ライフサイエンスコーパス: shockwave

1 kwave absorption property upon laser-induced shockwave.

2 in NILs plays an important role in absorbing shockwaves.

3 d shock-induced ordering contribute to NIL's shockwave absorption performance.

4 ic liquids (NILs) that possess an intriguing shockwave absorption property upon laser-induced shockwa

5 rce designed to bring order to this sequence shockwave and improve usability of viral sequence data.

6 noindentation, drive the dislocations with a shockwave, and use electron microscopy to determine how

7 were treated with six sessions of low-energy shockwave (biweekly for 3 consecutive weeks) or left unt

8 ce points to their acceleration by supernova shockwaves, but we know little of their escape from the

9 g shockwave lithotripsy, such as varying the shockwave delivery rate and method.

10 y excluding the possibility of ionization by shockwave formation.

11 virus inactivation based on plasmon enhanced shockwave generation is proposed.

12 Understanding shockwave-induced physical and chemical changes of impac

13 ted the roles of cavitation bubble location, shockwave intensity and the size of a cavitation bubble

14 During the laser peening phase, a shockwave is used to compress the film.

15 Results of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower calyceal stones a

16 For the last three decades, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) has been the mainstay of man

17 Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) was initially the preferred

18 of treating urolithiasis with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and endoscopic surgery continues t

19 g its use in combination with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

20 In this review, the cost-effectiveness of shockwave lithotripsy and that of endoscopic surgery in

21 Excellent results can be obtained by both shockwave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic methods, with re

22 hemselves, associated with refractoriness to shockwave lithotripsy are fairly well defined, refining

23 these traits and optimizing the efficacy of shockwave lithotripsy are still under investigation.

24 The current literature continues to support shockwave lithotripsy as both a safe and effective means

25 Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy combined with endoscopic therapy f

26 Shockwave lithotripsy continues to evolve with the adven

27 Widespread use of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for calculi in congenitally abnorm

28 different factors and predictors that affect shockwave lithotripsy for stone disease.

29 ter define patient selection and the role of shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of urolithiasis.

30 Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy maintains a major role in treating

31 Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy success rates vary from 50 to 90%,

32 ost validated parameters that correlate with shockwave lithotripsy success.

33 and reporting improvements in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy technique and outcomes.

34 nt developments in predicting the failure of shockwave lithotripsy when treating patients with urinar

35 lude conservative management, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, ure

36 se the efficacy of the technology underlying shockwave lithotripsy, such as varying the shockwave del

37 Multiple modalities including shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephro

38 d peer reviewed literature on the subject of shockwave lithotripsy.

39 ed to genetic polymorphism and extracorporal shockwave lithotripsy.

40 We report a shockwave method for altering the properties of the supe

41 , Cerenkov showed how charged particles emit shockwaves of light when moving faster than the phase ve

42 arge-scale molecular dynamics simulations of shockwave propagation and quasi-isentropic compression i

43 everal studies have also shown that a slower shockwave rate improves stone fragmentation for intraren

44 beta1-integrin) ex vivo A 3-week low-energy shockwave regimen attenuated renovascular hypertension,

45 This shockwave regimen did not cause detectable kidney injury

46 ons representative of the flow behind strong shockwaves, relevant to hypersonic flight, are analyzed.

47 ciated retinal lesions and can actually damp shockwaves significantly.

48 h prolonged (6 weeks) renal artery stenosis, shockwave therapy also decreased BP and improved GFR, mi

49 management of the disease by extracorporeal shockwave therapy have been reported in many centres.

50 In conclusion, low-energy shockwave therapy improves stenotic kidney function, lik

51 Low-energy shockwave therapy may serve as a novel noninvasive inter

52 Low-energy shockwave therapy stimulates angiogenesis, but the effec

53 We hypothesized that low-energy shockwave therapy would restore the microcirculation and

54 th their mass ratio supports spiral waves or shockwaves tidally induced by the companion star as the

55 The shockwave-treated sample exhibits n-type semiconductor p

56 ducting Bi2Sr2CuO6+delta (Bi2201) during the shockwave treatment.

57 difying the superconducting properties via a shockwave treatment.

58 igh-intensity lasers can be used to generate shockwaves, which have found applications in nuclear fus

59 ionless electrostatic shocks are one type of shockwave widely studied for applications involving ion