ライフサイエンスコーパス: should be interpreted

1 However, secondary and subgroup analyses should be interpreted cautiously and considered exploratory.

2 te cancer deaths will favor a noninferiority conclusion and should be interpreted cautiously.

3 ated more precisely: EHMacute = (RHacute - 1) x dacute, and should be interpreted with respect to the 120 hazard-months g

4 n-protein interactions is subject to a systematic error and should be interpreted with caution.

5 They are thus imperfect and should be interpreted as the best available evidence.

6 Our findings were based on a small study sample and should be interpreted with caution.

7 These conclusions should be interpreted in the context of limitations related t

8 Hence, the cuticle should be interpreted within the context of the outer epiderm

9 Our analysis revealed that ITC data should be interpreted in the context of chiral purity of the

10 The safety data should be interpreted in light of the small number of partici

11 milar to CBT and GET at long-term follow-up, but these data should be interpreted in the context of additional therapies

12 dentify interactions, and networks inferred from these data should be interpreted with caution.

13 s in Pompe disease and likely other neuromuscular disorders should be interpreted with caution to avoid unnecessary cardi

14 om administrative data without validation of outcome events should be interpreted with caution.

15 entified among the nonhypertensive cohort, but this finding should be interpreted with caution.

16 e nature of the results of this meta-analysis, our findings should be interpreted cautiously and replicated in future stu

17 tter captures the onset time and milder cases, our findings should be interpreted with caution.

18 These findings should be interpreted in light of potential adverse effects o

19 However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity,

20 imary hypothesis related to PPI use, our findings for H2RAs should be interpreted with caution.

21 th mammography in patients over 40 years old and the images should be interpreted along with the patient's history and cl

22 d using GCTA, and the results' qualitative interpretations, should be interpreted with great caution.

23 Considering these results, data generated without ISs should be interpreted with great care and may not be suitable

24 These findings suggest that these markers should be interpreted with caution in patients with obesity.

25 Therefore, for T-cell monitoring, either method should be interpreted with caution.

26 ults obtained in the most commonly used experimental models should be interpreted in the development of future replacemen

27 ever, the clinical significance of this change in mortality should be interpreted with caution.

28 estimates of prenatal exposure to OPs and neurodevelopment should be interpreted with caution because of significant het

29 OS should be interpreted with caution as it was likely impacted

30 .96 [0.81-1.14]; p=0.655), and therefore secondary outcomes should be interpreted with caution.

31 clinical studies of extracellular miRNA in archived plasma should be interpreted with caution and future studies should

32 nly rarely in suspected patients with sCJD and when present should be interpreted with caution.

33 sical experimental approaches such as free energy relations should be interpreted with care.

34 Overall, although this result should be interpreted in light of the relatively small sample

35 Our results should be interpreted cautiously, given the nonrandomized nat

36 ack of prior research on these outcomes and stress, results should be interpreted with caution.

37 s adjusted for several confounders at baseline, the results should be interpreted with caution because of a lack of infor

38 The main limitations of this study are that the results should be interpreted with caution given the relatively small

39 arms, but the confidence limits were broad, and the results should be interpreted with caution.

40 troduces the possibility of recall bias; therefore, results should be interpreted cautiously until additional studies are

41 These results should be interpreted in the context of the strengths and lim

42 These results should be interpreted with caution, and other confirmatory st

43 ification by GSTP1 or TNF genotypes, although these results should be interpreted with caution.

44 ighlight that estimates of capacitance from excised samples should be interpreted with caution, as certain storage compar

45 er, this was not confirmed in the multivariable analysis so should be interpreted with caution.

46 istically significant is not the outcome of interest and so should be interpreted with caution.

47 correlated with poor prognosis, even though this statement should be interpreted with care, as the effects of macrophage

48 sterior) emissions, and hence conclusions from such studies should be interpreted with caution.

49 Findings in this study should be interpreted with caution and with careful considera

50 have important diagnostic and prognostic implications, they should be interpreted in the context of a patient's age and t