ライフサイエンスコーパス: slit lamp examination

1 mouse mutations by phenotypic screening with slit lamp examination.

2 Eyes were evaluated by slit lamp examination.

3 edge was noted in postoperative visits under slit-lamp examination.

4 acuity and refraction tests, funduscopy, and slit-lamp examination.

5 cataract was classified into seven stages by slit-lamp examination.

6 njunctival impression cytology, 44% and 48%; slit-lamp examination, 20% and 66%; tear film break-up t

7 Mean clinical scores, slit lamp examination, adenosine diphosphatase (ADPase),

8 Corneal virulence was evaluated by slit lamp examination and bacterial cultures in both a r

9 Ocular pathology was evaluated by slit lamp examination and myeloperoxidase activity of in

10 orrelated well with clinical grading both at slit lamp examination and when looking at the images the

11 Cataract was diagnosed using a slit-lamp examination and defined as any lens opacity in

12 Cataracts were assessed on slit-lamp examination and were graded according to the L

13 ms of clinical signs (slit lamp examination, slit lamp examination), and viable bacteria.

14 Development of keratitis was assessed by slit lamp examination, and inflammatory cells in the cor

15 was evaluated by indirect ophthalmoscopy and slit lamp examination, and retinal changes were evaluate

16 eal features of FECD and cataract density at slit-lamp examination, and corneal backscatter using in

17 -corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessments, slit-lamp examinations, and stereoscopic fundus photogra

18 CVA) visual acuity in 4 m, 80 cm, and 40 cm; slit-lamp examination; and tomography.

19 animals, cataract formation was followed by slit lamp examination at regular intervals.

20 Slit-lamp examinations at 3 days and 1, 2, and 4 weeks a

21 each visit, graft survival was determined by slit-lamp examination; best spectacle-corrected visual a

22 rehensive eye examination, including dilated slit lamp examination by an ophthalmologist and digital

23 treated with spantide, and after infection, slit lamp examination; clinical score; bacterial counts;

24 cuity (DCVA) in 4 m, 80 cm, 60 cm, and 40 cm slit-lamp examination; defocus testing; contrast sensiti

25 Slit lamp examination, dilated fundus examination, and e

26 es given before presentation, visual acuity, slit-lamp examination findings, corneal sensation, dose

27 ch visit includes (1) Clinical evaluation: a slit lamp examination, fundoscopy, intraocular pressure

28 CASE PRESENTATION: We evaluated slit lamp examination, fundoscopy, optical coherence tom

29 ced by UMCR1 were documented by photographs, slit lamp examination, histopathologic analysis, and qua

30 erity of stromal keratitis were monitored by slit lamp examination in a masked fashion.

31 ed demonstrate that IVCM is complementary to slit-lamp examination in the follow-up of HSK, particula

32 oplegic retinoscopy, A-scan ultrasonography, slit lamp examination, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and kera

33 y was assessed over this same time period by slit lamp examination, indirect ophthalmoscopy, electror

34 rected visual acuity, applanation tonometry, slit-lamp examination, indirect ophthalmoscopy, digital

35 s included measurement of best-corrected VA, slit-lamp, examination, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and ult

36 e comparatively analyzed at multiple ages by slit lamp examination, intraocular pressure recording, a

37 nations, including visual acuity, perimetry, slit-lamp examination, intraocular pressure, and fundus

38 backscatter measurement by combined IVCM and slit-lamp examination may improve the outcome of HSK.

39 Glaucoma diagnosis based on slit-lamp examination, measurement of intraocular pressu

40 al discomfort, despite minor lens opacity on slit-lamp examination, minor loss of best-corrected visu

41 al function and potential acuity, and to the slit lamp examination of the lens, posterior capsule, an

42 Slit-lamp examination of 10 affected individuals was con

43 Age, visual acuity (VA), slit-lamp examination of anterior vitreous (SLAV), and c

44 Ocular viral cultures were obtained after slit-lamp examination on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 14.

45 keratitis was graded in a masked fashion by slit-lamp examination on days 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 14.

46 Lesions were evaluated by slit lamp examinations over a 2-week period after infect

47 ity, refractive error, intraocular pressure, slit lamp examination, pachymetry measurements and endot

48 Slit-lamp examinations performed in childhood or adultho

49 punctum diameter (not readily measurable by slit-lamp examination), rather than the surface diameter

50 showed no obvious loss of lens clarity, but slit lamp examination revealed the emergence of opacific

51 Slit lamp examination revealed the presence of bilateral

52 Slit-lamp examination revealed progressive pathology, an

53 In the rabbit model, ocular damage (slit lamp examination score) mediated by the parent stra

54 tivity, mediated infections characterized by slit lamp examination scores significantly lower than th

55 Slit lamp examination showed that control mice, C3(-/-)

56 Slit lamp examination showed that, from an early age, ne

57 Slit-lamp examination showed chemosis, ciliary injection

58 Slit-lamp examination showed that Lyst mutant mice unifo

59 s, and pathologic changes were determined by slit lamp examination (SLE) and histopathologic analysis

60 Slit lamp examination (SLE) and histopathology were perf

61 Pathologic changes were monitored by slit lamp examination (SLE) and histopathology.

62 Slit lamp examination (SLE) and measurement of erosions

63 Mice underwent slit lamp examination (SLE) at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 days af

64 Eyes were graded for disease by slit lamp examination (SLE) every 6 hours until 24 hours

65 Slit lamp examination (SLE) of rabbit eyes was performed

66 Eyes were scored by slit lamp examination (SLE), and bacterial colony-formin

67 ated in rabbit and mouse keratitis models by slit lamp examination (SLE), bacterial enumeration, and/

68 Slit lamp examination (SLE), electroretinography, and my

69 e recovered from the corneas after the final slit lamp examination (SLE).

70 evaluate the severity of herpetic keratitis, slit lamp examinations (SLE) were performed every other

71 were determined and pathology was scored by slit-lamp examination (SLE).

72 Slit lamp examinations (SLEs) were performed at 24, 36,

73 rastromal models in terms of clinical signs (slit lamp examination, slit lamp examination), and viabl

74 changes in corneal opacity were detected by slit-lamp examination, the corneas of homozygous mutant

75 rameters were indiscernible or overlooked at slit-lamp examination, they proved to be excellent indic

76 Patients were followed up clinically using slit-lamp examination to determine evidence of tumor dis

77 he D-Eye device, followed by dilated retinal slit-lamp examination, to grade DR according to a 5-step

78 icles in the inferior AC that were missed by slit-lamp examination were detected by OCT.

79 Standardized slit-lamp examinations were performed by trained study o

80 Changes in ocular disease, determined by slit-lamp examination, were measured at 3, 16, 22, and 2

81 to oval epithelial lesions in the cornea in slit-lamp examination with mild to moderate conjunctival