ライフサイエンスコーパス: social activity

1 in synaptic function in regions involved in social activity.

2 gth of the association depend on the type of social activity.

3 urons reversed social avoidance and restored social activity.

4 s was correlated with the preferred level of social activity.

5 l research that investigates this ubiquitous social activity.

6 of communication and cooperation to perform social activities.

7 provide a mechanism for the coordination of social activities.

8 demarcate areas and times for key ritual and social activities.

9 ey did not report significant limitations in social activities.

10 ction, including participation in school and social activities.

11 ctors of reduced participation in school and social activities.

12 ious services, group membership, and regular social activities.

13 68% (108/160) reported extremely restricted social activities.

14 llular signals to communicate and coordinate social activities, a process referred to as quorum sensi

15 Risk of anaphylaxis and implications for social activities affect patients' quality of life and p

16 Family support significantly increased social activities and improved quality of life for carer

17 ear less likely to be involved in structured social activities and routine volunteer work than non-AL

18 ikely than ALDs to be involved in structured social activities and routine volunteer work.

19 Bacteria exhibit many social activities and they represent a model for dissect

20 our ability to understand, model and predict social activities and to plan the development of infrast

21 ed questionnaires detailing their sexual and social activities and underwent serological testing for

22 uring participation in areas of life such as social activities and work.

23 tunities that physical activity provided for social activity and enjoyment.

24 Our results indicate that impairments in social activity and functioning in school or work are fa

25 We find that the individuals' social activity and their strategy in choosing ties wher

26 sfaction with participation in discretionary social activities), and the Florida Patient Acceptance S

27 patients' quality of life and impairs work, social activities, and family life.

28 ity, physical inactivity, poor memory, fewer social activities, and higher depression scores, but not

29 at often cause embarrassment, curtailment of social activities, and reduction in quality of life.

30 ning in the domains of family relationships, social activities, and sexual activity.

31 arm and breast symptoms, restricted work and social activity, and impaired QOL (P < or = .002 all ite

32 t had no effect on patients' daily activity, social activity, anxiety, depression, and number of fall

33 key media for our scientific, economic, and social activities by enabling people to access informati

34 unicate pain to others, and participation in social activities can influence osteoarthritis pain and

35 e home and resulted in more participation in social activities compared with placebo plus MTX.

36 An OT group, a social activity control group, and a nontreatment contro

37 ter controlling for cognitive, physical, and social activities, depressive symptoms, or number of chr

38 For social activity, differences between cases and controls

39 ong those with schizophrenia, impairments in social activity (effect size [d], 0.55) and functioning

40 ify a generalized version of Gibrat's law of social activity expressed as a scaling law between the f

41 small impairments compared with controls in social activity (F = 28.25, P < .001) and functioning in

42 sibling's time of illness onset (time trend: social activity: F = 5.463, P = .02; independent behavio

43 alls, daily activity (Barthel index scores), social activity (Frenchay activities index), hospital an

44 ections and a high level of participation in social activities, has been thought to prevent cognitive

45 onality, insomnia, cognitive stimulation and social activities, head injury, diet, and reproductive a

46 puter use (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.85), and social activities (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.94) were ass

47 y withdrawn children frequently refrain from social activities in the presence of peers.

48 f 3 key components of community functioning--social activity, independent behavior, and functioning i

49 online behaviors that indicate face-to-face social activity (like posting photos) are associated wit

50 e results suggest that the monitoring of the social activities of others is disrupted early in the de

51 The principal social activity of Myxococcus xanthus is to organize a d

52 cantly related to decreased participation in social activities on a day-to-day basis.

53 ; 95% CI, 1.37-4.38), as well as leisure and social activities (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.87-5.77).

54 lower exposure to disease, and physical and social activity patterns.

55 between five lifestyle factors-cognitive and social activity, physical activity, diet, alcohol consum

56 resence of chronic conditions, cognitive and social activity, physical activity, healthy diet, and li

57 bling) correlations were relatively high for social activity (r = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.39-0.41) and functi

58 ld social ties, and the bursty nature of the social activity setting the pace of these choices.

59 In each behavioral domain (ie, mood, energy, social activity, sleep, appetite, and weight), a signifi

60 xts (home, school/university, work, visiting/social activities, special occasions/parties, and vacati

61 as not affected by the surgery in 83%, while social activities, sports, traveling, and sexual life al

62 higher level of switching between different social activities than expected in a uncorrelated patter

63 xtended the day, creating effective time for social activities that did not conflict with productive

64 uent countries organisations tend to promote social activities twice more often.

65 or work, productivity was reduced by 26% and social activities were reduced by 31% during active flar

66 paired at 24 hours, this and return to usual social activities were similar in both groups.