ライフサイエンスコーパス: shared decision making

1 based on patient values and preferences, and shared decision making.

2 ted the model into an online tool to support shared decision making.

3 in the patient record, and the importance of shared decision making.

4 ith patient's values and preferences through shared decision making.

5 mpetencies in collaborative goal setting and shared decision making.

6 lized prostate cancer treatment could inform shared decision making.

7 r study and improvement of interprofessional shared decision making.

8 reasonable treatment options is often called shared decision making.

9 isfied with their level of collaboration and shared decision making.

10 econdary outcome was an objective measure of shared decision making.

11 settings and allows for risk assessment and shared decision making.

12 hould be communicated to patients as part of shared decision making.

13 entered outcomes are needed to better inform shared decision making.

14 benefits for patient education, support, and shared decision making.

15 ree of personalization within a framework of shared decision making.

16 ion-making quality and enhance collaborative shared decision making.

17 sks and benefits to patients is critical for shared decision making.

18 ions of bedside patient-family engagement or shared decision-making.

19 l outcomes for reimbursement and engaging in shared decision-making.

20 al ward settings using a recognised model of shared decision-making.

21 ed in three ways: 1) presence of elements of shared decision-making, 2) balance between physician and

22 out treatment goals and plans; 3) ethics and shared decision making; 4) relief of pain and other symp

23 % CI, 5.9%-7.8%; P<.001) and negotiation and shared decision making (5.7% difference; 95% CI, 4.5%-6.

24 within 10 years) and the results are used in shared decision making about possible treatments.

25 mation is needed to facilitate and encourage shared decision making about the clinical implications o

26 Palliative care focuses on communication, shared decision making about treatment options, advance

27 ons should be the major factors addressed in shared decision making about treatment options.

28 tion, 47% of women reported a preference for shared decision making; afterwards, 61% felt they had pr

29 help inform the development of a future CHC shared decision-making aid.

30 lence, and support greater communication and shared decision making among family members, as well as

31 practice guidelines or consensus statements, shared decision making and decision aids, or provider fe

32 ine-recommended CPRD, the general concept of shared decision making and decision aids, the American C

33 decision contains both risk and uncertainty, shared decision making and informed consent are both app

34 ividual physician and patient participate in shared decision making and physicians are held accountab

35 This can be used for shared decision making and to benchmark hospital perform

36 ations management, developing more effective shared decision making and transparent medical records a

37 gnosis, patient and family decision support, shared decision making and triage, treatment, and monito

38 l requiring particular attention in terms of shared decision-making and either formal discussion or w

39 on quality as evidenced by fewer elements of shared decision-making and greater imbalance between phy

40 e also discuss the potential for encouraging shared decision-making and improving medical consensus t

41 Though there were good examples of shared decision-making and parent and child engagement s

42 ve care unit, which addresses communication, shared decision making, and pain and symptom management

43 , foster productive communication, stimulate shared decision making, and ultimately lead to better ou

44 ms, promote evidence-based medicine, support shared decision making, and ultimately lead to improved

45 ripts using OPTION 5, an observer measure of shared decision making, and used qualitative content ana

46 d patients, facilitated patients' desire for shared decision making, and were feasible to implement i

47 ect a test and laboratory, engage parents in shared decision-making, and for the return of results.

48 QIP risk estimates used for benchmarking and shared decision-making appear to differ between emergenc

49 Providers should pursue a shared decision-making approach, engaging in open conver

50 TION 2: ACP recommends that clinicians use a shared decision-making approach, including a discussion

51 Using shared decision making as a reference category, we deter

52 entered clinical approaches to care (such as shared decision-making augmented with relevant decision-

53 nt of a decision aid (PCI Choice) to promote shared decision making between clinicians and patients r

54 Shared decision making between paramedics and primary ca

55 rtance of patient preference exploration and shared decision making between patient and physician whe

56 ministering advice and treatment to that of shared decision making between patient and physician.

57 nt-centered care, these results should guide shared decision making between patients with lung cancer

58 e of new technologies can be reduced through shared decision-making between well-informed physicians

59 determinations, and they include: relying on shared decision making by all participants, obtaining in

60 lth decision aids are designed to facilitate shared decision making by helping patients and their phy

61 potential harms and benefits; and (4) using shared decision making by physicians to incorporate the

62 An increase in shared decision making can result from a better understa

63 d dissemination of evidence, and support for shared decision making) can be smaller, but better direc

64 This provides valuable information for shared decision making, comparative effectiveness resear

65 s and health care providers should engage in shared decision-making conversations that include full d

66 this scalable web-based platform, a general shared decision-making core structure would accommodate

67 index may play a useful role in facilitating shared decision making, developing and implementing risk

68 ngagement of the patient by the clinician in shared decision making did not change with use of the DA

69 mation exchange within a recognised model of shared decision-making do not adequately fit with patien

70 to change surgeon communication and promote shared decision making during high-stakes surgical decis

71 (minimizing conflict of interest, respecting shared decision-making, emphasizing patient accountabili

72 primary prevention patients, this process of shared decision making establishes the appropriateness o

73 us was strong that patients should engage in shared decision making for genetic testing.

74 entered decision aid (PCI Choice) to promote shared decision making for patients with stable CAD.

75 eam approach that includes clinician-patient shared decision making for the use of pharmacologic and

76 and validated a prognostic nomogram to guide shared decision making for these patients.

77 Pediatricians can engage in shared decision-making for this process and work to help

78 deline in 7 areas: patient-centered care and shared decision making, glycemic biomarkers, hemoglobin

79 ive to one another reveals that a process of shared decision-making governs baboon movement.

80 Enhancing shared decision making has the potential to improve ment

81 ded to explore the effect and feasibility of shared decision making implementation into routine endoc

82 eetings by increasing the use of elements of shared decision-making, improving the balance between ph

83 ed controlled trials favours the use of this shared decision making in other settings, populations, a

84 A patient decision aid to support shared decision making in prosthetic heart valve selecti

85 ient decision aid results in optimization of shared decision making in prosthetic heart valve selecti

86 ructure challenging conversations to promote shared decision making in the acute setting.

87 ework fostering patient-centered imaging and shared decision-making in cardiac imaging.

88 imizing participation or the opportunity for shared decision-making, including discussion of informat

89 ly used for preoperative patient assessment, shared decision making, informed consent, and preoperati

90 al authority over their own medical choices, shared decision making, informed consent, and simple con

91 rapy, and explain how they would incorporate shared decision making into clinical practice.

92 ecommendations were endorsed: 1) DEFINITION: Shared decision making is a collaborative process that a

93 Shared decision making is a patient-centred approach in

94 Shared decision making is a tenet of contemporary medici

95 al process used to promote patient autonomy; shared decision making is a widely promoted ethical appr

96 Shared decision making is associated with improved patie

97 To help patients to fully participate in shared decision making is becoming an important goal in

98 Shared decision making is critical to achieve value-conc

99 Shared decision making is endorsed by critical care orga

100 Shared decision making is inadequate in intensive care u

101 Shared decision making is most appropriate in situations

102 Shared decision making is needed to support decisions ab

103 ations in endocrinology practice guidelines, shared decision making is still not routinely implemente

104 The goal of shared decision making is to match patient preferences,

105 however, there remains confusion about what shared decision making is, when it should be used, and a

106 Recent theoretical work suggests that shared decision-making is often the most efficient way f

107 Information exchange as part of shared decision-making is widely discussed in research a

108 Better strategies for shared decision making may be needed when there is no ev

109 it therapies, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, shared decision making, medical and nursing consensus, b

110 itis media that empowers families by using a shared decision-making model will reduce the use of anti

111 and should promote information exchange and shared decision-making more strategically.

112 e and respect for patients in the context of shared decision making must prevail if the trust of this

113 Responsible, shared decision making on the part of physicians and pat

114 Of the 11 elements of shared decision-making, only four occurred in more than

115 d include care standardization and redesign, shared decision making, palliative care, care coordinati

116 , endocrinologists can now start to practice shared decision making, partner with their patients, and

117 arch has been integrated into strategies for shared decision-making, patient educational resources, p

118 likelihood that their health information or shared decision-making preferences would be met.

119 ans should use as their "default" approach a shared decision making process that includes three main

120 2) Clinicians should engage in a shared decision making process to define overall goals o

121 should be offered to patients as part of the shared decision making process.

122 ons, should facilitate discussion during the shared decision-making process about care plans for thes

123 elines should participate in an informed and shared decision-making process by discussing the potenti

124 their expectations are as a component of the shared decision-making process.

125 The purpose of this statement is to define shared decision making, recommend when shared decision m

126 erized decision support system to facilitate shared decision making regarding prescriptions.

127 disclosed by a genetic counselor followed by shared decision making regarding statin therapy with a p

128 on adherence and actively engage patients in shared decision-making regarding their treatment.

129 Although shared decision making requires clinicians to discuss th

130 Shared decision making requires understanding of the est

131 Shared decision making (SDM) has been recommended as a s

132 Shared decision making (SDM) in nonmental health populat

133 rge both patient and clinician engagement in shared decision making (SDM) to promote patient-centered

134 dge, reduce decisional conflict, and promote shared decision making (SDM).

135 thalmologist-dominant decision-making (ODM), shared decision-making (SDM) and patient-dominant decisi

136 Shared decision-making (SDM) requires that both physicia

137 igh health care costs to instruct them about shared decision making, self-care, and behavioral change

138 Active patients roles include participant in shared decision making, self-manager, and help and infor

139 efine shared decision making, recommend when shared decision making should be used, identify the rang

140 ectively address clinician knowledge gaps in shared decision-making skills, even in the context of ca

141 Two factors, patients' endorsement of a shared decision-making style (odds ratio 1.61, 95% confi

142 ent, patient assessment, and negotiation and shared decision making-tasks that are important to posit

143 In this Personal View, we describe shared decision making, the evidence behind the approach

144 an equitable partnership that also includes shared decision-making to determine study direction, pla

145 s) and forming collaborative partnerships (a shared decision-making tool).

146 better knowledge transfer and creation of a shared decision-making tool, we conducted qualitative in

147 ooks were embedded in daily practice but the shared decision-making tools were not.

148 sing differences of opinion is important for shared decision making, whereas patients not knowing tha