ライフサイエンスコーパス: social dominance

1 rone promotes behaviours intended to enhance social dominance.

2 perceptions of attractiveness, strength, and social dominance.

3 rting success, signalling and enhancing male social dominance.

4 ted the format of infants' representation of social dominance.

5 and 2 targeted expectations of stability of social dominance.

6 cks, and migration, and at varying levels of social dominance.

7 and cooperation in predicting 2 measures of social dominance.

8 ntrolled, wins alone predicted teacher-rated social dominance.

9 rative behaviors and their associations with social dominance.

10 ey were thus lower ranking on all indices of social dominance.

11 screening reveals deficits in olfaction and social dominance.

12 cial patterns strongly predict body size and social dominance.

13 t's rank in object dominance and its rank in social dominance.

14 s higher in sex-changing females that attain social dominance and display dominant male behavior than

15 e establishment of relationships of coercive social dominance and exploitation.

16 GH axis and central DA neurotransmission in social dominance and fitness is clearly appreciated, the

17 niature GPS tracking to study, respectively, social dominance and in-flight leader-follower relations

18 st that preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance and use a cue that covaries with it phy

19 tream signals that are critical for fitness, social dominance, and competition between adult males.

20 lity originates from their representation of social dominance as a relationship between two agents ra

21 by studying human infants' understanding of social dominance as a stable relation.

22 nd synaptic defects in prefrontal cortex and social dominance behavior.

23 lin in the medial prefrontal cortex reverses social dominance deficits in Grn+/- mice, an animal mode

24 uronal progranulin-deficient lines developed social dominance deficits similar to those in global Grn

25 ed to object dominance (food competition) or social dominance (freedom of movement in social encounte

26 Female social dominance (FSD) over males is unusual in mammals,

27 etration and victimization, we highlight the social dominance function of bullying, the inflated self

28 f humans, bonobos, and chimpanzees, lived in social dominance hierarchies that created conflict throu

29 e nonhuman primate, the authors examined the social dominance hierarchy of juvenile macaque monkeys (

30 show that trait anxiety directly influences social dominance in male outbred rats and identify an im

31 Despite widespread interest in social dominance, little is known of its neural correlat

32 ts a model of the evolution of interspecific social dominance mimicry (ISDM), that does not rely on t

33 as female perinea and faces, as well as the social dominance of those faces.

34 Individual differences in social dominance orientation (SDO) interact with the soc

35 suggest that Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation, indicators of support for

36 This social dominance paradigm may mimic human relational str

37 Subjects were exposed to a widely used social dominance paradigm that elicits behavioral and ph

38 Here, we present a "social dominance paradox": using self-report scales and

39 Social dominance, personality ratings, and frequency, du

40 one of the operated groups showed changes in social dominance postsurgery, although changes in other

41 hat behaviors, such as those associated with social dominance, produce fitness effects that are subje

42 Infants' demonstrated understanding of social dominance reflects the cognitive underpinning of

43 s demonstrate that infants' understanding of social dominance relations may be based on evolutionaril

44 s 6-9 mo of age are capable of understanding social dominance relations.

45 uctive and health benefits, but the costs of social dominance remain a topic of debate.

46 ation of this expression engenders increased social dominance specifically among other aspects of soc

47 we investigate how body mass interacts with social (dominance status and number of helpers) and envi

48 xic amygdala lesions displayed lower rank in social dominance status, reduced aggressive gestures, an

49 adolescent monkeys did not alter presurgical social dominance status.

50 imal distinctiveness, uncertainty reduction, social dominance, terror management); (c) key moderators

51 age sleeping, and subordinate responses in a social dominance test.