ライフサイエンスコーパス: skin prick

1 -nine house dust mite-sensitised adults were skin prick and allergen patch tested against a sterile s

2 herapies (elemental, 6-food elimination, and skin prick and atopy patch-directed elimination diets) a

3 aist/hip ratio, current asthma, and specific skin prick and IgE sensitisation.

4 Standardized skin prick and intradermal tests were carried out with a

5 Skin prick and intradermal tests with cetuximab were cle

6 tization in an unsupervised manner, based on skin prick and sIgE tests taken throughout childhood and

7 eactivity to a specific allergen by means of skin prick or in vitro testing.

8 ) LEN) survey, we measured the prevalence of skin prick positivity to a panel of allergens, and geome

9 d based on ARC symptom severity and erythema skin prick reaction to short ragweed.

10 acodynamic effects, including suppression of skin prick responses to allergen.

11 Younger participants had higher skin prick sensitivity prevalence, but not total IgE, th

12 lected at age 12 months: food sensitization (skin prick test >/= 2 mm) and allergy (oral food challen

13 d by IgE (aOR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.57, 0.91) and skin prick test (aOR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.50, 0.86).

14 IgE sensitization was assessed by skin prick test (inhalant allergens) and specific IgE le

15 n of pricking in the apple on prick-to-prick skin prick test (PTP) results.

16 We sought to develop skin prick test (SPT) and allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) t

17 Food-specific serum IgE, skin prick test (SPT) and atopy patch test (APT) to food

18 wheeze in last year, atopy assessed both by skin prick test (SPT) and by the measurement of allergen

19 ine release test (HR) (RefLab ApS, Denmark), skin prick test (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT).

20 Skin prick test (SPT) and measurement of serum-specific

21 in had the highest AUC (0.79), comparable to skin prick test (SPT) and sIgE to soy extract (0.76 and

22 Skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) are often

23 sought to determine the association between skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) to egg pro

24 ized nonallergic (n = 25) children underwent skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) to peanut

25 ercise, were all negative.The results of the skin prick test (SPT) for Citrus unshiu and specific IgE

26 1 spiking of the ImmunoCAP, and size of the skin prick test (SPT) for hazelnut were determined, also

27 lergic sensitization was determined based on skin prick test (SPT) of five mites, three molds, and ni

28 dence of nut specifc IgE shown by a positive skin prick test (SPT) or specific IgE (sIgE) test.

29 ng cows' milk-specific IgE antibodies (IgE), skin prick test (SPT) reactivity and double-blind, place

30 HDE) bioactivity were predictive of allergen skin prick test (SPT) reactivity for infants at high ris

31 pecific IgE against aeroallergens (sIgE) and skin prick test (SPT) reactivity for the most common loc

32 Atopy was measured based on skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to 9 allergens at 36 mo

33 Skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to grass, cypress, oliv

34 Infants with a skin prick test (SPT) response to egg white (EW) of less

35 action to egg, milk, or both with a positive skin prick test (SPT) response to the trigger food and/o

36 lergy, milk allergy, or both with a positive skin prick test (SPT) response to the trigger food and/o

37 nd 4 years of age and develop thresholds for skin prick test (SPT) results and specific IgE (sIgE) le

38 ping peanut allergy, and the implications of skin prick test (SPT) screening before peanut introducti

39 Skin prick test (SPT) sensitivity to house dust mite all

40 protein levels in household dust and peanut skin prick test (SPT) sensitization and likely allergy.

41 nfantile atopic dermatitis and preceding egg skin prick test (SPT) sensitization, we found a strong a

42 Allergic sensitization was determined by skin prick test (SPT) to 17 aeroallergens.

43 of 5276 one-year-old children who underwent skin prick test (SPT) to 4 food allergens and those with

44 A total of 433 patients with positive skin prick test (SPT) to birch pollen were analyzed rega

45 Atopy was assessed by skin prick test (SPT) using inhalant and food allergens.

46 eczema, egg allergy, or both but 0-mm peanut skin prick test (SPT) wheal responses (n = 542); group I

47 ty-two poly-sensitized athletes according to skin prick test (SPT) with different allergic phenotypes

48 fe (EQ-5D) health questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test (SPT), exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), smel

49 Patients with CMA and/or RA underwent skin prick test (SPT), intracutaneous test (ICT), and, w

50 A clinical questionnaire, skin prick test (SPT), spirometry, and serum total and s

51 and responsiveness of mast cells in vivo by skin prick test (SPT).

52 R) Rapid results were compared with those of skin prick test (SPT).

53 , they underwent physical examinations and a skin prick test (SPT).

54 pecific IgE was 10.1% (95% CI: 9.4-10.8) and skin prick test 2.7% (95% CI: 2.4-3.0), food challenge p

55 nates, and allergic disease was evaluated by skin prick test and clinical examination at 12 months of

56 tolerant to food challenge, 159 negative on skin prick test and food challenge).

57 le NSAID in history were tested first with a skin prick test and if negative challenged with the culp

58 ergen sources, and latex was tested by using skin prick test and ImmunoCAP.

59 Skin prick test and sIgE display moderate agreement, but

60 nical-demographic questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test and specific IgE were evaluated yearly.

61 tratified for eczema status and test method (skin prick test and specific IgE).

62 to diagnose food allergy, when compared with skin prick test and specific IgE.

63 Atopy was detected by skin prick test and/or serum specific-IgE in patients wi

64 pplied for selected cases where the history, skin prick test and/or specific IgE are not definitive f

65 e positive ELISA results correlated with the skin prick test areas with the whole body and the setae

66 In two patients who showed positive skin prick test but negative for challenge test, titer o

67 Identical ISAAC questionnaire and skin prick test data were collected and compared at 10 y

68 or more completed a questionnaire and had a skin prick test for atopy.

69 A skin prick test for poly-gamma-glutamic acid (PGA) which

70 Our skin prick test for several kinds of edible jellyfish su

71 f the outcomes examined: at least 1 positive skin prick test from the panel of 10 allergens (21.7% vs

72 extracts was evaluated by IgE immunoblot and skin prick test in patients with clinical allergy to pea

73 Inclusion criteria included a positive skin prick test of 6 mm or more (wheal diameter, above t

74 s not appear to contain factors that enhance skin prick test or atopy patch test responses to house d

75 including detection of milk-specific IgE (by skin prick test or serum assay), diagnostic elimination

76 aluation, milk-specific IgE levels, and milk skin prick test performed at enrollment, 6 months, 12 mo

77 wanted to measure geographical variation in skin prick test positivity and assess whether it was exp

78 Geographical variation in the prevalence of skin prick test positivity in Europe is unlikely to be e

79 re fitted for allergic sensitization (either skin prick test positivity or serum-specific IgE >/= 0.3

80 Skin prick test positivity to any one of the measured al

81 The main outcome was atopy defined as skin prick test reaction >/=3 mm.

82 Associations of NVAS and atopy (defined as skin prick test reaction of >/=3 mm) were analysed using

83 Skin prick test reactions to pollen elicited larger weal

84 ion between a chronic helminth infection and skin prick test reactivity even in a developed country.

85 e reactions to peanut were reported in 1.5%, skin prick test reactivity in 2.0%, and IgE sensitizatio

86 py was measured by specific IgE in serum and skin prick test reactivity to aeroallergens.

87 studies demonstrated that exercise increases skin prick test reactivity to and bioavailability of the

88 Total IgE, grass pollen-specific IgE, and skin prick test reactivity to grass pollen were all redu

89 children with eczema, wheeze, or a positive skin prick test response before ending exclusive breast-

90 SAFS (n = 38) was defined as specific IgE or skin prick test response positivity to Aspergillus fumig

91 with greater airway hyperresponsiveness and skin prick test response positivity.

92 ible mold at age 1 year and child's positive skin prick test response to aeroallergens and molds at a

93 ID-independent anaphylaxis to LTPs, positive skin prick test response to LTPs, and serum LTP IgE.

94 Peanut skin prick test responses and peanut- and Ara h 2-specif

95 PPOIT was associated with reduced peanut skin prick test responses and peanut-specific IgE levels

96 Skin prick test responses and specific IgE levels agains

97 in Childhood2000 birth cohort by using both skin prick test responses and specific IgE levels.

98 tifiable by using routinely available peanut skin prick test responses or specific IgE levels, but th

99 risk of atopic wheeze, total IgE levels, and skin prick test responses to cockroach.

100 serum total IgE levels, specific IgE levels, skin prick test responses to common aeroallergens, and I

101 ves with allergic disease) but with negative skin prick test responses to common allergens at randomi

102 For the incidence of AR, positive skin prick test responses to indoor allergens, parental

103 Positive skin prick test responses to outdoor allergens at baseli

104 th a history of ragweed allergy and positive skin prick test responses to ragweed were randomized and

105 Histamine skin prick test responses were diminished in patients wi

106 exposure and sensitization (as determined by skin prick test responses) was analyzed in more than 100

107 ith peanut- and Ara h 2-specific IgE levels, skin prick test responses, basophil activation, and TH2

108 eanut but have peanut-specific IgE, positive skin prick test responses, or both represents a signific

109 to peanut (>/=0.35 kU/L) had negative peanut skin prick test responses.

110 By the end of therapy, titrated CM skin prick test results and CD63 and CD203c expression d

111 random sample of participants with negative skin prick test results attended a hospital-based food c

112 asing their judgment on clinical history and skin prick test results before and after obtaining the I

113 Overall, clinical allergy and skin prick test results complied with the specific IgE r

114 th antivenoms and cetuximab induced positive skin prick test results in patients with sIgE to alpha-g

115 Based on available clinical data and skin prick test results, 922 (73%) patients would have b

116 higher IgG4 values (P = .001) and lower egg skin prick test scores (P = .0002) over time and a lower

117 among M+ participants tracked the following skin prick test sensitization statuses: M+P+C- > M+P+C+

118 lacebo-controlled oral food challenge (OFC), skin prick test titration (SPTT), and basophil histamine

119 e in peanut-specific basophil activation and skin prick test titration compared with nonresponders.

120 iral culture for varicella-zoster virus, and skin prick test to common food and animal allergens were

121 icipants aged 18 to 65 years with a positive skin prick test to Dactylis glomerata pollen were expose

122 easonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and positive skin prick test to grass and olive pollens and evaluate

123 ty reaction after peanut ingestion, positive skin prick test to peanuts, and positive by double-blind

124 Moreover, a skin prick test using the crude extract was positive for

125 Skin prick test was a better predictor for hazelnut alle

126 Provided consent, a skin prick test was performed, and history of allergic s

127 A skin prick test was used to ascertain atopy.

128 Atopy was defined as any skin prick test weal to common aeroallergens >/=4 mm.

129 E 33.3 kUA /l (7.2-120.2), and median peanut skin prick test wheal 11.3 mm (6.5-18)]; four experience

130 In subjects ingesting baked egg, EW-induced skin prick test wheal diameter and EW-, ovalbumin-, and

131 od challenges (OFCs) to egg, irrespective of skin prick test wheal sizes.

132 The negative predictive value of skin prick test with peanut extract and peanut butter an

133 thma, atopy (grass, house dust mite, and cat skin prick test) and atopic vs. non-atopic asthma at the

134 o standard diagnostic methods (ImmunoCAP and skin prick test).

135 Of the 1430 children with a valid skin prick test, 228 (16%) were positive (more boys (20%

136 iagnostic testing, 47.3% was assessed with a skin prick test, 39.9% with a serum specific IgE test, a

137 ondary outcomes were desensitization, peanut skin prick test, and specific IgE and specific IgG4 meas

138 In addition to clinical history, skin prick test, and specific IgE determination, BAT can

139 nical-demographic questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test, and specific IgE to aeroallergens were

140 Specific IgE values, skin prick test, and T-cell subsets of STAT3-HIES patien

141 is, using the standard methodology (history, skin prick test, IgE assay).

142 nly 4 predictors of the original model: sex, skin prick test, peanut sIgE, and total IgE minus sIgE.

143 shed, using 6 predictors: sex, age, history, skin prick test, peanut specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE)

144 Skin prick test, s-IgE and CRD to hazelnut, peanut, PR10

145 Skin prick test, sIgE measurements, and assessment of al

146 Skin prick test, specific IgE determinations, DBPCFC and

147 n infants with allergic mothers positive for skin prick test.

148 nd ELISA inhibition, basophil activation and skin prick test.

149 gE/4 allergens: OR = 1.81, 95% CI 0.80-4.24; skin prick test/4+ allergens: OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.34-3.9

150 A larger wheal on the skin-prick test and a lower ratio of peanut-specific IgG

151 A skin-prick test showed positive reactions for Inavir inh

152 on who initially had negative results on the skin-prick test, the prevalence of peanut allergy at 60

153 ract, which was determined with the use of a skin-prick test--one consisting of participants with no

154 dence of "atopic eczema," "any positive SPT [skin-prick test]," "sensitization to egg," and "sensitiz

155 dence and severity of atopic dermatitis, and skin-prick-test positivity at 6 mo of age were not diffe

156 with respiratory or cutaneous symptoms were skin-prick tested with GB extract.

157 Twelve-month-old infants were skin prick-tested to common food allergens, and sensitiz

158 Each child underwent skin prick testing (ALK-Abello) and serum IgE assays (Im

159 tern blot and IgE-ELISA were complemented by Skin Prick Testing (SPT) and mediator release assay to d

160 Skin prick testing (SPT) in combination with the clinica

161 Skin prick testing (SPT) is an important step in the dia

162 Skin prick testing (SPT) is fundamental to the practice

163 orm beta lactam testing with 17% undertaking skin prick testing (SPT) only, 77% SPT followed by intra

164 5276 infants (HealthNuts), infants underwent skin prick testing (SPT) to egg white at 12 months of ag

165 ng hay fever, eczema, food allergy, positive skin prick testing (SPT), or elevated allergen-specific

166 evaluated in a basophil activation assay and Skin Prick Testing (SPT).

167 and allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) and perform skin prick testing (SPT).

168 intervention (structured allergy history and skin prick testing and appropriate advice on allergy avo

169 gy intervention (structured allergy history, skin prick testing and appropriate allergy avoidance adv

170 Morphine skin prick testing and basophil activation were diminish

171 s defined as one or more positive results on skin prick testing and clinically relevant symptoms of r

172 stic correlates included end point titration skin prick testing and measurement of CM-specific IgE an

173 vited for a standardized physician exam with skin prick testing and parental interview at age 2 years

174 IgE sensitization tests, such as skin prick testing and serum-specific IgE, have been use

175 and aeroallergens was determined by means of skin prick testing and specific IgE measurement.

176 re, taking a structured allergy history with skin prick testing and tailored advice on allergy avoida

177 Children completed skin prick testing at age 1 year.

178 Participants underwent skin prick testing for house dust mite, cat, grasses and

179 Skin prick testing for peanut sensitization was performe

180 Skin prick testing is available in only half of the case

181 For the diagnosis of LAR, neither skin prick testing nor determination of the presence of

182 ly relevant sensitizations are elucidated by skin prick testing or by the determination of specific I

183 ulture and a sputum cell differential count; skin prick testing to both common aeroallergens and an e

184 ample of 5276 one-year-old infants underwent skin prick testing to peanut, egg, sesame, and cow's mil

185 In addition, skin prick testing was performed to six study foods (cow

186 Skin prick testing with a panel of aeroallergens and a m

187 grass pollen allergic individuals underwent skin prick testing with allergen alone, allergen plus Be

188 subjected to topical cowhage provocation and skin prick testing with histamine and assessed for diffe

189 dditional healthy controls were subjected to skin prick testing with histamine.

190 minth Opishorchis felineus and specific IgE, skin prick testing, and atopic symptoms in Western Siber

191 e an interviewer-administered questionnaire, skin prick testing, and measurement of lung function fro

192 similar in children positive and negative on skin prick testing, and were not appreciably altered by

193 Morphine skin prick testing, ImmunoCAP assays for allergen-specif

194 Skin prick testing, lung function tests, exhaled nitric

195 post-bronchodilator spirometry (n = 1,389), skin prick testing, lung volumes, and diffusing capacity

196 ths for scorings of symptoms and medication, skin prick testing, total IgE, specific IgE, and Der p 1

197 en patients assigned to immediate or delayed skin prick testing.

198 pic status were determined by spirometry and skin prick testing.

199 ng a rat basophil leukaemia cell line and by skin prick testing.

200 ed with IL-31 and NaCl (negative control) by skin prick testing.

201 s underwent a clinical examination including skin prick testing.

202 of rhinitis but without positive results on skin prick testing.

203 ldren were examined for eczema and underwent skin prick testing.

204 e markers measured, small wheal diameters on skin-prick testing and increases in egg-specific IgG4 an

205 Skin-prick testing predicted only 13% of foods associate

206 ly to attend research clinics and consent to skin-prick testing.

207 to seeds of oilseed rape and turnip rape in skin prick tests (SPT) and open food challenges.

208 Skin prick tests (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) against f

209 Conjunctival provocation tests (CPT), skin prick tests (SPT), BAT, and sIgE determination incl

210 Skin prick tests (SPT), specific-IgE (sIgE), component-r

211 y against common allergens was determined by skin prick tests (SPT); specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE)

212 Skin prick tests (SPTs) and atopy patch tests (APTs) wer

213 Skin prick tests (SPTs) and basophil activation tests (B

214 All subjects with skin prick tests (SPTs) for birch pollen conducted durin

215 ich they answered a questionnaire, underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) for common aeroallergens, and pr

216 were invited to a parental questionnaire and skin prick tests (SPTs) to ten airborne allergens, and 2

217 ous reactions was obtained, and standardized skin prick tests (SPTs) using finely ground tree-nut sol

218 erial 10-fold dilutions of milk protein, and skin prick tests (SPTs) were performed to commercial mil

219 Skin prick tests (SPTs) were performed to gain attention

220 logical work-up included a detailed history, skin prick tests (SPTs) with IVIP, and basophil activati

221 e following outcomes at age 2 years: eczema, skin prick tests (SPTs), increased allergen-specific IgE

222 7 with mollusc tolerance) were studied using skin prick tests (SPTs), specific IgEs (sIgEs) and SDS-P

223 ations, including a structured interview and skin prick tests (SPTs).

224 tic sensitivity to 65% compared with 20% for skin prick tests and 46% ImmunoCAP using kiwi extract.

225 nonallergic subjects (group 4) by performing skin prick tests and APTs with rBet v 1 and hypoallergen

226 Skin prick tests and basophil activation test using cetu

227 Skin prick tests and basophil activation tests with N, P

228 re, taking a structured allergy history with skin prick tests and giving tailored advice on allergy a

229 6 months, 18 months, 4 years, and 6 years by skin prick tests and IgE measurements.

230 Associations with allergic diseases, skin prick tests and lung function assessed at 12 and 18

231 Clinic evaluation, which consisted of skin prick tests and OFC where eligible, was undertaken

232 ge 2 years, infants had FS/FA screening with skin prick tests and oral food challenges.

233 icipants underwent a standardized interview, skin prick tests and pulmonary function tests.

234 reened 5276 infants (74% participation) with skin prick tests and sensitized infants underwent food c

235 Skin prick tests and sIgE were performed in 529 children

236 ust mites was diagnosed longitudinally using skin prick tests and specific IgE measurements at (1/2),

237 icult, because of the limited sensitivity of skin prick tests and specific IgE tests to meat extracts

238 were 58% (95% CI 49-67) and 49% (40-58%) for skin prick tests and specific-IgE.

239 ergenicity of Ory c 3 was confirmed by using skin prick tests and the basophil activation assay.

240 formed consent; evidencing of an allergen by skin prick tests and/or serum-specific IgE dosages; bein

241 ldren (5-17 years old) with asthma underwent skin prick tests at baseline and had clinical data colle

242 sensitization (FAS) was identified by using skin prick tests conducted between 1 and 18 years of age

243 Food-specific serum IgE and skin prick tests for egg, soy, peanut, and cross-reactan

244 rkers outperformed allergen-specific IgE and skin prick tests for predicting OFC outcomes.

245 hensive set of recommendations on the use of skin prick tests in allergic rhinitis-conjunctivitis and

246 to determine whether C+ assayed by means of skin prick tests influenced AR symptom severity in contr

247 es to TG and DM allergen based on results of skin prick tests or nasal disk challenges (P < .01 and P

248 Two hundred eighty-one children had valid skin prick tests performed, and 14% (39/281) were atopic

249 d cohort study of 5276 infants who underwent skin prick tests to 4 allergens, including egg.

250 population-based HealthNuts study underwent skin prick tests to determine peanut sensitization and s

251 Subjects with positive skin prick tests to GOS (n = 30, 6.2%) underwent basophi

252 d via structured questionnaire and underwent skin prick tests to GOS.

253 ciation between 10 loci and specific IgE and skin prick tests to individual allergens and poly-sensit

254 Because of the low sensitivity of skin prick tests to meat, we studied the possibility to

255 Skin prick tests using wheat extract were performed on 3

256 easurements of eczema, asthma, rhinitis, and skin prick tests were available for all follow-ups.

257 Skin prick tests were carried out at ages 4, 10, and 18

258 F), forced midexpiratory flow (FEF(50)), and skin prick tests were measured at age 12 years.

259 In both cases, skin prick tests were negative for suspected seafoods.

260 Skin prick tests were performed at the ages of 6, 12, an

261 Food-specific serum IgE measurements and skin prick tests were performed before initiating the di

262 n, IgE inhibition, ImmunoCAP inhibition, and skin prick tests were performed using samples from selec

263 Skin prick tests were performed with commercial pollen e

264 Skin prick tests were performed with pollen extracts.

265 Skin prick tests were used to identify sensitization to

266 meat, we studied the possibility to perform skin prick tests with cetuximab, which carries the alpha

267 Blinded, quadruplicate skin prick tests with concentrate and three serial half-

268 Skin prick tests with purified rAed a 3 and Ae. aegypti

269 llenges with standardized doses of rMal d 1, skin prick tests with recombinant allergens, and measure

270 Questionnaires, skin prick tests, and basophil activation assays were pe

271 apnic voluntary hyperpnea challenge, allergy skin prick tests, and bronchoscopy with bronchial biopsi

272 ecific immunoglobulin E-antibodies in serum, skin prick tests, and double-blind, placebo-controlled f

273 ecific inhalation challenge to argan powder, skin prick tests, and immunoblotting analysis.

274 te use of testing (specific IgE measurement, skin prick tests, and oral food challenges), and the tim

275 food-allergic sensitization were measured by skin prick tests, and physician-diagnosed inhalant and f

276 Patients underwent skin prick tests, and received 0.1ml of influenza vaccin

277 who had undergone objective OFCs, concurrent skin prick tests, and specific IgE tests.

278 -of-function samples, we performed histamine skin prick tests, investigated the contribution of STAT3

279 Skin prick tests, measurements of specific IgE to peanut

280 for food allergy by standardized interviews, skin prick tests, prick-to-prick tests and ImmunoCAP.

281 In contrast to positive skin prick tests, SE-IgE was more common in smokers (<15

282 Clinical data, skin prick tests, specific IgE to aero- and food allerge

283 85; P = 0.02), and with similar findings for skin prick tests.

284 he patient's allergic triggers or performing skin prick tests.

285 en Asthma Study completed questionnaires and skin prick tests.

286 Atopy was assessed by using skin prick tests.

287 Atopy was assessed using skin prick tests.

288 n observed pasteurized raw egg challenge and skin prick tests.

289 and 6 years by specific IgE assessments and skin prick tests.

290 inical examinations including serum IgEs and skin prick tests.

291 saline challenge tests, questionnaires, and skin prick tests.

292 t basophils and elicit positive responses in skin prick tests.

293 We performed skin-prick tests and basophil degranulation tests using

294 gogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs), biopsies, and skin-prick tests for food and aeroallergens.

295 co-factor enhanced food allergy, assessed by skin-prick tests, specific IgE and oral challenges.

296 ystematic reintroduction analysis but not by skin-prick tests.

297 The result of enokitake skin prick to prick test was positive.

298 ther mushrooms (siitake, simeji, and eringi) skin prick to prick test were all positive.

299 At Day 85, 6 weeks after the last dose, skin prick wheal responses to allergen were suppressed b

300 allergen extracts are standardized based on skin prick wheal size in 20-30 allergic subjects.