ライフサイエンスコーパス: sister

1 anch attraction artifacts yielded Ctenophora-sister.

2 observing refusal of altruism from a genetic sister.

3 ed just before Mad1 loss events at the first sister.

4 ded breast cancer in both her mother and her sister.

5 t topological changes in support of Porifera-sister.

6 bably corresponding to recombination between sisters.

7 a Swedish population-based cohort of 580,006 sisters.

8 oral dilemma between genetic vs. non-genetic sisters.

9 atasets that previously supported Ctenophora-sister [10, 12] display strong heterogeneity in amino ac

10 ohesin regulator, precocious dissociation of sisters 5 (Pds5), Scc2 consists mostly of helical repeat

11 re necessary for accurate segregation of the sisters after DNA replication.

12 to depolymerizing microtubules, pulling its sister along polymerizing microtubules [1, 2].

13 llus species and compared these in detail to sister and more distant genera.

14 Orphans interacted with sisters and matriarchs less while feeding than did non-o

15 s pertinent for breast cancer in her mother, sister, and maternal aunt.

16 latter enhances equal segregation of plasmid sisters beyond this level, elevating the plasmid close t

17 erential lineage specification of MS and its sister blastomere, whereas the inductive interaction pro

18 to mature adults but affiliated instead with sisters, bulls, and age mates.

19 pE-mediated lateral attachment of the second sister can persistently generate this metaphase-like ten

20 arly-immediate post-fission randomization of sister cell fates highlights the potential of stochastic

21 tiation markers in single cells reveals that sister cell pairs have high levels of mRNA variability,

22 s approximately 2.5-fold more CYB-3 than its sister cell, the germline progenitor P1 CYB-3 is not onl

23 ically identical and morphologically similar sister cells and eventually gives rise to a clonal popul

24 namics of phenotypic individualization among sister cells by scrutinizing and modeling microscopicall

25 DI systems that mediate growth inhibition of sister cells lacking the cognate immunity protein.

26 al probability and post-stress physiology of sister cells shift from highly similar to uncorrelated w

27 nd elongation, while their Ret-/- or Etv4-/- sister cells tend to lag behind and contribute only to t

28 n elucidated, the speed with which identical sister cells tend to phenotypically diverge from each ot

29 established by a pivot-like process between sister cells.

30 ctional annotation of the genome directly in sister cells.

31 Thr133 phosphorylation and SAC components in sister centromere orientation and chromosome segregation

32 in yeast and mammals that are important for sister centromere orientation and chromosome segregation

33 Sister chromatid attachment during meiosis II (MII) is m

34 hroughout the mitotic cell cycle, modulating sister chromatid cohesion and higher-order chromatin str

35 rates long-range DNA interactions to mediate sister chromatid cohesion and other aspects of chromosom

36 ng Smc3, but their relative contributions to sister chromatid cohesion are unknown.

37 t role for an lncRNA in the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion by modulating DDX11 enzymatic

38 Sister chromatid cohesion conferred by entrapment of sis

39 Cohesins establish sister chromatid cohesion during S phase and are removed

40 coordinates replication fork progression and sister chromatid cohesion establishment.

41 Timely resolution of sister chromatid cohesion in G2/M is essential for genom

42 Mechanistically, STAG1 loss abrogates sister chromatid cohesion in STAG2 mutated but not in wi

43 a decrease in securin that ultimately causes sister chromatid cohesion loss.

44 Sister chromatid cohesion mediated by the cohesin comple

45 Thus, STAG1 and STAG2 support sister chromatid cohesion to redundantly ensure cell sur

46 mediates DNA-DNA interactions both between (sister chromatid cohesion) and within chromosomes (DNA l

47 Mitotic chromosome condensation, sister chromatid cohesion, and higher order folding of i

48 is a conserved protein complex required for sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, DNA

49 multi-subunit protein complex essential for sister chromatid cohesion, gene expression and DNA damag

50 iotic prophase chromosome axis that mediates sister chromatid cohesion, homologous recombination and

51 lls depleted of CONCR show severe defects in sister chromatid cohesion, suggesting an essential role

52 anochemistry may occur before dissolution of sister chromatid cohesion.

53 function as antagonists to regulate meiotic sister chromatid cohesion.

54 ith distinct sites on chromosomes to mediate sister chromatid cohesion.

55 e checkpoint activation and establishment of sister chromatid cohesion.

56 lexes ensure timely chromosome condensation, sister chromatid disentanglement, and maintenance of mit

57 , called Strand-seq, that can be used to map sister chromatid exchange (SCE) events genome-wide in si

58 the simultaneous high-resolution mapping of sister chromatid exchange (SCE), facilitating the study

59 centromeric CO-FISH patterns consistent with sister chromatid exchange at the frequency of 5% in prim

60 mutagenic but causes DNA breaks and elevates sister chromatid exchange in mammalian cells.

61 easured interhomolog recombination and intra/sister chromatid exchange in the CUP1 locus.

62 on can be induced display elevated levels of sister chromatid exchange, gross chromosomal aberrations

63 RECQ5 is significant in suppressing sister chromatid exchanges during homologous recombinati

64 Sister chromatid exchanges, a surrogate measure of iHR,

65 l regions as circular "loop outs" to convert sister chromatid intertwines into catenated circles.

66 ompanied by drastic changes in the degree of sister chromatid intertwines.

67 t (SAC) delays mitotic progression until all sister chromatid pairs achieve bi-orientation, and while

68 ng chromosomes once each cell cycle produces sister chromatid pairs, which separate accurately at ana

69 inating the extended repair synthesis during sister chromatid recombination (SCR).

70 The rate of intra/sister chromatid recombination exceeded the rate of inte

71 ation in rate of both interhomolog and intra/sister chromatid recombination in the CUP1 array; recomb

72 Despite its importance, sister chromatid recombination is not easily studied bec

73 Sister chromatid resolution during mitosis required the

74 rt of a response mechanism ensuring accurate sister chromatid segregation.

75 er-sister kinetochore distance and premature sister chromatid separation (PSCS), suggesting aberrant

76 Hos1 depletion significantly delayed sister chromatid separation and segregation.

77 Precise control of sister chromatid separation during mitosis is pivotal to

78 Crucially, sister chromatid separation must be delayed until all th

79 points in the cell cycle when the lack of a sister chromatid to serve as a homologous template preve

80 hromosomes rather than the equally available sister chromatid, a bias that in Saccharomyces cerevisia

81 on at the centromere region until release of sister-chromatid cohesion at the metaphase II/anaphase I

82 has previously been shown to play a role in sister-chromatid cohesion in metazoans.

83 Sister-chromatid cohesion is established by Eco1-mediate

84 During the cell cycle, sister-chromatid cohesion tethers sister chromatids toge

85 favoring homologous recombination linked to sister-chromatid cohesion.

86 ary Pml(C62A/C65A) cells exhibited increased sister-chromatid exchange and chromosome abnormalities.

87 gulation through its prevention of premature sister-chromatid separation and the formation of DNA loo

88 and Cyclin B, leading to the dissolution of sister chromatids and anaphase onset [1].

89 Sister chromatids are held together by cohesin, a tripar

90 rom Separase-mediated cleavage ensuring that sister chromatids are kept together until their separati

91 recombination during cell cycle phases when sister chromatids are present.

92 Sister chromatids are tethered together by the cohesin c

93 complex, which ensures proper segregation of sister chromatids at mitosis by mediating the interactio

94 al weak H3T3ph signals occur between cohered sister chromatids at prometaphase.

95 3 acetylation locks cohesin rings around the sister chromatids by counteracting an activity associate

96 has been implicated in the alignment of four sister chromatids by forming parallel guanine quadruplex

97 n DNA sequence, making recombination between sister chromatids difficult to detect.

98 indle assembly checkpoint (SAC) ensures that sister chromatids do not separate until all chromosomes

99 al role in the dissolution of cohesion among sister chromatids during chromosome segregation.

100 x subunit SMC3 to regulate the separation of sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis.

101 ts are essential for faithful segregation of sister chromatids during mitosis.

102 he symmetric tethering of plasmid sisters to sister chromatids embodies the replication-dependent com

103 hugoshin) mutants during meiosis II when the sister chromatids exhibit random distribution.

104 hich condensin complexes compact and resolve sister chromatids in mitosis and by which cohesin genera

105 oint system prevents premature separation of sister chromatids in mitosis and thus ensures the fideli

106 that, despite a loss in centromere cohesion, sister chromatids in STAG2 mutant tumor cells maintain c

107 Homologous recombination involving sister chromatids is the most accurate, and thus most fr

108 This requires that sister chromatids maintain cohesion at the centromere as

109 During hermaphrodite spermatogenesis, the sister chromatids of the X chromosomes separate during m

110 the formation of DNA intermediates, in which sister chromatids or homologous chromosomes are covalent

111 und centromeres is protected by shugoshin-2, sister chromatids remain attached through centromeric/pe

112 omologs segregate to opposite poles; and (3) sister chromatids segregate to opposite poles.

113 ts and H2AThr133ph on maize lines containing sister chromatids separate precociously in anaphase I re

114 ggesting that it controls the segregation of sister chromatids through heterochromatin modification.

115 The ability of cohesin to tether sister chromatids together depends on acetylation of its

116 ell cycle, sister-chromatid cohesion tethers sister chromatids together from S phase to the metaphase

117 rase-mediated cleavage, in order to maintain sister chromatids together until their separation in mei

118 oval of cohesin, the protein complex holding sister chromatids together, first from arms in meiosis I

119 identified through its major role in holding sister chromatids together.

120 ecruitment of high levels of cohesin to link sister chromatids together.

121 mitotic fidelity as evidenced by unresolved sister chromatids with marked accumulation of H1S/T18ph

122 e not consistent with cohesin embracing both sister chromatids within silent chromatin domains.

123 's ability to ensure accurate segregation of sister chromatids, but, as in centromere localization, t

124 The unpaired X precociously separates into sister chromatids, which co-segregate with the autosome

125 central core, which may physically separate sister chromatids.

126 and is required to promote bi-orientation of sister chromatids.

127 ndle during mitosis to capture and segregate sister chromatids.

128 on during mitosis depend on cohesion between sister chromatids.

129 g Bacillus subtilis sporulation, segregating sister chromosomes are anchored to cell poles and the ch

130 nded DNA breaks, and improper segregation of sister chromosomes.

131 ylogenetically, Decemunciger appears to be a sister clade among current vent and seep deep-sea Amphar

132 f skeletogenic mesoderm specification in the sister clade of euechinoids, the cidaroids, suggesting t

133 ses place SAGMEG Archaea as a deeply rooting sister clade of the Thermococci, leading us to propose t

134 n a lineage of endofungal symbionts that are sister clade to Burkholderia.

135 strongly supported, but highly divergent 18S sister clade.

136 t mortality by including both population and sister controls.

137 STITCH and STRING are sister databases that catalog known and predicted drug-p

138 ir template bias by specifically suppressing sister-directed repair.

139 Coentrapment of sister DNAs at replication is accompanied by acetylation

140 hromatid cohesion conferred by entrapment of sister DNAs within a tripartite ring formed between cohe

141 sin's Smc3 subunit, which locks together the sister DNAs.

142 enerates physically interlinked or catenated sister DNAs.

143 ion before biorientation, likely stabilizing sister end-on attachment, yet cannot induce Mad1 loss fr

144 The MMPs and the sister families of "adisintegrin and metalloproteinase"

145 her POT1b homologs from Brassicaceae and its sister family, Cleomaceae, naturally bear a non-aromatic

146 exemplar datasets each containing a pair of sister fish species: Siniperca chuatsi vs. Sini. kneri a

147 Imaging with the sister fluorescence agent revealed that uptake was confi

148 r diagnosed with breast cancer but who had a sister (full or half) diagnosed with breast cancer.

149 iversification using a large dataset of bird sister genera endemic to the New World.

150 Both sister genes are retained through subsequent speciation

151 erin is part of a cluster of three potential sister genes encoding proteins of similar architecture,

152 larity among modern tetherin genes and their sister genes.

153 timate that is independent of their proposed sister group [4, 8, 12, 14].

154 , [6, 7]), whereas Ctenophora emerges as the sister group of all other animals ("Ctenophora-sister")

155 blem because Porifera tends to emerge as the sister group of all other animals ("Porifera-sister") wh

156 or comb jellies (phylum Ctenophora) are the sister group of all other animals [1-5].

157 our results strongly support sponges as the sister group of all other animals and provide further ev

158 Nuclear DNA indicated Neanderthals as a sister group of Denisovans after diverging from modern h

159 at Branchiopoda (e.g., fairy shrimps) is the sister group of Hexapoda [1-7].

160 and questioning the position of Psocodea as sister group of holometabolans in the most recent phylog

161 nocerotoids that indicates Uintaceras is the sister group of paraceratheriids, to which amynodontids

162 ies-poor Trigonaloidea are identified as the sister group of the stinging wasps (Aculeata).

163 Permopsocida resolves as sister group of Thripida + Hemiptera and represents an e

164 Ascidians belong to the tunicates, the sister group of vertebrates and are recognized model org

165 Finally, we provide evidence to support the sister group relationship of Megaloceros giganteus with

166 scenario in which sponges (Porifera) are the sister group to all other animals ("Porifera-sister" hyp

167 native topology in which ctenophores are the sister group to all other animals (including sponges).

168 ses are under debate: Xenacoelomorpha is the sister group to all remaining Bilateria (= Nephrozoa, na

169 find unequivocal evidence that ants are the sister group to bees+apoid wasps (Apoidea) and that bees

170 The sister group to DPANN comprises the Euryarchaeota and th

171 eal that a duplication within the charophyte sister group to land plants led to distinct Class I and

172 The GABA immunoreactivity in a sister group to the nudibranchs, Pleurobranchaea califor

173 placed the pangolins, order Pholidota, as a sister group to the order Carnivora.

174 0,982 amino acid positions, clearly reject a sister-group relationship between Hexapoda and Branchiop

175 Our study has found a sister-group relationship between Ornithischia and Thero

176 Nonetheless, support for a hexapod sister-group relationship to Remipedia or to Cephalocari

177 atistical support for placing sponges as the sister-group to all other metazoans, with ctenophores em

178 nd Hexactinellida, are generally regarded as sister groups forming the clade Silicea, although the na

179 ipedia + Cephalocarida [12, 13] as potential sister groups of hexapods, but they either did not inclu

180 uggests that East Asians and Melanesians are sister groups, and I discuss what implications this has

181 arthra Lang, 1948, are monophyletic, but not sister groups.

182 h bioluminescent courtship compared to their sister groups.

183 reover, collagen IV is absent in unicellular sister-groups.

184 turation involves limited separation between sister guard cells and stomatal responses require revers

185 His sister had a history of multiple visual abnormalities an

186 .69 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.78) and sisters hazard ratios=0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.5

187 tablishment of different PTMs on individual "sister" histones in the same nucleosomal context, that i

188 t breast cancer diagnoses among women with a sister history of breast cancer and the presumed enrichm

189 vor of the ctenophores-sister or the sponges-sister hypothesis, we submit that research programs aime

190 The "Ctenophora-sister" hypothesis implies that eumetazoan-specific trai

191 sister group to all other animals ("Porifera-sister" hypothesis), consistent with a single origin of

192 pulling on mutant kinetochores and decouple sisters in vivo, and thereby separately probe Hec1's rol

193 non-nodulating (nod-) and nodulating (nod+) sister inbred peanut lines, E4/E5 and E7/E6, and their n

194 enies rarely include the divergence times of sister intraspecific taxa, and when they do little is sa

195 les, which we term 'bridging fibre', bridges sister k-fibres and balances the interkinetochore tensio

196 The CK1delta kinase Hrr25 is critical for sister kinetochore co-orientation, but its roles are not

197 At metaphase, one sister kinetochore couples to depolymerizing microtubule

198 aternal ageing, oocytes show increased inter-sister kinetochore distance and premature sister chromat

199 ts against the age-related increase in inter-sister kinetochore distance and PSCS.

200 nome through cell division requires that all sister kinetochores bind to dynamic microtubules (MTs) f

201 on due to opposing pulling forces exerted on sister kinetochores by dynamic microtubule tips.

202 with robust kinetics and that tension across sister kinetochores is established just before Mad1 loss

203 Finally, if the two sister kinetochores on a chromosome are both attached to

204 lizes preferentially to properly bi-oriented sister kinetochores, representing the final outer kineto

205 verging ray-finned fish, resolving it as the sister lineage of Cheirolepis [13] plus all younger acti

206 plement of cp-ndh genes which represents the sister lineage to all other orchids, and three published

207 support the view that sponges represent the sister lineage to the rest of the animals, while other p

208 several genome duplications evidenced in its sister lineage, i.e. sturgeons.

209 ivorous, gelatinous marine organisms, as the sister lineage.

210 allowing independent ohnologue divergence in sister lineages sharing an ancestral WGD event.

211 which our analyses suggest are monophyletic sister lineages.

212 s an otherwise inevitable transition between sister lineages.

213 al levels of gap junctional coupling between sister MCs at the same glomerulus.

214 chrony of inhibitory signals in pairs of non-sister MCs.

215 se, focusing mainly on activity between 'non-sister' MCs affiliated with different glomeruli (intergl

216 opsis has lost a PIN clade sister to AtPIN1, Sister-of-PIN1 (SoPIN1), which is conserved in flowering

217 ng out positions in favor of the ctenophores-sister or the sponges-sister hypothesis, we submit that

218 Finally, sister-pair comparisons were consistent with both rapid

219 In exome sequencing data from a sister population, the Nunavik Inuit, we found no other

220 h blocks releasing activity and ensures that sisters remain connected.

221 and provide further evidence that Ctenophora-sister represents a tree reconstruction artifact.

222 ugar, and phosphate mutations in the twister-sister ribozyme, suggest contributions to the cleavage c

223 ional pre-catalytic structure of the twister-sister ribozyme.

224 vage assays of a four-way junctional twister-sister self-cleaving ribozyme.

225 dent mechanism termed Separation-Into-Recent-Sisters (SIRS).

226 netic admixture with a nearby non-threatened sister species (Sistrurus tergeminus).

227 s rule for female sterility in field cricket sister species (Teleogryllus oceanicus and T. commodus).

228 s similar levels of genetic diversity to its sister species Calotriton asper, from which it separated

229 es, can be difficult to distinguish from the sister species Cetraria ericetorum.

230 tween Wolbachia infecting D. suzukii and its sister species D. subpulchrella (wSpc).

231 of two individual butterfly genomes from the sister species Heliconius melpomene rosina and H. cydno.

232 t genome-wide introgression from the selfing sister species M. nasutus has acted to maintain a barrie

233 Here we show that two sister species of mice, Peromyscus polionotus and Peromy

234 that guides DNA methylation is incomplete in sister species of seed plants, especially lycophytes.

235 or, but not other behaviors, compared to its sister species P. maniculatus.

236 ributions and competitive outcomes of the EM sister species Rhizopogon vinicolor and Rhizopogon vesic

237 enetic analysis places this new taxon as the sister species to Daspletosaurus torosus.

238 Phytochromes from streptophyte algae, sister species to land plants, instead use phycocyanobil

239 solates from domestic bathrooms which form a sister species with Exophiala lecanii-corni are describe

240 enetic analysis suggests that V. fordii is a sister species with J. curcas within the Eurosids I.

241 ses between I. loxense and its blue-flowered sister species, I. cyaneum, suggested that a single locu

242 ethritis, akin to the syndrome caused by its sister species, N. gonorrhoeae, the etiologic agent of g

243 Due to very low molecular divergence among sister species, traditional DNA barcoding has not been s

244 es from the remaining six Magicicada and two sister species, we show that each Magicicada species har

245 ition and promoting the coexistence of plant sister species.

246 f high differentiation between the sympatric sister species.

247 tion among any but the most recently derived sister species.

248 Here we examine two sister-species of Peromyscus mice with divergent mating

249 e free of breast cancer were enrolled in the Sister Study (n = 50,884).

250 The Sister Study enrolled 50,884 U.S. and Puerto Rican women

251 From 2003-2009, the Sister Study enrolled 50,884 U.S. women 35-74 y old who

252 The Sister Study is a unique cohort designed to efficiently

253 Sister Study participants (n=50,884) were recruited from

254 of the first 5 y of follow-up for all 50,884 Sister Study participants showed that self-reported vita

255 The Sister Study sought a large cohort of women never diagno

256 The Sister Study was designed to address gaps in the study o

257 unity (comprised primarily by Nitrososphaera sister subclusters 1.1 and 2) was displaced by populatio

258 to false inferences of homology between non-sister taxa that are later correctly identified as homop

259 on average, 21-fold more speciose than their sister taxa, indicating that a shift in diet is associat

260 d morphology support that caecilians are the sister taxon of batrachians (frogs and salamanders), fro

261 ies at the base of ichthyosauriforms, as the sister taxon of Cartorhynchus with which it shares a sho

262 axon exclusion support Remipedia as the sole sister taxon of Hexapoda and suggest that the prior grou

263 This clade is the sister taxon of Ornithodira (pterosaurs and birds) and s

264 'superclade' E. dalsassoi potentially is the sister taxon of Sauropterygia.

265 ogenetic analysis places Gurbanodelta as the sister taxon of the North American latest Cretaceous Nan

266 Liverworts may be the sister taxon to all other land plants, and the genome sh

267 As a sister taxon to lamiids and campanulids, E. ulmoides und

268 a suboscine group that, unlike their oscine sister taxon, does not exhibit vocal learning [9] and is

269 telomeres lacking CTCF-driven TERRA exhibit sister-telomere loss and upon entry into mitosis, exhibi

270 These data indicate that the sister template is distinguished from the homologue prim

271 DHR(+) populations were very similar between sisters, those between mothers and daughters were unrela

272 dling germination in Austrobaileya scandens, sister to all other extant Austrobaileyales.

273 tering analyses, the Suriname sample appears sister to an Ivory Coast landrace, and shows no evidence

274 ed CGs (mCG) were also identified in species sister to angiosperms.

275 However Arabidopsis has lost a PIN clade sister to AtPIN1, Sister-of-PIN1 (SoPIN1), which is cons

276 nces support placement of Xenacoelomorpha as sister to Nephrozoa or Protostomia.

277 ted phylogenetic tree places Macrauchenia as sister to Perissodactyla, but close to the radiation of

278 oup in two highly divergent clades, robustly sister to the bivalve parasite Perkinsus.

279 passes Poecilostomatoida Thorell, 1859, as a sister to the family Schminkepinellidae Martinez Arbizu,

280 -Ala, in Pachysolen tannophilus in the clade sister to the known CUG-Ser clade.

281 idiomycota clones placed Arctic marine fungi sister to the order Lobulomycetales.

282 Tardigrada are placed as sisters to Arthropoda and Onychophora (velvet worms) in

283 regation; the symmetric tethering of plasmid sisters to sister chromatids embodies the replication-de

284 ortices, when the subjects believed that the sisters were genetically related.

285 sisters, with subjects guided to believe the sisters were related either genetically or by adoption.

286 sister group of all other animals ("Porifera-sister") when site-specific amino acid differences are m

287 ster group of all other animals ("Ctenophora-sister") when they are ignored (e.g., [8-11]).

288 k of hypertension in brothers and unaffected sisters, whereas an increased risk of cardiovascular eve

289 Compared with their sisters who did not have hypertension in pregnancy, wome

290 who had hypertension in pregnancy and their sisters who did not using the dataset from the Genetic E

291 including paternal mosaicism in two affected sisters who inherited a BMP2 splice-altering variant, we

292 or idiopathic end-stage heart failure in two sisters who underwent cardiac transplantation at three y

293 s women with singleton births who also had a sister with a first birth during that time period.

294 lled 50,884 U.S. women 35-74 y old who had a sister with breast cancer but had never had breast cance

295 f the United States or Puerto Rico who had a sister with breast cancer were eligible.

296 d States or Puerto Rico, 35-74 y old, with a sister with breast cancer were eligible.

297 Although all had a biologic sister with breast cancer, 16.5% had average or lower ri

298 BRCA2 mutations, 57 (51.4%) had a mother or sister with breast or ovarian cancer and 54 patients (48

299 Exome sequencing of two Finnish sisters with non-syndromic POI revealed a homozygous mut

300 icting refusal of organ donation between two sisters, with subjects guided to believe the sisters wer