ライフサイエンスコーパス: shock wave

1 inconsistent with formation during a nebular shock wave.

2 ls or a portion of a cell in the path of the shock wave.

3 d emergence of a giant collective incoherent shock wave.

4 ated in a very fast process, comparable to a shock wave.

5 in the two expansions, perhaps arising from shock waves.

6 ceed supersonic speeds and result in gaseous shock waves.

7 ms (T > 600 K, P < 100 bar) behind reflected shock waves.

8 precise application of ablation catheters or shock waves.

9 Each pig received 2000 shock waves, 24 kV, or sham SWL to the lower pole calyx

10 al limb ischemia treated with extracorporeal shock wave [280 impulses at 0.1 mJ/mm]), and group 5 (co

11 d endothelial progenitor cell-extracorporeal shock wave) after critical limb ischemia induction.

12 dothelial progenitor cells or extracorporeal shock wave alone in improving ischemia in rodent critica

13 that combined treatment with extracorporeal shock wave and bone marrow-derived endothelial progenito

14 lasma formation results in the emission of a shock wave and the ablation of material within the focal

15 emonstrated here will be useful for studying shock waves and other high-strain-rate phenomena, as wel

16 t renal microvessels are highly sensitive to shock waves and that frank injury to tubules and vessels

17 Shock waves are generated in a 10 microm-thick layer of

18 es, we obtain a series of images tracing the shock wave as it converges at the center of the ring bef

19 We track an expanding shock wave as it sweeps through the red giant wind, prod

20 een thought that they are accelerated in the shock waves associated with powerful supernova explosion

21 e, inside the black hole, by incorporating a shock wave at the leading edge of the expansion of the g

22 Early in the plasma expansion, the generated shock wave at the plume edge acts as a barrier for the c

23 Each SWL-treated pig received 2000 shock waves at 12, 18, or 24 kV to the lower pole calyx

24 mping with 'pause-protection' nor delivering shock waves at reduced shock wave rate --- have been tes

25 hocked material, it is shown that for weaker shock waves (below the perfect-crystal yield strength),

26 xploded in the stratosphere, and the ensuing shock wave blasted the city of Chelyabinsk, damaging str

27 up (n = 32 events) compared with the placebo shock wave + BMCs (n = 18) and shock wave + placebo infu

28 all thickening improved significantly in the shock wave + BMCs group (3.6% [95% CI, 2.0% to 5.2%]) bu

29 end point was significantly improved in the shock wave + BMCs group (absolute change in LVEF, 3.2% [

30 vents was significantly less frequent in the shock wave + BMCs group (n = 32 events) compared with th

31 oled groups shock wave + placebo infusion vs shock wave + BMCs; secondary end points included regiona

32 The temporal evolution of the shock wave can be monitored, yielding detailed informati

33 nsEP exposure, as it is known that acoustic shock waves can cause membrane poration (sonoporation).

34 as is often used to acclimate the patient to shock waves causes less tissue trauma when the initial d

35 e tool for studying dynamical events such as shock waves, chemical dynamics in living cells, neural a

36 d molecular formation is prevalent after the shock wave collapse.

37 The response of amorphous steels to shock wave compression has been explored for the first t

38 mechanical loadings pertinent to therapeutic shock wave conditions.

39 , where 1 TeV is 10(12) eV) in the expanding shock waves connected with the remnants of powerful supe

40 e brightens again when it crosses a standing shock wave corresponding to the bright 'core' seen on th

41 und electronic state triggered by the use of shock waves created by high-speed impacts.

42 In addition, modifications in shock wave delivery by altering shock rate and voltage h

43 ower and shock wave rate and the sequence of shock wave delivery can be used to reduce trauma to the

44 succeed with ESWL and where improvements in shock wave delivery may increase successful stone fragme

45 Continued research into the methods of shock wave delivery techniques and lithotripter designs

46 y-induced tissue damage with slower rates of shock wave delivery.

47 se is followed by a brief (3-4 min) pause in shock wave delivery.

48 that propagate away either as acoustic or as shock waves, depending on the explosivity of the eruptio

49 modifications (caused by high-speed jets or shock waves derived from bubble collapse).

50 tio molecular dynamics simulations show that shock waves drive the synthesis of transient C-N bonded

51 on the microstructural processes that drive shock-wave-driven deformation.

52 imary interest is the production of acoustic shock waves during nsEP exposure, as it is known that ac

53 kin graft donor sites, this study focused on shock wave effects in burn wounds.

54 have been researched in an effort to improve shock wave efficacy.

55 ubble-stratum corneum interactions including shock wave emission, microjet penetration into the strat

56 plications as energy absorbing materials for shock wave energy mitigation due to their nanoporosity.

57 MOFs may prove useful in the dissipation of shock wave energy through large structural changes (free

58 ed lesion increased significantly in size as shock wave energy was increased from 12 to 24 kV.

59 Pressure scales based on the reduced shock-wave equations of state alone may predict pressure

60 total mass behind the shock decreases as the shock wave expands, and the entropy condition implies th

61 Here we present shock-wave experiments on carbon (using a magnetically d

62 xamined in the high-pressure phase, and that shock-wave experiments using sapphire windows need to be

63 ecause alumina is used as window material in shock-wave experiments, this transformation should be im

64 to the freezing line than so far reported in shock-wave experiments.

65 eriments and as a window material in dynamic shock-wave experiments; it is also a model material in c

66 eased luciferase production for 100- and 400-shock wave exposures without and with air injection.

67 s with postinfarction chronic heart failure, shock wave-facilitated intracoronary administration of B

68 odifications of the source for generation of shock waves, focusing, and even localization techniques

69 Exposure to 800 shock waves, followed by immediate isolation and culture

70 outburst to the 'break-out' of the supernova shock wave from the progenitor star, and show that the i

71 imately 50% of the cells (p < 0.01), whereas shock waves from the lasers did not.

72 A single shock wave generated by the shock tube delivered both fl

73 The shock wave generation system was similar to a Dornier HM

74 d kidneys, and only in the pole to which the shock waves had been applied.

75 hanisms underlying the beneficial effects of shock waves have not yet been fully revealed.

76 Therapeutic shock waves have the potential to mechanically destroy d

77 We conclude that the impulse of the shock wave (i.e., the pressure integrated over time), ra

78 aptured the propagation of the spray-induced shock waves in a gaseous medium and revealed the complex

79 aging is used to study laser-driven focusing shock waves in a thin liquid layer in an all-optical exp

80 Shock waves in condensed matter are of great importance

81 We propose that chondrule-forming shock waves in icy regions of the nebula produced condit

82 Pressure-driven shock waves in solid materials can cause extreme damage

83 quilibrium molecular-dynamics simulations of shock waves in three-dimensional 10-million atom face-ce

84 petitive melting of dust (probably caused by shock waves) in the protoplanetary disk around the early

85 The pressure profile of a shock wave indicates its energy content, and shock-wave

86 dynamics (MD) to simulate the scenario of a shock wave induced cavitation collapse within the perine

87 Here we show that the shock waves induced by gravity in the gas of the interga

88 tumor therapy was evaluated by searching for shock wave-induced DNA transfer in mouse tumor cells.

89 owever, the biomolecular mechanisms by which shock waves interact with diseased and healthy cellular

90 It is found the shock wave interaction with CNTs induces a stress field,

91 Direct particle-shock wave interactions are therefore indicated as the p

92 A core-collapse supernova, whose shock wave is capable of compressing such a cloud, is an

93 injury induced by exposure to long-duration shock wave is similar to patterns that are characteristi

94 othelial progenitor cells and extracorporeal shock wave is superior to either bone marrow-derived end

95 Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the preferred modality

96 Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) acco

97 on lesion size and renal function induced by shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in the 6- to 8-wk-old pig.

98 The efficiency of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), a noninvasive first-line t

99 Other treatments such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endoscopic treatments have no

100 Shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy have similar sto

101 Changes in shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy offer patients h

102 Slower rates of shock wave lithotripsy appear to improve the efficiency

103 s, liver tumor ablations, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy are all the procedures that benef

104 nce of hypertension following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy are conflicting, as are reports r

105 nd long-term adverse effects associated with shock wave lithotripsy calls for treatment strategies to

106 Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy does not appear to improve the cl

107 trial show that prophylactic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for small, asymptomatic renal cal

108 val appears to be superior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of lower pole s

109 Shock wave lithotripsy has become a widely used modality

110 The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has been called into question, es

111 Shock wave lithotripsy has been considered a mainstay of

112 Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has been used for over 2 decades,

113 The tolerability of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has led to an increase in the tre

114 Indications and utilization of shock wave lithotripsy have expanded, with clinical effi

115 was successfully treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 1980, its rapid acceptance and

116 The introduction of shock wave lithotripsy into clinical practice revolution

117 Shock wave lithotripsy is noninvasive and requires the l

118 New studies have shown that shock wave lithotripsy may be less effective than other

119 copy have similar stone-free rates, although shock wave lithotripsy may be preferable due to more fav

120 in diameter can be managed with observation, shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy.

121 Although ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy predominate in the treatment of u

122 d that can offer an emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service and patients informed of

123 Endoscopic or shock wave lithotripsy vie for which is best, and both a

124 tensity laser irradiation and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, are reviewed, as well as the eff

125 g regarding methods of patient selection for shock wave lithotripsy, changes in the technique of the

126 Shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy and percutaneous ne

127 roved stone fragmentation and a reduction in shock wave lithotripsy-induced tissue damage with slower

128 used to more effectively select patients for shock wave lithotripsy.

129 ual stone fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

130 rate on stone breakage and tissue injury by shock wave lithotripsy.

131 f approximately 80%, which surpasses that of shock wave lithotripsy.

132 s have documented the efficacy and safety of shock wave lithotripsy.

133 the potential adverse events associated with shock wave lithotripsy.

134 ve, albeit more invasive than extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

135 nal radiology procedures, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

136 taken to improve the safety and efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy.

137 improve the efficiency of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy.

138 ureteral calculi, but no more effective than shock-wave lithotripsy (Dornier HM-3) for distal uretera

139 size and impaired renal function induced by shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) was examined in 6- and 10-w

140 Currently, ureteroscopy and shock-wave lithotripsy are regarded by many as the first

141 patients who are not suitable candidates for shock-wave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

142 s 2 cm, are best treated with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.

143 sign for a contemporary electromagnetic (EM) shock wave lithotripter, based on recently acquired know

144 Shock wave lithotripters have undergone modifications of

145 sy, changes in the technique of the existing shock wave lithotriptors and new technologies designed t

146 ologies designed to increase the efficacy of shock wave lithotriptors.

147 Since then, second- and third-generation shock-wave lithotriptors, small-caliber ureteroscopes, a

148 Alternatively, a supernova shock wave may have simultaneously triggered the collaps

149 Cell permeabilization using shock waves may be a way of introducing macromolecules a

150 g bubble expansion, collapse, and subsequent shock waves may contribute to membrane permeabilization.

151 uorophore uptake into living cells, and that shock waves might have changed the permeability of the n

152 ng the firing rate of the lithotripter to 60 shock waves/min or slower is also effective in reducing

153 However, a nebular shock wave model for chondrule formation agrees with man

154 , and the entropy condition implies that the shock wave must weaken to the point where it settles dow

155 pable of withstanding shear stress caused by shock waves of up to 21 GPa, although some nanotube tips

156 gle episode of 100, 300, or 1000 impulses of shock wave on both cheeks at energy levels 0.1 mJ/mm(2).

157 ons that were used to examine the effects of shock waves on a membrane-bound ion channel.

158 of particles, with possible intervention of shock waves or turbulence.

159 ly annihilated) by a powerful interplanetary shock wave passage.

160 h the placebo shock wave + BMCs (n = 18) and shock wave + placebo infusion (n = 61) groups (hazard ra

161 (3.6% [95% CI, 2.0% to 5.2%]) but not in the shock wave + placebo infusion group (0.5% [95% CI, -1.2%

162 % [95% CI, 2.0% to 4.4%]), compared with the shock wave + placebo infusion group (1.0% [95% CI, -0.3%

163 om baseline to 4 months in the pooled groups shock wave + placebo infusion vs shock wave + BMCs; seco

164 itates the improved accuracy of catheter and shock wave placement, as well as efficiency of a variety

165 00 kilometres per second, originate in dense shock waves powered by hot galactic winds.

166 lerene-like structures (IFs) under very high shock wave pressures of 25 GPa is described.

167 42), high-dose (n = 40), or placebo (n = 21) shock wave pretreatment targeted to the left ventricular

168 Twenty-four hours later, patients receiving shock wave pretreatment were randomized to receive doubl

169 igh-pressure, chemical-vapour-deposition and shock-wave processes, but these approaches have serious

170 explosions on the (210) surface, and finally shock waves propagate through the materials to further s

171 shock wave indicates its energy content, and shock-wave propagation in tissue is associated with cell

172 Solid-state shock-wave propagation is strongly nonequilibrium in nat

173 esent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of shock-wave propagation through a metal allowing a detail

174 aced in close proximity to the membrane, the shock wave proved to be more destructive to the protein

175 ar strains generate strongly nonlinear shear shock waves qualitatively different from their compressi

176 ction' nor delivering shock waves at reduced shock wave rate --- have been tested in clinical trials.

177 how that lithotripter settings for power and shock wave rate and the sequence of shock wave delivery

178 The potential mechanisms of a shock wave rate effect are reviewed here, together with

179 However, the optimal shock wave rate has not been determined.

180 The vast majority of studies assessing shock wave rate have reported improved stone fragmentati

181 hat have assessed the effect of altering the shock wave rate on stone breakage and tissue injury by s

182 Ongoing studies are evaluating changing the shock wave rate to increase stone fragmentation.

183 ed for a randomized clinical trial to assess shock wave rate.

184 s or placebo, and patients receiving placebo shock wave received intracoronary infusion of BMCs.

185 The shock-wave resistance of WS(2) nanotubes has been studie

186 ing a sea of coherent small-scale dispersive shock waves (shocklets) towards the unexpected emergence

187 The processes suggested--such as shock waves, solar flares or nebula lightning--operate o

188 These shock-wave solutions indicate a cosmological model in wh

189 In the present study, three different shock-wave sources were investigated; argon fluoride exc

190 Lithotripsy shock waves (SW) to one renal pole damage that pole but

191 This review provides an update of the latest shock wave technology, reviewing the clinical indication

192 aphs also allow quantitative analysis of the shock waves that has been difficult if not impossible wi

193 from behind a blast wave, or outward-moving shock wave, that expanded freely for less than 2 days an

194 As extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) can enhance healing of skin gr

195 We hypothesized that extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) could promote the regeneration

196 Moderate evidence exists for extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of chronic cases rel

197 Extracorpal shock wave therapy may have significant clinical benefit

198 on, which supports the concept that gene and shock wave therapy might be advantageously merged.

199 lications, however, can arise as a result of shock wave therapy.

200 Abbreviations: ESWT, extracorporeal shock wave therapy; PCR, polymerase chain-reaction.

201 Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) has been suggested as an alter

202 ve recently demonstrated that extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) is effective in promoting the

203 In laboratory studies of shock waves, there is a need in developing diagnostic te

204 The shock wave, thermal pulse, and event-related environment

205 apascal pressures by sending a laser-induced shock wave through a sample that is precompressed inside

206 inger, in a gene therapy experiment has sent shock waves throughout the US research community.

207 Shock wave treatment accelerates impaired wound healing

208 ated intracoronary administration of BMCs vs shock wave treatment alone resulted in a significant, al

209 r light on the molecular mechanisms by which shock wave treatment exerts its beneficial effects.

210 gs could help to improve the clinical use of shock wave treatment for wound healing.

211 Extracorporeal shock wave treatment has been experimentally shown to in

212 therefore can be induced during lithotripter shock wave treatment in vivo, particularly with enhanced

213 Shock wave treatment induced ATP release, increased Erk1

214 o studies in a rat wound healing model where shock wave treatment induced proliferation and increased

215 in vivo wound healing model to study whether shock wave treatment influences proliferation by alterin

216 II study, application of a single defocused shock wave treatment to the superficial second-degree bu

217 In summary, this report demonstrates that shock wave treatment triggers release of cellular ATP, w

218 ur ability to identify suitable patients for shock wave treatment.

219 r, as a trigger of the biological effects of shock wave treatment.

220 ams, occurred for 200-, 400-, 800-, and 1200-shock wave treatments with plasmid and air injection.

221 The potential for gene transfection during shock wave tumor therapy was evaluated by searching for

222 udy was designed to determine the effects of shock wave voltage (kV) on lesion size and renal functio

223 A planar shock wave was found to compress the ion channel upon im

224 shear-dominated crack growth featuring shear shock waves was observed along weak planes in a brittle

225 steam reaction to generate highly controlled shock waves, we show that carbon black nanoparticles act

226 used pulse from a laser created a mechanical shock wave which disrupted a group of cells or a portion

227 ct of air blast overpressure waves (OPW), or shock wave, with the body wall or body armor produces tw