ライフサイエンスコーパス: skinfold thickness

1 t or fat (ie, has either a high BMI or large skinfold thickness).

2 irect measurements of fat mass (bioimpedance/skinfold thickness).

3 d body mass index z score (BMIz) and triceps skinfold thickness.

4 oups on the basis of measurements of triceps skinfold thickness.

5 ody mass index, body weight, and subscapular skinfold thickness.

6 ns of dual-emission x-ray absorptiometry and skinfold thickness.

7 at the same level of waist circumference or skinfold thickness.

8 Similar results were apparent for sum of skinfold thickness.

9 ity status with changes in BMI and in sum of skinfold thickness.

10 the sum of central to the sum of peripheral skinfold thicknesses.

11 ed levels of PBF(DXA) in children with large skinfold thicknesses.

12 the body fatness of children who have thick skinfold thicknesses.

13 ngle examiner measured weights, heights, and skinfold thicknesses.

14 triceps site but similar median subscapular skinfold thicknesses.

15 t circumference, and triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses.

16 relation with body mass index and the sum of skinfold thicknesses.

17 is of the average of triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses.

18 -0.25 mm; 95% CI: -0.44, -0.06), subscapular skinfold thickness (-0.20 mm; 95% CI: -0.33, -0.06), and

19 0.04, 1.25) and a reduction in mean triceps skinfold thickness (-0.25 mm; 95% CI: -0.44, -0.06), sub

20 unrelated to BMIz (95% CI, -0.21 to 0.26) or skinfold thickness (95% CI, -0.42 to 1.45) for 89 GG gen

21 dependent variables and increased adiposity (skinfold thickness above the 85th percentile) were explo

22 (DXA), bioelectrical impedance analysis, and skinfold-thickness analysis.

23 tion was estimated by using a combination of skinfold thickness and bioelectrical impedance measureme

24 Fat distribution was determined by skinfold thickness and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

25 elated with changes in mass per unit length, skinfold thickness and serum albumin concentration, but

26 on between SGA birth and adiposity outcomes (skinfold thicknesses and bioelectrical impedance measure

27 ar disease (CVD) risk factors are related to skinfold thicknesses and body mass index (BMI) among chi

28 indicators of body fatness were the sum of 5 skinfold thicknesses and body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2

29 and other clinical measurements (individual skinfold thicknesses and body mass index) for the assess

30 y composition was determined with the use of skinfold thicknesses and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometr

31 Fatness determined by using skinfold-thickness and bioelectrical impedance analysis

32 All skinfold-thickness and circumference measures, waist-hip

33 1.70) higher sum of subscapular and triceps skinfold thickness, and 0.17 kg/m(2) (95% CI: -0.02, 0.3

34 Height, weight, bone age, pubertal status, skinfold thickness, and arm circumference were assessed.

35 easurements included weight, height, triceps skinfold thickness, and arm muscle circumference.

36 ion: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), skinfold thickness, and bioimpedance analysis (BIA).

37 Data on weight, height, age, skinfold thickness, and body impedance were used in publ

38 res for child height, body mass index, total skinfold thickness, and head circumference (beta = 0.24

39 t circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, and percentage total fat (bioimpedan

40 atio (WHR), waist circumference, subscapular skinfold thickness, and ratio of triceps to subscapular

41 st/hip circumference, waist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, and skinfold-derived percentage fat

42 istance was strongly related to BMI, triceps skinfold thickness, and waist circumference, and this re

43 ometric measures included body mass index, 4 skinfold thicknesses, and 4 body circumferences.

44 easurements of BMI, body circumferences, and skinfold thicknesses, and a random subgroup of 5,568 had

45 r arm circumference, subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses, and change in height-for-age, weig

46 FFM was based on skinfold thicknesses, and estimated with the regression

47 gestational weight gain, and maternal sum-of-skinfold thicknesses, and increased physical activity.

48 anthropometric variables (weight, height, 4 skinfold thicknesses, and waist girth), dual-energy X-ra

49 and -0.02 mm (-0.79 to 0.75) for subscapular skinfold thicknesses; and -0.02 standard deviations (-0.

50 5), indicating that BIA and FFM derived from skinfold thicknesses are better correlated with each oth

51 Weight, length, and 4 skinfold thicknesses as an indicator of adiposity were m

52 independent methods (bioimpedance, multiple skinfold-thickness assessment of whole-body composition,

53 ght-for-length, body fat, fat-free mass, and skinfold thickness at 12 mo.

54 Moreover, maternal height, weight, and skinfold thickness at 6 and 9 mo of pregnancy were posit

55 Maternal skinfold thickness at 9 mo of pregnancy and maternal hei

56 rtain degree of independence between BMI and skinfold thickness at the upper extremes of the BMI dist

57 : 0.40 (weight at week 37, kg)+ 0.16 (biceps skinfold thickness at week 37, mm) + 0.15 (thigh skinfol

58 fold thickness at week 37, mm) + 0.15 (thigh skinfold thickness at week 37, mm)-0.09 (wrist circumfer

59 d marginally predicted changes in the sum of skinfold thicknesses (at 6 mo: 14.7 +/- 7.5 mm/unit log

60 The sum of the triceps plus subscapular skinfold thicknesses averaged 28.6+/-7.0 mm in boys and

61 Percentage body fat was estimated from skinfold thickness, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BI

62 The best formulas use skinfold thicknesses, bioelectrical impedance, and a 4-c

63 with other clinical indexes such as triceps skinfold thickness, body mass index, body weight, and su

64 In forward-regression analysis, subscapular skinfold thickness, body weight, triceps skinfold thickn

65 All formulas for estimating body fat from skinfold thicknesses, body density, or impedance perform

66 o, abdominal height, triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses, body mass index, and conicity inde

67 Subscapular skinfold thickness, but not triceps skinfold thickness,

68 reference curves for triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses by using the same national samples

69 Skinfold thicknesses cannot be used to assess changes in

70 New equations that are based on skinfold-thickness combinations from African children pr

71 d the highest predictive value of any single skinfold thickness compared with DXA fat.

72 dilution (H(2)18O), bioelectrical impedance, skinfold thicknesses, corporal diameters, and circumfere

73 ur results indicate that it is unlikely that skinfold thicknesses could be used to monitor trends in

74 ed cross-sectional MUAC and triceps (triceps skinfold thickness) data from 32,952 US children aged 1-

75 her BMI (% difference 21%, 95%CI 18 to 24%), skinfold thickness (% difference 34%, 95%CI 26 to 42%),

76 with white Europeans, UK Indians had higher skinfold thickness (% difference 6.0%, 95%CI 1.5 to 10.7

77 prospective assessment of body composition (skinfold thickness, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), c

78 tage of energy from protein and fat, triceps skinfold thickness during pregnancy, and infant birth we

79 nderestimated by approximately 10% when this skinfold-thickness equation is used.

80 ntage fat mass (%FM) predicted by using each skinfold-thickness equation was compared with the criter

81 One circumference equation and one skinfold-thickness equation yielded the smallest residua

82 on of percentage body fat with the Slaughter skinfold-thickness equations (PBF(Slaughter)) is widely

83 etermine the agreement between 8 widely used skinfold-thickness equations and a 4-compartment criteri

84 Although skinfold-thickness equations are widely used to estimate

85 s to determine the accuracy of the Slaughter skinfold-thickness equations.

86 Values derived from use of BIA and skinfold thickness, estimated by using the Jackson-Pollo

87 ignificantly lower than fat mass measured by skinfold thickness, even though fat mass measurements by

88 All body circumferences and skinfold thicknesses examined were significantly greater

89 Median skinfold thicknesses for children considered overweight

90 Skinfold thicknesses, girths, body fat by hydrodensitome

91 nfold thicknesses (subscapular- plus triceps-skinfold thicknesses) >/= 50 mm, PBF(Slaughter) overesti

92 Biceps skinfold thickness had the highest predictive value of a

93 Furthermore, midlife triceps skinfold thickness has been found to be positively assoc

94 Skinfold thicknesses have long been considered important

95 of low SES but exhibited the lowest BMIz and skinfold thickness in contexts of high SES.

96 uch that they exhibited the highest BMIz and skinfold thickness in contexts of low SES but exhibited

97 waist circumference, weight, and subscapular skinfold thickness in men; in women, these associations

98 e-height velocity and weight gain, increased skinfold thicknesses in late pregnancy (28 wk) and early

99 s in levels of BMI, waist circumference, and skinfold thicknesses in men in the United States from 19

100 al level, high body mass index, high triceps skinfold thickness, increasing level of disability, wint

101 al [CI], -0.73 to -0.17]; P = .002), triceps skinfold thickness (intervention vs control change: 14.5

102 ater weighing (densitometry), measurement of skinfold thicknesses, isotope dilution (H(2)(18)O), and

103 difference: 0.06 +/- 9.6%), but not between skinfold thickness (mean difference: 6.33 +/- 12.3%) or

104 ty was greatest for DXA, followed by BIA and skinfold-thickness measurement.

105 mately 19% of the subjects were missing >/=1 skinfold-thickness measurement.

106 23.98) to be higher than those derived from skinfold-thickness measurements (mean: 21.05) and BIA (m

107 on in children, we evaluated the accuracy of skinfold-thickness measurements (with the Slaughter et a

108 F was observed for fat-free mass assessed by skinfold-thickness measurements and total body water (P

109 , respectively) and for fat mass assessed by skinfold-thickness measurements and total-body electrica

110 comparison with national reference data and skinfold-thickness measurements were converted to z scor

111 uations, which are based on triceps and calf skinfold-thickness measurements), bioelectrical resistan

112 Skinfold-thickness measurements, circumferences, body co

113 e of the training and errors associated with skinfold-thickness measurements, the advantages of BMI s

114 The skinfold-thickness measurements, waist-to-height ratio,

115 tors for those subjects with greater triceps skinfold-thickness measurements.

116 ing to body fat stores determined by triceps-skinfold-thickness measurements.

117 tly recommended for predicting body fat from skinfold-thickness measures in prepubescent children of

118 change in weight, kg)+ 0.07 (change in thigh skinfold thickness, mm)-6.13 (r2 = 0.73).

119 -energy X-ray absorptiometry, the Pennington skinfold thickness model, and the Pennington density mod

120 mula included mainly limb circumferences and skinfold thicknesses [model 1: height (in m) and skinfol

121 ilution (n = 81), densitometry (n = 62), and skinfold thicknesses (n = 85).

122 in BMI of 0.14 kg/m2 (SE 0.03) and in sum of skinfold thickness of 0.62 mm (0.17) for black girls, an

123 8 (95% CI, -0.47 to -0.09) and a decrease in skinfold thickness of 0.95 (95% CI, -1.77 to -0.12) mm,

124 iac, subscapular, thigh, calf, and abdominal skinfold thicknesses of the subjects were measured with

125 Several widely used skinfold-thickness- or circumference-based equations wer

126 weight had greater energy intake (P = 0.02), skinfold thickness (P = 0.0001), and leptin concentratio

127 t (P = 0.0001), weight (P = 0.0001), triceps skinfold thickness (P = 0.001), and arm muscle circumfer

128 ropean offspring birth weight, fat mass, and skinfold thicknesses (P < 0.05).

129 up, and we observed significant increases in skinfold thicknesses (P </= 0.022 for all).

130 he LMS method was used to derive 10 smoothed skinfold-thickness percentile reference curves and to ge

131 on and age, weight, body mass index, triceps-skinfold-thickness percentile, midupper arm circumferenc

132 d thickness, when substituted for the sum of skinfold thicknesses, performed nearly as well in women

133 hanges in body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)), skinfold-thickness ratio (subscapular-to-triceps), waist

134 /y) greater change in subscapular-to-triceps skinfold-thickness ratio and a 0.8 cm/y (95% CI: 0.1, 1.

135 Ethnicity, sum of central skinfold thicknesses, ratio of polyunsaturated to satura

136 however, had increased truncal-to-peripheral skinfolds thickness ratios.

137 lar skinfold thickness, body weight, triceps skinfold thickness, sex, and height2/resistance estimate

138 ether the sum of the triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses (SF sum) is more strongly related t

139 ary outcome was infant fat mass estimated by skinfold thickness (SFT) measurements at 4 body sites at

140 from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), skinfold thicknesses (SFTs), bioelectrical impedance ana

141 Waist and thigh girths, rather than skinfold thicknesses, should be considered for use in lo

142 waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, skinfold-derived percentage fat mass

143 asured by the sum of subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses (SS + TR) and risk of obesity (body

144 In the 65 boys with a sum of skinfold thicknesses (subscapular- plus triceps-skinfold

145 elation of circumference (waist and hip) and skinfold-thickness (subscapular and triceps) measurement

146 del R2 and SEE were not as strong as for the skinfold-thickness technique.

147 r, those studies all used body mass index or skinfold thicknesses to measure obesity and did not alwa

148 The best combination of skinfold thicknesses to predict body fat in African prep

149 s as an indicator of immunostimulation; (ii) skinfold thickness, to estimate subcutaneous fat stores

150 to assess body composition: measurements of skinfold thickness, total body water by deuterium oxide,

151 t circumference, body mass index, and sum of skinfold thicknesses (triceps, subscapular, and supraili

152 mography (ADP) and formulas based on triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) and bioelectrical impedance ana

153 the change in relative weight and in triceps skinfold thickness-two indicators of obesity.

154 ce imaging [MRI], and truncal and peripheral skinfold thicknesses using calipers).

155 score, BMI percentile, body fat percentage, skinfold thickness, waist circumference, or prevalence o

156 entrations were associated with the sum of 4 skinfold thicknesses, waist and hip circumferences, ethn

157 dy mass index, percentage body fat, sum of 6 skinfold thicknesses, waist circumference, and total, su

158 was followed up until young adulthood, when skinfold thickness was measured.

159 Triceps skinfold thickness was not related to early infant feedi

160 Maternal triceps skinfold thickness was significantly inversely related t

161 The sum of skinfold thicknesses was greater in females than in male

162 ht), midupper arm circumference, and triceps skinfold thickness, was compared among feeding groups.

163 scapular skinfold thickness, but not triceps skinfold thickness, was positively associated with colon

164 ickness, and ratio of triceps to subscapular skinfold thickness, we recruited 48 normotensive African

165 tely active girls, changes in BMI and sum of skinfold thickness were about midway between those for a

166 BMI and sum of skinfold thickness were assessed annually, whereas habit

167 f 5106 students, height, weight, and triceps skinfold thickness were measured at 9 (baseline) and 11

168 mference, waist : hip ratio, and subscapular skinfold thickness were measured or calculated by a stan

169 , the REE before transplantation and triceps skinfold thickness were positively associated and the cu

170 the trunk region, abdominal and subscapular skinfold thicknesses were 30-40% greater in the Hispanic

171 Maternal weight, height, and triceps skinfold thicknesses were determined at 6 and 9 mo of pr

172 for-age in detecting overweight when average skinfold thicknesses were used as the standard, but no d

173 rence, biceps/triceps/subscapular/suprailiac skinfold thickness) were conducted in both cohorts; bioe

174 Triceps skinfold thickness, when substituted for the sum of skin

175 ee mass, midupper arm circumference, triceps skinfold thickness [which allowed for the derivation of