practical implications, altering serologic approaches to allergen testing and bringing a
31                                              Serologic approaches to diagnosis remain inaccurate, and
32                               Using the same serologic assay, we compared the estimated anti-HEV immu
33                                              Serologic assays can potentially produce precise exposur
34 ity explain why, in some cases, conventional serologic assays do not correlate with disease activity,
35 f historical perspective on the evolution of serologic assays for Lyme disease and provides a summary
36 validated serologic test exists, and current serologic assays have low sensitivity in early HTBRF.
37 logy-a rate comparable to the error rate for serologic assays.
38 y, antibody maturation was evaluated using 3 serologic assays: the BED capture enzyme immunoassay (CE
39 ve homologous helminth proteins in IgE-based serologic assessment of allergic disorders in a helminth
40       A combination of baseline basophil and serologic biomarkers defined a subset of patients in whi
41                            To identify novel serologic biomarkers of malaria exposure, we evaluated r
42 h deliberate sting challenges and to monitor serologic changes for up to 2 years.
43 ction in human fetal brain tissue along with serologic confirmation proves the vertical transmission
44             We investigated the incidence of serologic conversion and of new cases of celiac disease
45           Subjects were included if they met serologic criteria for syphilis (ie, a positive nontrepo
46                   We estimated the levels of serologic cross-reactivity among humans primed with seas
47                                     Based on serologic cross-reactivity of H3N8 EIV from different li
48                                              Serologic cross-reactivity, a hallmark of orthopoxvirus
49 f occurrence in the same geographic regions, serologic cross-reactivity, and similar but often less s
50                                              Serologic data indicated that MERS-CoV was circulating i
51 rs associated with narcolepsy, together with serologic data, collectively point to an autoimmune orig
52 ed on a retrospective review of clinical and serologic data, including therapeutic response.
53 creasing days of illness, demonstrating that serologic detection methods are best utilized during pre
54 osis of Lyme disease in the United States is serologic detection of antibodies against Borrelia burgd
55                                              Serologic determination of human leukocyte antigen antib
56 females; mean age: 42.7 years) with previous serologic diagnosis of HIV, from the acquired immunodefi
57 -on-a-chip point of care (POC) assay for the serologic diagnosis of human Lyme disease.
58                                   Definitive serologic diagnosis of the infection during gestation is
59 ights the ongoing challenges associated with serologic diagnosis of ZIKV infection.
60  (ELISA) has been proposed as an alternative serologic diagnostic test to the indirect immunofluoresc
61 ic DQalpha/beta combination within the donor serologic DQ specificity that were different from the do
62 s is greater than what is apparent using the serologic equivalents.
63 ck-borne infection in the United States, and serologic evaluation for antibodies to Borrelia burgdorf
64 , to April 1, 2016, in blinded comprehensive serologic evaluation for autoantibody profiles to aid th
65                                              Serologic evaluation for Zika virus (ZIKV) infection cur
66 008, to June 30, 2010, comprehensive service serologic evaluation performed on 54853 patients with un
67                   Reproductive histories and serologic evaluations were used to determine menopausal
68                Blood samples were tested for serologic evidence of CD.
69 1 asymptomatic recipient in each cluster had serologic evidence of exposure that decreased over time.
70                                     However, serologic evidence of exposure to an orthopoxvirus was d
71               Of 849 participants, 73.4% had serologic evidence of exposure to CMV (89.0% black and 6
72 nfected children, but not HEU children, lack serologic evidence of immunity to MMR, despite documente
73 ome consistent with Balamuthia infection and serologic evidence of infection.
74  autoinflammatory signs and symptoms without serologic evidence of inflammation as part of an atypica
75 or 4 d, chimeric mice developed clinical and serologic evidence of liver failure and lactic acidosis.
76                 Records of 302 patients with serologic evidence of recent T gondii infection (a posit
77 atory from June 2004 through August 2010 for serologic evidence of recent Toxoplasma gondii infection
78 hese, 35 patients (88%) had molecular and/or serologic evidence of recent ZIKV infection in the serum
79  and T. pallidum from none; one woman showed serologic evidence of syphilis.
80  examinations on 290 of 454 individuals with serologic evidence of T gondii infection during the epid
81  associates with poor allograft outcomes and serologic evidence of viral infections and alloimmunity.
82        These findings do not support routine serologic examination for Borrelia in uveitis patients.
83 ss onset may have a role in the clinical and serologic expression of juvenile myositis.
84  However, reports that suggest high rates of serologic false positives and low levels of viremia have
85 rotonin release in the absence of heparin, a serologic feature characteristic of delayed-onset HIT (i
86 c features correlated best with clinical and serologic features of dAIH.
87 FD affects symptoms, histology, immunity, or serologic features of patients with celiac disease.
88  these models, the one which has the closest serologic features to PBC is a mouse with a T-cell-restr
89 er cardiac bypass surgery, share a number of serologic features with HIT Abs, including platelet acti
90 nd study their association with clinical and serologic features.
91 en-detected celiac disease based on positive serologic findings found initiation of a gluten-free die
92                       Patients with positive serologic findings underwent intestinal biopsies.
93                        Based on clinical and serologic findings, the genetic defect was detected by m
94 sults on standard (18)F-FDG PET and negative serologic findings.
95 ore was a useful tool in predicting positive serologic findings.
96 s inability to cross-tabulate histologic and serologic findings.
97   The distribution of these alleles within a serologic group varies, with some alleles being more fre
98                                          The serologic hallmark of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), t
99 ration biopsy data report no linkage between serologic Hashimoto's thyroiditis and thyroid cancer, ye
100                                              Serologic HBV markers, including hepatitis B surface ant
101 lpha/beta allele combinations with the donor serologic HLA-DQ antigens.
102 formed, 147 patients had antibodies to donor serologic HLA-DQ antigens.
103 istent children were more likely to elicit a serologic immune response, and both infection groups had
104 men and control women mount similarly robust serologic immune responses to IIV, with no significant d
105 der two opposing models to explain long-term serologic immunity.
106                                 In addition, serologic incidence predictions from cross-sectional sam
107 e influence of pretransplant weight loss and serologic indicators of nutritional homeostasis on relap
108  titers were associated with a lower risk of serologic infection (P = .01) and maintenance of antibod
109                                              Serologic infection was defined as a 4-fold increase in
110  titers were associated with protection from serologic infection.
111                                              Serologic investigations and systemic work-up results we
112 rapy and medical treatment on the level of a serologic marker of inflammation (high-sensitivity C-rea
113                                 We evaluated serologic markers from these pathways in a case-control
114 , numbers of intraepithelial lymphocytes, or serologic markers of celiac disease.
115                  We assessed associations of serologic markers of monocyte activation, soluble CD163
116                           The development of serologic markers specific to CD has revolutionized the
117  specificity and kinetics of these potential serologic markers.
118 r a minimum of 18 months, using clinical and serologic measures of disease activity.
119 should be evaluated serially by Fibroscan or serologic measures of fibrosis.
120                                              Serologic measures of increased intestinal permeability
121 e of glomerular dysfunction and conventional serologic measures, even in patients with other manifest
122 a and Ehrlichia species with blood smear and serologic methods in an upper Midwest population.
123  been the development and validation of host serologic microbial biomarkers, which have achieved a di
124 osylation has been suggested as a marker for serologic monitoring of liver disease and hepatocellular
125 ombined smooth muscle cells were excluded by serologic neutralization.
126                                    The human serologic observations supported the translational relev
127 y was observed among clinical specimens with serologic or molecular markers for various unrelated blo
128                  Therefore, the clinical and serologic parallels to APS-I in patients with thymomas a
129 g only smokers found no correlations between serologic parameters and demographic or clinical paramet
130 , histopathologic (Banff classification) and serologic parameters were compared between both groups b
131 IP.4mut suggest utility as an immunogen or a serologic probe; moreover, the specific four alterations
132                          MBO130 has a unique serologic profile; has as much alphaGlcNAc as 11F, 11B,
133 ing monoclonal antibodies show that 6X11 has serologic properties of 6B/6D, whereas 6X12 has 6A/6C.
134 has four known members (6A-6D) with distinct serologic properties, homologous cps loci, and structura
135 dentified specific aortic autoantigens using serologic proteomic studies.
136                             We evaluated the serologic reactivity of the paired sera to R. rickettsii
137                                 We find that serologic reactivity to dengue 1 virus (DENV1) EDIII bef
138  strains requires knowledge of antigenic and serologic relationships between MERS-CoV and other CoVs.
139        However, after long-term clinical and serologic remission, approximately 11 years after initia
140  prospective cohort study was to compare the serologic response between human immunodeficiency virus
141                                     Maternal serologic response during pregnancy after adequate syphi
142 ase are small bile ducts, and the prototypic serologic response includes antimitochondrial antibodies
143                                              Serologic response rates following 3 doses of tOPV for b
144           Factors that negatively influenced serologic response rates were high doses of immunosuppre
145 ectively, these data suggest that a positive serologic response to HPV16 oncoproteins may be the best
146 ectively, these data suggest that a positive serologic response to HPV16 oncoproteins may be the best
147  however, a marginal 7% increase (P=.065) in serologic response to poliovirus type 1 was observed.
148 V infection did not impact the likelihood of serologic response to therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.001; P
149 e modeling were used to assess predictors of serologic response to treatment at 180 days and 400 days
150                                              Serologic response to treatment should be evident by 6 m
151      We assessed factors that influenced the serologic response to vaccination.
152 t and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and serologic responses (using neutralization assays) agains
153              PsA-TT generated robust tetanus serologic responses in 1- to 29-year-olds, similar to th
154 rnia/07/2009 influenza vaccines, we analyzed serologic responses of participants stratified by BMI gr
155 alpha blocker use was associated with better serologic responses than other immunosuppressive drugs.
156 Lyme disease is done by determination of the serologic responses to Borrelia burgdorferi antigens, wi
157 compromised patients showed moderate to good serologic responses to hepatitis A vaccination, but may
158 n long-term memory by measuring cellular and serologic responses to measles.
159                    Little is known about the serologic responses to Pneumocystis jirovecii major surf
160                                        Human serologic responses to S. aureus and their relationship
161 We utilized ELISA to measure the IgM and IgG serologic responses to three overlapping recombinant fra
162 ca assessed whether PsA-TT generated tetanus serologic responses when tested in African populations (
163 cocorticoids showed the poorest clinical and serologic responses.
164 grans lesion or a positive standard 2-tiered serologic result in a patient with symptoms compatible w
165                             In this context, serologic results correlated with the likelihood of sign
166                                              Serologic results in contacts who were sampled 13 days o
167 dular ocular and systemic manifestations and serologic results in men compared to women.
168                                              Serologic results suggest that further spread of this ou
169 e 450 subjects of Group I disclosed positive serologic results, presence of DQ2 and/or DQ8 alleles an
170 he prior season was indicated by both VE and serologic results.
171 identified by latent class analysis by using serologic, RT-PCR, and GM data.
172 ficant patient-centered barriers that impede serologic screening and contribute to the delayed detect
173         Objective: To assess the evidence on serologic screening and preventive interventions for gen
174 1, 2004 to October 31, 2014, in whom routine serologic screening for Borrelia burgdorferi (IgG as det
175 nt-centered barriers have a role in impeding serologic screening for celiac disease in individuals fr
176                   All participants underwent serologic screening for celiac disease using the IgA tis
177 type was determined at 15 months of age, and serologic screening for celiac disease was evaluated at
178                   Conclusions and Relevance: Serologic screening for genital herpes is associated wit
179                                              Serologic screening for genital herpes was associated wi
180 ation: The USPSTF recommends against routine serologic screening for genital HSV infection in asympto
181 uded that the harms outweigh the benefits of serologic screening for genital HSV infection in asympto
182 ence on the accuracy, benefits, and harms of serologic screening for HSV-2 infection in asymptomatic
183 es; studies evaluating accuracy and harms of serologic screening tests for HSV-2; RCTs assessing prev
184 nd the available evidence on the accuracy of serologic screening tests, the USPSTF concluded that the
185      Despite the availability of inexpensive serologic screening tests, ~85% of individuals with celi
186 cipate in the study (Group I), and underwent serologic screening.
187 tribution of molecular equivalents within DQ serologic specificities.
188  DSA (IgM, IgG3, and IgG) refers to the same serologic specificity.
189                                  Most recent serologic specimen was used to determine measles seropro
190 ation, and clinical data were abstracted and serologic specimens collected.
191 alyzed the impact of donor and recipient EBV serologic status on overall survival, relapse-free survi
192                                          HBV serologic status was determined for 126 (91%) of 139 res
193 the B. pertussis receptors was obtained from serologic studies demonstrating pertussis patient serum
194                                  Even though serologic studies have shown that children are exposed t
195 culture, histopathologic examination, and/or serologic studies.
196                                              Serologic study results revealed glutamic acid decarboxy
197 ne exhibited different associations based on serologic subtype adds to the expanding knowledge base i
198                      A large cross-sectional serologic survey was conducted in the Netherlands during
199 d repeated clinical surveys for active yaws, serologic surveys for latent yaws, and molecular analyse
200                                              Serologic surveys were conducted from May 2013 to Decemb
201 timated by national vaccination coverage and serologic surveys.
202                                 No validated serologic test exists, and current serologic assays have
203    Although the availability of a commercial serologic test for ZIKV has greatly expanded the nationa
204 ies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) are the serologic test of choice for diagnosing celiac disease (
205  of having a normal mucosa but a positive CD serologic test result (OR, 4.57; 95% CI, 1.58-13.22).
206 viduals with normal mucosa but a positive CD serologic test result.
207 ormal mucosa (Marsh stage 0) but positive CD serologic test results (IgA/IgG gliadin, endomysium, or
208                       The donor had positive serologic test results for E. cuniculi.
209 ASDs) and celiac disease (CD) or positive CD serologic test results, but larger studies are contradic
210 osis remains challenging in the absence of a serologic test.
211  a second stage of the study and undergo new serologic testing (Group II).
212               Combining the BAT with routine serologic testing allows classification of patients with
213 proach that involves biliary cytology, FISH, serologic testing and advanced imaging techniques when C
214 ocused systemic medical evaluation including serologic testing and imaging studies.
215 amined rates and factors associated with HBV serologic testing and vaccination rates in adults infect
216 ia should be used to determine when to order serologic testing and when the results of such testing s
217 Eighty-two (51.3%) children underwent either serologic testing and/or esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
218          Polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) and serologic testing at the Centers for Disease Control and
219  for Lyme disease with standardized 2-tiered serologic testing between 2005 and 2010 at a single hosp
220 nificant variance in the frequency of celiac serologic testing between providers.
221 e relatives from Group II that underwent new serologic testing disclosed eight sero-converted subject
222                                              Serologic testing for antibodies to H. pylori remains th
223                                              Serologic testing for B. miyamotoi was performed using a
224 t, C-reactive protein or fecal calprotectin, serologic testing for celiac disease, and age-appropriat
225 % took antiretroviral prophylaxis, 23.8% had serologic testing for hepatitis B and 43.1% for hepatiti
226                To discuss recent advances in serologic testing for systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associate
227 we present our initial experiences with ZIKV serologic testing from a national reference laboratory p
228          In addition to suggestive symptoms, serologic testing has high diagnostic reliability and bi
229        Lyme disease is diagnosed by 2-tiered serologic testing in patients with a compatible clinical
230             Next, we reviewed the outcome of serologic testing in patients with select clinical syndr
231 CD4 percentage between last vaccine dose and serologic testing independently improved the cumulative
232                  In early Lyme disease (LD), serologic testing is insensitive and seroreactivity may
233 inal symptoms did not predict whether celiac serologic testing occurred, though Caucasians (P < 0.01)
234 Detection of brucellosis currently relies on serologic testing of an antibody response to Brucella in
235                              Cytomegalovirus serologic testing of enrolled mothers was performed to d
236   To improve vaccine strain selection, human serologic testing on vaccination-induced cross-reactivit
237    The majority of patients had no record of serologic testing prior to biopsy, and evidence of posit
238                                  HAV and HBV serologic testing prior to referral and at the liver cli
239                    The conventional 2-tiered serologic testing protocol for Lyme disease (LD), an enz
240                                              Serologic testing revealed a high prevalence (29 of 81;
241                                              Serologic testing ruled out toxoplasmosis, rubella, cyto
242                                              Serologic testing shows that antibodies to this region c
243    The application of imaging techniques and serologic testing such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 may
244           Current diagnostic methods rely on serologic testing that are complicated by cross reactivi
245  endocrinologist and a standardized panel of serologic testing that included serum insulin-like growt
246                               The utility of serologic testing to evaluate vaccine efficacy of season
247 termined on the basis of testing history and serologic testing to have been recently infected.
248 ness among North Carolina residents and that serologic testing using R. rickettsii antigen may miss c
249                                       Celiac serologic testing was completed in 63 (39.4%) children.
250                                              Serologic testing was performed for all 782 children inc
251                                   Results of serologic testing were not predictive of relapse.
252      Ophthalmic and systemic evaluations and serologic testing were performed on all infants.
253                              Two barriers to serologic testing were significant across the participan
254                 Changes in reimbursement for serologic testing will likely drive future provider orde
255 s were systematically collected for culture, serologic testing, antigen detection, and molecular diag
256 ldhood were followed for up to 38 years with serologic testing, imaging, and noninvasive fibrosis mar
257                                              Serologic testing, including examination of serotype-spe
258                                              Serologic testing, including plaque reduction neutraliza
259                                          HBV serologic testing, relevant medical history, and HBV gen
260 disseminated Lyme disease underwent 2-tiered serologic testing.
261 t celiac disease symptoms, risk factors, and serologic testing.
262 ure history and positive results of MERS-CoV serologic testing.
263  a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR and serologic testing.
264 verall study results for combined RT-PCR and serologic testing.
265 reaction assay (RT-PCR), viral isolation, or serologic testing.
266 t components is an important step in allergy serologic testing.
267 erformed for each patient within 2 months of serologic testing.
268    A total of 146 adult patients with CF had serologic tests (ImmunoCap total IgE, specific Aspergill
269                                        Novel serologic tests allowed for the detection of otherwise u
270 tified 671 MSM with available results of HCV serologic tests and with an HIV genotypic resistance tes
271                              We propose that serologic tests based on VMPs are of additional value in
272            Newer diagnostic tools, including serologic tests for antibodies against tissue transgluta
273                            Only 2 studies of serologic tests for celiac disease involving 62 and 158
274 c disease; studies on diagnostic accuracy of serologic tests for celiac disease.
275 S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention serologic tests for detection of anti-MERS-CoV antibodie
276                                              Serologic tests have a greater sensitivity, but their re
277                                     Based on serologic tests of a community population for celiac dis
278 chistosomiasis (based on positive results of serologic tests or detection of ova) and 17 healthy cont
279  with results of laboratory testing, such as serologic tests or polymerase chain reaction.
280                                Retrospective serologic tests suggested that HHV-8 was likely transmit
281                             In recent years, serologic tests to identify the less common antisyntheta
282                                Molecular and serologic tests were performed to diagnose CRT infection
283 disease (identified by positive results from serologic tests) had lower mean levels of vitamin B-12 a
284 e detection of intracellular morulae) and on serologic tests, both of which have recognized limitatio
285 collected to perform rapid diagnostic tests, serologic tests, culture, and molecular tests for potent
286  anti-MERS-CoV antibodies by at least 2 of 3 serologic tests, in addition to 2 fatal cases identified
287  of US Food and Drug Administration-approved serologic tests, such as an enzyme immunoassay (EIA), fo
288 of interlaboratory variability of several LD serologic tests-whole cell sonicate (WCS) enzyme-linked
289 0,425 adults with positive results from both serologic tests.
290              We also analyzed the results of serologic tests.
291 f 1.44 to increase in 1.86), or results from serologic tests.
292 mab interference with transfusion laboratory serologic tests.
293 tures of LAM (i.e., clinical, radiologic, or serologic), the guideline panel made conditional recomme
294  ANCA vasculitis and then focus on clinical, serologic, therapeutic and mechanistic aspects of four m
295 rom patient isolates correlated with initial serologic titers and with mortality in murine pneumonia.
296           Following treatment, nontreponemal serologic titers should decline in a stable pattern, but
297                                    A lack of serologic tools has hindered targeted studies of transmi
298 exposure, and also inform the development of serologic tools to monitor gametocyte exposure in popula
299                                              Serologic (total and A fumigatus-specific IgE), pulmonar
300                            Interpretation of serologic, urine and biopsy studies is complicated by ox

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top