ライフサイエンスコーパス: skin conductance response

1 The outcome measure was the electrodermal skin conductance response.

2 ing in the MR-available groups as indexed by skin conductance responses.

3 vior, questionnaires, subjective report, and skin conductance responses.

4 group had significantly smaller conditional skin conductance responses.

5 s are associated with changes in nonspecific skin conductance response, a sensitive psychophysiologic

6 opposing asymmetric gradients of conditioned skin conductance responses across training groups that s

7 specificity in the recovery of extinguished skin conductance responses after presentations of an aud

8 igated the relationship between non-specific skin conductance response, an objective index of sympath

9 es was associated with transiently increased skin conductance responses and bilateral amygdala activa

10 Skin conductance responses and blood oxygenation level-d

11 salient cues (indexed by subjective ratings, skin conductance responses and EEG event-related potenti

12 They also showed weaker correlations between skin conductance responses and frontal brain regions, in

13 The saliency manipulation was confirmed by skin conductance responses and subjective ratings of the

14 Skin conductance responses and verbal self-reports of ar

15 o losses relative to gains, as measured with skin conductance response, and the difference in arousal

16 roups did not differ in conditioned arousal (skin conductance responses) at any stage.

17 Skin conductance responses, blood oxygenation level-depe

18 Subjective pleasantness ratings and skin conductance responses did not differ between behavi

19 (CRF-R1) antagonist, GW876008, on brain and skin conductance responses during acquisition and extinc

20 Controls had greater skin conductance responses during acquisition than extin

21 Skin conductance responses during extinction recall did

22 ex predicted fear expression (as measured by skin conductance response) during extinction recall.

23 h PTSD and combat controls were conditioned (skin conductance response), extinguished, and tested for

24 Despite no skin conductance response group differences during extin

25 recovery (freezing in rats and anticipatory skin conductance responses in humans) when tested 24 hou

26 Skin conductance responses in OCD patients (n = 43) fail

27 The skin conductance responses of 15 patients with chronic d

28 re-exposure did not affect generalization of skin conductance response or fear potentiated startle.

29 ls with autism spectrum disorder showed less skin conductance responses overall.

30 ctive condition displayed lower increases in skin conductance responses relative to baseline and repo

31 In the present study, skin conductance response (SCR) and unconditioned stimul

32 The sympathetic skin conductance response (SCR) is one index of autonomi

33 Skin conductance response (SCR) was the behavioral index

34 ctions in the magnitude of the unconditioned skin conductance response (SCR).

35 Skin conductance responses (SCR) and self-reported fear

36 king performance and electrodermal activity (skin conductance responses, SCR) as an index of somatic

37 We measured the skin conductance responses (SCRs) of subjects after they

38 Additionally, skin conductance responses (SCRs) were weakly correlated

39 over, normals began to generate anticipatory skin conductance responses (SCRs) whenever they pondered

40 esonance imaging and concurrent recording of skin conductance responses (SCRs).

41 Anticipatory sympathetic arousal [i.e., skin conductance responses (SCRs)] and explicit measures

42 uring extinction, women with IBS had greater skin conductance responses than controls-an effect norma

43 the inflation group exhibited larger learned skin conductance responses than the control group.

44 enewal; in the danger context, they had less skin conductance response to CS+E and lower activity in

45 The authors used skin conductance response to index conditioned respondin

46 individuals who failed to show a suppressed skin conductance response to the extinguished versus non

47 Change in skin conductance response to the neutral stimulus was us

48 The skin conductance response to unpleasant pictures was sig

49 e manifest in higher pain ratings and larger skin conductance responses to directly experienced cues.

50 In contrast, FTLD patients showed reduced skin conductance responses to the aversive stimulus, whi

51 vary FGF2 exhibited significantly heightened skin conductance responses to the CS without shock durin

52 nificant differences in conditionability for skin conductance responses, verbal reports, or activatio

53 Skin conductance response was measured throughout the ex

54 ce noted in our psychophysiological measure (skin conductance responses) was during extinction recall

55 Additionally, skin conductance responses were found to have less contr

56 cocaine users, but not in control subjects, skin conductance responses were positively correlated wi

57 Skin conductance responses were used as an index of cond

58 ile viewing fearful faces and showed reduced skin conductance response when greeting an unfamiliar ex

59 ersive than did controls and displayed lower skin conductance responses when anticipating an upcoming

60 TMS to target 1 showed significantly reduced skin conductance responses, whereas TMS to target 2 had