コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 teracts directly with Ffh in assembly of the signal recognition particle.
2 acillus subtilis is the RNA component of the signal recognition particle.
3 s 7SL RNA, which is the RNA component of the signal recognition particle.
4 iculum of eukaryotes by interacting with the signal recognition particle.
5 have no effect on the GTPase activity of the signal recognition particle.
6 inding of the nascent signal sequence to the signal recognition particle.
7 ibodies for the barley 54-kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle.
8 nized and targeted co-translationally by the signal recognition particle.
9 sertion of signal peptides recognized by the signal-recognition particle.
12 shock proteins (Hsp70 and Hsp96 precursor), signal recognition particle 72 (SRP72), and 10 different
13 autoimmune necrotizing myopathies recognize signal recognition particle and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutar
14 o signal peptides that are recognized by the signal recognition particle and are thereby targeted to
15 did not affect the extent of binding to the signal recognition particle and association with ER memb
17 ncluded ATPase subunits, elongation factors, signal recognition particle and its receptor, three sets
19 chondrial genomes would be recognized by the signal recognition particle and targeted to the endoplas
20 luding yeast snoRNAs, the RNA subunit of the signal recognition particle and the yeast U2 spliceosoma
21 terminal signal peptides for the Sec-, SRP- (signal recognition particle), and Tat (twin arginine tra
22 Ffh (the bacterial protein component of the signal recognition particle), and the SecYEG translocon
23 ) inhibits signal peptide recognition by the signal recognition particle, and we now show that fusion
24 ittle inflammation such as the myopathy with signal recognition particle antibodies; immune myopathie
25 from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and anti-signal recognition particle antibody-positive myositis.
27 geting to the ER membrane is directed by the signal recognition particle, as demonstrated in other eu
28 the GTPase activity of the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle, as previously reported, but
29 factor in African American adults with anti-signal recognition particle autoantibodies (OR 7.5, Pcor
32 ns, showing progressively lower affinity for signal recognition particle binding, were targeted to mi
33 es, including the ribosome, spliceosome, and signal recognition particle, but the role of RNA in guid
34 a gene encoding a component of the bacterial signal recognition particle by screening in vivo for def
37 with weak similarity to the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle component Ffh, are sufficien
38 hey affected housekeeping functions, such as signal recognition particle components and ATP synthase
42 complex that interacts with the chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP) and the cpSRP recept
43 etween the 54-kDa subunit of the chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP) and the pCytf nascen
47 l (Chl) b biosynthesis or in the chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP) machinery to study t
48 ion of thylakoid proteins by the chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP) posttranslational tr
49 First, LHCP interacts with a chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP) to form a soluble ta
50 ay in chloroplasts employs the function of a signal recognition particle (cpSRP) to target light harv
52 m in which the 38-kDa subunit of chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP43) efficiently revers
53 ded by the 38-kDa subunit of the chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP43), which uses bindin
57 m via an alternative to the cotranslational, signal recognition particle-dependent mechanism that the
58 cent chain-ribosome complexes during Sec and signal recognition particle-dependent protein translocat
59 artially translated MHC-I heavy chains after signal recognition particle-dependent transfer to the en
61 in African American patients producing anti-signal recognition particle (DQA1*0102) and anti-Mi-2 au
65 that heat shock inhibits the release of the signal recognition particle from the endoplasmic reticul
68 plex plays crucial roles in targeting of the signal recognition particle-independent protein substrat
69 ignal peptides on the GTPase activity of the signal recognition particle is an artifact of the high p
71 chloroplast homolog of the 54 kDa subunit of signal recognition particle is required for the in vitro
73 helix, the signal sequence recognized by the signal recognition particle, is made by the ribosome.
74 o the RNA component and aggregate the entire signal recognition particle, leading to a loss of its in
78 gulation of 7SL RNA results in inhibition of signal recognition particle-mediated vesicular protein t
80 The second class, designated SIMIBI (after signal recognition particle, MinD, and BioD), consists o
81 stinct autoantibodies recognizing either the signal recognition particle or 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutary
82 involved in targeting and folding, like the Signal Recognition Particle or cytosolic chaperones, mus
83 lw-generated multiple sequence alignments of signal recognition particle or RNaseP orthologs from con
84 ransient, with association occurring via the signal recognition particle pathway and dissociation occ
85 routing of the scFab to the co-translational signal recognition particle pathway combined with reengi
87 own genes encoding components of the E. coli signal recognition particle pathway: ffh, ffs, and ftsY,
88 was found to be only weakly dependent on the signal recognition particle pathway: insertion was weakl
90 ty of the nascent protein for binding to the signal recognition particle, preferentially targets CYP2
91 ian ER membrane involves, in addition to the signal recognition particle receptor and the Sec61p comp
92 e and has been proposed to interact with the signal recognition particle receptor during targeting of
93 ith other essential components including the signal recognition particle receptor TRAM and the TRAP c
94 Most dramatically, the alpha subunit of the signal recognition particle receptor was increased over
95 e demonstrate that in Bacillus subtilis, the signal recognition particle receptor, FtsY, transiently
96 uted with purified Sec61p complex, TRAM, and signal recognition particle receptor, some substrates, s
97 ase III transcripts, pre-RNase P RNA and the signal recognition particle RNA (scR1), was more drastic
98 RNA polymerase III (pol III), including the signal recognition particle RNA and an Alu RNA as report
99 n, new results indicate that biosyntheses of signal recognition particle RNA and telomerase RNA invol
102 -coding RNA genes (e.g. Alu RNA, B1 RNA, and signal recognition particle RNA) in macrophages to favor
103 ore than 100 nucleotide residues include the signal recognition particle RNA, group I intron, the Glm
104 ree nucleolus-associated small nuclear RNAs (signal recognition particle RNA, telomerase RNA and U6 R
106 ypeptide that associates intimately with the signal-recognition particle RNA (SRP RNA) and serves as
107 ing RNAs from Escherichia coli, RNase P RNA, signal-recognition particle RNA, and tmRNA is facilitate
108 l 44 known transfer RNAs, ribosomal RNAs and signal recognition particle RNAs could be identified.
110 ibosome to the endoplasmic reticulum via the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its membrane-assoc
114 two guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) in the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor (SR)
117 rotein targeting reaction facilitated by the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor (SR),
122 rmediate during complex assembly between the Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) and its receptor.
123 major pathways: cotranslational targeting by signal recognition particle (SRP) and posttranslational
126 ous to essential components of the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP) and SRP receptor, resp
127 n of three GTPases: the SRP54 subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the alpha- and bet
129 We have examined the hypothesis that the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the nascent polype
130 m is mediated by the concerted action of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the SRP receptor (
132 s paradigm is provided by two GTPases in the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the SRP receptor (
133 ted into the endoplasmic reticulum using the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the SRP receptor,
134 membranes is regulated by two GTPases in the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the SRP receptor;
135 ignal sequences by the 54 kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP) as they emerge from th
136 mutant signal sequences fail to bind to the signal recognition particle (SRP) at the ribosome exit s
137 -> Leu and Tyr-5 --> Leu, which increase the signal recognition particle (SRP) binding, diminished MT
139 ring co-translational protein targeting, the signal recognition particle (SRP) binds to the translati
141 experiments revealed that expression of the signal recognition particle (SRP) complex is essential f
144 ER) occurs in the context of two cycles, the signal recognition particle (SRP) cycle and the ribosome
149 nes encoding the minimal conserved bacterial signal recognition particle (SRP) elements are inactivat
150 signed to identify proteins that utilize the signal recognition particle (SRP) for targeting in Esche
152 f the signal sequence binding subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP) from Thermus aquaticus
154 ition particle, MinD, and BioD), consists of signal recognition particle (SRP) GTPases, the assemblag
155 is an essential RNA-binding component of the signal recognition particle (SRP) in Archaea and Eucarya
168 fractionation experiments indicated that the signal recognition particle (SRP) is required for oleosi
172 interact with the Alu RNA-binding subunit of signal recognition particle (SRP) known as SRP9/14.
174 ses, cancer, and autoantibodies specific for signal recognition particle (SRP) or 3-hydroxy-3-methylg
175 e show here that the Sec translocase and the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway are required f
178 is fundamental question, we investigated the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway in Escherichia
181 is homologous to the receptor protein of the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway of membrane pr
182 een shown to occur co-translationally by the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway or post-transl
191 emonstrated that signal peptides bind to the signal recognition particle (SRP) primarily via hydropho
197 Cotranslational protein targeting by the signal recognition particle (SRP) requires the SRP RNA,
198 hat A3F specifically interacts with cellular signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA (7SL RNA), which i
200 nal peptide-binding protein, SRP54, with the signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA in both archaeal a
203 we have investigated how the distribution of signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA within the nucleol
204 se rapidly trafficking nucleolar RNAs is the signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA, and further resul
205 ed phylogenies derived from the structure of signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA, the mRNA encoded
207 evidence indicates that the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle (SRP) selectively targets pr
215 TPase that comprises part of the prokaryotic signal recognition particle (SRP) that functions in co-t
216 zygous mutation in SRP72, a component of the signal recognition particle (SRP) that is responsible fo
219 ed to prevent mistargeting due to binding of signal recognition particle (SRP) to signalless ribosome
220 tifs within the ribosome tunnel and lure the signal recognition particle (SRP) to the ribosome, provi
221 ting ribosomes during their targeting by the signal recognition particle (SRP) using a site-specific
222 al dynamics and substrate selectivity of the signal recognition particle (SRP) using a thermodynamic
223 l signal peptide, which is recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP) when nascent polypepti
225 One important example is the eukaryotic signal recognition particle (SRP), a cytoplasmic RNP con
226 n SRP54 is an integral part of the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP), a cytosolic ribonucle
228 tical in all living organisms and involves a signal recognition particle (SRP), an SRP receptor, and
230 erges from the ribosome, binds the cytosolic signal recognition particle (SRP), and targets the ribos
231 ing membrane proteins to YidC is mediated by signal recognition particle (SRP), and we show by site-d
232 chain complexes (RNCs), associated with the signal recognition particle (SRP), can be targeted to Se
233 in cotranslational protein targeting by the signal recognition particle (SRP), during which the SRP
234 es the binding of the signal sequence to the signal recognition particle (SRP), followed by an intera
235 Consistent with structural analysis of the signal recognition particle (SRP), highly conserved base
236 ing cotranslational protein targeting by the signal recognition particle (SRP), information about sig
237 chia coli and Bacillus subtilis involves the signal recognition particle (SRP), of which the 54-kDa h
238 induction of a dozen genes required for the signal recognition particle (SRP), SRP receptors, the tr
239 ant homology to two GTPases of the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP), SRP54 and SRalpha.
240 the ER membrane require the function of the signal recognition particle (SRP), suggesting that an al
241 e have analyzed the interactions between the signal recognition particle (SRP), the SRP receptor (SR)
242 y conserved protein-targeting machinery, the signal recognition particle (SRP), which recognizes ribo
243 some, signal sequences are recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP), which subsequently as
244 e Methionine aminopeptidase (MetAP), and the signal recognition particle (SRP), which targets secreto
245 amB signal peptide (LamB) were targeted in a signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent manner to ro
247 r system containing either SecA-dependent or signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent signal pepti
251 f Yarrowia lipolytica is cotranslational and signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent, whereas tra
252 idence exists, however, for translation- and signal recognition particle (SRP)-independent mRNA local
253 se (GTPase) domains interact directly during signal recognition particle (SRP)-mediated cotranslation
254 a pseudo-transmembrane domain to utilize the signal recognition particle (SRP)-mediated pathway.
269 g from the ribosome are first sampled by the signal-recognition particle (SRP), then targeted to the
274 Other down-regulated genes included ffh (a signal recognition particle subunit) and brpA (biofilm r
275 ning the secY40 mutation with defects in the signal recognition particle targeting pathway led to syn
277 SEC65 gene encodes a 32 kDa subunit of yeast signal recognition particle that is homologous to human
278 In cell fractionation experiments, more signal recognition particle was bound to the endoplasmic
281 o signal peptides that are recognized by the signal recognition particle were exported inefficiently.
282 ti-OJ, anti-EJ, anti-KJ, anti-tRNA, and anti-signal recognition particle) were equally distributed am
283 istargeting through recognition by cytosolic signal recognition particle, which preferentially intera
284 e endoplasmic reticulum is controlled by the signal recognition particle, which recognizes a hydropho
285 i homolog of the chloroplast-localized SRP43 signal recognition particle, whose occurrence and functi
286 interaction of protein SRP54M from the human signal recognition particle with SRP RNA was studied by
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。