ライフサイエンスコーパス: shower

1 (3) CFU per L (toilets), and 14.4 CFU per L (showers).

2 ations spanning multiple kilobases (mutation showers).

3 ic cratering rates indicative of an asteroid shower.

4 id and the parent body of the Geminid Meteor Shower.

5 mL of chlorhexidine gluconate, 4%, for each shower.

6 events pre-dating this cataclysmic meteorite shower.

7 d so could not have been a member of a comet shower.

8 se of SMPS and geoengineered artificial rain showers.

9 , and 387.1 [217.5] microg/mL, respectively) showers.

10 ially the time between cream application and showering.

11 xidine gluconate applied during preoperative showering.

12 on; and ingestion of treated rainwater while showering.

13 e exposed through aerosols inhalation during showering.

14 nd clinically severe illness (P(csi)) due to showering.

15 to reduce the deleterious impact of mutation showers."

16 and clean-contaminated wounds can be safely showered 48 hours after surgery.

17 , and independent daily activities (taking a shower: 53% versus 38%, P=0.030; walking 100 meter: 76%

18 influence on time-average internal dose were showering (-71% for BBzP), cooking (+27% for DEHP), and

19 of aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate, 4%, per shower; a minimum of 2 sequential showers; and a 1-minut

20 sure to a combination of toilet, faucet, and shower aerosols ranged from ~10(-2) to ~10(0) CFU per L

21 ) can increase the pace of recovery, or that showering after sex can prevent pregnancy.

22 Showering after surgery is a controversial issue for wou

23 mount and, for trihalomethanes only, bathing/showering and integrated exposure that included ingestio

24 concentrations of chloroform released during showering and of 2-butyoxyethanol following use of a vol

25 eg, housing agencies, food lines, and mobile showers), and roving locations around Los Angeles.

26 rhexidine gluconate, 4%; duration (number of showers); and timing (pause) before rinsing.

27 ir, the aerosolization of C. burnetii in the shower, and the air filtration efficiency.

28 e, 4%, per shower; a minimum of 2 sequential showers; and a 1-minute pause before rinsing results in

29 The active CNV mutation shower appears to be restricted to a transient perizygot

30 Showers are an important interface for human interaction

31 a pool/hot tub/sauna within 24 h or taking a shower/bath within 6 h of blood collection was associate

32 Estimated THM uptake via showering, bathing, and swimming was significantly assoc

33 The OR in the highest category of showering/bathing for brominated THMs was 1.43 (95% CI:

34 chloroform than water chloroform, suggesting showering/bathing was a more important source than drink

35 ed lifetime exposure to THMs from ingestion, showering/bathing, and hours of swimming pool use.

36 Cosmic rays initiate air showers--cascades of secondary particles in the atmosphe

37 dine gluconate, 4%, showering groups (2 vs 3 showers), containing 60 participants each, and 3 subgrou

38 h ozone present, increasing the number of no-shower days enhanced ozone-skin surface reactions, yield

39 rimination occurred with CA during "taking a shower" (discrimination = 2.54), wearing a necklace (2.3

40 Postoperative showering does not increase the risk of surgical site co

41 reading of MDRPa, including a newly designed shower drain, disinfecting siphons underneath the sinks,

42 cta cloud increases during the annual meteor showers, especially the Geminids, because the lunar surf

43 We conclude that mutation showers exist and that they constitute at least 0.2% and

44 ross-connected sewage to drinking water, and shower exposures to DBPs.

45 unistic pathogens commonly are cultured from shower facilities, there is little knowledge of either t

46 evening prior to the experiments or skipped showering for 24 and 48 h.

47 investigated the benefits and detriments of showering for postoperative wound care.

48 Reduced shower frequency increased human emissions of gas-phase

49 nown about how personal hygiene, in terms of showering frequency, can influence these emissions and t

50 ic field and a negative charge excess in the shower front.

51 4, there were 222 patients randomized to the shower group and 222 to the nonshower group.

52 superficial surgical site infections in the shower group and 6 in the nonshower group (4/220, 1.8% v

53 Patients in the shower group were more satisfied with their method of wo

54 patients were randomized to allow showering (shower group) or to keep the wound dry (nonshower group)

55 randomized to 2 chlorhexidine gluconate, 4%, showering groups (2 vs 3 showers), containing 60 partici

56 The mutation showers had an average of approximately one mutation per

57 The existence of mutation showers has implications for oncogenesis and evolution,

58 l method to compute the probability of comet showers impacting Earth, which saves considerable comput

59 w-up visits (OR, 10.12; 95% CI, 5.01-20.46); showering in lenses (OR, 3.29, 95% CI, 1.17-9.23); lens

60 Water samples were collected from showers in buildings supplied with chlorinated groundwat

61 for studying the properties of extensive air showers in detail.

62 collected before, during, and after flushing showers in five unoccupied (i.e., for ~2 months) univers

63 e laboratory testing implemented during baby showers in intervention group churches, whereas particip

64 Extensive air showers induced from high-energy cosmic rays provide a w

65 ty of 16 grams per square centimetre for air showers initiated by cosmic rays with energies of 10(17)

66 We find that this asteroid shower is the most likely source (>90 per cent probabili

67 Creating artificial rain showers is an even more expensive process and is resorte

68 the scavenging efficiency from natural rain showers is ~ 20%.

69 nomes have revealed a novel form of mutation showers (kataegis) in which multiple same-strand substit

70 the relative importance of greywater (i.e., shower, kitchen sink, bathroom washbasin, and laundry) a

71 measurements of the atmospheric depth of the shower maximum (Xmax; the depth of the air shower when i

72 cidation of these phenomena, called mutation showers, mutation clusters, or kataegis, in parallel wit

73 bservations with the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) of the bright GRB 221009A, w

74 Decay of (125)I produces a shower of low energy electrons (Auger electrons) that ca

75 to convert a single photon excitation into a shower of low-energy photons but fails owing to the many

76 Pharmacologic experiments indicated that the shower of PSCs was mediated by glutamate, with a small m

77 f the biologic effects caused by the intense shower of these low-energy AEs.

78 umor-bearing mice indicated that spontaneous showering of tumor cell emboli into the lung was robust,

79 ral strategy for determining structures from showers of microcrystals.

80 uggesting that these patients experienced a 'shower' of second hit mutations in TSC2 during kidney de

81 nd potentially triggered a significant comet shower on Earth.

82 Despite honours being showered on him, life after the Prize also was not strai

83 e record 35 Myr ago, but its origin by comet shower or asteroid collision remains uncertain.

84 Before surgery, patients should shower or bathe (full body) with soap (antimicrobial or

85 ss, how many times a day the patients had to shower or change clothes, intention to undergo the proce

86 difference in concentrations between 2 and 3 showers or between the 1- and 2-minute pauses.

87 year and from 8.1% to 3.0%, respectively, in shower outlets.

88 the most particles) or of the composition of shower particles reaching the ground.

89 ese constraints indicate that only one comet shower producing late Eocene bombardment levels has like

90 sent in current nonstandardized preadmission shower protocols for patients undergoing elective surger

91 , those at greatest risk had been allowed to shower rather than bathe and to get their exit site wet

92 A standardized preadmission shower regimen that includes 118 mL of aqueous chlorhexi

93 This showering regimen corrects deficiencies present in curre

94 To determine the extent of the mutation showers, regions (8.5 kb total) remote from the lacI reg

95 x 10(3) CFU per L for faucets, toilets, and showers, respectively.

96 requent maintenance, and cannot be used when showering, resulting in poor compliance and avoidable SC

97 Our results demonstrate that the shower's intensity strongly depends on HD7977's impact p

98 eeding bathing equipment (bath grab bars and shower seat) but having none or needing toileting equipm

99 gly mundane equipment, such as grab bars and shower seats, mitigates injury, dependence, and reduced

100 The patients were randomized to allow showering (shower group) or to keep the wound dry (nonsh

101 ese remote regions, consistent with mutation showers that generally do not extend more than approxima

102 hare a number of habitats with humans (e.g., showers) that can lead to exposure and infection.

103 The volunteers either showered the evening prior to the experiments or skipped

104 se observations provide evidence for a comet shower triggered by an impulsive perturbation of the Oor

105 mentioned curtailment (e.g., taking shorter showers, turning off the water while brushing teeth) rat

106 microorganisms that may be delivered during shower usage.

107 Preadmission showers using chlorhexidine gluconate, 4%.

108 We present a new method for observing these showers using the silicon imaging detector Subaru Hyper

109 Neglecting to shower was associated with ear, nose, and throat symptom

110 trosamines and their precursors, followed by shower water and urine.

111 from exposure to L. pneumophila and MAC via showering were generally low (i.e., less than a 10(-7) d

112 Showers were the driving indoor exposure risk compared t

113 e shower maximum (Xmax; the depth of the air shower when it contains the most particles) or of the co

114 vibration belonging to this class in a home shower where the two modes are the pendulum excursion an

115 linked video clips photographed in the home shower which support the basic theoretical assumptions.

116 wear (95.7%), all-in-one solutions (95.7%), showering while wearing CL (65.2%), and generally poor C

117 e care bundle, which included a preoperative shower with 4% chlorhexidine soap, appropriate hair remo

118 e care bundle, which included a preoperative shower with 4% chlorhexidine soap, appropriate hair remo

119 approach for administering the preadmission shower with chlorhexidine gluconate, 4%, resulting in ma

120 n involved chlorhexidine mouthwash, baths or showers with chlorhexidine, and nasal mupirocin for 5 da

121 the first results of observing extensive air showers with Subaru HSC.