ライフサイエンスコーパス: slit lamp biomicroscopy

1 rabbit corneas (3 +/- 0.4) quantified using slit lamp biomicroscopy.

2 ty of haze in the rabbit eye was graded with slit lamp biomicroscopy.

3 dividuals in a large family were examined by slit lamp biomicroscopy.

4 All grafts were evaluated clinically by slit lamp biomicroscopy.

5 Graft survival was evaluated by slit lamp biomicroscopy.

6 r UVB exposure and for as long as 10 days by slit lamp biomicroscopy.

7 , 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after treatment by slit-lamp biomicroscopy.

8 underwent anterior segment examination with slit-lamp biomicroscopy.

9 CA was assessed by ophthalmologists using slit-lamp biomicroscopy.

10 Eyes were examined weekly by slit-lamp biomicroscopy.

11 kly for cataract development by conventional slit-lamp biomicroscopy.

12 Progression of cataracts was monitored by slit-lamp biomicroscopy.

13 e posterior hyaloid membrane observed during slit-lamp biomicroscopy after posterior vitreous detachm

14 rosis were determined with stereomicroscopy, slit lamp biomicroscopy, alpha-smooth muscle actin (alph

15 Slit lamp biomicroscopy and corneal pachymetry were perf

16 t II), epithelial closure was monitored with slit lamp biomicroscopy and fluorescein staining, and co

17 ular pressure, best corrected visual acuity, slit lamp biomicroscopy and medical history were obtaine

18 with cataractous stages visually observed by slit lamp biomicroscopy and retroillumination photograph

19 Corneal grafts were evaluated by ophthalmic slit-lamp biomicroscopy and analyzed by Kaplan-Meier sur

20 24, 48, and 72 hours and were re-examined by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and by indirect ophthalmoscopy.

21 ic nerve damage was assessed by stereoscopic slit-lamp biomicroscopy and fundus photography and by co

22 is study, the AC cell response, evaluated by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and graded using a standard grad

23 , 24, 48, and 72 hours after injection using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and laser flare photometry.

24 , both eyes of each patient were examined by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and white-light IVCM (Confoscan

25 At 24 and 72 hours, slit-lamp biomicroscopy (and additionally indirect ophth

26 f treatment, cumulative dose, Orlando stage (slit-lamp biomicroscopy), and serum concentrations of am

27 nockout mice were screened for cataract with slit lamp biomicroscopy, and dissected lenses were exami

28 In vivo lens changes were monitored by slit lamp biomicroscopy, and enucleated lenses were exam

29 raocular defects by indirect ophthalmoscopy, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and ERG to discover new spontan

30 pressure measurement, ultrasound pachymetry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and laser scanning in vivo conf

31 cted visual acuity recorded in LogMAR units, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and optical coherence tomograph

32 After maximal mydriasis, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and photography, imaging of the

33 ents had their ocular surface evaluated with slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and tear production quantified

34 of optic disk hemorrhage was evaluated with slit lamp biomicroscopy at each clinic visit prior to an

35 All the eyes in the study were examined by slit-lamp biomicroscopy at baseline and 6, 9, 24, 48, an

36 All eyes were examined by slit-lamp biomicroscopy at baseline, 3, 6, 9, 24, 48, an

37 Best-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, wid

38 Slit lamp biomicroscopy disclosed the clinical features

39 ssed at various times following injection by slit lamp biomicroscopy, electroretinography (ERG), bact

40 (HBL-) was assessed bacteriologically and by slit lamp biomicroscopy, electroretinography, histology,

41 ssure was normal in all of the study groups; slit lamp biomicroscopy examinations revealed that no ce

42 Demographic and clinical characteristics, slit-lamp biomicroscopy findings, and dilated ophthalmos

43 er flare photometry were consistent with the slit-lamp biomicroscopy flare findings up to grade 3+.

44 e were compared with untreated animals using slit-lamp biomicroscopy, flow cytometry, and ELISA.

45 All eyes were evaluated by slit-lamp biomicroscopy for inflammatory response at 3,

46 ncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, Goldmann applanation tonometry,

47 History and ocular examination, including slit-lamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, specular microscopy

48 e posterior hyaloid membrane observed during slit-lamp biomicroscopy in patients with posterior vitre

49 Visual outcomes, slit lamp biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure (IOP), and

50 assessment of best-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure measuremen

51 stionnaire; ophthalmic examination including slit-lamp biomicroscopy, noncontact tonometry, fundus ph

52 Different approaches, including slit-lamp biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopic examination, ul

53 y by a masked grader, applanation tonometry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, optic nerve evaluation, and A-s

54 fts were evaluated for signs of rejection by slit lamp biomicroscopy over 8 weeks.

55 Slit-lamp biomicroscopy showed refractile, polychromatic

56 Comparison was made between slit lamp biomicroscopy (SLB) and photographic grading.

57 al ocular findings, including visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, spectral-domain optical coheren

58 All corneas were examined by using slit-lamp biomicroscopy to determine the severity of FEC

59 A uveitis specialist used slit-lamp biomicroscopy to grade the AC cells on a scale

60 All corneas were examined using slit-lamp biomicroscopy, ultrasonic pachymetry, and conf

61 es used for imaging the anterior segment are slit-lamp biomicroscopy, ultrasound biomicroscopy, schei

62 Slit lamp biomicroscopy was performed throughout the per

63 arts), Orbscan, retinoscopy, refraction, and slit-lamp biomicroscopy were performed.

64 Eyes were examined by slit lamp biomicroscopy with fluorescein solution to ass