戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 osis remains challenging in the absence of a serologic test.
2 f 1.44 to increase in 1.86), or results from serologic tests.
3 course of the disease, diagnosis is based on serologic tests.
4 riteria, despite an increase in requests for serologic tests.
5 mplemented simple acceptability criteria for serologic tests.
6 -infected individuals undetected by standard serologic tests.
7 HIV-1 and HCV in blood earlier than standard serologic tests.
8 dardization of the present generation of IgM serologic tests.
9 determined by culture or subsequent standard serologic tests.
10  reactive test result by newer enzyme-linked serologic tests.
11 code proteins not included in routinely used serologic tests.
12 mab interference with transfusion laboratory serologic tests.
13 0,425 adults with positive results from both serologic tests.
14              We also analyzed the results of serologic tests.
15 al pertussis infection based upon additional serologic testing.
16 from reflex samples originally submitted for serologic testing.
17 earned that they have genital herpes through serologic testing.
18 egionella pneumophila exposure, according to serologic testing.
19 before infection in children was detected by serologic testing.
20 ed to clinical microbiology laboratories for serologic testing.
21 rase chain reaction and for coronaviruses by serologic testing.
22 complete follow-up, and 23% in each year had serologic testing.
23  595, one third of which was attributable to serologic testing.
24 ts, high-resolution computed tomography, and serologic testing.
25 n efficacy and underwent unnecessary, costly serologic testing.
26 disseminated Lyme disease underwent 2-tiered serologic testing.
27 t celiac disease symptoms, risk factors, and serologic testing.
28 ure history and positive results of MERS-CoV serologic testing.
29  a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR and serologic testing.
30 verall study results for combined RT-PCR and serologic testing.
31 reaction assay (RT-PCR), viral isolation, or serologic testing.
32 t components is an important step in allergy serologic testing.
33 erformed for each patient within 2 months of serologic testing.
34 ted, and their partners were invited for HSV serologic testing.
35 of office visits, 11 and 7; median number of serologic tests, 4 and 4; and median days of antibiotic
36                                 At the first serologic test, 641 were HBeAg positive and 893 were ant
37       Incidence was determined by applying a serologic testing algorithm for recent HIV seroconversio
38                                          The serologic testing algorithm for recent human immunodefic
39  the remaining California counties using the Serologic Testing Algorithm for Recent Seroconversion (S
40                                        Novel serologic tests allowed for the detection of otherwise u
41               Combining the BAT with routine serologic testing allows classification of patients with
42                                              Serologic testing also revealed possible cases of Lyme b
43 ion in the United States by conducting HHV-8 serologic testing among participants of the Transfusion-
44 proach that involves biliary cytology, FISH, serologic testing and advanced imaging techniques when C
45  these 14, only 5 (35.7%) sought appropriate serologic testing and counseling for active immunization
46  cross-sectional study was undertaken of EBV serologic testing and histories of IM and sexual behavio
47 y limited data on risk in the current era of serologic testing and human leukocytes antigen typing to
48 ocused systemic medical evaluation including serologic testing and imaging studies.
49 plantation have replaced, for the most part, serologic testing and in vitro cultures for the diagnosi
50          Genotyping is a powerful adjunct to serologic testing and is superior for typing transfused
51 s with positive results of M. pneumoniae IgM serologic testing and no alternative diagnosis were cons
52 cellent correlation between contemporary EBV serologic testing and the BioPlex 2200 system.
53 amined rates and factors associated with HBV serologic testing and vaccination rates in adults infect
54 ia should be used to determine when to order serologic testing and when the results of such testing s
55 Eighty-two (51.3%) children underwent either serologic testing and/or esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
56                           The added value of serologic tests and inflammatory markers in clinical ass
57                                          New serologic tests and molecular techniques are being added
58 lthough the application of a large number of serologic tests and more stringent donor questioning has
59 ronic relapsing brucellosis as determined by serologic tests and the patient's clinical picture.
60  use in future research or as an antigen for serologic tests and vaccines, the extent of structural c
61 tified 671 MSM with available results of HCV serologic tests and with an HIV genotypic resistance tes
62 iagnostic evaluation (including cultures and serologic tests), and analysis of lymph node tissue.
63 re tested; 100 (20.4%) reacted on at least 1 serologic test, and 65 (13%) were determined to be posit
64  Mice were assayed for infection by culture, serologic testing, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) a
65  visits, number of physicians seen, types of serologic tests, and days of antibiotic treatment; 2) oc
66 b. microti polymerase-chain-reaction assays, serologic tests, and questionnaires.
67 of the most sensitive and specific screening serologic tests (anti- tissue transglutaminase antibodie
68 s were systematically collected for culture, serologic testing, antigen detection, and molecular diag
69                                  A number of serologic tests are available commercially for identifyi
70 gnosis relies on intestinal biopsy findings, serologic tests are useful as screening tools and as an
71 f class I than single-mutant cells, based on serologic tests, as well as a significantly diminished s
72          Polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) and serologic testing at the Centers for Disease Control and
73  discuss the diagnostic use and potential of serologic tests based on detection of antibodies to MTB
74                                              Serologic tests based on this antigen will identify peop
75                              We propose that serologic tests based on VMPs are of additional value in
76  for Lyme disease with standardized 2-tiered serologic testing between 2005 and 2010 at a single hosp
77 nificant variance in the frequency of celiac serologic testing between providers.
78 e detection of intracellular morulae) and on serologic tests, both of which have recognized limitatio
79 2 to 1995, 17 laboratories performed 100,000 serologic tests costing $7.1 million on Maryland residen
80 collected to perform rapid diagnostic tests, serologic tests, culture, and molecular tests for potent
81 hepatitis C, and biochemical blood tests and serologic tests currently have only modest value in pred
82 antibody test-positive histories on approved serologic tests, demonstrating that RT-nPCR was probably
83                                              Serologic tests developed in the last decade provide a n
84                                              Serologic tests developed in the past decade provide a n
85 e relatives from Group II that underwent new serologic testing disclosed eight sero-converted subject
86 t on the understanding and interpretation of serologic testing during pregnancy and the perinatal per
87 ructs elicit antibodies detected by standard serologic tests (enzyme immunoassays, rapid tests, and W
88 he sensitivity and specificity of commercial serologic tests (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELIS
89                                 No validated serologic test exists, and current serologic assays have
90 tart empirical IBS treatment and (2) perform serologic test for CS followed by endoscopic biopsy for
91 mmercially available microimmunofluorescence serologic test for the detection of Chlamydophila pneumo
92    Although the availability of a commercial serologic test for ZIKV has greatly expanded the nationa
93              There is no evidence to support serologic testing for anti-HBs in this context.
94                                              Serologic testing for antibodies to H. pylori remains th
95                                              Serologic testing for B. miyamotoi was performed using a
96 d biopsy results with results for concurrent serologic testing for celiac autoantibodies.
97 t, C-reactive protein or fecal calprotectin, serologic testing for celiac disease, and age-appropriat
98                                              Serologic testing for chronic parasitic infections is of
99  their first-degree family members underwent serologic testing for different autoantibodies.
100 re collected through personal interviews and serologic testing for H. pylori antibodies.
101 % took antiretroviral prophylaxis, 23.8% had serologic testing for hepatitis B and 43.1% for hepatiti
102           Recent reports have indicated that serologic testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patient
103                                              Serologic testing for HEV infection should be performed,
104  years of age were interviewed and underwent serologic testing for HIV and HSV-2.
105   Serious limitations of these data are that serologic testing for HTLV has a high false positive rat
106             The diagnosis was established by serologic testing for IgM and IgG antibodies to La Cross
107  Despite almost universal use in this study, serologic testing for LD did not appear to influence tre
108                                              Serologic testing for LD was performed for 36 patients (
109 ents seen for tick bites, 95 (67%) underwent serologic testing for LD.
110           Because clinicians routinely order serologic testing for Legionella pneumophila serogroups
111 e attempted to clarify the clinical value of serologic testing for Lyme disease using the results of
112                To discuss recent advances in serologic testing for systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associate
113            Newer diagnostic tools, including serologic tests for antibodies against tissue transgluta
114 We describe a recombinant antigen for use in serologic tests for antibodies to Kaposi's sarcoma (KS)-
115 atients did not significantly cross-react in serologic tests for Borrelia burgdorferi.
116 etermined the sensitivity and specificity of serologic tests for CD.
117                            Only 2 studies of serologic tests for celiac disease involving 62 and 158
118 c disease; studies on diagnostic accuracy of serologic tests for celiac disease.
119 S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention serologic tests for detection of anti-MERS-CoV antibodie
120                                   Results of serologic tests for heparin-induced antibodies were posi
121                                              Serologic tests for hepatitis A, B, and C viruses were n
122         The positive predictive value of the serologic tests for Kaposi's sarcoma was 82 percent, and
123                          To ascertain use of serologic tests for Lyme disease (LD) in Maryland, all l
124 rols may minimize false-positive results for serologic tests for Lyme disease, and these tests must b
125  chemiluminescence) are probably superior to serologic tests for predicting hemolytic disease of the
126 rlor in Bangkok, Thailand, were interviewed; serologic tests for sexually transmitted infections were
127                                   High-titer serologic tests for syphilis are uncommon, and prozone r
128 es were low; the use of glycoprotein G-based serologic tests for the measurement of HSV-1 and HSV-2 a
129 we present our initial experiences with ZIKV serologic testing from a national reference laboratory p
130  a second stage of the study and undergo new serologic testing (Group II).
131 disease (identified by positive results from serologic tests) had lower mean levels of vitamin B-12 a
132          In addition to suggestive symptoms, serologic testing has high diagnostic reliability and bi
133  Campylobacter jejuni infection, detected by serologic tests, has been implicated in some acute immun
134                                              Serologic tests have a greater sensitivity, but their re
135 luded nucleic acid detection, viral culture, serologic testing, histopathologic evaluation, and immun
136  straightforward and uses commonly available serologic tests; however, the signs and symptoms of celi
137 ldhood were followed for up to 38 years with serologic testing, imaging, and noninvasive fibrosis mar
138    A total of 146 adult patients with CF had serologic tests (ImmunoCap total IgE, specific Aspergill
139 act identification; pre- and postvaccination serologic testing in contacts and infants, respectively;
140        Lyme disease is diagnosed by 2-tiered serologic testing in patients with a compatible clinical
141             Next, we reviewed the outcome of serologic testing in patients with select clinical syndr
142 -transcription polymerase chain reaction, or serologic testing in the prospective groups, and 61 were
143  anti-MERS-CoV antibodies by at least 2 of 3 serologic tests, in addition to 2 fatal cases identified
144      Patients underwent echocardiography and serologic testing including C-reactive protein (CRP).
145                                              Serologic testing, including examination of serotype-spe
146                                              Serologic testing, including plaque reduction neutraliza
147                       Sensitive and specific serologic tests, including those for anti-transglutamina
148 CD4 percentage between last vaccine dose and serologic testing independently improved the cumulative
149                                              Serologic testing is essential for the diagnosis of some
150 lichiosis and determination of etiology when serologic testing is inconclusive.
151 sis (HGE) and determination of etiology when serologic testing is inconclusive.
152                  In early Lyme disease (LD), serologic testing is insensitive and seroreactivity may
153                                              Serologic testing is not useful early in the course of L
154                                              Serologic testing is usually unable to provide evidence
155                                              Serologic testing may be more useful in later disease, a
156 ble comparing RIPA to commercially available serologic test methods.
157 s, using viral culture, electron microscopy, serologic testing, molecular analysis, and histopatholog
158 amined by testing plasma from 43 horses with serologic test-negative histories and no known contact w
159 inal symptoms did not predict whether celiac serologic testing occurred, though Caucasians (P < 0.01)
160 ies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) are the serologic test of choice for diagnosing celiac disease (
161 Detection of brucellosis currently relies on serologic testing of an antibody response to Brucella in
162                              Cytomegalovirus serologic testing of enrolled mothers was performed to d
163 ly with distinct clinical phenotypes, making serologic testing of great diagnostic aid.
164 ) with rNS1 as the antigen was evaluated for serologic testing of laboratory rodents.
165 termine the presence of leptospiral DNA; and serologic testing of serum from patients and rats by mic
166                                        Early serologic testing of the recipient pretransplant and pro
167  we conducted chart reviews, interviews, and serologic testing of thoracic-surgery patients at the tw
168                                     Based on serologic tests of a community population for celiac dis
169   To improve vaccine strain selection, human serologic testing on vaccination-induced cross-reactivit
170                     Syphilis is diagnosed by serologic testing or by identification of the causative
171 chistosomiasis (based on positive results of serologic tests or detection of ova) and 17 healthy cont
172  with results of laboratory testing, such as serologic tests or polymerase chain reaction.
173 tic process must be optimized to ensure that serologic tests perform adequately.
174                                The number of serologic tests performed declined by 25% after implemen
175 06 through 9 February 2007, and we performed serologic tests, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysi
176    The majority of patients had no record of serologic testing prior to biopsy, and evidence of posit
177                                  HAV and HBV serologic testing prior to referral and at the liver cli
178                    The conventional 2-tiered serologic testing protocol for Lyme disease (LD), an enz
179 ilis prevention, as indicated by nonreactive serologic tests (rapid plasma reagin and fluorescent tre
180 studies due to the reported insensitivity of serologic tests relative to antigen detection methods.
181                                          HBV serologic testing, relevant medical history, and HBV gen
182  of having a normal mucosa but a positive CD serologic test result (OR, 4.57; 95% CI, 1.58-13.22).
183 viduals with normal mucosa but a positive CD serologic test result.
184 ormal mucosa (Marsh stage 0) but positive CD serologic test results (IgA/IgG gliadin, endomysium, or
185 st cases, antibiotics were prescribed before serologic test results became available.
186                                              Serologic test results for C. trachomatis antibodies in
187 tion (PCR) and immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG serologic test results for confirming BTV cases.
188                       The donor had positive serologic test results for E. cuniculi.
189 dividuals with normal mucosa but positive CD serologic test results was 3.09 (95% CI, 1.99-4.80).
190 ASDs) and celiac disease (CD) or positive CD serologic test results, but larger studies are contradic
191 ononuclear cells (PBMCs) to confirm positive serologic test results.
192 greement between the real-time PCR assay and serologic test results: 19.8% (19/96) and 13.7% (29/212)
193 f the genus flavivirus mandates caution when serologic testing results are interpreted.
194                                              Serologic testing revealed a high prevalence (29 of 81;
195                                              Serologic testing revealed both ganglionic neuronal acet
196 A tests as well as the introduction of rapid serologic tests (RT) and HIV nucleic acid amplification
197                                              Serologic testing ruled out toxoplasmosis, rubella, cyto
198 oved by enhancing HCV detection, with annual serologic testing, screening with HCV RNA to detect acut
199          We studied 7046 pregnant women whom serologic tests showed to be at risk for herpes simplex
200                                              Serologic testing shows that antibodies to this region c
201    The application of imaging techniques and serologic testing such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 may
202  of US Food and Drug Administration-approved serologic tests, such as an enzyme immunoassay (EIA), fo
203                                        These serologic tests suggest that Granulibacter immunoreactiv
204                                Retrospective serologic tests suggested that HHV-8 was likely transmit
205           Current diagnostic methods rely on serologic testing that are complicated by cross reactivi
206 ld adopt policies on student vaccination and serologic testing that conform to ACIP recommendations a
207  endocrinologist and a standardized panel of serologic testing that included serum insulin-like growt
208                                              Serologic tests that provide results rapidly could overc
209 induced infections of dogs were confirmed by serologic testing, tissue culture isolation, and PCR amp
210                                  The role of serologic testing to confirm cure of Helicobacter pylori
211                                              Serologic testing to detect H. pylori immunoglobulin G (
212    We used molecular methods, culturing, and serologic testing to diagnose and ascertain the cause of
213                                   The use of serologic testing to diagnose Lyme disease (LD) is a sou
214                               The utility of serologic testing to evaluate vaccine efficacy of season
215 termined on the basis of testing history and serologic testing to have been recently infected.
216              There are no generally accepted serologic tests to confirm the disease.
217  syphilis is challenging and often relies on serologic tests to detect treponemal or nontreponemal an
218                             In recent years, serologic tests to identify the less common antisyntheta
219 d recommendation of techniques to be used in serologic testing, training in virus isolation, and proc
220 e a faster and less expensive alternative to serologic tests used in reference laboratories.
221                                   Results of serologic tests used to diagnose H. pylori should be int
222 lated antigens in addition to gag and env in serologic tests used to identify HTLV-infected individua
223 ness among North Carolina residents and that serologic testing using R. rickettsii antigen may miss c
224 t further standardization, variability among serologic tests using E. equi and HGE agent isolates for
225                                              Serologic testing, viral culture, and molecular methods,
226                                       Celiac serologic testing was completed in 63 (39.4%) children.
227                         Of 23 people on whom serologic testing was conducted, eight were seroreactive
228 sions, polymerase-chain-reaction testing, or serologic testing was done.
229                                              Serologic testing was performed 12 and 20 months after s
230                                              Serologic testing was performed for all 782 children inc
231                                          HIV serologic testing was performed, and the presence of ris
232  the reliability of the glycoprotein G-based serologic tests, we evaluated HSV-1 and HSV-2 enzyme imm
233                                   Results of serologic testing were not predictive of relapse.
234      Ophthalmic and systemic evaluations and serologic testing were performed on all infants.
235                              Two barriers to serologic testing were significant across the participan
236 o treatment status but counsellors doing the serologic testing were.
237                              Biochemical and serologic tests were best at predicting no or minimal fi
238       Alcohol consumption, demographics, and serologic tests were correlated with degrees of steatosi
239                             Results of viral serologic tests were negative.
240                                Molecular and serologic tests were performed to diagnose CRT infection
241 sis was obtained when culture, skin PCR, and serologic tests were used, although serologic testing wi
242                                              Serologic testing, when available, requires antigen prep
243 of interlaboratory variability of several LD serologic tests-whole cell sonicate (WCS) enzyme-linked
244                 Changes in reimbursement for serologic testing will likely drive future provider orde
245 PCR, and serologic tests were used, although serologic testing with skin PCR was almost as sensitive
246 of Lyme borreliosis (LB) is commonly made by serologic testing with Western blot (WB) analysis servin

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top