ライフサイエンスコーパス: skinfold

1 the sum of two skinfolds, and the sum of six skinfolds.

2 the total phenotypic variation in extremity skinfolds.

3 e, birth weight, percent fat mass and sum of skinfolds) and newborn metabolic traits (cord glucose an

4 serum albumin; and weight, body mass index, skinfold, and arm muscle area were significantly and inv

5 Percent body fat, sum of two skinfolds, and sum of six skinfolds shared similar growt

6 fat, abdominal circumference, the sum of two skinfolds, and the sum of six skinfolds.

7 tured 149 lesions and 175 unaffected control skinfold areas from 65 adult HS patients.

8 g HMEC-1 cells and also in vivo using dorsal skinfold assays.

9 icknesses of the subjects were measured with skinfold calipers and the buttocks circumference with a

10 Because skinfolds can more accurately estimate body fatness than

11 he panniculus carnosus (PC) muscle of dorsal skinfold chamber (DSC) preparations in mice.

12 mmary tumor (MCaIV) grown in a murine dorsal skinfold chamber and in normal tissue controls.

13 cinoma (LS174T) were implanted in the dorsal skinfold chamber in C3H and severe combined immunodefici

14 Moreover, with the use of a dorsal skinfold chamber model and multiphoton fluorescence reso

15 oscopy of C6 glioma xenografts in the dorsal skinfold chamber model revealed that SU6668 treatment su

16 The dorsal skinfold chamber model was used to study the subcutaneou

17 by intravital microscopy applying the dorsal skinfold chamber model.

18 ging of cutaneous inflammation in the dorsal skinfold chamber revealed unaffected leukocyte rolling o

19 16F10 melanomas growing in the murine dorsal skinfold chamber showed that the number of functional, d

20 the cranial window and day 10 in the dorsal skinfold chamber, respectively.

21 n of generalized Shwartzman reaction, dorsal skinfold chamber-equipped mice were challenged twice wit

22 her in the cranial window than in the dorsal skinfold chamber.

23 ient mice: the cranial window and the dorsal skinfold chamber.

24 mary adenocarcinomas implanted in the dorsal skinfold chamber.

25 0 and 1000 microns, were implanted in dorsal skinfold chambers inserted on Beige nude/xid mice.

26 wis lung carcinoma (LLC) implanted in dorsal skinfold chambers of nude mice.

27 gen measurements in mice with chronic dorsal skinfold chambers or cranial windows.

28 embryonic stem cells) grown in murine dorsal skinfold chambers.

29 fold thicknesses [model 1: height (in m) and skinfold-corrected upperarm, thigh, and calf girths (CAG

30 dy fatness than can BMI, it is possible that skinfolds could be useful in monitoring secular trends i

31 ist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, and skinfold-derived percentage fat mass (P < 0.05) but not

32 , waist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, skinfold-derived percentage fat mass, BIA-derived percen

33 tion of percentage body fat (%BF) by using a skinfold equation or densitometry to categorize subjects

34 Agreement between the skinfold equations and UWW, based on deviations from mea

35 quadratic, three linear, and two logarithmic skinfold equations was compared with body fat estimated

36 e purpose of this study was to compare seven skinfold equations with underwater weighing (UWW) for es

37 The mean triceps skinfold, for example, increased by 2 mm through 2003-20

38 NF1) is characterized by cafe-au-lait spots, skinfold freckling, and cutaneous neurofibromas.

39 tational age], high infant adiposity [sum of skinfolds >90th percentile for gestational age], and cae

40 in men and correlated only with subscapular skinfolds in women.

41 ous traits, as follows: D7S514 and extremity skinfolds (LOD = 3.1), human carboxypeptidase A1 (HCPA1)

42 kg/m(2); FMI 4.7 (+/-3.5) kg/m(2) and sum of skinfold measurements 4.9 (+/-2.7) cm.

43 Weight, girth, and skinfold measurements were taken at the time of the inte

44 he percentage of body fat was measured using skinfold measurements, and the Medical Outcomes Short Fo

45 bertal stages in all 3 races by both DXA and skinfold measurements.

46 ; height adjusted fat mass (FMI), and sum of skinfold measurements.

47 average method) could be used in lieu of the skinfold method for categorizing subjects who are not ob

48 ly estimated by fusing the densitometric and skinfold methods, respectively.

49 These rare taxa of normal skinfold microbiota were associated with lesions indepen

50 d with measures of newborn adiposity (sum of skinfolds model 3 Z-score 7.356, P = 1.90x10(-)(1)(3), a

51 iation with either body mass index or sum of skinfolds (p < 0.001 for both models) but not with the o

52 BMI (P = 3.6 x 10(-5)), 0.039 SD, in sum of skinfolds (P = 1.7 x 10(-7)), and 0.022 SD in waist circ

53 sis of BMI cutoffs do not follow closely the skinfold percentile reference channels across age, espec

54 The age- and sex-standardized skinfold percentiles and z scores will be appropriate fo

55 In conclusion, the skinfold prediction equations evaluated in this study we

56 hydration status; expedient methods such as skinfold predictions will be more resistant to such effe

57 34 x sex) + (0.32 x weight) + (0.38 x biceps skinfold) (R2 = 0.84, P < 0.001, SEE = 4.85).

58 p ratio, although the subscapular-to-triceps skinfold ratio was slightly but significantly (P < 0.001

59 body mass index, and subscapular-to-triceps skinfold ratio).

60 significantly with the subscapular/ triceps skinfold ration in women only.

61 Nevertheless, there are no current skinfold reference data for US children and adolescents.

62 dy fat, sum of two skinfolds, and sum of six skinfolds shared similar growth patterns, with strong di

63 mparable overestimation in girls with a high skinfold sum was 6 percentage points.

64 skin, characterized by recurrent or chronic skinfold suppurative lesions with a high impact on quali

65 age of body fat was determined by the sum of skinfolds technique.

66 s index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) and sum of skinfolds (tests for linear trend: p < 0.001).

67 her BMI (% difference 21%, 95%CI 18 to 24%), skinfold thickness (% difference 34%, 95%CI 26 to 42%),

68 with white Europeans, UK Indians had higher skinfold thickness (% difference 6.0%, 95%CI 1.5 to 10.7

69 -0.25 mm; 95% CI: -0.44, -0.06), subscapular skinfold thickness (-0.20 mm; 95% CI: -0.33, -0.06), and

70 0.04, 1.25) and a reduction in mean triceps skinfold thickness (-0.25 mm; 95% CI: -0.44, -0.06), sub

71 unrelated to BMIz (95% CI, -0.21 to 0.26) or skinfold thickness (95% CI, -0.42 to 1.45) for 89 GG gen

72 al [CI], -0.73 to -0.17]; P = .002), triceps skinfold thickness (intervention vs control change: 14.5

73 difference: 0.06 +/- 9.6%), but not between skinfold thickness (mean difference: 6.33 +/- 12.3%) or

74 weight had greater energy intake (P = 0.02), skinfold thickness (P = 0.0001), and leptin concentratio

75 t (P = 0.0001), weight (P = 0.0001), triceps skinfold thickness (P = 0.001), and arm muscle circumfer

76 ary outcome was infant fat mass estimated by skinfold thickness (SFT) measurements at 4 body sites at

77 mography (ADP) and formulas based on triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) and bioelectrical impedance ana

78 ee mass, midupper arm circumference, triceps skinfold thickness [which allowed for the derivation of

79 dependent variables and increased adiposity (skinfold thickness above the 85th percentile) were explo

80 tion was estimated by using a combination of skinfold thickness and bioelectrical impedance measureme

81 Fat distribution was determined by skinfold thickness and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

82 elated with changes in mass per unit length, skinfold thickness and serum albumin concentration, but

83 ght-for-length, body fat, fat-free mass, and skinfold thickness at 12 mo.

84 Moreover, maternal height, weight, and skinfold thickness at 6 and 9 mo of pregnancy were posit

85 Maternal skinfold thickness at 9 mo of pregnancy and maternal hei

86 rtain degree of independence between BMI and skinfold thickness at the upper extremes of the BMI dist

87 : 0.40 (weight at week 37, kg)+ 0.16 (biceps skinfold thickness at week 37, mm) + 0.15 (thigh skinfol

88 fold thickness at week 37, mm) + 0.15 (thigh skinfold thickness at week 37, mm)-0.09 (wrist circumfer

89 d the highest predictive value of any single skinfold thickness compared with DXA fat.

90 tage of energy from protein and fat, triceps skinfold thickness during pregnancy, and infant birth we

91 Biceps skinfold thickness had the highest predictive value of a

92 Furthermore, midlife triceps skinfold thickness has been found to be positively assoc

93 of low SES but exhibited the lowest BMIz and skinfold thickness in contexts of high SES.

94 uch that they exhibited the highest BMIz and skinfold thickness in contexts of low SES but exhibited

95 waist circumference, weight, and subscapular skinfold thickness in men; in women, these associations

96 -energy X-ray absorptiometry, the Pennington skinfold thickness model, and the Pennington density mod

97 in BMI of 0.14 kg/m2 (SE 0.03) and in sum of skinfold thickness of 0.62 mm (0.17) for black girls, an

98 8 (95% CI, -0.47 to -0.09) and a decrease in skinfold thickness of 0.95 (95% CI, -1.77 to -0.12) mm,

99 was followed up until young adulthood, when skinfold thickness was measured.

100 Triceps skinfold thickness was not related to early infant feedi

101 Maternal triceps skinfold thickness was significantly inversely related t

102 tely active girls, changes in BMI and sum of skinfold thickness were about midway between those for a

103 BMI and sum of skinfold thickness were assessed annually, whereas habit

104 f 5106 students, height, weight, and triceps skinfold thickness were measured at 9 (baseline) and 11

105 mference, waist : hip ratio, and subscapular skinfold thickness were measured or calculated by a stan

106 , the REE before transplantation and triceps skinfold thickness were positively associated and the cu

107 ed cross-sectional MUAC and triceps (triceps skinfold thickness) data from 32,952 US children aged 1-

108 rence, biceps/triceps/subscapular/suprailiac skinfold thickness) were conducted in both cohorts; bioe

109 t or fat (ie, has either a high BMI or large skinfold thickness).

110 irect measurements of fat mass (bioimpedance/skinfold thickness).

111 1.70) higher sum of subscapular and triceps skinfold thickness, and 0.17 kg/m(2) (95% CI: -0.02, 0.3

112 Height, weight, bone age, pubertal status, skinfold thickness, and arm circumference were assessed.

113 easurements included weight, height, triceps skinfold thickness, and arm muscle circumference.

114 ion: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), skinfold thickness, and bioimpedance analysis (BIA).

115 Data on weight, height, age, skinfold thickness, and body impedance were used in publ

116 res for child height, body mass index, total skinfold thickness, and head circumference (beta = 0.24

117 t circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, and percentage total fat (bioimpedan

118 atio (WHR), waist circumference, subscapular skinfold thickness, and ratio of triceps to subscapular

119 st/hip circumference, waist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, and skinfold-derived percentage fat

120 istance was strongly related to BMI, triceps skinfold thickness, and waist circumference, and this re

121 Percentage body fat was estimated from skinfold thickness, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BI

122 with other clinical indexes such as triceps skinfold thickness, body mass index, body weight, and su

123 In forward-regression analysis, subscapular skinfold thickness, body weight, triceps skinfold thickn

124 Subscapular skinfold thickness, but not triceps skinfold thickness,

125 prospective assessment of body composition (skinfold thickness, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), c

126 Values derived from use of BIA and skinfold thickness, estimated by using the Jackson-Pollo

127 ignificantly lower than fat mass measured by skinfold thickness, even though fat mass measurements by

128 al level, high body mass index, high triceps skinfold thickness, increasing level of disability, wint

129 change in weight, kg)+ 0.07 (change in thigh skinfold thickness, mm)-6.13 (r2 = 0.73).

130 lar skinfold thickness, body weight, triceps skinfold thickness, sex, and height2/resistance estimate

131 waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, skinfold-derived percentage fat mass

132 s as an indicator of immunostimulation; (ii) skinfold thickness, to estimate subcutaneous fat stores

133 to assess body composition: measurements of skinfold thickness, total body water by deuterium oxide,

134 score, BMI percentile, body fat percentage, skinfold thickness, waist circumference, or prevalence o

135 ht), midupper arm circumference, and triceps skinfold thickness, was compared among feeding groups.

136 scapular skinfold thickness, but not triceps skinfold thickness, was positively associated with colon

137 ickness, and ratio of triceps to subscapular skinfold thickness, we recruited 48 normotensive African

138 Triceps skinfold thickness, when substituted for the sum of skin

139 the change in relative weight and in triceps skinfold thickness-two indicators of obesity.

140 Similar results were apparent for sum of skinfold thickness.

141 ity status with changes in BMI and in sum of skinfold thickness.

142 oups on the basis of measurements of triceps skinfold thickness.

143 d body mass index z score (BMIz) and triceps skinfold thickness.

144 ody mass index, body weight, and subscapular skinfold thickness.

145 ns of dual-emission x-ray absorptiometry and skinfold thickness.

146 at the same level of waist circumference or skinfold thickness.

147 however, had increased truncal-to-peripheral skinfolds thickness ratios.

148 elation of circumference (waist and hip) and skinfold-thickness (subscapular and triceps) measurement

149 (DXA), bioelectrical impedance analysis, and skinfold-thickness analysis.

150 Fatness determined by using skinfold-thickness and bioelectrical impedance analysis

151 All skinfold-thickness and circumference measures, waist-hip

152 independent methods (bioimpedance, multiple skinfold-thickness assessment of whole-body composition,

153 New equations that are based on skinfold-thickness combinations from African children pr

154 nderestimated by approximately 10% when this skinfold-thickness equation is used.

155 ntage fat mass (%FM) predicted by using each skinfold-thickness equation was compared with the criter

156 One circumference equation and one skinfold-thickness equation yielded the smallest residua

157 on of percentage body fat with the Slaughter skinfold-thickness equations (PBF(Slaughter)) is widely

158 etermine the agreement between 8 widely used skinfold-thickness equations and a 4-compartment criteri

159 Although skinfold-thickness equations are widely used to estimate

160 s to determine the accuracy of the Slaughter skinfold-thickness equations.

161 ty was greatest for DXA, followed by BIA and skinfold-thickness measurement.

162 mately 19% of the subjects were missing >/=1 skinfold-thickness measurement.

163 23.98) to be higher than those derived from skinfold-thickness measurements (mean: 21.05) and BIA (m

164 on in children, we evaluated the accuracy of skinfold-thickness measurements (with the Slaughter et a

165 F was observed for fat-free mass assessed by skinfold-thickness measurements and total body water (P

166 , respectively) and for fat mass assessed by skinfold-thickness measurements and total-body electrica

167 comparison with national reference data and skinfold-thickness measurements were converted to z scor

168 uations, which are based on triceps and calf skinfold-thickness measurements), bioelectrical resistan

169 Skinfold-thickness measurements, circumferences, body co

170 e of the training and errors associated with skinfold-thickness measurements, the advantages of BMI s

171 The skinfold-thickness measurements, waist-to-height ratio,

172 tors for those subjects with greater triceps skinfold-thickness measurements.

173 ing to body fat stores determined by triceps-skinfold-thickness measurements.

174 tly recommended for predicting body fat from skinfold-thickness measures in prepubescent children of

175 he LMS method was used to derive 10 smoothed skinfold-thickness percentile reference curves and to ge

176 on and age, weight, body mass index, triceps-skinfold-thickness percentile, midupper arm circumferenc

177 hanges in body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)), skinfold-thickness ratio (subscapular-to-triceps), waist

178 /y) greater change in subscapular-to-triceps skinfold-thickness ratio and a 0.8 cm/y (95% CI: 0.1, 1.

179 del R2 and SEE were not as strong as for the skinfold-thickness technique.

180 Several widely used skinfold-thickness- or circumference-based equations wer

181 d marginally predicted changes in the sum of skinfold thicknesses (at 6 mo: 14.7 +/- 7.5 mm/unit log

182 ilution (n = 81), densitometry (n = 62), and skinfold thicknesses (n = 85).

183 ropean offspring birth weight, fat mass, and skinfold thicknesses (P < 0.05).

184 up, and we observed significant increases in skinfold thicknesses (P </= 0.022 for all).

185 ether the sum of the triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses (SF sum) is more strongly related t

186 from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), skinfold thicknesses (SFTs), bioelectrical impedance ana

187 asured by the sum of subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses (SS + TR) and risk of obesity (body

188 In the 65 boys with a sum of skinfold thicknesses (subscapular- plus triceps-skinfold

189 t circumference, body mass index, and sum of skinfold thicknesses (triceps, subscapular, and supraili

190 mula included mainly limb circumferences and skinfold thicknesses [model 1: height (in m) and skinfol

191 on between SGA birth and adiposity outcomes (skinfold thicknesses and bioelectrical impedance measure

192 ar disease (CVD) risk factors are related to skinfold thicknesses and body mass index (BMI) among chi

193 indicators of body fatness were the sum of 5 skinfold thicknesses and body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2

194 and other clinical measurements (individual skinfold thicknesses and body mass index) for the assess

195 y composition was determined with the use of skinfold thicknesses and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometr

196 5), indicating that BIA and FFM derived from skinfold thicknesses are better correlated with each oth

197 Weight, length, and 4 skinfold thicknesses as an indicator of adiposity were m

198 The sum of the triceps plus subscapular skinfold thicknesses averaged 28.6+/-7.0 mm in boys and

199 reference curves for triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses by using the same national samples

200 Skinfold thicknesses cannot be used to assess changes in

201 ur results indicate that it is unlikely that skinfold thicknesses could be used to monitor trends in

202 All body circumferences and skinfold thicknesses examined were significantly greater

203 Median skinfold thicknesses for children considered overweight

204 Skinfold thicknesses have long been considered important

205 e-height velocity and weight gain, increased skinfold thicknesses in late pregnancy (28 wk) and early

206 s in levels of BMI, waist circumference, and skinfold thicknesses in men in the United States from 19

207 iac, subscapular, thigh, calf, and abdominal skinfold thicknesses of the subjects were measured with

208 r, those studies all used body mass index or skinfold thicknesses to measure obesity and did not alwa

209 The best combination of skinfold thicknesses to predict body fat in African prep

210 ce imaging [MRI], and truncal and peripheral skinfold thicknesses using calipers).

211 The sum of skinfold thicknesses was greater in females than in male

212 the trunk region, abdominal and subscapular skinfold thicknesses were 30-40% greater in the Hispanic

213 Maternal weight, height, and triceps skinfold thicknesses were determined at 6 and 9 mo of pr

214 for-age in detecting overweight when average skinfold thicknesses were used as the standard, but no d

215 nfold thicknesses (subscapular- plus triceps-skinfold thicknesses) >/= 50 mm, PBF(Slaughter) overesti

216 ometric measures included body mass index, 4 skinfold thicknesses, and 4 body circumferences.

217 easurements of BMI, body circumferences, and skinfold thicknesses, and a random subgroup of 5,568 had

218 r arm circumference, subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses, and change in height-for-age, weig

219 FFM was based on skinfold thicknesses, and estimated with the regression

220 gestational weight gain, and maternal sum-of-skinfold thicknesses, and increased physical activity.

221 anthropometric variables (weight, height, 4 skinfold thicknesses, and waist girth), dual-energy X-ra

222 The best formulas use skinfold thicknesses, bioelectrical impedance, and a 4-c

223 All formulas for estimating body fat from skinfold thicknesses, body density, or impedance perform

224 o, abdominal height, triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses, body mass index, and conicity inde

225 dilution (H(2)18O), bioelectrical impedance, skinfold thicknesses, corporal diameters, and circumfere

226 Skinfold thicknesses, girths, body fat by hydrodensitome

227 ater weighing (densitometry), measurement of skinfold thicknesses, isotope dilution (H(2)(18)O), and

228 d thickness, when substituted for the sum of skinfold thicknesses, performed nearly as well in women

229 Ethnicity, sum of central skinfold thicknesses, ratio of polyunsaturated to satura

230 Waist and thigh girths, rather than skinfold thicknesses, should be considered for use in lo

231 entrations were associated with the sum of 4 skinfold thicknesses, waist and hip circumferences, ethn

232 dy mass index, percentage body fat, sum of 6 skinfold thicknesses, waist circumference, and total, su

233 relation with body mass index and the sum of skinfold thicknesses.

234 is of the average of triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses.

235 the sum of central to the sum of peripheral skinfold thicknesses.

236 ed levels of PBF(DXA) in children with large skinfold thicknesses.

237 the body fatness of children who have thick skinfold thicknesses.

238 ngle examiner measured weights, heights, and skinfold thicknesses.

239 triceps site but similar median subscapular skinfold thicknesses.

240 t circumference, and triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses.

241 and -0.02 mm (-0.79 to 0.75) for subscapular skinfold thicknesses; and -0.02 standard deviations (-0.

242 hether there were similar secular trends for skinfolds (triceps and subscapular), BMI, and waist circ

243 emity strength, and significant decreases in skinfolds, triglyceride, and very-low-density lipoprotei

244 aded by BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, subscapular skinfold, triglycerides, HDL, homeostasis model assessme

245 n vasculature was confirmed using the dorsal skinfold vascular window model.

246 Triceps skinfold was lower only in hepatocellular patients (cont

247 9-2010 was 1 higher, but mean levels of both skinfolds were 5-10% lower.

248 nd waist circumference (7-8%), but trends in skinfolds were markedly different.

249 ring warm regions (eg, flexural surfaces and skinfolds) were identified in 4 patients.

250 Using the dorsal skinfold window chamber system, we have demonstrated for

251 Hamsters implemented with a skinfold window chamber were given an intravenous inject

252 CID mice bearing HCT116 xenografts in dorsal skinfold window chambers (DSWC) were imaged by direct po

253 tal microscopy of tumors grown within dorsal skinfold window chambers.

254 Multipoint analysis of abdominal skinfold with an LOD of 2.68 showed signals in the same

255 ody fat, fat-free mass z scores, and triceps skinfold z scores decreased with therapy.

256 an the control group of reducing the triceps skinfold z-score by at least 0.1 (hazard ratio: 1.40, 95