ライフサイエンスコーパス: social integration

1 re of the local VMW-system (95%) due to poor social integration.

2 cidence of suicide decreased with increasing social integration.

3 ess in relation to individual differences in social integration.

4 (AHR, 0.52 [CI, 0.30 to 0.91]) categories of social integration.

5 cidence of suicide decreased with increasing social integration.

6 h both of these latter components reflecting social integration.

7 longlasting adverse outcomes for health and social integration.

8 ive support, confidants, friend support, and social integration.

9 r depression (-0.7, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.2) and social integration (0.8, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2).

10 her consolatory tendencies predicting better social integration, a sign of social competence.

11 mong participants in the highest category of social integration (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.23 [95% CI,

12 , 0.09-0.58]) and second-highest category of social integration (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.26 [95% CI,

13 he authors investigated associations between social integration and all-cause and cause-specific mort

14 rehabilitation, interventions that optimize social integration and decrease depressive symptoms, tec

15 The inverse associations between social integration and nonfatal myocardial infarction ri

16 y sought to examine the associations between social integration and risk of incident CHD in a large f

17 ation (Health Education Impact Questionnaire social integration and support subscale), pain-related s

18 contrast, provides safety, opportunities for social integration, and the ability to predict and/or co

19 e found sustained benefits on depression and social integration at 6 and 12 mo, but there was no effe

20 that lower mortality risk was found for all social integration categories above the lowest level (HR

21 to 0.52, P's < 0.01) and each of the higher social integration categories were in turn equivalent.

22 mortality for men in the lower two levels of social integration compared with more socially integrate

23 There was evidence that social integration, depressive symptoms, and alcohol con

24 , 49%, and 18% of participants reported poor social integration, economic problems, worrying about fa

25 -dominant animals appears to offer routes to social integration following maternal loss, but lack of

26 Our findings demonstrate that social integration has a direct influence on thermoregul

27 ly significant only for the highest level of social integration (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66, 95% confid

28 nce (Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire), social integration (Health Education Impact Questionnair

29 on and suicide either in terms of Durkheim's social integration hypothesis or the hypothesis of the r

30 ature, an important non-social stressor, and social integration in wild female vervet monkeys (Chloro

31 mployed cohort of middle-aged men and women, social integration is an important predictor of mortalit

32 Higher social integration is associated with a survival advanta

33 RATIONALE: Higher social integration is associated with lower cardiovascul

34 Social integration is inversely associated with CHD inci

35 These results suggest that online social integration is linked to lower risk for a wide va

36 The value of social integration is often suggested to derive from an

37 Successful social integration may be critical to survival and repro

38 s, medical history, depressive symptoms, and social integration measures.

39 planning for family reunification and other social integration options.

40 on on health, educational level, employment, social integration, sexuality, and reproduction was obta

41 for severe mental illness) and the number of social integration stressors (1.10, 1.05-1.16 for PTSD).

42 Social integration was also inversely associated with al

43 Social integration was assessed by a simplified Berkman-

44 ic disease, socioeconomic status and smoking social integration was inversely related to ten-year sur

45 Social integration was measured with a 7-item index that

46 Social integration was measured with a 7-item index that

47 Increasing or consistently high levels of social integration were associated with a lower risk of

48 -related self-efficacy, pain acceptance, and social integration were better in the intervention group

49 For Hispanics, moderate and high levels of social integration were equally protective.

50 augmenting psychosocial care programmes and social integration would be a key approach to improve hu