ライフサイエンスコーパス: shoal

1 it significantly decreased their tendency to shoal.

2 wimming stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) shoals.

3 ols are faster and less dense than zebrafish shoals.

4 mixing, especially if males encounter mixed shoals.

5 of time zebrafish groups spend schooling or shoaling.

6 he individual selective advantages gained by shoaling.

7 that reduced the 2-dimensional area of their shoals 15-fold compared with water-only controls.

8 ymetry and upwelling resulted in mixed-layer shoaling above the depth of minimum annual irradiance do

9 ree-dimensional structure of Antarctic krill shoals acoustically.

10 e likely to benefit from the protection of a shoal and will improve their survival chances as a resul

11 most rapidly when North Atlantic Deep Water shoaled and stratification in the Southern Ocean was red

12 ent evidence that behavioural traits such as shoaling and mate choice can promote population mixing i

13 e motion corresponding to the definitions of shoaling and schooling.

14 ystems around the unpopulated French Frigate Shoals and along the relatively lightly populated Kona C

15 ip in large, swarm-like groups, such as fish shoals and bird flocks.

16 tive behavior: birds flock, bees swarm, fish shoal, and ungulates herd.

17 roups in the wild, such as bird flocks, fish shoals, and locust swarms.

18 sea surface, many anchovies in the targeted shoal appeared to lose orientation and flowed passively

19 Tunas that will be most impacted by shoaling are Pacific and southern bluefin tunas-habitat

20 aling is adaptive, and signals that maintain shoals are likely to evolve under selection.

21 of fish can either be 'shoals' or 'schools': shoals are simply aggregations of individuals; schools a

22 Loose aggregations of fishes, or shoals, are a basal social organization of vertebrates a

23 containing massive densely populated herring shoals at night-time and diffuse herring distributions d

24 We found severe effects on feeding and shoaling behavior as well as metabolism of the fish; hen

25 study, combining the effects of mate choice, shoaling behaviour and genetics.

26 ingly, social differentiation coincided with shoals being somewhat smaller under high-perceived risk,

27 For fish, the extent to which shoaling can reduce an individual's risk of exposure to

28 levels when under stress and do not modulate shoal cohesion, indicative of abnormal social behaviour.

29 atile short-term behavior of very large fish shoals, containing tens of millions of fish and stretchi

30 largely unaffected by the early Pliocene CAS shoaling, corroborating other evidence that indicates la

31 that are highly correlated to trends in fish shoaling density and to each other over the diel cycle.

32 We evaluated shoal dimensions in groups of minnows exposed to O. ptyc

33 the formation processes of vast oceanic fish shoals during spawning, we show that (i) a rapid transit

34 ply aggregations of individuals; schools are shoals exhibiting polarized, synchronized motion.

35 A model based on shoaling fish suggests how a group can show decision-mak

36 compare risk of exposure in shoaling vs. non-shoaling fish, we confined groups of minnows into mesh c

37 erences in exposure between shoaling vs. non-shoaling fish.

38 the coupling of ice and sediment dynamics: a shoal forms at the glacier terminus, reducing ice discha

39 ure given that these waters are predicted to shoal from depth over the coming decades.

40 um zones (OMZs) in midwater environments are shoaling globally; this can affect distributions of spec

41 Fish confined within artificial shoals had 3-fold fewer worms than single fish and minno

42 nows located within the centre of artificial shoals had significantly fewer worms than those without

43 strate that individuals discriminate between shoals having different pigment pattern phenotypes and t

44 We tested for antiparasite benefits of shoaling in fathead minnows exposed to larvae (cercariae

45 ata, reveal a long-term trend of thermocline shoaling in the equatorial Pacific since approximately 1

46 Overall, we project P50 depths to shoal, indicating likely habitat compression for tuna sp

47 havioral trait observed in bird flocks, fish shoals, insect swarms, and mammal herds.

48 Thus, shoaling is adaptive, and signals that maintain shoals a

49 nt variants demonstrate that fish can select shoal mates solely on the basis of their color patterns,

50 Consequently, OMZ shoaling may preferentially facilitate foraging opportun

51 The extent of isopycnal shoaling, nutricline depth, and chlorophyll concentratio

52 during which the calcite compensation depth shoaled, ocean temperatures increased and carbon isotope

53 To judge the overall direction of a shoal of fish or a crowd of people, observers must integ

54 n (Experiment 1) the dyad chose which larger shoal of guppies to join and when (Experiment 2) the dya

55 ing the last 60,000 years reflect widespread shoaling of sedimentary methane gradients and increased

56 H, thereby triggering a rapid (<10,000-year) shoaling of the calcite compensation depth (CCD), follow

57 This finding implies that the early Pliocene shoaling of the CAS had no profound impact on the evolut

58 The early Pliocene shoaling of the Central American Seaway (CAS), ~4.7-4.2

59 ification goes together with a weakening and shoaling of the interhemispheric overturning circulation

60 reductions, weakening of the halocline, and shoaling of the intermediate-depth Atlantic Water layer

61 is linked to increased heat content and to a shoaling of the mid-depth temperature maximum over the c

62 eract anthropogenic global warming through a shoaling of the mixed layer depth (MLD) and a consequent

63 This warming is associated with a severe shoaling of the ocean calcite compensation depth and a >

64 A possible explanation is that the gradual shoaling of the oceanic thermocline reached a threshold

65 the surface shelf sediments that may lead to shoaling of the SMT.

66 Additional shoaling of the thermocline after 5 Myr ago probably exp

67 alf of their initial biomass, owing to rapid shoaling of winter mixed layers and their associated sep

68 Shoals of clupeid fish (e.g., sardine, anchovy) from geo

69 Here, we address these questions on shoals of Hemigrammus rhodostomus, a species of fish exh

70 gblenny's scope by allowing it to blend into shoals of small reef fish as well as to remain inconspic

71 For example, groups of fish can either be 'shoals' or 'schools': shoals are simply aggregations of

72 erring and krill, aggregate to form schools, shoals, or swarms (hereafter simply "schools," although

73 , female guppies did not distinguish between shoaling partners when given the choice between native a

74 n coupled with reduced availability of small shoaling pelagic fish such as sandeel (Ammodytes marinus

75 assess the impact of the early Pliocene CAS shoaling phase on deep-water circulation.

76 ges in NADW resulted from earlier and deeper shoaling phases.

77 ronmental determinants in the development of shoaling preference.

78 notypes and that early experience determines shoaling preference.

79 rience plays a key role in determining these shoaling preferences.

80 he character of which indicates that the CCD shoaled rapidly (<10,000 years) by more than 2 kilometer

81 h located within the centre of an artificial shoal reduced their risk of cercariae exposure compared

82 These results show that shoaling reduces a minnows' risk of exposure to cercaria

83 nsively investigate the preference space for shoaling related to adult pigment pattern variation, pre

84 per direct observation, and understanding of shoaling remains incomplete.

85 posure to predation can explain the observed shoal shape.

86 Shoal size and packing density varied greatly, but surfa

87 Moreover, as the OML shoals, squids will have to retreat to these shallower,

88 lability in a warming world ocean may impact shoal structure: because structure affects catchability

89 n classical experimental paradigms assessing shoaling tendency, fear, anxiety, and general locomotion

90 habituation, causing them to spend more time shoaling than schooling, contrary to most models' predic

91 Many fishes form aggregations called shoals that reduce predation risk while enhancing foragi

92 er, decreasing carbon export efficiency, and shoaling the average depths of nutrient regeneration.

93 t of the nutricline toward its western edge, shoaling the mixed layers into the base of the euphotic

94 umboldt squid are indirectly affected by OMZ shoaling through effects on a primary food source, mycto

95 oleucas) swimming in two-fish and three-fish shoals to map the mean effective forces as a function of

96 To compare risk of exposure in shoaling vs. non-shoaling fish, we confined groups of mi

97 our-mediated differences in exposure between shoaling vs. non-shoaling fish.

98 comparing data from two-fish and three-fish shoals, we challenge the standard assumption, ubiquitous

99 er region undergoing strong ocean subsurface shoaling where upper ocean heat content can drop by 20-5

100 Fish form social aggregations called shoals which often consist of fish with similar morpholo

101 pe patterning) in deciding whether to join a shoal, zebrafish female preferences do not correlate wit