ライフサイエンスコーパス: sewage

1 sence of only suspended biomass in untreated sewage.

2 ers through the discharge of treated and raw sewage.

3 nto consumer products that are disposed into sewage.

4 a good stability of the target biomarkers in sewage.

5 , ranging from unpolluted river water to raw sewage.

6 C), and, as such, they have been detected in sewage.

7 t numerous populations to be associated with sewage.

8 nutrients originated almost exclusively from sewage.

9 evaluated against measured concentrations in sewage.

10 3 from RNA extracted directly from stool and sewage.

11 yelitis patient, the contacts, and the local sewage.

12 eactive N-nitrosamine precursors to domestic sewage.

13 f (12%), groundwater infiltration (39%), and sewage (49%).

14 nome amplification (WGA) of RNA and DNA from sewage and animal (avian, cattle, poultry, and swine) fe

15 percentage true positives) of MST results in sewage and animal waste samples (21-33%) was lower than

16 m two sources concentrated in urban systems, sewage and atmospheric deposition.

17 Untreated recycled water, such as sewage and graywater, will almost always contain a wide

18 Virus serotypes detected in sewage and groundwater were temporally correlated, sugge

19 ect beta-lactam resistance in wastewater and sewage and identified resistance in individual bacterial

20 s of total fipronil related compounds in raw sewage and in plant effluent after chlorination were sta

21 ects poliovirus circulation in environmental sewage and is used to monitor transmission in communitie

22 genetic markers were highly abundant in raw sewage and sewage-impacted water samples.

23 essfully for the determination of ammonia in sewage and soil water samples.

24 (CSOs) occur in combined sewer systems when sewage and stormwater runoff are released into water bod

25 to evaluate stability of drug biomarkers in sewage and the uncertainty related to back-calculation o

26 etect small amounts of OPV in both stool and sewage and to distinguish nonrevertant and revertant ser

27 es persisted through biological treatment of sewage and was measured in the effluent.

28 rting reactive nitrogen to dinitrogen gas in sewage and waste treatment plants.

29 .6) shorter than children in households with sewage and with large storage containers.

30 blished the specificity of the microarray in sewage, and fluorescence decrease of positive probes ove

31 e most abundant groups of faecal bacteria in sewage, and several Lachnospiraceae high-abundance sewag

32 When conservative estimates of DIN from sewage are included in input calculations, DIN retention

33 We also sampled a local lake and untreated sewage as potential virus sources.

34 ybrid system operating continuously with raw sewage as the feed at water recovery up to 80%.

35 Our research identified sewage as the predominant nutrient source in this semiar

36 d water sources through latrine overflow and sewage, as well as by the periodicity of human activitie

37 terica, and Giardia lamblia were detected in sewage, as well as MST markers and resistance genes to a

38 g particles have been located in incinerated sewage ash including a 20 mum diameter cluster of <3 mum

39 be useful in predicting samples enriched in sewage-associated and pathogen-like bacteria in tropical

40 asured levels of FIB and the distribution of sewage-associated bacteria, including potential pathogen

41 presence of the nifH marker along with other sewage-associated markers, namely, enterococci surface p

42 icated that the proportion of sequences from sewage-associated taxa (SAT) or pathogen-like sequences

43 nd SR14 bacteriophages were present in human sewage at 2-4 orders of magnitude.

44 d nonrevertant OPV-2 and -3 were detected in sewage at 6 and 13 weeks after the NID.

45 poser and flushing for management with other sewage at a wastewater treatment plant emits 0.10 kg of

46 al analysis, stability of drug biomarkers in sewage, back-calculation of drug use (specific case of c

47 bic and aerobic microbial communities during sewage biological treatment.

48 Mn and Fe in Fe3O4@OMS-2@CTS changed during sewage biological treatment.

49 consumption through the chemical analysis of sewage biomarkers of illicit drugs.

50 oil) applied via a likely route of exposure, sewage biosolid application.

51 f environmental and human samples, including sewage, blood, and urine.

52 ions revealed that the overboard disposal of sewage by oyster harvesters into oyster-bed waters was t

53 ch has been frequently detected in raw urban sewage, can occur via intake of contaminated water and f

54 an populations are potentially excreted into sewage collection systems and concentrated in sewage slu

55 Albumin (BSA) as a surrogate for protein in sewage, column experiments investigating the capacity of

56 ectively account for nearly 35% of the total sewage community.

57 cetamiprid, and clothianidin as recalcitrant sewage constituents that persist through wastewater trea

58 There are many "prehygiene" communities with sewage-contaminated water supplies, helminth infestation

59 he sterol ratios indicated a higher level of sewage contamination in the Santos Estuary.

60 This outbreak of HEV was likely caused by sewage contamination of the municipal water system.

61 ation) and TCS (methylation) occurred during sewage conveyance and treatment.

62 and previous studies suggest that sulfide in sewage could alter the activity of heterotrophic denitri

63 enylacetate decarboxylase from an anaerobic, sewage-derived enrichment culture that quantitatively pr

64 to total event-based nitrate loads, although sewage-derived nitrate remained the dominant source (66%

65 ctionations into mixing models; up to 19% of sewage-derived samples showed the isotopic effects of de

66 ed was constructed, ultimately inverted, and sewage DIN inputs constrained using Monte Carlo simulati

67 arge increases in fertilizer application and sewage discharge in Egypt.

68 The mean concentration from the expected sewage discharge scenario indicated that 12% by length o

69 yster-harvesting waters, including overboard sewage discharge, must be undertaken if future outbreaks

70 inner part of the bay, directly affected by sewage discharges and where water circulation is more re

71 nylestradiol (EE2), are present in municipal sewage discharges.

72 ection, those in households without adequate sewage disposal and with small storage containers were 1

73 Lack of adequate sewage disposal explained a height deficit of 0.9 cm (0.

74 Efforts to halt improper sewage disposal in oyster-harvesting waters, including o

75 g levels of sanitation of drinking water and sewage disposal.

76 uncertainties are related to the analysis of sewage drug biomarkers (uncertainty as relative standard

77 he RT-qPCR assays against RNA extracted from sewage effluent (n = 14), surface water (n = 30), and tr

78 ural) progestins have so far been studied in sewage effluent and surface waters.

79 emoval rates, were used to derive per capita sewage effluent values for the European countries .

80 om water pollution control plants (WPCPs) in sewage effluent.

81 armaceuticals are active substances found in sewage effluents and can negatively impact aquatic syste

82 fectious persons shedding pathogens into the sewage, environmental transport of these pathogens via L

83 nient biomarkers for NIC tracing through the sewage epidemiology approach at the local scale.

84 Sewage epidemiology is a rapidly expanding field that ca

85 stewater analysis (sometimes referred to as "sewage epidemiology") relates to the size and variabilit

86 od was used to collect 1.75 L of raw flowing sewage every 2-4 weeks.

87 m wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) influent sewage from 12 cities geographically distributed across

88 ound to effectively reduce sulfide levels in sewage from 12.7 +/- 0.3 to 0.2 +/- 0.0 mg S/L at a sulf

89 URA-protected areas, but also receives urban sewage from a large city through a manmade ditch.

90 iruses in the wells was leakage of untreated sewage from sanitary sewer pipes.

91 from the United States and Australia and in sewage from Spain, reflecting a global distribution and

92 We quantified NoV and Escherichia coli in sewage from storm tank discharges and treated effluent p

93 sis of purified viral particles in untreated sewage from the United States (San Francisco, CA), Niger

94 e of the WWTF (that treats 0.6 m(3) s(-1) of sewage) from a trickling filter/solids contact process t

95 3) The input of the newly increased sanitary sewage had a dominant influence on the quality and yield

96 al or aquatic environments contaminated with sewage, hydrocarbons, heavy metals, and other industrial

97 on of MS2 to levels regularly encountered in sewage-impacted environments.

98 Concentrations of QACs in sewage-impacted estuarine sediments (up to 74 microg/g)

99 rkers were highly abundant in raw sewage and sewage-impacted water samples.

100 bacteriophage MS2, a virus often detected in sewage-impacted water supplies.

101 lloids often occur together with proteins in sewage-impacted water.

102 he risk cleaning products pose to health and sewage in Merida, a city in the Yucatan peninsula of Mex

103 e and Ruminococcaceae for their potential as sewage indicators.

104 ics of the dominant community members within sewage influent from two wastewater treatment plants (WW

105 e steroid estrogen conjugates in matrix-rich sewage influents and effluents (method detection limits

106 than the measured fluxes indicating that the sewage infrastructure of Boston diverts watershed DSi to

107 ecreased water flow months were dominated by sewage inputs and soil-related organisms.

108 Further, they highlight the importance of sewage inputs to DIN budgets in urban streams, particula

109 sewer overflows (SSOs) occur when untreated sewage is discharged into water sources before reaching

110 ethyl-mono-(di;tri) sulfide are important in sewage-like odors of pit latrines under anaerobic condit

111 roughput sequencing of patient and untreated sewage microbiomes showed many sequences with no similar

112 The use of some of these chemicals as sewage molecular markers was also investigated.

113 influences of the paved runoff and sanitary sewage on the DOM quality of WWF using excitation-emissi

114 the concentration ratio usually measured in sewage or runoff waters.

115 off is redirected to the combined stormwater-sewage overflow system.

116 arded as indicators to identify the types of sewage overflows and the illicit connection status of dr

117 st a potential health impact associated with sewage overflows.

118 The balancing of Gd input and output of a sewage plant over seven days indicated that approximatel

119 rated in local tap water and in effluents of sewage plants.

120 are recovering from industrial, mining, and sewage pollution during the 20th century.

121 to surface water DOM and characteristic of a sewage pollution influence.

122 wed fipronil occurrence at 12-31 ng/L in raw sewage, primary effluent, secondary effluent, chlorinate

123 Deep sequencing of untreated sewage provides an opportunity to monitor enteric infect

124 , and several Lachnospiraceae high-abundance sewage pyrotags occurred in at least 46 of 48 human faec

125 ts reveal substantial DIN contributions from sewage ranging from 6 to 14 kg ha-1 yr-1.

126 ormation, excretion, national water use, and sewage removal rates, were used to derive per capita sew

127 attained for all species in raw and treated sewage, respectively; whereas, the limits of quantificat

128 stimulated by nutrients from fertilizer and sewage runoff.

129 then applied to determination of PPCPs in a sewage sample and ASA and FP in drug preparations.

130 in 3 other major cities in 2011-2013); b. in sewage samples (27 from metropolitan Tel-Aviv, 14 from t

131 llel identification of target BWAs in spiked sewage samples after PCR amplification.

132 ociated markers were detected in 100% of the sewage samples analyzed.

133 uencing data obtained for viruses present in sewage samples and successfully detected multiple sub-po

134 The application of the method to composite sewage samples collected during 1 week in three differen

135 nd deeper sampling of viral nucleic acids in sewage samples could be used to monitor changes in the p

136 of particle-protected viral nucleic acid in sewage samples could therefore rapidly establish the pre

137 ting Clostridium coccoides (C. coccoides) in sewage samples demonstrated that Lachnospiraceae-annotat

138 Untreated sewage samples from 12 cities in the United States were

139 tool samples from 124 children and 8 1-liter sewage samples from Orizaba, Veracruz, Mexico, collected

140 The faecal components of the sewage samples included enriched pyrotag populations fro

141 tify new illicit drugs and/or metabolites in sewage samples is also discussed.

142 All four virus groups were detected in sewage samples of less than a milliliter from multiple U

143 Sewage samples were all extremely high in virus concentr

144 Rates and types of polioviruses found in sewage samples were analyzed, and all poliovirus isolate

145 Sewage samples were collected from 27 environmental samp

146 Serial sewage samples were collected in 4 towns of Mexico befor

147 of 24 illicit drugs and metabolites in urban sewage samples.

148 HAV was detected in sewage samples: 16/27(59.2%) from Tel-Aviv; 4/14(28.6%)

149 circulating wild poliovirus (WPV) in Israel, sewage sampling detected WPV type 1 (WPV1) in April 2013

150 e first time, a novel quantitative community sewage sensor (namely DNA-directed immobilization of apt

151 the developed DDIAS can be used as community sewage sensors for rapid and cost-effective evaluation o

152 mmunities degrading BACs were developed from sewage (SEW), activated sludge (AS), soil (SOIL) and sea

153 In the United States, most of the treated sewage sludge (biosolids) is applied to farmland as a so

154 of ECs derived from pastures fertilized with sewage sludge (biosolids): a common global agricultural

155 In the U.S., the primary fate of processed sewage sludge (class B biosolids) is application to agri

156 Land application of stabilized sewage sludge (known as biosolids) can contribute PBDEs

157 To relieve the environmental issues of sewage sludge (SS) disposal and greenhouse gas (GHG) emi

158 tion process and after postprocessing of the sewage sludge (which caused a significant change in Zn s

159 (4-NP), a common nonionic detergent found in sewage sludge amended soils.

160 Sewage sludge and biosolids production and management ar

161 he concentrations of 69 elements in digested sewage sludge and effluent samples from 64 municipal was

162 valuable information for risk assessment of sewage sludge application on agricultural soils.

163 lates as genotype T4 and three isolates from sewage sludge as genotype T5.

164 Sewage sludge ash (SSA) is a prospective phosphorus sour

165 However, the sewage sludge ash (SSA) is almost completely disposed of

166 trations of parabens also were determined in sewage sludge collected from several wastewater treatmen

167 The analysis of sewage sludge did not prove the presence of anthropogeni

168 Sewage sludge digester gas samples have been stored only

169 Sewage sludge drying contributes 25% to emissions, soils

170 o standard ecotoxicity media, and in primary sewage sludge for a period of up to 48 h.

171 (Hydro)thermal treatments of sewage sludge from wastewater treatment process can sign

172 set showed that the biogas reactors treating sewage sludge had distinctly different DOM characteristi

173 Resource recovery from sewage sludge has the potential to save natural resource

174 tural residues, animal manure, biowaste, and sewage sludge in 2010 and 2030 was assessed for Europe.

175 ra, and values as high as 0.8 were found for sewage sludge incinerated at 800 degrees C in a syntheti

176 Thus, the behavior of Ag-NP during sewage sludge incineration is essential for a comprehens

177 rapid formation of Ag(0)-NP from Ag2S during sewage sludge incineration, as demonstrated in this stud

178 o address the transformation of Ag-NP during sewage sludge incineration, we spiked metallic Ag(0)-NP

179 environmental performance of wastewater and sewage sludge management is commonly assessed using life

180 currently the most important strategies for sewage sludge management.

181 The wastewater-sewage sludge pathway has been identified as a key relea

182 gh the addition of chemical additives during sewage sludge processing.

183 The amount of sewage sludge produced worldwide is expected to further

184 eatment of nitrogen removal via nitrite from sewage sludge reject water.

185 shotgun viral metagenomics was applied to 10 sewage sludge samples from 5 wastewater treatment plants

186 eries of the four SCCP, MCCP and LCCP-spiked sewage sludge samples ranged from 86 to 123%.

187 During anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge supplemented with CO added through a hollo

188 onmental Protection Agency Targeted National Sewage Sludge Survey data from 2006 to 2007 revealed hig

189 ental Protection Agency in its 2001 national sewage sludge survey.

190 A novel technology for simultaneous sewage sludge treatment and CO biomethanation in an anae

191 Critics suggest that rules regulating sewage sludge treatment and land application may be insu

192 tituent of excess sludge produced by Aerobic Sewage Sludge Treatment plants.

193 This study highlights the potential for sewage sludge treatment processes to affect the risk of

194 is) and hydrothermal treatments of municipal sewage sludge using complementary chemical extraction an

195 euticals at pre-existent concentrations from sewage sludge was assessed, for the first time, in nonst

196 Australian sewage sludge was dominated by MCCPs with concentrations

197 unts of each isomer were added separately to sewage sludge which provided the electron-donating subst

198 in decision making about land application of sewage sludge will strengthen environmental health prote

199 ilabilities of P as a response to manure and sewage sludge with a range of P capture and hygienizatio

200 substrates like pig slaughterhouse waste and sewage sludge, among others.

201 of infection from exposure to wastewater and sewage sludge, and represent a significant leap forward

202 ped, and the chemicals were analyzed in air, sewage sludge, and sediment.

203 r agricultural fields via the application of sewage sludge, by irrigation with treated municipal wast

204 sh and carbonized wood shavings, pig manure, sewage sludge, carbon nanotubes, and activated carbon.

205 ce of organic support medium (soil, compost, sewage sludge, etc.) inoculum provision, a targeted enri

206 ciation as a result of postprocessing of the sewage sludge, mimicking composting/stockpiling, were al

207 gged, and safe) of a complex matrix, such as sewage sludge, regarding their impacts on the chemical s

208 CPs (SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs) in Australian sewage sludge, we applied and further validated a recent

209 421 ng/g dw) were detected in the Australian sewage sludge, which were comparable with the LCCPs conc

210 agmentation or following land application of sewage sludge-derived biosolids.

211 ic sludge digestion, and land application of sewage sludge.

212 d manufacturing byproducts of TCC and TCS in sewage sludge.

213 byproducts of TCC and TCS in raw and treated sewage sludge.

214 materials such as municipal waste, wood and sewage sludge.

215 17 RNA) different types of human viruses in sewage sludge.

216 ewage collection systems and concentrated in sewage sludge.

217 gum Bayram, a strain isolated from activated sewage sludge.

218 utinely measuring SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs in sewage sludge.

219 lvent for obtaining maximum information from sewage sludge.

220 other "conventional" forms of Zn present in sewage sludge.

221 n the soil that had received high amounts of sewage sludge.

222 of several organic micropollutants (OMPs) in sewage sludge.

223 st time that CPs were reported in Australian sewage sludge.

224 ts in the majority becoming entrained in the sewage sludge.

225 cipal sewer system largely accumulate in the sewage sludge.

226 xperiment amended by different quantities of sewage sludges has been evaluated.

227 U.S. sewage sludges were analyzed for 58 regulated and nonreg

228 been detected in oceans, rivers, sediments, sewages, soil and even table salts.

229 fety: bacteria are exposed to MNMs in water, sewage, soils, and sediments, wherein they influence MNM

230 ive against Ent. faecalis, it is not for the sewage-source organisms.

231 during baseflow conditions and indicate that sewage-sourced DIN is not limited to sewer overflow even

232 faecalis, but depressed photoinactivation of sewage-sourced enterococci and E. coli after correcting

233 The decay of sewage-sourced Escherichia coli and enterococci was meas

234 4% of nitrate in streamwater originated from sewage sources during baseflow conditions.

235 s with a particular focus on detecting human sewage sources of contamination.

236 The nifH marker, however, appears to be sewage-specific in SEQ, Australia, and therefore, it is

237 her than nonhost specific RYC2056 phages and sewage-specific KS148 phages (p < 0.05).

238 We developed sewage-specific microbial source tracking (MST) tools us

239 and molecular analysis of polioviruses from sewage specimens monitored the duration of vaccine-relat

240 mber and December 2000, to test for cVDPV in sewage, streams, canals, and public latrines.

241 sed by people, which after use can enter the sewage system and, subsequently, enter the environment a

242 nd are released into the environment via the sewage system.

243 d-off of urban surfaces and emissions to the sewage system.

244 fide is found in many environments including sewage systems, petroleum extraction platforms, kraft pa

245 and heat losses from basements of buildings, sewage systems, subsurface district heating networks, an

246 eational water, ingestion of cross-connected sewage to drinking water, and shower exposures to DBPs.

247 e results highlight the utility of analyzing sewage to monitor shedding of viral pathogens and the hi

248 ssolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) inputs from sewage to Nine Mile Run (NMR), an urban watershed (1570

249 r pipelines, although primarily designed for sewage transport, can also be considered as bioreactors.

250 l DSi year(-1)) indicate that the process of sewage treatment at DITP likely does not remove DSi.

251 xperiments simulating the aeration tank of a sewage treatment plant confirmed the Gd complex removal

252 toxins from reagent water, river waters, and sewage treatment plant effluent samples extracted with C

253 In some cases, disposal to a sewage treatment plant may be favored, but plant perform

254 The determination of phosphate at a sewage treatment plant was carried out to demonstrate a

255 ons of steroid sulfates in the influent to a sewage treatment plant were approximately 100 times grea

256 rations found in proximity to a metropolitan sewage treatment plant, a wood-related industrial area,

257 ective electrode installed at the inlet of a sewage treatment plant, showed a distinctive pattern whi

258 surface water and wastewater samples from a sewage treatment plant.

259 ion (n = 21), to levels above 600 ng/m(3) at sewage treatment plants (n = 2).

260 products were quantified in influents of ten sewage treatment plants (STP) serving populations rangin

261 e raw wastewater samples were collected from sewage treatment plants (STPs) in 17 cities.

262 to reduce MPs in the effluents of municipal sewage treatment plants (STPs).

263 affic-related variables but the proximity to sewage treatment plants was present in all models indica

264 surface water, and wastewater collected from sewage treatment plants.

265 We developed an empirical model to estimate sewage treatment prevalence for 47 additional countries.

266 in 2010; of these, 77 had published data on sewage treatment prevalence.

267 is more likely to occur with septic tanks as sewage treatment systems especially in karstic terrains.

268 as a groundwater infiltration tracer within sewage treatment systems, and highlights the underapprec

269 for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during sewage treatment was investigated.

270 Interestingly, at one sewage treatment works (STW), the levels of GB-124 phage

271 eroid estrogens in effluents from Australian sewage treatment works and a receiving river were predic

272 tandardized questionnaires collected from 19 sewage treatments plants (STPs) and the results of an in

273 hages (536_P1 and 536_P7) were isolated from sewage using strain 536, a highly virulent extraintestin

274 ewerage as "improved sanitation" only if the sewage was treated before discharge to the environment.

275 eful management of sources from urban input, sewage waste and irrigation runoff.

276 of novel viral sequences in human serum and sewage which are clearly related to the asfarvirus famil

277 component occurred in the reserved sanitary sewage, while a type of longer emission wavelength (em:

278 as marker genes), we sampled poultry, dogs, sewage, wild birds and flies.

279 f paved runoff and point sources of sanitary sewage within the drainage networks.

280 00% specificity and 90% sensitivity to human sewage without detecting 68 animal manure pooled samples

281 (oceans 160 per ml; soil 6,400-38,000 per g; sewage works 70 per ml).