ライフサイエンスコーパス: sexual partner

1 ed HBV infection from a chronically infected sexual partner.

2 reams, alcohol drinking, and condom use by a sexual partner.

3 tential sexual exposure to an HSV-2-infected sexual partner.

4 to susceptible individuals with an infected sexual partner.

5 another case patient as a syringe-sharing or sexual partner.

6 tient who was treated with telaprevir to his sexual partner.

7 th disclosed their HIV status to their first sexual partner.

8 to greatly reduced transmission of HIV to a sexual partner.

9 linked isolates such as those collected from sexual partners.

10 pose continued risk of HSV-2 transmission to sexual partners.

11 (index participants) to their HIV-uninfected sexual partners.

12 ections but may be depositions from infected sexual partners.

13 ies of males versus females to seek multiple sexual partners.

14 d those with an increased number of lifetime sexual partners.

15 urers were also more likely to have had many sexual partners.

16 602 MSM aged 16-27 years with </= 5 lifetime sexual partners.

17 d reduce transmission of the virus to female sexual partners.

18 strated transmission of the pathogen between sexual partners.

19 ive treatment for infected persons and their sexual partners.

20 with mild symptoms, shed HSV, and can infect sexual partners.

21 mption, and having a male partner with other sexual partners.

22 dults are favored because they are preferred sexual partners.

23 nitis, exposure to T. vaginalis, or multiple sexual partners.

24 experiences of unprotected sex and multiple sexual partners.

25 an 39 years and having had more than 20 male sexual partners.

26 gressive behaviors and dictate the choice of sexual partners.

27 , alcohol, and other drug use; and number of sexual partners.

28 rograms which encourage people to have fewer sexual partners.

29 on of gonorrhea from infected males to their sexual partners.

30 an be transmitted in semen from a man to his sexual partners.

31 n of syphilis in persons exposed to infected sexual partners.

32 ogy has been observed in viral isolates from sexual partners.

33 ocaine use, and a greater lifetime number of sexual partners.

34 s occur, even in persons with relatively few sexual partners.

35 d take appropriate measures to protect their sexual partners.

36 se in genetically linked HIV-1 infections in sexual partners.

37 mavirus (HPV) infection from female and male sexual partners.

38 ut underlies selective tuning to appropriate sexual partners.

39 li that predict the availability of food and sexual partners.

40 or age, race, education, and total number of sexual partners.

41 as 72% were attributed to 5 or more lifetime sexual partners.

42 Of the 1,329 men with a regular sexual partner, 173 were current smokers, 836 had previo

43 e than one partner), and number of male anal-sexual partners (2.57, 1.46-4.49, for at least three mal

44 Median numbers of sexual partners 6 months and 1 month before acquisition

45 that among those infected by extra-household sexual partners, 62% (95% CI: 55%-70%) are infected by s

46 sexual activity since treatment denied a new sexual partner; 62% of these subjects reported that thei

47 Of the 400 people who had a new sexual partner abroad, 300 (75%) used condoms on all occ

48 not least because young people who meet new sexual partners abroad may be a convenient proxy group f

49 were used to develop mathematical models of sexual partner acquisition and antibody dynamics.

50 ent BV was associated with exposure to a new sexual partner (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 2.51; 95% C

51 ated with having the same pre-/posttreatment sexual partner (adjusted HR [AHR] = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.0

52 s risk increases among persons with multiple sexual partners (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.2-2.9), but

53 Patterns of age differences between sexual partners - "age-mixing" - may partially explain t

54 ession, stratifying by study, age, number of sexual partners, age at first intercourse, parity, smoki

55 ce linking HHV8 infection with the number of sexual partners among homosexual men, the challenge now

56 CI, 0.76-1.03; P = .11] for having an older sexual partner and an odds ratio of 0.91 [95% CI, 0.60-1

57 s increased with the same pre-/posttreatment sexual partner and inconsistent condom use, and halved w

58 s (IDUs) and secondary transmission to their sexual partners and children.

59 nfection were identified based on numbers of sexual partners and eventual seroconversion.

60 cessful in promoting HIV testing among their sexual partners and in facilitating safer sexual decisio

61 le mice and increased aggression toward both sexual partners and male intruders in a seminatural envi

62 lts in frequent transmission of infection to sexual partners and neonates.

63 nd current disease state to both prospective sexual partners and potential rivals.

64 rises in part from higher number of lifetime sexual partners and stronger associations with sexual be

65 s such as exposure to an increased number of sexual partners and to certain medications.

66 among men who reported having >/=16 lifetime sexual partners and using condoms intermittently.

67 ntrols, all of whom reported having only one sexual partner, and from interviews with their husbands.

68 nfection from a cohabiting or non-cohabiting sexual partner, and then the proportion of total heteros

69 Associations with age, sex, number of sexual partners, and current number of cigarettes smoked

70 dal anti-inflammatory drugs, total number of sexual partners, and lifetime marijuana use, whereas an

71 behavioral contexts, such as locating food, sexual partners, and oviposition sites.

72 egarding sexual concerns, relationships with sexual partners, and reproductive issues with women suff

73 HIV infection among thousands of IDUs, their sexual partners, and their children.

74 a managerial occupation, had fewer lifetime sexual partners, and were more likely to have a history

75 dom receptive anal intercourse, who had more sexual partners, and who had a history of syphilis or he

76 fined as using a condom with the most recent sexual partner; and (c) itchy vaginal discharge in the p

77 vs married/living-as-married); and number of sexual partners (aOR 3.6 [95% CI, 1.9-7.0] >/=6 vs 1).

78 red to married/living as married), number of sexual partners (AOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.0-6.1 for >/=4 part

79 th of BV-associated microorganisms and a new sexual partner appeared to be at particularly high risk

80 chains of transmission is difficult, because sexual partners are commonly difficult or impossible to

81 their undersampling and very high numbers of sexual partners are factored in, the discrepancy disappe

82 hemes emerged: young people assess potential sexual partners as "clean" or "unclean"; sexual partners

83 n drug use, and a greater number of lifetime sexual partners as independent risk factors for HBV-HCV

84 HIV was 0.5% and the patient did not have a sexual partner at risk.

85 were also likely to report large numbers of sexual partners at home.

86 t minority of the population who report most sexual partners at home.

87 Sexual partnering between young women and older men, who

88 INTERPRETATION: Sexual partnering between young women and older men, who

89 ng an initial mating and that selection of a sexual partner can be determined by olfactory stimuli as

90 han twice as likely to have 2 or more recent sexual partners compared with oral contraceptive users (

91 Having multiple sexual partners concurrently increases the risk of trans

92 suggest that KIR/HLA incompatibility between sexual partners confers protection against HIV-1 transmi

93 those with a higher number of lifetime oral sexual partners, current tobacco use and immunosuppressi

94 HPV exposure, HPV DNA positivity, number of sexual partners, cytology findings, and age.

95 Additionally, the mean number of sexual partners decreased over the study.

96 Most participants with primary sexual partners distributed self-tests to partners: 53 (

97 black MSM that facilitate communication with sexual partners especially about risk reduction strategi

98 s of age, same-sex experience, more lifetime sexual partners, ever being diagnosed with a sexually tr

99 A slow turnover of sexual partners favors HR HPV, whereas high frequency of

100 ctices that lead to mucosal trauma (multiple sexual partners, fisting, use of sex toys) and the prese

101 age, current smoking, and lifetime number of sexual partners for both genders (adjusted Ptrend < 0.02

102 VS activation predicted greater increases in sexual partners for both men and women, the effect in me

103 en's infidelity, and with number of lifetime sexual partners for men and women.

104 ), and have had a greater lifetime number of sexual partners (for > or =14 partners vs < or =4 partne

105 llowed prospectively with their 19 long-term sexual partners from 1986 to 1993 in California, Florida

106 rotect themselves, their families, and their sexual partners from HIV.

107 tners, 62% (95% CI: 55%-70%) are infected by sexual partners from outside their community.

108 g women coenrolled with their regular female sexual partner (FSP), to investigate the BV incidence ra

109 vaginal microbiota of women and their female sexual partners (FSPs), as measured by Nugent score (NS)

110 phosphoryl lipid A in subjects whose regular sexual partners had a history of genital herpes.

111 r, recipients who transmitted HIV-1 to their sexual partners had higher mean viral RNA levels than di

112 but the effect of KIR/HLA mismatches between sexual partners has never been investigated.

113 ial sexual partners as "clean" or "unclean"; sexual partners have an important influence on behaviour

114 with having a high number of lifetime female sexual partners (hazard ratio 2.40, 1.38-4.18, for at le

115 ith previous syphilis infection, an infected sexual partner, HIV infection, or more than 4 sex partne

116 M. genitalium infections in women and their sexual partners improve reproductive health in women and

117 e resident in these boroughs, had at least 1 sexual partner in the last 12 months, stated willingness

118 and proportion reporting at least one female sexual partner in the past 5 years (2.00, 1.59-2.51) inc

119 Participants reporting one or more sexual partner in the past year were given a score on th

120 ence (odds ratio, 3.9 [CI. 2.6 to 5.9]), new sexual partner in the previous year (odds ratio, 2.2 [CI

121 ho have sex with men to report having only 1 sexual partner in the previous year.

122 mpleted by transients and men with exclusive sexual partners in a city-level analysis, in the interve

123 ntial age difference between female and male sexual partners in Manicaland is the major behavioural d

124 ed in consistent condom use or the number of sexual partners in the last 7 days, with high levels of

125 ples were collected from PBD, IDU, and their sexual partners in the most severely affected provinces,

126 ttern everywhere, but having had two or more sexual partners in the past year is more common in men t

127 reporting partner concurrency or two or more sexual partners in the past year were independently asso

128 ncy of sexual contact and overall numbers of sexual partners in this group of homosexual men who acqu

129 The majority of male sexual partners in this study were infected, emphasizing

130 role of C. trachomatis and number of recent sexual partners in type-specific HPV redetection.

131 [1.46-4.71]), and higher numbers of lifetime sexual partners (in women only; 2.12 [1.68-2.67] for ten

132 Importantly, the per-sexual partner increase in prevalence was significantly

133 of first intercourse, reduction in number of sexual partners, increases in condom use, etc) that are

134 R, 2.3 [CI, 1.7 to 3.0]), more than 1 recent sexual partner (IRR, 3.1 [CI, 2.3 to 4.2]), and HIV infe

135 clude interventions to address age-disparate sexual partnering is crucial to reducing HIV incidence a

136 HSV-2) was conducted to assess whether their sexual partners may be at an increased risk of HSV-2 fro

137 s in the mother plus child program had fewer sexual partners (mean [SE], 0.68 [0.16]) compared with a

138 or 42% of named partners; the mean number of sexual partners medically evaluated per index case was 5

139 tivariable regression suggest that number of sexual partners met from online social networking techno

140 lities of HIV transmission, and the rates of sexual partner mixing.

141 use of other services (PWID), more lifetime sexual partners (MSM), and needle sharing (PWID).

142 h 30.4% of men tested self-reporting reduced sexual partner numbers and 12.8% reporting increased con

143 (76.7-78.7%) of women reported at least one sexual partner of the opposite sex in the past year.

144 C. albicans was isolated from both the male sexual partner of the patient with a recurrent infection

145 es, along with provision of treatment to all sexual partners of chiamydia-infected individuals.

146 Nine of 85 sexual partners of HCV-positive donors were anti-HCV-pos

147 alyses of follow-up samples and samples from sexual partners of infected donors.

148 onors (PBD), injection drug users (IDU), and sexual partners of infected individuals.

149 elf-tests distributed to and used by primary sexual partners of participants, couples testing occurre

150 We investigated whether serotesting sexual partners of pregnant women for herpes simplex vir

151 s is greater exposure to previously infected sexual partners of the opposite sex.

152 h his HIV-1-infected partner (P63) and other sexual partners of unknown HIV-1 serostatus.

153 and semen for T. vaginalis detection in male sexual partners of women with trichomoniasis identified

154 ltaneously infected with HIV-1 from the same sexual partner--one individual progressed to AIDS in les

155 95% CI, 1.52-4.32), greater than 15 lifetime sexual partners (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.94-2.76) and sexual

156 s aged 16-44 years who reported at least one sexual partner over the lifetime was tested for the pres

157 However, in women, the number of male sexual partners over the lifetime (age-adjusted odds rat

158 individuals vary greatly in their number of sexual partners over time, but it has proved difficult t

159 d gender predicting changes in the number of sexual partners over time.

160 I, 3.91-19.31]) and increased with number of sexual partners (P < .001 for trend) and cigarettes smok

161 der symptoms (P < 0.001), number of lifetime sexual partners (P = 0.035), legal troubles (P = 0.002),

162 Number of sexual partners, partner characteristics, condom use, an

163 oeconomic status, greater lifetime number of sexual partners, past use of hormones, and condom use.

164 mission of HIV-1 from bisexual men to female sexual partners plays a greater role in heterosexual tra

165 Sexual partner preference in female rats has been diffic

166 , we focused on four regions associated with sexual partner preferences.

167 Targeting MSM with sexual partners ranging between >10 to >50 partners with

168 percent) assigned to expedited treatment of sexual partners (relative risk, 0.76; 95 percent confide

169 Among persons whose sexual partners reportedly took antiretroviral medicatio

170 Effective treatment of men and their sexual partner(s) is complicated as macrolide antimicrob

171 g, while living/continued communication with sexual partner(s) was associated with lower odds of SDCS

172 symptoms of NGU as well as in their current sexual partner(s).

173 nt criteria, and having had two or more male sexual partners since the last visit.

174 with unknown HIV status, number of lifetime sexual partners, syphilis, bacterial vaginosis (BV), and

175 rtners reported significantly fewer external sexual partners than did the other groups.

176 havior is that men report substantially more sexual partners than women do.

177 mely low estimated risk for HCV infection in sexual partners, the lack of association with specific s

178 ases of apparent sexual transmission between sexual partners; the prevalence of HCV infection in high

179 s and privacy concerns precluded identifying sexual partners through the Internet service provider.

180 In this study, meeting sexual partners through the Internet was associated with

181 more likely than controls to have met their sexual partners through use of the Internet (67% vs 19%;

182 An increase in unsafe sex or sexual partners to 50% or more could substantially reduc

183 rt procuring condoms and ability to convince sexual partners to use condoms were significantly higher

184 nvertors with those from their corresponding sexual partners (transmitters).

185 directly with the lifetime number of female sexual partners (trend p < 0.001) but not with male part

186 ng tests received by primary and non-primary sexual partners, two (4%) of 53 tests from participants

187 ndoms and were instructed to have their male sexual partners use them.

188 contraceptives and increased with number of sexual partners, use of hormonal creams, alcohol drinkin

189 ipants, the proportion of participants whose sexual partners used a self-test, couples testing, and s

190 2002 to estimate the prevalence of physical/sexual partner violence (55.5%), adult sexual assault by

191 iated with increased risk of physical and/or sexual partner violence (risk ratio = 2.43, 95% confiden

192 iated with increased risk of physical and/or sexual partner violence (risk ratio = 2.64, 95% confiden

193 ct the population prevalence of physical and sexual partner violence within the past 12 months.

194 Older age of sexual partner was associated with increased risk of HIV

195 men (RR, 8.71; 95% CI, 6.19-12.24) when the sexual partner was infected with the same HPV type.

196 A new sexual partner was reported more often in subjects with

197 In addition, having multiple lifetime sexual partners was a significant risk for oral-genital

198 Tobacco use and greater number of lifetime sexual partners was associated with higher HPV infection

199 ty education because locating information on sexual partners was limited to screen names and privacy

200 An increased number of sexual partners was significantly associated with infect

201 Lifetime number of sexual partners was the most important modifiable risk f

202 Using the locations of self-reported sexual partners, we estimate that 39% (95% CI: 34%-42%)

203 ing a primary HSV-2 infection and from their sexual partners were analyzed by RFLP and heteroduplex m

204 Recent and lifetime numbers of sexual partners were both strongly associated with incid

205 tive voluntary blood donors and their female sexual partners were either HIV infected (n=246) or HIV

206 ges in the rates of condom use and number of sexual partners were evaluated among 140 female sex work

207 d 15-25 years with no more than six lifetime sexual partners were included in PATRICIA irrespective o

208 opsy results, and no more than four lifetime sexual partners were randomly assigned (1:1) by central

209 Patients assigned to expedited treatment of sexual partners were significantly more likely than thos

210 f incident detections were attributed to new sexual partners, whereas 72% were attributed to 5 or mor

211 need for condoms even if they have multiple sexual partners, which places them at risk for sexually

212 29-3.63) and having a spouse or other steady sexual partner who earned a high income (OR, 2.85; 95% C

213 articipants at the 4 sites reported having a sexual partner who had developed AIDS.

214 known about their clients and noncommercial sexual partners who may heavily influence their behavior

215 ted sexual intercourse with 235 (62%) of 380 sexual partners who tested HIV-negative, compared with e

216 e gay men assessed via ACASI reported having sexual partners who were HIV antibody positive (odds rat

217 with a urogenital chlamydial diagnosis or a sexual partner with chlamydia were eligible.

218 gibility was expanded to pregnant women with sexual partners with similar travel histories.