1 g major molecular response, were tested at a
significance level of 0.0001 to adjust for multiple comp
2 was protocol-specified and used a two-sided
significance level of 0.001 and a p value at or below th
3 ed with relapse-free survival at a stringent
significance level of 0.001 to account for multiple comp
4 ignificantly associated (Bonferroni-adjusted
significance level of 0.003) with many ion properties re
5 ention type and occasion factor time, with a
significance level of 0.01.
6 fied one-sided stratified log rank test at a
significance level of 0.02.
7 near and generalized linear mixed model at a
significance level of 0.05 (P value).
8 ore nearly impossible to ensure a genomewide
significance level of 0.05 using the available statistic
9 A
significance level of 0.05 was applied for 95% confidenc
10 Adopting a cFDR nominal
significance level of 0.05, 287 loci were identified for
11 roportional hazards regression models with a
significance level of 0.1 were used to build up univaria
12 vidual servers based on TM-score at a t-test
significance level of 0.1%.
13 power of 80% with concordant sib pairs at a
significance level of .
0001 are given, stratified by par
14 rly all were much smaller than the customary
significance level of.
0001 for genomewide scans.
15 the sample sizes required for 80% power at a
significance level of.
001 and also used simulation metho
16 ific performance levels by using a two-sided
significance level of .
0294.
17 A 2-tailed t test with a
significance level of .
05 was used for all comparisons.
18 nalyses were done by using chi(2) tests with
significance level of .
05.
19 45 with approximately 85% power at two-sided
significance level of .
05.
20 ession analysis and two-sided t tests with a
significance level of .
05.
21 t were used for statistical analyses, with a
significance level of .
05.
22 rcentage of activated voxels at single-voxel
significance levels of 10(-2), 10(-3), and 10(-4) within
23 ided P = .055; two-sided P = .11 [predefined
significance level of .
10, one-sided]).
24 emissions above 200 megaelectron volts at a
significance level of 17sigma from the globular cluster
25 14 of 443 experimentally determined sites (a
significance level of 18 standard deviations).
26 tein or DNA sequences in the database at the
significance level of 1e-6.
27 tal arms) with 81% power while maintaining a
significance level of 2.5% in a two-sided test for each
28 ect a 33% prolongation of PFS at a one-sided
significance level of .
2.
29 th higher liver fat levels at the exome-wide
significance level of 3.6 x 10(-7): two in PNPLA3, an es
30 ociated with schizophrenia at the suggestive
significance level of 5 x 10(-5).
31 Nine loci reached the genome-wide
significance level of 5 x 10(-8) including six already k
32 circulating phylloquinone at the genome-wide
significance level of 5 x 10(-8).
33 ect a putative mutant allele at a genomewide
significance level of 5% can usually be achieved in prac
34 A
significance level of 5% was used.
35 analysis of variance and chi(2) tests with a
significance level of 5%.
36 orphometry were statistically processed at a
significance level of 5%.
37 re meta-analyzed, and a Bonferroni-corrected
significance level of 7.7 x 10(-4) was used to account f
38 ivariate regression analysis were applied at
significance level of 95% (P </= 0.05) to compare study
39 vents and number of positions as well as the
significance level of a given data set.
40 9p23, and 16q24.1, exceeding the statistical
significance level of a LOD score >2.0.
41 We recover 75%-85% (depending on
significance level) of all regulatory sites from a stand
42 Analyses included a
significance level of alpha = .10 with no adjustments fo
43 0.73) using one-sided binomial tests with a
significance level of alpha=0.025.
44 Results of the QTL analyses indicated that
significance levels of detected QTL were greatly improve
45 A Bonferroni-corrected
significance level of less than 0.0016 was considered st
46 BMI; weight (kg)/height (m)(2)) at a minimum
significance level of &
lt;/=5 x 10(-7) in the US National H
47 le comparisons with the Bonferroni-corrected
significance level of &
lt;0.0015.
48 To adjust for multiple comparisons, a
significance level of P < .01 was chosen.
49 0.075 for liver enzyme concentrations, at a
significance level of P < .05.
50 ssociated with 1-year overall mortality at a
significance level of P < .10 constructed a multivariate
51 power calculation used a 1-sided test with a
significance level of P < .10.
52 er to detect 50% prolongation at a one-sided
significance level of P < .20.
53 cohort and both the NC and ACA cohorts at a
significance level of P < 0.01.
54 atients and controls were generated, using a
significance level of P < 0.05 in a general linear model
55 292 genes per wood trait using a statistical
significance level of P < 0.05 to maximize discovery.
56 At a
significance level of P < 0.05, CGM Cho, CGM and NAWM tN
57 henotype associations with an experimentwise
significance level of P < 0.05.
58 (SNPs) that were associated with NAFLD at a
significance level of P < 10(-5) was examined in adults
59 12 new susceptibility loci (at a genome-wide
significance level of P < 5 x 10(-)(8)) and replicated a
60 ted to prostate cancer risk at a genome-wide
significance level of P < 5 x 10(-8) with the most signi
61 AL PARAMETRIC MAPPING software package and a
significance level of P < or = 0.001, uncorrected for mu
62 oints, but they did not reach a prespecified
significance level of P < or = 25.
63 18p11, and 20q13), with a nominal multipoint
significance level of P< or =.01 or LOD > or =1.18.
64 7 (D17S1301), with evidence for linkage at a
significance level of P<.005.
65 ies using study data confirmed a genome-wide
significance level of P<0.05 (95% CI 0.005-0.0466).
66 We used a statistical
significance level of p<0.05 for a between-group differe
67 Using the
significance level of p<0.05, we found that 59 miRNAs we
68 fied for 64 nsSNPs, generating a genome-wide
significance level of P=0.002.
69 lateral case, corresponding to a genome-wide
significance level of P=0.034.
70 ualised relapse rate after 24 months, with a
significance level of p=0.10.
71 s observed at three Y haplotype clades, with
significance levels of P = 0.002, P = 0.020, and P = 0.0
72 core-based method for estimating genome-wide
significance level of putative QTL effects suitable for
73 LOD score 3.6 is.00191, giving a genomewide
significance level of slightly <.05.
74 CONCLUSIONS/
SIGNIFICANCE: Levels of specific serum phospholipids dif
75 hen based on D', and 11 cM when based on the
significance level of the allelic association.
76 ce determination is applied to represent the
significance level of the genes in a Bayesian inference
77 The statistical
significance levels of the correlations and the pattern
78 oducible determinations of the probabilistic
significance levels of the deviations between theoretica