ライフサイエンスコーパス: sign language

1 cortical coherence to visual information in sign language.

2 us understand the role of gesture in spoken/sign language.

3 ign Language of the Netherlands, and Turkish Sign Language.

4 he time-course of lexical access in American Sign Language.

5 nd meaning that may be a unique signature of sign language.

6 s underlying any natural language, including sign language.

7 act, symbolic actions-signs used in American Sign Language.

8 spoken language and have not been exposed to sign language.

9 should be considered a gestural component of sign languages.

10 t form part of the categorical properties of sign languages.

11 Research on deaf children and sign language acquisition can broaden the G-M&B approach

12 Deaf participants, who used American Sign Language, activated bilateral auditory processing a

13 ights the utility of new technology to study sign language and gesture.

14 n of visual communication strategies such as sign language and speechreading.

15 y Western countries with the introduction of sign language and the establishment of residential schoo

16 (2) event descriptions by users of different sign languages and hearing nonsigners exhibit marked sim

17 rience (for example, exposure to a spoken or signed language) and innate abilities (for example, the

18 ngaged by linguistically structured content (sign language); and to assess whether sign language expe

19 these principles to novel signs in American Sign Language, and their capacity to do so depends on th

20 nd automatic analysis of natural gesture and sign language are discussed.

21 of deaf people are "just gestures," or that sign languages are "just like spoken languages" - the vi

22 of input to homesigners, and (b) established sign languages, as these codified systems display the li

23 Signed languages such as American Sign Language (ASL) are natural languages that are forma

24 nts and are exposed to English, not American Sign Language (ASL) as their first language, most studie

25 ography (EEG) in fluent speakers of American Sign Language (ASL) as they watch videos in ASL.

26 the average STM capacity when using American Sign Language (ASL) rather than English is only 5 +/- 1

27 ntence processing in English and in American Sign Language (ASL) was characterized by employing funct

28 Deaf native users of American Sign Language (ASL) were presented signed sentences that

29 f subjects who were native users of American Sign Language (ASL), 25 hearing subjects with no knowled

30 mensions: linguistic and meaningful American Sign Language (ASL), non-meaningful pseudo-ASL, meaningf

31 /or use of a visuospatial language [American sign language (ASL)] on the organization of neural syste

32 ical (phonological) structure of the British Sign Language (BSL) signs for the objects, (2) the seman

33 roimaging study of the perception of British Sign Language (BSL), we explored these questions by meas

34 Nonsigners also show coherence to sign language, but entrainment at frontal sites is reduc

35 l hearing and between deaf users of American Sign Language, but laughter rarely intrudes on the phras

36 not at-issue, whereas iconic enrichments in sign language can often be at-issue.

37 We find quasiperiodic fluctuations in sign language, characterized by lower frequencies than f

38 nerally, we propose that the use of space in sign languages comes in many flavours and may be both ca

39 How does sign language compare with gesture, on the one hand, and

40 liance on cross-modal sensory integration in sign language compared with spoken language.

41 The results demonstrated that even sign language constructions that appear on the surface t

42 sampled typical attention-getting sounds and sign language conversations between each of 4 originally

43 psky, the chimpanzee who was taught American Sign Language, does not show the expected productivity o

44 pants (male and female), who either acquired sign language early or late in life.

45 Here we show that sign languages encode telicity in a seemingly universal

46 Furthermore, hearing signers, with the same sign language experience as the deaf participants, did n

47 ntent (sign language); and to assess whether sign language experience influences the neural systems u

48 To investigate how hearing status, sign language experience, and task demands influence fun

49 uals with different auditory deprivation and sign language experience.

50 was associated with both hearing status and sign language experience.

51 stigated whether auditory deprivation and/or sign language exposure during development alters the mac

52 view is to elucidate the relationships among sign language, gesture, and spoken language.

53 A new sign language has been created by deaf Nicaraguans over

54 A sign language has emerged among three generations of dea

55 Naturally occurring sign languages, however, often appear to conflate form a

56 Semantic work on sign language iconicity suggests, as do Goldin-Meadow &

57 phical narratives in English and in American Sign Language in hearing subjects who were native users

58 rts of deaf signers who acquired an emerging sign language in Nicaragua at the same age but during di

59 p-reading interpreter and a hearing American sign language interpreter worked together in a circuit f

60 ion (such as lip reading, writing notes, and sign language interpreter); medication safety and other

61 ticulation in the hand movement sequences of sign language interpreters engaged in fingerspelling.

62 r making some accommodations, such as hiring sign language interpreters.

63 The American Sign Language interviews of 54 deaf adults were analyzed

64 The syntax of a signed language is mediated through space.

65 rtical entrainment to visual oscillations in sign language <5 Hz, peaking at [Formula: see text]1 Hz.

66 language processing (perception, production, sign language, meaning construction), new insights and a

67 storically unrelated) Italian Sign Language, Sign Language of the Netherlands, and Turkish Sign Langu

68 o widely held and contradictory views - that sign languages of deaf people are "just gestures," or th

69 examples from research on the brain bases of sign language perception.

70 ence of hearing status on the recruitment of sign language processing systems was explored by compari

71 Despite the fact that sign language relies on visuospatial rather than rapid t

72 ion arises of whether the comprehension of a signed language requires neural systems specific for thi

73 n of humans and other primates, I argue that sign language research might benefit from the lessons le

74 The fact that sign languages share the visual-manual modality with a n

75 ns from (the historically unrelated) Italian Sign Language, Sign Language of the Netherlands, and Tur

76 terview Schedule-III, Revised, into American Sign Language, Signed English, and speech reading for de

77 translation of selected scales into American Sign Language, Signed English, and speech reading; revie

78 vian language areas during the perception of signed language signs.

79 Using a sign language since infancy might shape the representati

80 at these visual cues were used by all of the sign languages studied here.

81 Signed languages such as American Sign Language (ASL) ar

82 nonsigners lacking any prior experience with sign language understand these encodings.

83 Sign languages used by deaf communities around the world

84 in-Meadow & Brentari (G-M&B) argue that, for sign language users, gesture - in contrast to linguistic

85 , we examined the linguistic abilities of 23 sign-language users with unilateral brain lesions.

86 ocessing of linguistic structure in American Sign Language (using verbs of motion classifier construc

87 t of neural oscillations to visual change in sign language, using electroencephalography (EEG) in flu

88 Correlation analyses of the production of sign language versus non-linguistic hand gestures sugges

89 and Dar freely converse in signs of American Sign Language with each other as well as with humans in

90 cons in textual communication and gesture in signed language with respect to the interdependence of c